ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07806487EYE-PODUpdated Sep 8, 2026

Eye Movements to Predict Post-Operative Delirium

An observational study in Post Operative Delerium and Post Operative Cognitive Dysfunction, sponsored by University of Chile. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Chile. Open to participants aged 70 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-08.

Sponsored by University of Chile · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
40
Ages
70 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common complication in older adults undergoing surgery, lacking objective and noninvasive diagnostic methods. This trial aims to evaluate the feasibility and prognostic performance of Eye movements (EM) as a risk biomarker for the development of POD in older patients undergoing moderate- to high-risk surgery. The investigators hypothesize that EM tracking will accurately predict POD, potentially optimizing early intervention and patient outcomes.

Read the detailed description

This prospective trial evaluates the integration of automated eye movement assessments as a novel, noninvasive risk biomarker for postoperative delirium (POD) in older adults. Upon enrollment, trained clinical staff will collect baseline demographic data and clinical characteristics. Chronic medical burden will be quantified using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). To establish baseline cognitive function and control for preexisting cognitive impairment, all participants will undergo the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).

Technical Protocol for Eye Movement Recording

Preoperatively, participants will complete an automated eye movement tracking protocol consisting of two distinct paradigms:

Prosaccadic Task: Utilized to measure specific ocular motor parameters, including saccadic latency, velocity, and accuracy.

Free Visual Exploration Task: Utilized to capture free-gaze metrics and spatial distribution patterns.

All eye-tracking data will be recorded using automated software to ensure objectivity and reproducibility.

Postoperative Monitoring Following the surgical procedure, patients will be systematically monitored for the development of POD. The Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) will be administered by trained examiners twice daily (morning and evening) for the first three postoperative days (72 hours) to detect and document the incidence and severity of delirium.

Statistical and Predictive Objectives

The collected data will be analyzed to fulfill three primary scientific objectives:

  1. Parameter Association: To identify which specific preoperative eye-tracking metrics (latency, velocity, accuracy, or free-gaze variables) demonstrate a statistically significant association with the incidence of POD.
  2. Diagnostic Performance: To calculate the sensitivity and specificity of these distinct preoperative eye movement parameters for predicting POD development.
  3. Incremental Predictive Value: To evaluate whether adding preoperative eye-tracking measurements to a standard clinical prediction model (comprising age, sex, CCI, and MoCA scores) significantly improves the model's overall predictive performance and risk stratification capabilities.
02

Conditions studied

  • Post Operative Delerium
  • Post Operative Cognitive Dysfunction

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Post operative delirium
  • Eye movements
  • Eye-tracking
03

In context

Emergence Delirium

752 studies on the registry are indexed under Emergence Delirium; 262 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 164 across 278 observational studies indexed under Emergence Delirium.

Browse Emergence Delirium studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Chile is the lead sponsor of 194 studies on the registry; 38 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
70 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Older adult patients scheduled for moderate- to high-risk surgeries at the Hospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile. The cohort is drawn from the elective surgical scheduling pool of the institution, aiming for a balanced distribution across biological sex and age ranges within the target demographic.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 70 years or older.
  • Scheduled for moderate- to high-risk elective surgery, defined as a procedure requiring a postoperative hospital stay of at least 3 days.
  • Able to provide signed, written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of delirium at baseline admission, evaluated via the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM).
  • Use of neuroleptic/antipsychotic medications within the past 6 months.
  • Prior history of dementia (including Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, or mild cognitive impairment).
  • History of encephalopathy.
  • Psychiatric disorders presenting with psychosis.
  • Brain injury with neurological sequelae (e.g., prior stroke, traumatic brain injury).
  • Visual acuity is insufficient to complete the automated eye-tracking tasks.
  • Illiteracy.
  • Non-Spanish speakers.
  • Concurrent participation in any other clinical trial.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • No Intervention: Control (Usual care) + Eye movement recording

    This is a prospective, observational cohort study designed to evaluate the prognostic accuracy of a preoperative eye-tracking biomarker protocol for predicting postoperative delirium (POD). All eligible participants are recruited from a cohort of patients already scheduled for moderate- to high-risk elective surgery at the University of Chile Clinical Hospital. The study procedures (baseline clinical data collection, Charlson Comorbidity Index, MoCA, and automated eye-tracking tasks) are strictly observational and diagnostic. The eye-tracking results are recorded for research purposes only and do not alter standard perioperative care, surgical management, or anesthetic techniques. Patients are subsequently followed into the postoperative period to monitor the incidence of POD via twice-daily Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) evaluations during the first three postoperative days.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of postoperative delirium (POD).

    The presence or absence of postoperative delirium will be assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM). Patients will be classified as "POD" or "No POD" based on the CAM diagnostic algorithm.

    Time frame: From the day of surgery up to postoperative day 3, patients were assessed twice daily.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Preoperative Baseline Cognitive Status

    Total score on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) to determine baseline global cognitive function. The score ranges from 0 to 30, with lower scores indicating greater cognitive impairment.

    Time frame: At preoperative baseline (day of surgery or day before).

  2. Preoperative Comorbidity Burden

    Score on the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) to quantify the participant's baseline medical comorbidity burden and pre-existing health conditions.

    Time frame: At preoperative baseline (day of surgery or day before)

  3. Preoperative Saccadic Latency

    The time taken from the appearance of a visual target to the initiation of the participant's saccadic eye movement during the prosaccadic task (milliseconds).

    Time frame: At preoperative baseline (day of surgery or day before)

  4. Preoperative Saccadic Velocity

    The peak speed of the participant's eye movement when moving towards the visual target during the prosaccadic task (degrees per second).

    Time frame: At preoperative baseline (day of surgery or day before).

  5. Preoperative Free Viewing Number of Fixations

    The absolute count of discrete gaze fixations made by the participant during the free visual exploration task (number of fixations)

    Time frame: At preoperative baseline (day of surgery or day before).

  6. Preoperative Free Viewing Saccade Length

    The average spatial distance between fixations in the participant's eye movements during the free visual exploration task (degrees of visual angle).

    Time frame: At preoperative baseline (day of surgery or day before).

  7. Hospital Length of Stay

    Total hospital stay from the day of surgery until official hospital discharge.

    Time frame: Up to 30 days post-surgery.

  8. All-Cause Mortality

    Total number of participant deaths from any cause, verified via hospital electronic medical records or direct follow-up contact.

    Time frame: At 30 days post-surgery.

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • van der Kooi AW, Rots ML, Huiskamp G, Klijn FA, Koek HL, Kluin J, Leijten FS, Slooter AJ. Delirium detection based on monitoring of blinks and eye movements. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014 Dec;22(12):1575-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2014.01.001. Epub 2014 Jan 4. PubMed 24495403 ↗
  • Chapin BA, Kimmett F, Garvan C, Tighe P, Dekosky S, Williamson JB, Price CC. Preoperative Visual Attention Performance Predicts Postoperative Delirium. Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Jan 3;20(Suppl 3):e091620. doi: 10.1002/alz.091620. PMCID: PMC11710506.
  • Al-Hindawi A, Vizcaychipi M, Demiris Y. A Dual-Camera Eye-Tracking Platform for Rapid Real-Time Diagnosis of Acute Delirium: A Pilot Study. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2024 May 7;12:488-498. doi: 10.1109/JTEHM.2024.3397737. eCollection 2024. PubMed 39050621 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Aug 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 4 months after the start.

Of 180 non-industry observational studies under Emergence Delirium, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 43. This study's planned 4 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 180 studies reached it within 21 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 43.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 3, 2026
First posted
Sep 8, 2026
StartActual
Aug 6, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2026
CompletionEst.
Mar 2027
Last update
Sep 8, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 8, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07806487
Responsible party
Iván Plaza-Rosales (Assistant professor, University of Chile) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 8, 2026
Start date
Aug 6, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 8, 2026

Study contacts

Ivan Plaza-Rosales, PhD
principal investigator · University of Chile

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion