ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07804992Updated Sep 4, 2026

Early Versus Deferred De-escalation From Controlled Ventilation After a 48-Hour Landmark of Physiological Stability

An observational study in Critical Illness, Respiratory Failure and Mechanical Ventilation, sponsored by Ruijin Hospital. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-04.

Primary conditionCritical Illness(the registry's first term)UnverifiedIs this wrong?Critical Illness is a broad heading, used only when no more specific condition is named. No better condition is named, so the registry's term is kept.

Sponsored by Ruijin Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
12,736
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This retrospective target trial emulation evaluates the optimal timing of de-escalation from controlled to assisted mechanical ventilation in critically ill adults. Using the clone-censor-weight (CCW) estimator with stabilised inverse-probability-of-censoring weights, we compare two strategies over a 24-hour grace window following a 48-hour landmark: early de-escalation (step-down in ventilatory support mode or successful extubation) versus deferred de-escalation (support maintained or increased). The primary outcome is 28-day in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes are 28-day restricted mean survival time (RMST) and ventilator-free days (VFD28). The study uses MIMIC-IV v2.2 (derivation cohort, n=1,902 analysable) with external validation in eICU-CRD v2.0 (validation cohort, n=10,957 analysable). All analyses employ stabilised IPCW with bootstrap confidence intervals, including six sensitivity and robustness analyses (extended covariate adjustment, alternative weight truncation, doubly robust AIPW estimator) and an exploratory FiO₂×PEEP threshold grid.

Read the detailed description

Background: Mechanical ventilation is life-saving, yet optimal timing of transition from controlled to assisted modes remains uncertain. Prolonged controlled ventilation exposes patients to sedation, diaphragm dysfunction, and lung injury, while premature de-escalation risks asynchrony and reintubation.

Design: Landmark target trial emulation with 48-hour eligibility ascertainment.

Eligibility: Adults ≥18 years, invasive mechanical ventilation >24 hours, alive and ventilated at 48 hours with classifiable Day-2 mode (controlled or assisted), Day-2 FiO₂ ≤50%, Day-2 PEEP ≤10 cmH₂O.

Strategies: Early-support level decreased by Day 3 (mode step-down from controlled to assisted, or successful extubation while alive); Deferred-support maintained or increased.

Analysis: Single-interval CCW estimator with stabilised IPCW (truncated 1st-99th percentile), propensity model with 21 baseline covariates, bootstrap 95% CIs (2,000 resamples primary; 800 sensitivity). Sensitivity analyses: no truncation, ICU mortality, unweighted per-protocol, extended 40-covariate adjustment, 5th-95th truncation, AIPW doubly robust estimator. E-values computed for unmeasured confounding.

External validation: Harmonised protocol in eICU-CRD v2.0 (208 hospitals, n=10,957), outcome: in-hospital mortality.

02

Conditions studied

  • Critical Illness
  • Respiratory Failure
  • Mechanical Ventilation

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • mechanical ventilation
  • ventilator weaning
  • target trial emulation
  • critical care
03

In context

Critical Illness Unverified

1,780 studies on the registry are indexed under Critical Illness; 442 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 12,736 is above the median of 140 across 814 observational studies indexed under Critical Illness.

Browse Critical Illness studies →

Lead sponsor

Ruijin Hospital is the lead sponsor of 679 studies on the registry; 387 are open to participants now.

Compared within Critical Illness, the registry's first condition term, which may not be this study's main condition. Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adults admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) receiving invasive mechanical ventilation who are alive and ventilated at the 48-hour landmark with low respiratory support requirements (FiO₂ ≤50%, PEEP ≤10 cmH₂O).

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Invasive mechanical ventilation for >24 hours
  • Alive and still ventilated at 48 hours after ICU admission
  • Classifiable Day-2 ventilatory mode (controlled or assisted/spontaneous)
  • Day-2 FiO₂ ≤50%
  • Day-2 PEEP ≤10 cmH₂O

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Death during the 24-hour grace period (Day 2 to Day 3)
  • Unascertainable Day-3 strategy (missing mode without documented ventilation end)
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
12,736 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Early De-escalation,Experimental

    Step-down in ventilatory support level by Day 3 (transition from controlled to assisted/spontaneous mode, or successful extubation with recorded end of mechanical ventilation while alive)

    Other: Ventilatory Support De-escalation Strategy

  • Deferred De-escalation,Active Comparator

    Ventilatory support level maintained or increased between Day 2 and Day 3

    Other: Ventilatory Support De-escalation Strategy

Interventions

  • OtherVentilatory Support De-escalation Strategy

    The study compares two respiratory support management strategies over a 24-hour grace window (Day 2 to Day 3 of ICU admission) following the 48-hour landmark. Early De-escalation: Ventilatory support level is decreased, defined as a transition from a controlled mode to an assisted/spontaneous mode, or successful extubation (end of mechanical ventilation) while the patient is alive by Day 3. Deferred De-escalation: Ventilatory support level is maintained or increased between Day 2 and Day 3.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 28-Day In-Hospital Mortality

    Death in hospital within 28 days of ICU admission

    Time frame: within 28 days of ICU admission

Secondary outcomes

  1. 28-Day Restricted Mean Survival Time (RMST)

    Mean survival time up to 28 days

    Time frame: within 28 days of ICU admission

  2. Ventilator-Free Days at Day 28 (VFD28)

    Number of days alive and free of mechanical ventilation within the first 28 days; set to zero for patients who died before day 28

    Time frame: within 28 days of ICU admission

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Critical Care Medicine,Ruijin Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Shanghai,China.
    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality 200025, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Pollard TJ, Johnson AEW, Raffa JD, Celi LA, Mark RG, Badawi O. The eICU Collaborative Research Database, a freely available multi-center database for critical care research. Sci Data. 2018 Sep 11;5:180178. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2018.178. PubMed 30204154 ↗
  • Hernan MA, Robins JM. Using Big Data to Emulate a Target Trial When a Randomized Trial Is Not Available. Am J Epidemiol. 2016 Apr 15;183(8):758-64. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv254. Epub 2016 Mar 18. PubMed 26994063 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Clinical study report, Analytic code

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jan 2024 to primary completion in Dec 2025, 23 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 1, 2026
First posted
Sep 4, 2026
StartActual
Jan 1, 2024
Primary completionActual
Dec 31, 2025
CompletionActual
Aug 31, 2026
Last update
Sep 4, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 4, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07804992
Lead sponsor
Ruijin Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 4, 2026
Start date
Jan 1, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2025
Completion
Aug 31, 2026
Last update
Sep 4, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion