ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07798856MICM-HFpEFUpdated Sep 1, 2026

Effects of a Multidisciplinary Integrated Care Model on Care Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

An interventional study of Multidisciplinary Integrated Care Model (MICM) and Usual Care in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) and Heart Failure, sponsored by Chimei Medical Center. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-01.

Sponsored by Chimei Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for approximately half of all heart failure cases and is associated with frequent hospitalizations, poor quality of life, and limited effective treatment options. Fragmented, single-discipline care often fails to address the multiple comorbidities and self-management needs of this population.

This study evaluates a Multidisciplinary Integrated Care Model (MICM) for patients with HFpEF, delivered by a coordinated team including cardiologists, case managers, pharmacists, dietitians, and rehabilitation specialists. The intervention group will receive structured team-based care, including regular follow-up, medication optimization, dietary and lifestyle counseling, and exercise guidance, in addition to standard cardiology care.

Using a prospective quasi-experimental design with a historical control group, this study compares clinical and patient-reported outcomes between patients receiving the multidisciplinary integrated care model and a historical cohort receiving usual care. The primary aim is to determine whether this integrated care approach improves outcomes such as heart failure-related hospitalization, functional status, and quality of life in patients with HFpEF.

Read the detailed description

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a heterogeneous clinical syndrome characterized by signs and symptoms of heart failure with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%. It disproportionately affects older adults and patients with multiple comorbidities, including hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and chronic kidney disease. Despite its high prevalence and disease burden, few pharmacologic therapies have demonstrated consistent benefit in this population, highlighting the importance of non-pharmacologic and system-level interventions.

This study investigates whether a Multidisciplinary Integrated Care Model (MICM) improves care outcomes for patients with HFpEF compared with historical usual care. The MICM intervention integrates the following components:

  • Cardiology-led clinical management with guideline-directed medical therapy optimization
  • Case management for care coordination, symptom monitoring, and care transitions
  • Pharmacist-led medication review and adherence support
  • Nutritional counseling tailored to heart failure and comorbidity management
  • Structured exercise and cardiac rehabilitation guidance
  • Patient and caregiver education on self-management and warning signs

Eligible participants are adults diagnosed with HFpEF (left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%) who receive care at the study institution. The intervention cohort will be prospectively enrolled and followed under the MICM program, while the historical control cohort will consist of patients who received standard usual care prior to program implementation, matched on relevant baseline characteristics.

Outcomes of interest include heart failure-related hospitalization and emergency visits, all-cause mortality, functional capacity, NYHA functional class, and health-related quality of life. Data will be collected through structured clinical assessments and medical record review at baseline and at scheduled follow-up intervals.

Findings from this study are intended to generate evidence on the effectiveness of multidisciplinary, team-based care models in improving outcomes for patients with HFpEF, and to inform future integrated care program development in similar clinical settings.

02

Conditions studied

  • Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF)
  • Heart Failure

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Multidisciplinary Care
  • Heart Failure Management
  • HFpEF
03

In context

Heart Failure

6,331 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,396 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 76 across 4,049 interventional studies indexed under Heart Failure.

Browse Heart Failure studies →

Lead sponsor

Chimei Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 27 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Hospitalized with a physician diagnosis of heart failure with preserved (HFpEF)
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50% on echocardiography performed during the index hospitalization
  • (NYHA) functional class III to IV
  • Able to communicate in Mandarin or Taiwanese and understand the study intervention
  • For the prospective intervention group: willing to participate and provide written . For the historical control group: existing medical record data will be collected under a waiver of informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who elected hospice or palliative care as part of an advance care plan during the index hospitalization
  • Severe cognitive impairment without a family member or caregiver available to assist with the digital platform
  • Anticipated inability to complete post-discharge follow-up or lack of regular follow-up at the study institution's outpatient clinic
  • Length of index hospital stay less than 24 hours
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    MICM Intervention Group

    Participants prospectively enrolled and managed under the Multidisciplinary Integrated Care Model (MICM), receiving coordinated care from cardiologists, case managers, pharmacists, dietitians, and rehabilitation specialists, in addition to standard cardiology follow-up.

    Other: Multidisciplinary Integrated Care Model (MICM)

  • Other
    Historical Control Group

    A retrospective cohort of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction who received usual, non-integrated cardiology care prior to implementation of the multidisciplinary integrated care model.

    Other: Usual Care

Interventions

  • OtherMultidisciplinary Integrated Care Model (MICM)

    A structured, team-based care program integrating cardiology management, case management, pharmacist-led medication review, nutritional counseling, and exercise guidance, delivered to patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

  • OtherUsual Care

    Standard, non-integrated cardiology care as routinely provided prior to implementation of the multidisciplinary integrated care model.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Length of Hospital Stay

    Mean length of hospital stay, measured in days from hospital admission to discharge, among patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), compared between the multidisciplinary integrated care intervention group and the historical usual care control group.

    Time frame: From hospital admission to discharge, up to 30 days

  2. 30-Day Hospital Readmission Rate

    Proportion of participants readmitted to the hospital for any cause within 30 days of discharge, compared between the multidisciplinary integrated care intervention group and the historical usual care control group.

    Time frame: 30 days post-discharge

  3. 90-Day Hospital Readmission Rate

    Proportion of participants readmitted to the hospital for any cause within 90 days of discharge, compared between the multidisciplinary integrated care intervention group and the historical usual care control group.

    Time frame: 90 days post-discharge

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Quality of Life as Measured by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ)

    Change in quality of life among patients with HFpEF following the multidisciplinary integrated care intervention, assessed using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ). The total score ranges from 0 to 105, with lower scores indicating better health-related quality of life and higher scores indicating worse health-related quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 months post-intervention

  2. Change in Self-Care Ability as Measured by the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index v8.0 (SCHFI v8.0)

    Change in self-care ability among patients with HFpEF following the multidisciplinary integrated care intervention, assessed using the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index version 8.0 (SCHFI v8.0), which includes three scales: self-care maintenance, symptom perception, and self-care management. Each scale is standardized to a score ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better self-care ability.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 months post-intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared, as this study involves data collected under local institutional review board approval, and the study protocol does not include provisions for external data sharing due to patient privacy and confidentiality considerations.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Aug 2026; primary completion for Jul 2027, 11 months later.

Of 1,118 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Heart Failure, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 50. This study's planned 11 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,354 studies reached it within 31 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 52.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 9, 2026
First posted
Sep 1, 2026
StartEst.
Aug 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jul 2027
CompletionEst.
Oct 2027
Last update
Sep 1, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 1, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07798856
Lead sponsor
Chimei Medical Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 1, 2026
Start date
Aug 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 1, 2026

Study contacts

Kai-Ning Chung, RN, MSN
Contact
9608L7@chimei.org.tw
+886-6-+886-6-2812811 ext. 57121

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion