ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07798453Updated Sep 1, 2026

Communication Training in Hearing Aid Users

An interventional study of Cognitive screening and Audiological Assessment in Hearing Loss, Age-Related, Hearing Aids and Sensorineural Hearing Loss, sponsored by University Ghent. Completed at 1 site in Belgium. Open to participants aged 45 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-01.

Sponsored by University Ghent · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
57
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
45 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of the current research project is to investigate the effectiveness of communication training in first-time hearing aid users with mild to moderate hearing loss delivered in-person in groups or individually. In doing so, the project aims to strengthen evidence-based person-centered care for individuals with hearing loss and pave the path toward more holistic hearing healthcare.

We hypothesize that participants receiving communication training will show improved hearing-related quality of life, communication strategies, and personal adjustment compared to controls. Moreover, group training is expected to yield greater benefits in communication strategies and adjustment than individual training, due to its interactive nature and peer support, leading to more positive evaluations in interviews.

A pretest-posttest design will be used, with testing before and after the communication training sessions, and two experimental groups and a control group. The two experimental groups are the groups receiving in-person group and individual training. The control group does not receive the communication training nor an alternative. A mixed-method will be applied to collect quantitative and qualitative data. The quantitative data include screening measures, audiological tests, and questionnaires, while the qualitative data consist of a semi-structured interview.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hearing Loss, Age-Related
  • Hearing Aids
  • Sensorineural Hearing Loss
  • Speech Intelligibility
  • Quality of Life Outcomes
03

In context

Presbycusis

66 studies on the registry are indexed under Presbycusis; 21 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 57 is close to the median of 60 across 45 interventional studies indexed under Presbycusis.

Browse Presbycusis studies →

Lead sponsor

University Ghent is the lead sponsor of 350 studies on the registry; 86 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Dutch speaking first-time hearing aid users between 45-80 years
  • Individuals with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss
  • Individuals with bilateral hearing aids (minimal 6 months)
  • Individuals who are capable to give consent to participate in the study themselves

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • User of cochlear implants
  • Participants who have previously received auditory, auditory-cognitive, or communication training
  • Participants with a middle ear disorder
  • Participants without age-appropriate cognition
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
57 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Control group

    The control group does not receive the communication training nor an alternative.

    Behavioral: Cognitive screening · Behavioral: Audiological Assessment · Behavioral: Questionnaires · Behavioral: Communication training · Other: Interview

  • Experimental
    Group with individual communication training

    The individuals receive individual training.

    Behavioral: Cognitive screening · Behavioral: Audiological Assessment · Behavioral: Questionnaires · Behavioral: Communication training · Other: Interview

  • Experimental
    Group with group communication training

    The individuals receive group training.

    Behavioral: Cognitive screening · Behavioral: Audiological Assessment · Behavioral: Questionnaires · Behavioral: Communication training · Other: Interview

Interventions

  • BehavioralCognitive screening

    The Dutch Montreal Cognitive Assessment will be assessed.

  • BehavioralAudiological Assessment

    1. Tympanometry 2. Otoscopy 3. Pure-tone audiometry 4. Speech audiometry in quiet and in noise

  • BehavioralQuestionnaires

    5 questionnaires are included (Dutch translation): 1. The hAVICOP questionnaire to assess the hearing-related quality of life for Auditory-Visual, Cognitive and Psychosocial functioning 2. The Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults (RHHI-A) 3. The Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired (CPHI) 4. The Hearing Attitudes in Rehabilitation Questionnaire (HARQ) 5. The International OutcomeInventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA)

  • BehavioralCommunication training

    The participant will take part in two training sessions. Depending on the assigned group, this will take place individually or in a group setting. During the training, challenges commonly faced by people with hearing loss will be discussed, and strategies to communicate more effectively will be introduced.

  • OtherInterview

    A semi-structured one-on-one interviews will be conducted. Participants in the group and individual training will be asked about the feasibility, usability, and effectiveness of the training they attended. Participants in the control group, who did not receive training, will be asked about their expectations regarding a communication training.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hearing related quality of life questionnaire

    Higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Time frame: Once during the baseline testing and once during the post testing (+/- 7 to 8 weeks after the baseline).

  2. International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids Questionnaire

    Higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Time frame: Once during the baseline testing and once during the post testing (+/- 7 to 8 weeks after the baseline).

  3. Hearing Attitudes in Rehabilitation Questionnaire

    Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Once during the baseline testing and once during the post testing (+/- 7 to 8 weeks after the baseline).

  4. Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly Screening Questionnaire

    Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Once during the baseline testing and once during the post testing (+/- 7 to 8 weeks after the baseline).

  5. Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired Questionnaire

    Higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Time frame: Once during the baseline testing and once during the post testing (+/- 7 to 8 weeks after the baseline).

  6. Interview about training

    Time frame: This outcome measure will be assessed once: once during the post testing (+/- 7 to 8 weeks after the baseline).

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ghent University Hospital
    Ghent, East-Flanders 9000, Belgium
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 1, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07798453
Lead sponsor
University Ghent
Collaborators
Sonova AG
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 1, 2026
Start date
Sep 16, 2025
Primary completion
Jul 9, 2026
Completion
Jul 9, 2026
Last update
Sep 1, 2026

Study contacts

Hannah Keppler, Prof. dr.
principal investigator · University Ghent

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion