ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07794826SHINE-RLSUpdated Aug 31, 2026

Efficacy and Safety of Super High-Flux Hemodialysis in Maintenance Dialysis Patients. SHINE-RLS (Super High-flux Dialysis Improves Neuro-symptoms and Efficacy in Restless Legs Syndrome)

An interventional study of Super High-Flux HD in End Stage Renal Failure, Hemodialysis and Restless Leg Syndrome (RLS), sponsored by Far Eastern Memorial Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-31.

Primary conditionKidney Failure, ChronicRegistry: Renal Insufficiency, ChronicReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Kidney Failure, Chronic
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Kidney Failure, Chronic, a narrower term within Renal Insufficiency, Chronic.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Far Eastern Memorial Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) rely on maintenance hemodialysis. While high-flux hemodialysis improves small solute clearance, its removal of middle-molecule uremic toxins (e.g., α1-microglobulin [α1-MG]) remains insufficient, contributing to symptoms such as restless legs syndrome (RLS), pruritus, and poor sleep quality, which are also linked to increased cardiovascular risk. In this study, the investigators evaluate whether using a "Super High-Flux" dialyzer (a Type V high-performance dialyzer) during hemodialysis can safely improve the removal of middle-molecule uremic toxins-specifically α1-microglobulin (α1-MG)-and relieve RLS symptoms in maintenance hemodialysis patients.

Read the detailed description

Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) on regular high-flux hemodialysis (HD) often experience an accumulation of middle-molecule uremic toxins, which are linked to systemic inflammation and troubling symptoms such as restless legs syndrome (RLS), severe itching, and poor sleep quality. While traditional high-flux dialysis efficiently clears small molecules, its ability to remove larger middle-molecule toxins (like α1-microglobulin [α1-MG]) is limited. Current alternatives such as online hemodiafiltration (HDF) have limitations, highlighting the need for new treatment approaches. Super High-Flux Hemodialysis (SHFHD) offers enhanced clearance of these middle molecules while preserving serum albumin levels and maintaining patient safety.

In this study, the investigators evaluate the effectiveness and safety of SHFHD compared with high-flux HD in patients undergoing maintenance HD, focusing on α1-MG removal and its potential effect on RLS. The investigators also explore the multiple diverse effects of SHFHD on the changes of cardiovascular risk factors including bone turnover, mineral metabolism, vascular calcification, uremia, inflammation, immunity, metabolomics, nutrition, and gut microbial metabolites in dialysis patients.

It is to conduct a randomized, controlled, crossover trial with cross-over design at a dialysis unit of tertiary teaching hospital in Northern Taiwan. The investigators will stratify participants by baseline RLS. Participants will receive either SHFHD or high-flux HD for 12 weeks, followed by a 4-week washout and crossover. The study outcome measures are difference in change-from-baseline values of α1-MG reduction ratio, RLS severity (International Restless Legs Scale), albumin levels, clearance of β2-microglobulin, free light chains, inflammatory markers, pruritus scores, and quality of life. Safety will be assessed via albumin maintenance, adverse events, and hemodynamic stability.

This will be the first RCT directly evaluating SHFHD for α1-MG removal and RLS outcomes, addressing critical knowledge gaps and potentially informing new dialysis prescription strategies.

02

Conditions studied

  • End Stage Renal Failure, Hemodialysis
  • Restless Leg Syndrome (RLS)

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • End-stage kidney disease
  • Restless leg syndrome
  • Super high-flux hemodialysis
03

In context

Kidney Failure, Chronic Reclassified

2,108 studies on the registry are indexed under Kidney Failure, Chronic; 273 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 57 across 1,569 interventional studies indexed under Kidney Failure, Chronic.

Browse Kidney Failure, Chronic studies →

Lead sponsor

Far Eastern Memorial Hospital is the lead sponsor of 260 studies on the registry; 40 are open to participants now.

Compared within Kidney Failure, Chronic, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Renal Insufficiency, Chronic. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Diagnosis of Restless Legs Syndrome according to standard criteria.
  2. Age ≥ 20 years.
  3. Maintenance high-flux hemodialysis for ≥ 3 months.
  4. Stable vascular access (AV fistula or AV graft).
  5. Adequate dialysis delivery (URR ≥ 65% or Kt/V(daugirdes) ≥ 1.2).
  6. Sufficient iron stores (serum ferritin ≥ 200 ng/mL, TSAT ≥ 20%).
  7. Clinically stable condition for the past 4 weeks.
  8. Able and willing to comply with study protocol

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Low-flux HD or temporary catheter use
  2. Serum albumin \< 2.5 g/dL
  3. Recent hospitalization (within 4 weeks)
  4. Scheduled kidney transplantation
  5. Active or infection
  6. Pregnancy
  7. Any condition impairing protocol adherence
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Super High-Flux HD

    Receives 12 weeks of Super High-Flux HD (Elisio™-HX)

    Device: Super High-Flux HD

  • No intervention
    High-Flux HD

    Receives 12 weeks of High-Flux HD as usual care

Interventions

  • DeviceSuper High-Flux HD

    Participants receive hemodialysis using a Type V super high-flux dialyzer (such as Elisio™-HX or Theranova) for 12 weeks to assess the clearance of middle-molecule uremic toxins and its effect on RLS symptoms.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline in α1-microglobulin (α1-MG) Reduction Ratio

    The reduction ratio of α1-MG will be calculated as \[({Pre-dialysis} - {Post-dialysis}) /{Pre-dialysis}\] at each study visit. The primary outcome is the difference in the change-from-baseline reduction ratio between the Super High-Flux HD period and the High-Flux HD period.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 of each 12-week treatment period

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline in International Restless Legs Scale (IRLS) Score

    IRLS score assesses the severity of Restless Legs Syndrome (ranging from 0 to 40, where higher scores indicate greater severity). Evaluated as the difference in score changes between the two treatment periods.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 of each 12-week treatment period

  2. Change from Baseline in Pre-dialysis Serum Albumin Level

    Monitored to evaluate nutritional safety and albumin preservation during Super High-Flux HD compared to High-Flux HD.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 of each 12-week treatment period

  3. Change from Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Score

    Assesses sleep quality. Evaluated as the difference in score changes between the two treatment periods.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 of each 12-week treatment period

  4. Change from Baseline in 5-D Itch Scale Score

    Assesses pruritus severity. Evaluated as the difference in score changes between the two treatment periods.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 of each 12-week treatment period

  5. Change from Baseline in health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) Score

    Assesses quality of life. Evaluated as the difference in score changes between the two treatment periods.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 of each 12-week treatment period

  6. Change from Baseline in β2-microglobulin [β2-MG] Reduction ratio

    The reduction ratio of β2-MG will be calculated as \[({Pre-dialysis} - {Post-dialysis}) /{Pre-dialysis}\] at each study visit and evaluated as the difference in the change-from-baseline reduction ratio between the Super High-Flux HD period and the High-Flux HD period.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 of each 12-week treatment period

  7. Change from Baseline in Kappa Free Light Chains Reduction ratio

    The reduction ratio will be calculated as \[({Pre-dialysis} - {Post-dialysis}) /{Pre-dialysis}\] at each study visit and evaluated as the difference in the change-from-baseline reduction ratio between the Super High-Flux HD period and the High-Flux HD period.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 of each 12-week treatment period

  8. Change from Baseline in Lambda Free Light Chains Reduction ratio

    The reduction ratio will be calculated as \[({Pre-dialysis} - {Post-dialysis}) /{Pre-dialysis}\] at each study visit and evaluated as the difference in the change-from-baseline reduction ratio between the Super High-Flux HD period and the High-Flux HD period.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 of each 12-week treatment period

  9. Change from Baseline in Pre-dialysis Serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) Level

    Measured at each study visit. Evaluated as the difference in the change from baseline between the Super High-Flux HD period and the High-Flux HD period.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 of each 12-week treatment period

  10. Change from Baseline in Pre-dialysis Serum High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hs-CRP) Level

    Measured at each study visit. Evaluated as the difference in the change from baseline between the Super High-Flux HD period and the High-Flux HD period.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 of each 12-week treatment period

  11. Change from Baseline in Pre-dialysis Serum Indoxyl Sulfate Level

    Measured at each study visit. Evaluated as the difference in the change from baseline between the Super High-Flux HD period and the High-Flux HD period.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 of each 12-week treatment period

  12. Change from Baseline in Pre-dialysis Serum P-cresol Sulfate Level

    Measured at each study visit. Evaluated as the difference in the change from baseline between the Super High-Flux HD period and the High-Flux HD period.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 of each 12-week treatment period

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual-level deidentified participant data will be made available by the corresponding author of the paper upon request by email. The data will be available for 3 years after formal publication.

Supporting information: Study protocol

Time frame: The data will become available after completing the study for 1 year and for 3 years after formal publication.

Access criteria: Data will be made available by the corresponding author of the paper upon request by email.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 31, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07794826
Responsible party
Wan-Chuan Tsai (M.D., Ph.D.; Attending Physician, Division of Nephrology; Director, Clinical Trials Center; Assistant Professor, Ministry of Education, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 31, 2026
Start date
Oct 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 30, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 31, 2026

Study contacts

Wan-Chuan Tsai, M.D., Ph.D.
Contact
mkks618@gmail.com
886-289667000 ext. 1780

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion