An interventional study of Educative Intervention in Enhance Patient Safety, Nurse Physician Relations and Physician-Nurse Relations, sponsored by Universitat Jaume I. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 22 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-04.
Sponsored by Universitat Jaume I · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research
Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →
Among 49 studies in Health Education with a site in Spain — 18 open to participants now, 19 under way, none of them phase 3. Health Education · Spain.
Among the 49 studies in Health Education with a site in Spain, this one is the 8th largest by enrollment of the 47 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 7 that started in 2024, is one of 44 with no phase, and was the 47th registered.
483 studies on the registry are indexed under Health Education; 112 are open to participants now.
Browse Health Education studies →18 of the 49 studies in Health Education with a site in Spain are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:
Universidad San Jorge · Sites in Spain
Ages 18–65 · Healthy volunteers
Fundación Pública Galega de Investigación Biomédica INIBIC · Sites in Spain
Ages 18+ · Women only
Fundació Sant Joan de Déu · Sites in Spain
Ages 11–16 · Healthy volunteers
Universidad San Jorge · Sites in Spain
Ages 18+
University of Valencia · Sites in Spain
Ages 18–45 · Women only
A study can be open while its sites in Spain have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Spain →
Of the 46 Health Education studies recruiting now, 29 (63%) set no upper age limit and 14 (30%) stop at 75 or younger; 11 take children under 18; 18 take healthy volunteers.
This study: 22 Years to 65 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.
The full table on the hub →This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
49 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.
First in 2003; this study’s year is marked. 7 started in 2024.
This study's enrollment of 538 is above the median of 132 across 452 interventional studies indexed under Health Education.
Median enrollment 168 across the 47 interventional studies, 268 across the 2 observational. Of the 22 that completed or were terminated, 1 (5%) have results posted.
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
None of the 49 has an industry lead sponsor. The 10 most frequent:
Universitat Jaume I is the lead sponsor of 80 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.
Universitat Jaume I has 1 study filed under Health Education — fewer than ten, so there is no comparison to draw.
5 of the studies in Health Education with a site in Spain that are under way reach primary completion within a year, 0 of them phase 3. Phase 3 first, then by date:
| Study | Primary completion |
|---|---|
| NCT07844707Universidad San JorgeExercise and Health Education for Musculoskeletal Health in Industrial Workers | 2027-03 |
| NCT06983405Universidad San JorgePhysical Therapy for Depression Quality of Life (Pilot Study Protocol) | 2027-04 |
| NCT07208045University of SevilleCultural Adaptation, Validation, and Evaluation of the Programme for Promotion of Healthy Affective-Sexual Behaviours in Adolescents (IYG) | 2027-06-30 |
| NCT07309510Fundación Pública Galega de Investigación Biomédica INIBICEffectiveness of a Counseling Program on Exclusive Breastfeeding Rates in a Primary Care Center | 2027-08 |
| NCT06212349University of ValenciaTherapeutic-educational Physiotherapy on Pain, Physical-functionality and Quality of Life in Women With Endometriosis. | 2027-09-09 |
Add all 5 to your calendar (.ics) → With an account.
Among the 49 studies in Health Education with a site in Spain, from their registry updates:
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
Background: Advanced airway management is a critical component of advanced life support (ALS). Supraglottic airway devices (SADs) represent an effective and safe alternative to endotracheal intubation in emergency settings, particularly in Primary Care (PC), where low exposure to critical situations favors skills decay. The objective is to analyze the baseline level of theoretical knowledge and self-perceived ability regarding SADs management among PC physicians and nurses.
Methods This quantitative cross-sectional study was conducted in primary care (PC) health centers within the Castellón Health Department, Spain. The study included 92 PC healthcare professionals. Data were collected using an ad hoc digital questionnaire that had previously been validated by 14 experts, achieving an overall Scale-level Content Validity Index (S-CVI) of 0.93. Descriptive and bivariate inferential analyses were performed using Pearson's chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and the Mann-Whitney U test. Statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05.
BACKGROUND Out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA) is one of the leading medical emergencies worldwide, with an incidence in Europe of approximately 55 cases per 100,000 inhabitants and an overall survival rate at hospital discharge of close to 8%. In Spain, the estimated incidence is around 25 cases per 100,000 inhabitants, with survival rates that remain moderate and are influenced by delays in the initiation of resuscitation and by the quality of initial advanced life support.
During Advanced Life Support (ALS), rapid and effective airway management is a critical factor in mitigating hypoxic brain injury. Although endotracheal intubation (ETI) has traditionally been considered the gold standard, its performance in out-of-hospital settings by non-anesthesiologists or practitioners with limited technical experience is associated with significant rates of failure, repeated attempts, and prolonged interruptions in chest compressions, which severely compromise coronary and cerebral perfusion. In this scenario, supraglottic devices (SGDs) have emerged as a priority first-line alternative that is safe and quick to insert, offering high success rates and minimizing pauses in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).
Current recommendations prioritize techniques that ensure effective ventilation while minimizing interruptions in chest compressions.
However, evidence indicates that a significant proportion of healthcare professionals have cognitive and competency deficits in the management of acute care. This situation is particularly relevant in primary care, where acute events are infrequent and opportunities for practical training are limited, which accelerates the phenomenon of skill decay.
Assessing baseline knowledge is a fundamental step in identifying actual training needs and designing tailored educational interventions. However, there is little evidence regarding the cognitive level of primary care professionals with respect to the management of DSG prior to receiving structured training-a key starting point for guiding competency-based programs and ensuring patient safety.
For all these reasons, the primary objective of this study was to assess the baseline level of theoretical knowledge regarding the management of DSG among primary care healthcare professionals (physicians and nurses) in the Castellón Department of Health. The following were set as secondary objectives:
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
This is an educational intervention in which participants were provided with several sessions to recognize and better manage supraglottic devices.
Other: Educative Intervention
This is an educational intervention in which participants were provided with several sessions to recognize and better manage supraglottic devices.
Change from baseline level of theoretical knowledge regarding the management of DSG
Change from baseline level of theoretical knowledge regarding the management of DSG among primary care healthcare professionals (physicians and nurses) in the Castellón Department of Health.
Time frame: From the enrollment to the end of first objective 6 weeks
Sociodemographic characteristics
Describe the sociodemographic profile of the staff being evaluated.
Time frame: From the enrollment to the end of the intervention, 4 weeks
Sociodemographic characteristics
Describe the academic profile of the staff being evaluated.
Time frame: From the enrollment to the end of the intervention, 4 weeks
Sociodemographic characteristics
Describe the employment profile of the staff being evaluated.
Time frame: From the enrollment to the end of the intervention, 4 weeks
gaps and common errors in ALS procedures
Identify specific conceptual gaps and common errors in ALS procedures related to the use of DSG.
Time frame: From the enrollment to the end of the intervention 4 weeks
statistical association between sociodemographic and professional variables
Analyze the statistical association between sociodemographic and professional variables and the success rate on the knowledge questionnaire.
Time frame: From the enrollment to the end of the intervention, 8 weeks
Comparative
Assess professionals' self-perceived competence and compare it with their objective cognitive/theoretical performance.
Time frame: From the enrollment to the end of the intervention, 8 weeks
Plan to share: Yes — The study is part of a doctoral thesis that will be defended in 2027.
Supporting information: Study protocol, Clinical study report
Time frame: It will be a doctoral thesis, so once defended, it will be available on Thesify indefinitely, as mandated by the doctoral thesis protocol of Spanish universities.
Access criteria: Thesify is an open repository, so anyone wishing to consult the results will be able to do so.
Ran from Sep 2024 to primary completion in Nov 2025, 14 months.
Of 292 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Health Education, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 24. This study's 14 months is above that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 293 studies reached it within 11 months; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 24.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Universitat Jaume I