CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07780773SPAREUpdated Aug 24, 2026

SPIP vs ESP Block in Cardiac Surgery

An interventional study of Bilateral Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block and Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block in Cardiac Surgery, Chronic Postsurgical Pain and Postoperative Pain, sponsored by Ondokuz Mayıs University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-24.

Sponsored by Ondokuz Mayıs University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
308
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This multicentre, randomized, assessor-blinded, non-inferiority trial will compare the analgesic efficacy of bilateral superficial parasternal intercostal plane (SPIP) block with bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) block in adults undergoing first-time on-pump cardiac surgery through median sternotomy. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either SPIP or ESP block before induction of general anesthesia, in addition to standardized perioperative multimodal analgesia. The primary outcome is cumulative intravenous morphine milligram equivalent (IV-MME) consumption from extubation to 24 hours after extubation. The study will evaluate whether SPIP block is non-inferior to ESP block using a prespecified non-inferiority margin of 3 mg IV-MME.

Read the detailed description

This multicenter, parallel-group, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial will compare bilateral SPIP block with bilateral ESP block for postoperative analgesia in adults undergoing first-time on-pump cardiac surgery through median sternotomy.

Patients aged 18-80 years will be enrolled across tertiary cardiac surgery centres in Türkiye and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by center, to receive either bilateral SPIP block or bilateral ESP block. Both interventions will be performed before induction of general anesthesia. Participants in the SPIP group will receive ultrasound-guided injection between 4th and 5th ribs, whereas participants in the ESP group will receive bilateral ultrasound-guided injection at the T5 transverse process.

Perioperative anesthesia, postoperative multimodal analgesia, and patient-controlled morphine analgesia will be standardised across participating centers. Postoperative outcome assessors will remain blinded to treatment allocation. Block success will be assessed using cold sensation testing before induction.

The primary outcome is cumulative opioid consumption from extubation to 24 hours after extubation, expressed as intravenous morphine milligram equivalents (IV-MME). The primary objective is to determine whether SPIP block is non-inferior to ESP block using a prespecified non-inferiority margin of 3 mg IV-MME. Secondary outcomes include time-weighted average pain intensity at rest and during coughing over the first 24 hours after extubation, Quality of Recovery-15 scores at 24 hours and hospital discharge, and the incidence of chronic postsurgical pain at 3 months. Exploratory outcomes include rescue analgesic requirements, postoperative nausea and vomiting and other opioid-related adverse effects, time to extubation, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, block failure, and block-related complications.

The primary non-inferiority analysis will be performed in both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. The between-group location shift in 24-hour IV-MME consumption will be estimated using the Hodges-Lehmann method with a two-sided 95% confidence interval. Non-inferiority will be concluded if the upper bound of the confidence interval for the SPIP minus ESP difference is less than 3 mg IV-MME.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiac Surgery
  • Chronic Postsurgical Pain
  • Postoperative Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • cardiac anesthesia
  • chronic post-surgical pain
  • nerve blocks
  • Erector Spinae Plane Block
  • Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • written informed consent
  • age 18 to 80 years
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II-IV
  • Scheduled for first-time on-pump cardiac surgery through a median sternotomy, including coronary artery bypass grafting, valve repair or replacement, or another open cardiac procedure requiring sternotomy
  • Ability to understand postoperative pain and recovery assessments and to use an intravenous patient-controlled analgesia device.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Emergency surgery.
  • Previous median sternotomy.
  • Minimally invasive cardiac surgery without median sternotomy.
  • Known allergy or hypersensitivity to bupivacaine, morphine, paracetamol, ondansetron or another protocol medication.
  • Chronic opioid use, defined as continuous opioid treatment for at least 30 days at a daily oral morphine equivalent dose of 15 mg or more.
  • Alcohol or substance use disorder that, in the investigator's judgment, may affect adherence or outcome assessment.
  • Clinically significant hepatic dysfunction, defined as alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase greater than twice the upper limit of normal.
  • Clinically significant renal dysfunction, defined as serum creatinine greater than twice the upper limit of normal.
  • Coagulation disorder or antithrombotic treatment that precludes safe block performance according to current institutional guidance.
  • Infection at a planned needle insertion site.
  • Severe psychiatric illness, cognitive impairment or communication difficulty preventing valid postoperative assessment.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Body mass index greater than 40 kg/m².
  • Prolonged postoperative mechanical ventilation, defined as failure to achieve extubation within 8 hours after surgery.
  • Refusal to participate.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
308 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group SPIP

    A bilateral SPIP Block(40 ml, %0.25 bupivacaine + 1:400,000 adrenaline, totally) + IV morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA)

    Procedure: Bilateral Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block · Drug: morphine PCA

  • Active comparator
    Group ESP

    A bilateral ESP Block(40 ml, %0.25 bupivacaine + 1:400,000 adrenaline, totally) + IV morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA)

    Procedure: Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block · Drug: morphine PCA

Interventions

  • ProcedureBilateral Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block

    Participants in the SPIP group will receive a bilateral ultrasound-guided SPIP block before induction of general anesthesia and systemic heparinization. With the participant supine, a high-frequency linear transducer will be placed parasagittally adjacent to the sternum. The needle will be advanced in-plane between the pectoral is major and external intercostal muscles. After hydrodissection and negative aspiration, 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with adrenaline 1:400,000 will be injected between the 4th and 5th ribs on each side (total 40 mL). In all participants, the surgeon will infiltrate 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine around the chest tube. The total bupivacaine dose will not exceed 3 mg/kg ideal body weight, with volume reduced proportionally if required.

    Also known as: Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block

  • ProcedureBilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block

    Participants in the ESP group will receive a bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block before induction of general anesthesia and systemic heparinization. With the participant sitting or lateral, a high-frequency linear transducer will be placed parasagittally to identify the T5 transverse process and erector spinae muscle. The needle will be advanced in-plane deep to the erector spinae muscle. After hydrodissection and negative aspiration, 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with adrenaline 1:400,000 will be injected on each side (total 40 mL). In all participants, the surgeon will infiltrate 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine around the chest tube. The total bupivacaine dose will not exceed 3 mg/kg ideal body weight, with volume reduced proportionally if required.

    Also known as: Erector Spinae Plane Block

  • Drugmorphine PCA

    After extubation and recovery of adequate consciousness, intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine will be initiated. The PCA device will be programmed to deliver 1 mg of intravenous morphine per demand, with a 6-minute lockout interval, no background infusion, and a maximum dose of 20 mg over 4 hours. If pain persists at an NRS score of 4 or greater despite appropriate PCA use, additional intravenous morphine 1-3 mg may be administered as rescue analgesia. All PCA-delivered and rescue opioid doses will be recorded and converted to intravenous morphine milligram equivalents (IV-MME).

    Also known as: PCA

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cumulative opioid consumption in the first 24 hours after surgery

    Total opioid consumption from extubation to 24 hours after extubation, including morphine delivered by patient-controlled analgesia and any additional rescue opioids. All opioid doses will be converted to intravenous morphine milligram equivalents (IV-MME).

    Time frame: From extubation to 24 hours after extubation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time-weighted average pain intensity at rest

    Time-weighted average Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain intensity at rest over the first 24 hours after extubation, calculated from NRS scores obtained at 0, 6, 12, and 24 hours using the trapezoidal method. NRS ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity.

    Time frame: From extubation to 24 hours after extubation

  2. Time-weighted average pain intensity during coughing

    Time-weighted average NRS pain intensity during coughing over the first 24 hours after extubation, calculated from assessments at 0, 6, 12, and 24 hours using the trapezoidal method. NRS ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity.

    Time frame: From extubation to 24 hours after extubation

  3. Quality of Recovery-15 score at 24 hours

    Quality of recovery assessed using the validated 15-item Quality of Recovery questionnaire (QoR-15). The total score ranges from 0 to 150, with higher scores indicating better postoperative recovery.

    Time frame: 24 hours after extubation

  4. Quality of Recovery-15 score at hospital discharge

    Quality of recovery assessed using the validated 15-item Quality of Recovery questionnaire (QoR-15). The total score ranges from 0 to 150, with higher scores indicating better postoperative recovery.

    Time frame: At hospital discharge, up to postoperative day 30

  5. Incidence of chronic postsurgical pain

    Incidence of chronic postsurgical pain defined according to International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision (ICD-11) criteria as pain that develops or increases after surgery, persists for at least 3 months, is localized to the sternotomy area or a relevant referred region, and is not better explained by another cause.

    Time frame: 3 months after surgery

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Burhan Dost
    Samsun, 55270, Turkey (Türkiye)
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Dost B, Kaya C, Turunc E, Amaral S, Tulgar S, Gurkan Y, De Cassai A, Elsharkawy H. Thoracic wall fascial plane blocks: a narrative review for breast, thoracic, and cardiac surgery. J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2025 Dec 16;6(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s44158-025-00328-w. PubMed 41402872 ↗
  • Joshi GP, Mariano ER, Elkassabany NM, Harbell M, Johnson RL, Li J, Napolitano L, Schwartz G, Suresh S, Wyatt-Thompson KE, Burns A, Agarkar M, Marbella A, Ramirez S, Sullivan N, Bloschichak A, Uhl S, Domino KB. 2026 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guideline on Perioperative Pain Management Using Local and Regional Analgesia for Cardiothoracic Surgeries, Mastectomy, and Abdominal Surgeries. Anesthesiology. 2026 Jan 1;144(1):19-43. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005790. Epub 2025 Dec 9. PubMed 41363869 ↗
  • Grant MC, Crisafi C, Alvarez A, Arora RC, Brindle ME, Chatterjee S, Ender J, Fletcher N, Gregory AJ, Gunaydin S, Jahangiri M, Ljungqvist O, Lobdell KW, Morton V, Reddy VS, Salenger R, Sander M, Zarbock A, Engelman DT. Perioperative Care in Cardiac Surgery: A Joint Consensus Statement by the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Cardiac Society, ERAS International Society, and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Ann Thorac Surg. 2024 Apr;117(4):669-689. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.12.006. Epub 2024 Jan 28. PubMed 38284956 ↗
  • Demarquette A, Jeanneteau A, Blanchard-Daguet A, Fouquet O, Parot-Schinkel E, Lasocki S, Rineau E, Leger M. Impact of superficial and deep parasternal blocks on recovery after cardiac surgery with sternotomy: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2025 Sep;135(3):764-771. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2025.05.043. Epub 2025 Jul 9. PubMed 40640047 ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07780773
Lead sponsor
Ondokuz Mayıs University
Responsible party
BURHAN DOST (Coordinating Investigator, Ondokuz Mayıs University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 24, 2026
Start date
Sep 10, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Apr 10, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 10, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 24, 2026

Study contacts

Burhan DOST, Assoc.Prof
Contact
burhandost@hotmail.com
+903623121919
Burhan DOST
Contact
+903623121919
Burhan DOST, Assoc.Prof
study director · Ondokuz Mayıs University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion