ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07779642US-PANTHERUpdated Oct 8, 2026

Precision Medicine Adaptive Network Platform Trial in Hypoxemic Acute Respiratory Failure

A Phase 2 interventional study of Simvastatin and Baricitinib in ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome) and Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Failure, sponsored by University of Colorado, Denver. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-08.

Sponsored by University of Colorado, Denver · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 8, 2026Sponsor changedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
300
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this trial is to accelerate the development of pharmacological therapies for critical illness by identifying biological sub phenotypes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The trial will stratify participants by biological markers into different sub phenotypes, then randomized 1:1:1 to active treatment 1, active treatment 2, or usual care. Initial stratification will be into hyperinflammatory and hypoinflammatory sub phenotypes in ARDS based on plasma biomarker profiles. Regular adaptive analyses will enable efficient identification of treatment effects within each sub phenotype, stopping interventions where there is evidence of efficacy or futility, and bringing in new interventions and potentially new sub phenotypes.

Read the detailed description

The primary objective of this trial is to accelerate the development of pharmacological therapies for critical illness by establishing an adaptive platform trial to test the efficacy of prioritized pharmacological interventions in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Participants will be recruited from multiple sites within the United States.

ARDS is defined by:

A known acute clinical insult or new or worsening respiratory dysfunction, and Receipt of respiratory support via invasive mechanical ventilation or non-invasive ventilation including continuous positive airway pressure, or high-flow nasal oxygen ≥30L/min, and

Within the same 24-hour time period:

Bilateral opacities on chest imaging not fully explained by effusions, lobar/lung collapse/atelectasis, or nodules, and Respiratory failure not fully explained by cardiac failure, fluid overload, pulmonary embolism, acute airways disease, or interstitial lung disease and Pa02/Fi02 ration \<40 kPa from arterial blood gases, or Sp02/Fi02 \<315 from pulse oximetry where Sp02 \<97.

The time of onset of ARDS is when the last criterion in 3 is met.

Developing effective pharmacological therapies for ARDS will improve patient outcomes in an area of significant unmet need as well as reduce health care costs. Survivors of ARDS experience reduced health-related quality of life, with substantial health care and societal costs. Secondary analyses of prior randomized clinical trials have suggested different treatment responses between biological sub phenotypes in patients with ARDS.

A new paradigm in critical care suggests that de-emphasizing clinical syndromic definitions and focusing instead on sub phenotypes more closely linked to the host biological response is the key to identifying effective therapeutics. Using syndromic definitions does not provide information on which subgroups of patients are likely to respond effectively and safely to a given pharmacological treatment.

Initially, the platform will use the hyper and hypoinflammatory sub phenotypes in ARDS that are characterized by differing levels of systemic inflammation, clinical features, and treatment responses. Hyper and hypoinflammatory phenotyping will be determined using validated assays for IL-6 and sTNFR1. These measurements will be combined with measurement of the lowest bicarbonate level within the proceeding 24 hours from a plasma or an arterial blood gas and the data used to determine phenotype in real time at the bedside using a validated algorithm. Thus, sub phenotyping will occur via collection and real-time processing of plasma biomarkers after inclusion criteria are met and prior to randomization.

The ELLA Device (Bio-Techne) is a fully automated immune-analyzer that enables on-site simultaneous detection of analytes from a single sample of blood. As a minimal risk procedure for the participant and user, a sample of less than 1 mL of fresh blood from the consented participant is required. The results are generated typically within 60-80 minutes, and biomarker values for IL-6 and sTNFR1, along with the lowest blood bicarbonate level in the previous 24 hours, are entered into a logistic regression model to identify the probability of belonging to the hyperinflammatory sub phenotype. Participants and clinical teams will not be aware of the participant's real-time sub phenotype.

This trial is open-label whereby participants, the clinical team and study team will not be masked to the intervention. Randomization will be balanced with equal ratios between usual care and each intervention participants are eligible for, i.e. a 1:1:1 ratio (usual care versus intervention (where eligible) by sub phenotype). There is no fixed sample size, but we have capped the sample size for the initial treatments and sub phenotype, and will stop enrollment when results indicate efficacy or futility. Every participant will have additional blood collected at trial enrollment (day 0), day 2, and day 6.

Participants will be followed by the clinical research team daily whilst in the ICU.

Once the participants have left ICU and been discharged to acute care, they will be followed prior to hospital discharge. They will also be followed up by telephone or electronically 90 days and 180 days after randomization (+14 days). Survival status will be entered at 365 days.

02

Conditions studied

  • ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome)
  • Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Failure

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • ARDS
  • acute hypoxic respiratory failure
03

In context

Acute Lung Injury

382 studies on the registry are indexed under Acute Lung Injury; 73 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 300 is above the median of 60 across 227 interventional studies indexed under Acute Lung Injury.

Browse Acute Lung Injury studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Colorado, Denver is the lead sponsor of 1,543 studies on the registry; 317 are open to participants now.

Of its 147 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 92 (63%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Critically ill patients in hospital and at least 1 of the following:

  1. Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). ARDS as defined by:

    1. a known acute clinical insult or new or worsening respiratory dysfunction
    2. receiving respiratory support via invasive mechanical ventilation or non- invasive mechanical ventilation including continuous positive airway pressure, or high flow nasal oxygen greater than or equal to 30L/min
    3. within the same 24-hour time period:

    i. bilateral opacities on chest imaging not fully explained by effusion, lobar/lung collapse/atelectasis, or nodules ii. respiratory failure not fully explained by cardiac failure, fluid overload, pulmonary embolism, acute airway disease iii. Pa02/Fi02 ration \<40 kPa from arterial blood gases, or Sp02 \<315 from pulse oximetry where Sp02 \<97

  2. A pandemic associated syndrome

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Simvastatin:

  1. More than 48 hours from the diagnosis of AHRF
  2. Patient is known to be pregnant
  3. Liver transaminases >8 times the
  4. Creatine kinase >10 times the upper limit of the normal range
  5. Currently receiving ongoing treatment with any of the following: itraconazole, ketoconazole, protease inhibitors, nefazodone, cyclosporine, amiodarone, verapamil, or diltiazem.
  6. Severe renal impairment ( \< 30mL/min and not receiving renal replacement therapy).
  7. Current or recent treatment (within 2 weeks) with statins
  8. Physician decision that a statin is required for proven indication
  9. to enteral drug administration, e.g., patients with mechanical bowel obstruction. Patients with high gastric aspirates due to an ileus are not excluded.
  10. Known to simvastatin

Baricitinib

  1. More than 48 hours from the diagnosis of AHRF
  2. Patient is known to be pregnant
  3. Liver transaminases >8 times the upper limit of the normal range
  4. less than 0.5x10 9/L
  5. Currently receiving ongoing (high dose , B and T cell targeted therapies, interferon, or JAK inhibitors)
  6. Severe renal impairment (eGFR \< 15mL/min) or receiving renal replacement therapy
  7. Known active tuberculosis infection or, if known, latent TB treated for less than 4 weeks with appropriate anti-tuberculosis therapy per local guidelines.
  8. Contraindication to enteral drug administration, e.g., patients with mechanical bowel obstruction. Patients with high gastric aspirates due to an ileus are not excluded.
  9. Known hypersensitivity to baricitinib
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(8)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
300 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Usual Care

    Usual care of ICU patients with ARDS. Patients randomized to the control arm or usual care will not receive simvastatin or baricitinib for 28 days or discharge from the ICU.

  • Active comparator
    Simvastatin

    Simvastatin will be administered at a dose of 80 mg once daily by the enteral route for up to 28 days

    Drug: Simvastatin

  • Active comparator
    Baricitinib

    Baricitinib will be administered at a dose of 4 mg once daily by the enteral route for up to 10 days.Baricitinib will be prescribed on the participants' in-patient drug administration chart (or equivalent) and administered to the participant by appropriately trained clinical staff with appropriate competencies in accordance with local practice. These staff do not need to be on the study delegation log. The dosing regimen below will be used in the setting of renal impairment: eGFR 30 to \<60 mL/min Baricitinib Dose: 2mg eGFR15 to \<30 mL/min Baricitinib Dose:1mg eGFR \<15 mL/min (or receiving RRT) Baricitinib Dose withheld

    Drug: Baricitinib

Interventions

  • Simvastatin will be administered at a dose of 80 mg once daily by the enteral route for up to 28 days

  • Baricitinib will be administered at a dose of 4 mg once daily by the enteral route for up to 10 days.Baricitinib will be prescribed on the participants' in-patient drug administration chart (or equivalent) and administered to the participant by appropriately trained clinical staff with appropriate competencies in accordance with local practice. These staff do not need to be on the study delegation log. The dosing regimen below will be used in the setting of renal impairment: eGFR 30 to \<60 mL/min Baricitinib Dose: 2mg eGFR15 to \<30 mL/min Baricitinib Dose:1mg eGFR \<15 mL/min (or receiving RRT) Baricitinib Dose withheld

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 28 day organ support free days

    Number of days alive and free of organ support, which is defined as needing either respiratory or cardiovascular support. Respiratory support is defined as invasive mechanical ventilation or non-invasive ventilation including continuous positive airway pressure or high-flow nasal oxygen with a Fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ≥ 0.4 and a flow rate ≥30L/min. Cardiovascular support is defined as the continuous infusion of any vasopressor or inotrope medication

    Time frame: in- hospital through day 28

Secondary outcomes

  1. 28 day vasopressor free days

    Number of days alive and free of vasopressor use

    Time frame: in-hospital through day 28

  2. 28-day respiratory support free days

    Days alive and free of invasive mechanical ventilation or non-invasive ventilation including continuous positive airway pressure or high-flow nasal oxygen with an FiO2 ≥ 0.4 and a flow rate ≥30L/min

    Time frame: 28 days

  3. Receiving new renal replacement therapy

    Initiation of hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, or continuous renal replacement therapy

    Time frame: in-hospital through day 28

  4. Progression to invasive mechanical ventilation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or death among those not receiving that support at baseline

    New initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), or death

    Time frame: In-hospital through day 90

  5. ICU length of stay

    Number of days alive and requiring ICU-level of care

    Time frame: in-hospital through day 90

  6. Hospital length of stay

    Number of days alive and in the hospitalized

    Time frame: In-hospital through day 90

  7. All-cause mortality

    The total number of deaths from any reason

    Time frame: In-hospital through Day 28 and day 90

  8. Elevated Creatine Kinase more than 10 times the upper limit of normal

    Number of occurrences in which creatinine kinase is elevated more than 10 times the upper limit of normal.

    Time frame: 28 days

  9. Alanine Transaminase or Aspartate Transaminase more than 8 times the upper limit of normal

    Number of occurrences in which alanine transaminase (ALT) or aspartate transaminase (AST) more than 8 times the upper limit of normal.

    Time frame: 28 days

  10. Severe thrombocytopenia, out of keeping with clinical disease

    Number of occurrences where the platelet count is lower than expected trajectory for a known clinical disease course.

    Time frame: 28 days

  11. Severe neutropenia, out of keeping with clinical disease

    Number of occurrences in which low neutrophil count is lower than expected trajectory for a known clinical disease course.

    Time frame: 28 days

  12. Serious infection defined as a positive blood cultures requiring treatment.

    Number of occurrences of a serious infection, defined as a positive blood culture that requires treatment, and pulmonary aspergillosis that requires treatment

    Time frame: 28 days

  13. Venous thromboembolism

    Number of occurrences of a venous thromboembolism defined as a condition where a blood clot forms in a non-superficial vein

    Time frame: 28 days

  14. Stroke

    number of occurrences of a stroke, defined as a sudden interruption of blood flow to the brain, either ischemic or hemorrhagic

    Time frame: 28 days

  15. Myocardial infarction

    Number of occurrences of a myocardial infarction, defined interruption or blockage of blood flow to the heart.

    Time frame: 28 days

  16. Ischemic bowel

    number of occurrences of an ischemic bowel, defined as blood flow to the intestines that has slowed or stopped.

    Time frame: 28 days

  17. Gastrointestinal perforation

    number of occurrences of gastrointestinal (GI) perforation, defined as a hole that has formed all the way through the wall of the stomach, small intestine, or large intestine.

    Time frame: 28 days

  18. Clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding.

    Number of occurrences of clinically important GI bleeding, defined as overt bleeding on GI endoscopy, developing as a complication in the ICU and accompanied by 1 or more of the following features within 24 hours: Spontaneous drop of systolic, mean arterial pressure or diastolic blood pressure of 20mmHg or more Start of vasopressor or a 20% increase in vasopressor dose Decrease in hemoglobin of at least 2 g/dl Transfusion of 2 units of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) or more

    Time frame: 28 days

  19. Serious adverse events

    Number of occurrences of a serious adverse event (SAE), defined as any event that * Results in death; * Is life-threatening * Requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing inpatient's hospitalization * Results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity * Is a congenital abnormality or birth defect

    Time frame: 90 days

  20. Physical function (SPPB) at hospital discharge

    The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) is an objective assessment tool for evaluating lower extremity functioning.

    Time frame: Hospital discharge

  21. Cognitive function Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)

    Completion of the mini-Montreal Cognitive Assessment (mini-MoCA), a tool for early detection of mild cognitive impairment. MoCA accurately and quickly assesses short term memory, visuospatial abilities, executive functions, attention, concentration and working memory, language, and orientation to time and place

    Time frame: Hospital discharge, day 90, day 180

Other outcomes

  1. 14-day Delirium and Coma-Free Days

    Days alive and free of delirium, assessed by the Confusion Assessment Method for the Instensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU), and delirium, assessed by the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS score)

    Time frame: 14 days

  2. Incidence of ICU acquired weakness.

    Evaluated using the Manual Muscle Strength Testing (MMST) and handgrip strength. The MMST is a standardized, hands-on clinical assessment to measure strength and function of individual muscles or muscle groups. Handgrip strength by dynamometer measures the maximum isometric hand and forearm strength.

    Time frame: Day 7 or ICU discharge and hospital discharge

  3. Health-related quality of life

    The EQ-5D-5L is a survey tool to measure health-related quality of life, whereby a score of 100 indicates the best possible health state and a score 0 is the worst possible health state.

    Time frame: 90 days and 180 days

  4. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

    HADS is a 14-item scale with 7 items each for anxiety and depression subscales. Scoring for each item ranges from 0 to 3, whereby a subscale score \>8 denotes anxiety or depression.

    Time frame: 90 days and 180 days

  5. Social and Wellbeing

    Social and wellbeing as measured by the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): a patient-reported survey that measures general health and quality of life.

    Time frame: 90 days and 180 days

  6. Impact of events scale (6 item) at 90 days and 180 days

    The Impact of Event Scale-6 (IES-6) is a short, 6-item version of the IES-R, which is used to quickly screen for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms.

    Time frame: 90 days and 180 days

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Dimairo M, Pallmann P, Wason J, Todd S, Jaki T, Julious SA, Mander AP, Weir CJ, Koenig F, Walton MK, Nicholl JP, Coates E, Biggs K, Hamasaki T, Proschan MA, Scott JA, Ando Y, Hind D, Altman DG; ACE Consensus Group. The adaptive designs CONSORT extension (ACE) statement: a checklist with explanation and elaboration guideline for reporting randomised trials that use an adaptive design. Trials. 2020 Jun 17;21(1):528. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04334-x. PubMed 32546273 ↗
  • McNamee JJ, Gillies MA, Barrett NA, Perkins GD, Tunnicliffe W, Young D, Bentley A, Harrison DA, Brodie D, Boyle AJ, Millar JE, Szakmany T, Bannard-Smith J, Tully RP, Agus A, McDowell C, Jackson C, McAuley DF; REST Investigators. Effect of Lower Tidal Volume Ventilation Facilitated by Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal vs Standard Care Ventilation on 90-Day Mortality in Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: The REST Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021 Sep 21;326(11):1013-1023. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.13374. PubMed 34463700 ↗
  • McAuley DF, Laffey JG, O'Kane CM, Perkins GD, Mullan B, Trinder TJ, Johnston P, Hopkins PA, Johnston AJ, McDowell C, McNally C; HARP-2 Investigators; Irish Critical Care Trials Group. Simvastatin in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 30;371(18):1695-703. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1403285. Epub 2014 Sep 30. PubMed 25268516 ↗
  • Famous KR, Delucchi K, Ware LB, Kangelaris KN, Liu KD, Thompson BT, Calfee CS; ARDS Network. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Subphenotypes Respond Differently to Randomized Fluid Management Strategy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Feb 1;195(3):331-338. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201603-0645OC. PubMed 27513822 ↗
  • Calfee CS, Delucchi K, Parsons PE, Thompson BT, Ware LB, Matthay MA; NHLBI ARDS Network. Subphenotypes in acute respiratory distress syndrome: latent class analysis of data from two randomised controlled trials. Lancet Respir Med. 2014 Aug;2(8):611-20. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70097-9. Epub 2014 May 19. PubMed 24853585 ↗
  • Calfee CS, Delucchi KL, Sinha P, Matthay MA, Hackett J, Shankar-Hari M, McDowell C, Laffey JG, O'Kane CM, McAuley DF; Irish Critical Care Trials Group. Acute respiratory distress syndrome subphenotypes and differential response to simvastatin: secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2018 Sep;6(9):691-698. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30177-2. Epub 2018 Aug 2. PubMed 30078618 ↗
  • Maslove DM, Tang B, Shankar-Hari M, Lawler PR, Angus DC, Baillie JK, Baron RM, Bauer M, Buchman TG, Calfee CS, Dos Santos CC, Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Gordon AC, Kellum JA, Knight JC, Leligdowicz A, McAuley DF, McLean AS, Menon DK, Meyer NJ, Moldawer LL, Reddy K, Reilly JP, Russell JA, Sevransky JE, Seymour CW, Shapiro NI, Singer M, Summers C, Sweeney TE, Thompson BT, van der Poll T, Venkatesh B, Walley KR, Walsh TS, Ware LB, Wong HR, Zador ZE, Marshall JC. Redefining critical illness. Nat Med. 2022 Jun;28(6):1141-1148. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01843-x. Epub 2022 Jun 17. PubMed 35715504 ↗
  • Boyle AJ, McDowell C, Agus A, Logan D, Stewart JD, Jackson C, Mills J, McNamee JJ, McAuley DF. Acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure after treatment with lower tidal volume ventilation facilitated by extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal: long-term outcomes from the REST randomised trial. Thorax. 2023 Aug;78(8):767-774. doi: 10.1136/thorax-2022-218874. Epub 2022 Oct 5. PubMed 36198573 ↗
  • Herridge MS, Tansey CM, Matte A, Tomlinson G, Diaz-Granados N, Cooper A, Guest CB, Mazer CD, Mehta S, Stewart TE, Kudlow P, Cook D, Slutsky AS, Cheung AM; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Functional disability 5 years after acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2011 Apr 7;364(14):1293-304. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011802. PubMed 21470008 ↗
  • Dowdy DW, Eid MP, Dennison CR, Mendez-Tellez PA, Herridge MS, Guallar E, Pronovost PJ, Needham DM. Quality of life after acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2006 Aug;32(8):1115-24. doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0217-3. Epub 2006 Jun 17. PubMed 16783553 ↗
  • Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, Fan E, Brochard L, Esteban A, Gattinoni L, van Haren F, Larsson A, McAuley DF, Ranieri M, Rubenfeld G, Thompson BT, Wrigge H, Slutsky AS, Pesenti A; LUNG SAFE Investigators; ESICM Trials Group. Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and Mortality for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries. JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):788-800. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0291. PubMed 26903337 ↗
  • Gorman EA, O'Kane CM, McAuley DF. Acute respiratory distress syndrome in adults: diagnosis, outcomes, long-term sequelae, and management. Lancet. 2022 Oct 1;400(10358):1157-1170. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01439-8. Epub 2022 Sep 4. PubMed 36070788 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Sep 2026; primary completion for Sep 2029, 36 months later.

Of 22 phase 2 interventional studies under Acute Lung Injury, half reached primary completion within 39 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 60. This study's planned 36 months is close to that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 18, 2026
First posted
Aug 21, 2026
StartEst.
Sep 2026
Primary completionEst.
Sep 2029
CompletionEst.
Sep 2030
Last update
Oct 8, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Sponsor
Collaborators added: Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs
Oct 8, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 8, 2026
    Sponsor Collaborators added: Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs
    + 2 other changes: identifiers and verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07779642
Collaborators
Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Emory University, Wake Forest University, New York University, University of California, San Francisco, Montefiore Medical Center, University of Pennsylvania, Intermountain Health Care, Inc., Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 21, 2026
Start date
Sep 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 8, 2026

Study contacts

Carrie B Higgins, BSN
Contact
carrie.higgins@cuanschutz.edu
3037240961
Jeffrey McKeehan, MSN AC-AGNP
Contact
jeffrey.mckeehan@cuanschutz.edu
3037246080
Neil Aggarwal, MD
principal investigator · University of Colorado, Denver

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Simvastatin · Baricitinib

Start the discussion