ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07779512Updated Nov 4, 2026

Infant Safe Sleep in Pediatric Emergency Depratment

An interventional study of Safe Sleep Education and Behavior habit tracking in Infant Safe Sleep Practices and SIDS, sponsored by State University of New York at Buffalo. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged Up to 3 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-04.

Sponsored by State University of New York at Buffalo · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2026; still recruiting 2 months later.
Updated Nov 4, 2026Now RecruitingSite recruiting status changedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
214
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 3 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Safe sleep recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) are designed to reduce the risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and other sleep-related infant deaths. These recommendations include placing infants on their backs to sleep, using a crib or bassinet, avoiding soft bedding, and not sharing a sleep space with other people.

Many families do not consistently follow all recommended safe sleep practices, particularly when infants are sick. Research has shown that educational programs provided in pediatric emergency departments can improve some safe sleep behaviors, but improvements have been limited and may not continue over time. Additional strategies are needed to help families adopt and maintain safe sleep practices.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a daily safe sleep tracking tool, used together with brief safe sleep education, can improve caregivers' adherence to recommended safe sleep practices compared with education alone. The information learned from this study may help healthcare providers develop more effective ways to promote safe sleep and reduce the risk of sleep-related infant deaths.

02

Conditions studied

  • Infant Safe Sleep Practices
  • SIDS

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Safe Sleep
  • Pediatric Emergency Department
03

In context

Sudden Infant Death

80 studies on the registry are indexed under Sudden Infant Death; 14 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 214 is above the median of 60 across 51 interventional studies indexed under Sudden Infant Death.

Browse Sudden Infant Death studies →

Lead sponsor

State University of New York at Buffalo is the lead sponsor of 294 studies on the registry; 63 are open to participants now.

Of its 19 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 15 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 3 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Legal guardian of infants ages 0 to \< 4 months , evaluated in GCHB PED ages 0 to \< 4 months
  • English speaking primary caregiver of infant
  • Infant ED triaged ESI 2-5
  • Able to complete follow-up surveys via phone or email
  • Family not completely adherent to all 4 pre-determined safe sleep guideline recommended behaviors. If they are adherent to 3 out of 4 guidelines, they are eligible for the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infants requiring intensive interventions where PED education is not feasible
  • Non-English-speaking primary caregiver
  • Legal guardian unable to complete baseline survey or provide follow-up contact
  • Legal guardian completely adherent to safe sleep guidelines
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
214 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Safe Sleep Education

    Families will watch a brief (1 minute) educational video on safe sleep in the pediatric emergency department and then receive a handout summarized infant safe sleep practices.

    Behavioral: Safe Sleep Education

  • Experimental
    Behavior Habit Tracking Plus Safe Sleep Education

    Families will watch a brief (1 minute) educational video on safe sleep in the pediatric emergency department and then receive a handout summarized infant safe sleep practices. After this, they will receive brief information on habit tracking for behavioral change and a form to take home to track their infant's sleep behaviors.

    Behavioral: Safe Sleep Education · Behavioral: Behavior habit tracking

Interventions

  • BehavioralSafe Sleep Education

    60 second safe sleep educational video from the NIH (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rs9Jw3uIoaU) with associated infant safe sleep handout

  • BehavioralBehavior habit tracking

    A daily sleep behavior tracking form over 4 weeks will be provided along with information about how tracking behaviors can form healthy habits.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in proportion of infants who are fully adherent to 4 AAP safe sleep guidelines.

    The investigators will assess whether providing a brief, evidence-based safe-sleep education video alone versus an evidence-based safe-sleep education video plus habit tracking increases full adherence to 4 pre-determined AAP safe sleep guideline recommended behaviors among caregivers of infants 0-4 months.

    Time frame: Will be evaluated at 2 and 4 weeks after initial emergency department visit / intervention time.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in proportion of infants who are fully adherent to each individual AAP safe sleep guideline.

    The investigators will assess whether providing a brief, evidence-based safe-sleep education video alone versus an evidence-based safe-sleep education video plus habit tracking increases full adherence to each of the 4 pre-determined AAP safe sleep guidelines recommended behaviors among caregivers of infants 0-4 months.

    Time frame: Will be evaluated at 2 weeks and 4 weeks following initial emergency department visit and intervention.

  2. Evaluate the change in caregiver safe sleep knowledge score before and after the educational intervention.

    The investigators will assess caregiver's knowledge of safe sleep practices before and after the educational intervention.

    Time frame: This will occur at the initial emergency department visit, as well as the 2 and 4 week follow-ups.

  3. Change in Reported Infant Sleep Duration Before and After the Intervention

    The investigators will assess the change in caregiver-reported average total infant sleep duration over a 24-hour period before and after the intervention. Unit of Measure: Mean hours of infant sleep per 24-hour period. Measurement Tool: Caregiver-reported infant sleep characteristics questionnaire administered as part of the study survey.

    Time frame: This will occur at the initial emergency department visit, 2 and 4 week follow-ups.

  4. Association Between Safe Sleep Practices and Number of Nighttime Infant Awakenings

    The investigators will assess the association between adherence to recommended safe sleep practices and caregiver-reported infant nighttime awakenings. Unit of Measure: Difference in mean number of nighttime awakenings per night according to safe sleep practice adherence status. Measurement Tool: Safe sleep behavior questionnaire and caregiver-reported infant sleep characteristics questionnaire.

    Time frame: Assessed at the initial emergency department visit, 2-week follow-up, and 4-week follow-up.

  5. Caregiver Acceptability of the Self-Tracking Tool

    The investigators will assess caregiver-reported acceptability and perceived usefulness of the self-tracking tool provided to participants in the intervention group. Unit of Measure: Mean score on a 5-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability. Measurement Tool: Study-specific caregiver acceptability questionnaire assessing perceived usefulness, ease of use, and overall acceptability of the self-tracking tool.

    Time frame: Assessed at the end of the emergency department intervention portion of the study.

  6. Differences in Intervention Effectiveness Across Caregiver and Infant Demographic Characteristics

    The investigators will assess whether the effectiveness of the intervention on adherence to recommended safe sleep practices differs according to selected caregiver and infant demographic characteristics. Characteristics examined will include caregiver age, caregiver education level, number of children, infant prematurity, and previous receipt of safe sleep educaction Unit of Measure: Difference in the proportion of infants adherent to recommended safe sleep practices between the intervention and control groups within demographic subgroups. Measurement Tool: Safe sleep behavior questionnaire and caregiver demographic questionnaire; infant prematurity and other relevant clinical characteristics will be obtained from the electronic medical record when available.

    Time frame: Demographic and clinical characteristics will be collected at enrollment, and intervention effectiveness will be assessed through the 4-week follow-up.

  7. Change in Reported Infant Sleep Duration Before and After the Intervention

    The investigators will assess the change in the caregiver-reported average number of times the infant wakes during the night before and after the intervention. Unit of Measure: Mean number of nighttime awakenings per night. Measurement Tool: Caregiver-reported infant sleep characteristics questionnaire administered as part of the study survey.

    Time frame: Assessed at the initial emergency department visit (baseline), 2-week follow-up, and 4-week follow-up.

  8. Change in Reported Infant Sleep Duration Before and After the Intervention

    The investigators will assess the change in caregiver perception of how well their infant sleeps before and after the intervention. Unit of Measure: Mean score on a 5-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating better perceived infant sleep quality. Measurement Tool: Caregiver-reported infant sleep characteristics questionnaire administered as part of the study survey.

    Time frame: Assessed at the initial emergency department visit (baseline), 2-week follow-up, and 4-week follow-up.

  9. Association Between Safe Sleep Practices and Caregiver-Reported Infant Sleep Quality

    The investigators will assess the association between adherence to recommended safe sleep practices and caregiver perception of how well their infant sleeps. Unit of Measure: Difference in mean caregiver-reported infant sleep quality score on a 5-point Likert scale according to safe sleep practice adherence status. Measurement Tool: Safe sleep behavior questionnaire and caregiver-reported infant sleep characteristics questionnaire.

    Time frame: Assessed at the initial emergency department visit, 2-week follow-up, and 4-week follow-up.

  10. Association Between Safe Sleep Practices and Infant Sleep Onset Latency

    The investigators will assess the association between adherence to recommended safe sleep practices and the caregiver-reported amount of time required for the infant to fall asleep. Unit of Measure: Mean minutes required for the infant to fall asleep. Measurement Tool: Safe sleep behavior questionnaire and caregiver-reported infant sleep characteristics questionnaire.

    Time frame: Assessed at the initial emergency department visit, 2-week follow-up, and 4-week follow-up.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kappy B, Edmunds K, Frey M, Zhang Y, Boyd S, Looman K, Pomerantz WJ, Hanke S, Kerrey B. Emergency Department Visits Before Sudden Unexpected Infant Death: A Touchpoint for Unsafe Sleep Reduction. Acad Pediatr. 2022 Aug;22(6):1065-1072. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2022.03.009. Epub 2022 Mar 18. PubMed 35307602 ↗
  • Howard MB, Ryan LM, Psoter KJ, Solomon BS, Mutala M, Ehrenberg S, Moon R. Changes in Sleep Practices During and After Illness. Pediatrics. 2025 Oct 1;156(4):e2025071605. doi: 10.1542/peds.2025-071605. PubMed 40962332 ↗
  • Willmott TJ, Pang B, Rundle-Thiele S. Capability, opportunity, and motivation: an across contexts empirical examination of the COM-B model. BMC Public Health. 2021 May 29;21(1):1014. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11019-w. PubMed 34051788 ↗
  • Whiteside-Mansell L, Nabaweesi R, Caballero AR, Mullins SH, Miller BK, Aitken ME. Assessment of Safe Sleep: Validation of the Parent Newborn Sleep Safety Survey. J Pediatr Nurs. 2017 Jul-Aug;35:30-35. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2017.02.033. Epub 2017 Mar 8. PubMed 28728766 ↗
  • Edmondson C, Shenoy RD, Herrera JH, Williams K, Acuna JM. Maternal adherence to safe infant sleep recommendations in the USA: trends and disparities from PRAMS 2016-2022. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2026 Mar 12;10(1):e004382. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2025-004382. PubMed 41819564 ↗
  • Walsh P, Vieth T, Rodriguez C, Lona N, Molina R, Habebo E, Caldera E, Garcia C, Veazey G. Using a pacifier to decrease sudden infant death syndrome: an emergency department educational intervention. PeerJ. 2014 Mar 13;2:e309. doi: 10.7717/peerj.309. eCollection 2014. PubMed 24688883 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The study involves collection of individual-level data from caregivers and infants, and participant privacy and confidentiality will be maintained in accordance with the IRB-approved study protocol and informed consent process. Deidentified aggregate results will be reported in publications and presentations.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Aug 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2027, 11 months after the start.

Of 15 interventional studies with no phase under Sudden Infant Death, half reached primary completion within 19 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 45. This study's planned 11 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 15, 2026
First posted
Aug 21, 2026
StartActual
Aug 17, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Aug 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Sep 1, 2027
Last update
Nov 4, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
changed Nov 4, 2026
Sites
Golisano Children's Hospital of Buffalo is now Recruiting
Nov 4, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 4, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
    Golisano Children's Hospital of Buffalo is now Recruiting
    + 1 other change: date precision

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07779512
Responsible party
Sarah Anne Ehrenberg (Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellow, State University of New York at Buffalo) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 21, 2026
Start date
Aug 17, 2026
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 4, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion