ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06618586GETSMARTUpdated Jun 11, 2025

Get Social Media and Risk-Reduction Training

An interventional study of TodaysBaby in Infant Death and Sudden Infant Death, sponsored by University of Virginia. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-11.

Primary conditionSudden Infant DeathRegistry: Infant DeathReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Infant Death — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Sudden Infant Death
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Sudden Infant Death, a narrower term within Infant Death.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by University of Virginia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2025; still recruiting 1 year 6 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10,000
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study examines the implementation of the TodaysBaby™ mobile safe sleep intervention program in US hospitals. The main aims of this study are to examine: 1) differences in program penetration and the equity of penetration according to income and race/ethnicity; 2) differences in feasibility, acceptability, sustainability and fidelity top the intervention; and 3) the effectiveness of the intervention.

02

Conditions studied

  • Infant Death
  • Sudden Infant Death

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Safe Sleep
  • Mobile Messaging
03

In context

Sudden Infant Death Reclassified

80 studies on the registry are indexed under Sudden Infant Death; 14 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 10,000 is above the median of 60 across 51 interventional studies indexed under Sudden Infant Death.

Browse Sudden Infant Death studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Virginia is the lead sponsor of 675 studies on the registry; 138 are open to participants now.

Of its 61 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 42 (69%) have results posted.

Compared within Sudden Infant Death, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Infant Death. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Must speak English or Spanish
  • Must live in the United States
  • Must have given birth to a healthy, term infants (37 weeks or greater) and be discharged within 7 days of birth
  • Must plan to care for infant and live in the same household as infant after birth
  • Must enroll in the TodaysBaby program by the time their infant is 7 days of age

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A prenatal diagnosis expected to have impact on infant care practices not compatible with study goals, such as supine infant sleep positioning.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10,000 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    New low touch (LT) hospital implementation strategy

    This will occur during either the first or second 6-month intervention time period (order randomly assigned). For the period of time hospitals are randomized into this arm mothers will be attracted to TodaysBaby through direct-to-consumer marketing and sign themselves up using a QR code. These mothers will also receive standard postpartum care.

    Behavioral: TodaysBaby

  • Active comparator
    Original high touch (HT) hospital implementation strategy

    This will occur during either the first or second 6-month intervention time period (order randomly assigned). For the period of time hospitals are randomized into this arm hospital staff will help mothers sign up and view the first 2 TodaysBaby in a one-on-one conversation format. These mothers will also receive standard postpartum care.

    Behavioral: TodaysBaby

  • No intervention
    Control- Standard of Care

    During the 3 months immediately prior to the first intervention time period, hospitals will recruit approximately 100 mothers to complete surveys regarding infant care practices. These mothers will also receive postpartum standard of care.

Interventions

  • BehavioralTodaysBaby

    The TodaysBaby intervention is comprised of: 1) Text message-delivered, short educational videos in the first 2 months after birth, with each video timed to match content addressing anticipated barriers and facilitators to adhering to guidelines (e.g. parental concerns that infant will choke while supine). Participants will also have access to a web portal where intervention videos will be maintained. 2) Text queries regarding safe sleep practices, which collect data on sleep practices in near real-time and provide reinforcement of adherence. Mothers will receive 1-2 text message questions weekly that assess sleep practices in near real-time .

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Penetration of sign up for TodaysBaby

    Rate of sign up for TodaysBaby among mothers that sign up during the different implementation strategies

    Time frame: First week after birth

  2. Equity of sign up for TodaysBaby

    Differences in rate of sign up for TodaysBaby by maternal insurance status and race/ethnicity among mothers that sign up during different implementation strategies

    Time frame: First week after birth

Secondary outcomes

  1. Feasibility of implementation

    Staff perception that the implementation strategies were successfully used or carried out (measured through semi-structured interviews; Rate of maternal report that signing up for TodaysBaby was simple and fast

    Time frame: Within a year of participant enrollment (qualitative) and >60 day after birth survey

  2. Acceptability

    Staff perception that the delivery of the implementation strategies was satisfactory (measured through semi-structured interviews)

    Time frame: Within a year of participant enrollment

  3. Sustainability

    Staff perception that the implementation strategies could continue to be delivered after the end of the study (measured through semi-structured interviews); monthly penetration rates

    Time frame: Within a year of participant enrollment (qualitative) and during the 6-month study implementation periods

  4. Fidelity

    Number of videos viewed by mother, divided by total videos among mothers enrolled in the different implementation strategies

    Time frame: First 60 days after birth

  5. Effectiveness of TodaysBaby on safe sleep practices

    We will measure 4 sleep practices in the past 2 weeks among mothers enrolled in the different implementation strategies: Sleep position: % reporting supine position only Sleep location: % reporting roomsharing not bedsharing only Soft bedding: % reporting no soft bedding in sleep space Pacifier: % reporting usual pacifier use when infant sleeping

    Time frame: 60-180 days (average 80 days) after birth survey

  6. Program cost of TodaysBaby

    Differences in rate of sign up for TodaysBaby by maternal insurance status and race/ethnicity among mothers that sign up during different implementation strategies

    Time frame: 60-180 days during the program sign up periods.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started May 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2027, 25 months after the start.

Of 15 interventional studies with no phase under Sudden Infant Death, half reached primary completion within 19 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 45. This study's planned 25 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 27, 2024
First posted
Oct 1, 2024
StartActual
May 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jun 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jun 1, 2028
Last update
Jun 11, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 11, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06618586
Responsible party
Rachel Moon, MD (Professor, Department of Pediatrics, University of Virginia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 1, 2024
Start date
May 1, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 11, 2025

Study contacts

Sarah Roth, MPH
Contact
saroth@bu.edu
(617)206-6198
Rachel Y Moon, MD
principal investigator · University of Virginia School of Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion