ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07778771CEEEC-IIUpdated Aug 21, 2026

CEEEC-II: A 12-Week Physical and Cognitive Enrichment Extension Study in Older Stroke Survivors With Multimorbidity

An interventional study of Physical Enrichment and Cognitive Enrichment in Stroke, Hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), sponsored by Duke Kunshan University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 60 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-21.

Sponsored by Duke Kunshan University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
365
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
60 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

CEEEC-II is a 12-week, community-based, prospective extension study conducted in 32 community health service stations in Kunshan, China. It will invite older stroke survivors with hypertension and/or type 2 diabetes who participated in the preceding CEEEC Phase I trial (NCT06975501) to provide new informed consent and complete Phase II eligibility and baseline assessments. Participants will remain in the physical enrichment, cognitive enrichment, combined enrichment, or usual-care arm assigned to their community cluster in Phase I; no new randomization will occur in CEEEC-II. The upgraded program includes eight physician-led Vitality Camp sessions and four volunteer-led reinforcement activities. The physical component integrates aerobic, resistance, balance, flexibility, Baduanjin, and nutrition education. The cognitive component integrates health education with age-adapted games delivered through an AI-enabled interactive large screen. The primary objective is to evaluate the marginal effect of the cognitive enrichment factor on intrinsic capacity at 12 weeks.

Read the detailed description

CEEEC-II is the prospective, open-label extension of the CEEEC Phase I 2×2 factorial cluster-randomized trial (NCT06975501). The extension is conducted in 32 community health service stations in Kunshan, Jiangsu Province, China. Up to 420 participants who completed the Phase I endpoint assessment will be approached consecutively. The estimated Phase II enrollment is 356 participants, with a target of at least 320 participants completing the primary endpoint assessment. All participants will undergo a new eligibility review and provide written informed consent specifically for CEEEC-II.

No new randomization will occur. Each participating community health service station will retain its Phase I cluster assignment: physical and nutrition enrichment only, AI-enabled cognitive enrichment only, combined physical, nutrition, and cognitive enrichment, or usual community-based care. This preserves the original 2×2 factorial structure while recognizing that the Phase II cohort is a selectively re-consented extension cohort rather than a newly randomized sample.

Each participant will receive 12 weeks of the intervention assigned to the community cluster. The active program comprises eight physician-led Vitality Camp sessions and four volunteer-led reinforcement activities. The upgraded physical and nutrition component integrates age-appropriate aerobic, resistance, balance, and flexibility exercises, incorporates Baduanjin-based movements, and provides practical nutrition education. The upgraded cognitive component combines health education with age-adapted, AI-enabled large-screen interactive games designed to engage memory, attention, processing speed, visuospatial ability, and executive function. Reinforcement activities and take-home materials support continued participation and practice between group sessions. Participants in the usual-care arm continue routine community-based stroke and chronic disease management without the structured Phase II physical or cognitive enrichment program.

Assessments will be conducted at baseline and approximately 12 weeks after intervention initiation. The primary outcome is an intrinsic capacity composite score derived from cognition, locomotion, vitality, and psychological capacity domains. The primary estimand is the marginal effect of the cognitive enrichment factor. The physical enrichment factor effect is a key secondary estimand. Cognitive function measured with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment is retained as a secondary outcome in continuity with Phase I. Other prespecified outcomes include MemTrax performance, physical function, nutritional status, depressive symptoms, blood pressure, health-related quality of life, medication adherence, physical activity, activities of daily living, falls, hospitalization, and recurrent stroke. Analyses will account for community-level clustering and the original factorial assignment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke
  • Hypertension
  • Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)
  • Multimorbidity

Keywords

  • Intrinsic Capacity
  • Older Adults
  • Community Health Services
  • Environmental Enrichment
  • Cognitive Training
  • Physical Exercise
  • Multicomponent Intervention
  • Cluster-Assigned Extension Study
03

In context

Stroke

8,255 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,056 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 365 is above the median of 49 across 6,024 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Duke Kunshan University is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Completed the endpoint assessment of the preceding CEEEC Phase I trial (NCT06975501) and remains under management at a participating community health service station in Kunshan.
  • Age 60 years or older.
  • Hospital-confirmed ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke in a stable stage, with no new or worsening neurological deficit within the previous 3 months.
  • Registered hypertension and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus; other comorbid conditions are permitted.
  • Willing and able to participate in the 12-week community-based extension program and complete baseline and endpoint assessments.
  • Able to travel to the community site independently or with a cane or walker; not dependent on a wheelchair for attendance.
  • Short Physical Performance Battery total score >=3, or able to maintain a supported side-by-side standing position for 10 seconds when the total score is \<3.
  • Able to communicate in Mandarin Chinese or the Kunshan dialect and able to recognize Arabic numerals.
  • Corrected vision sufficient to identify large characters at approximately 40 cm and at least one upper limb able to complete touchscreen selection.
  • Resides in the participating community and has no plan to move away during the study period.
  • Provides written specifically for CEEEC-II.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Life-threatening disease or another condition associated with an expected survival of less than 6 months.
  • A new stroke, , acute coronary event, or hospitalization for decompensated heart failure within the previous 3 months.
  • Uncontrolled resting blood pressure (systolic >=180 mmHg or diastolic >=110 mmHg after repeated measurement) until clinically reassessed and controlled.
  • Extreme glycemic instability, including fasting blood glucose >16.7 mmol/L or severe hypoglycemia requiring assistance within the previous month, until clinically reassessed.
  • An absolute to unsupervised community exercise or another medical condition judged by the study clinician to make participation unsafe.
  • Unable to walk to the community site even with a cane or walker, or dependent on a wheelchair for attendance.
  • A severe musculoskeletal, neurological, visual, hearing, cognitive, psychiatric, or communication impairment that prevents safe participation or valid completion of study procedures.
  • Unable to recognize Arabic numerals or unable to complete touchscreen selection with either upper limb.
  • Current participation in another structured physical, cognitive, or nutrition intervention study that may contaminate the assigned intervention.
  • Any other reason documented by the study clinician as making the individual unsuitable for participation.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
365 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control Group

    Participants continue routine community-based stroke and chronic disease management, including usual follow-up and medication adherence or health education provided by community healthcare professionals. They do not receive the structured CEEEC-II physical, nutrition, or AI-enabled cognitive enrichment program.

  • Experimental
    Behavioral: Multicomponent Physical and Nutrition Enrichment

    Participants receive a 12-week upgraded physical and nutrition enrichment program comprising eight physician-led Vitality Camp sessions and four volunteer-led reinforcement activities. The program integrates age-appropriate aerobic, resistance, balance, and flexibility exercises, Baduanjin-based movements, practical nutrition education, and between-session practice support.

    Behavioral: Physical Enrichment

  • Experimental
    Behavioral: AI-Enabled Large-Screen Cognitive Enrichment

    Participants receive a 12-week cognitive enrichment program comprising eight physician-led Vitality Camp sessions and four volunteer-led reinforcement activities. Health education is integrated with age-adapted games delivered through an AI-enabled interactive large screen to engage memory, attention, processing speed, visuospatial ability, and executive function, with between-session practice support.

    Behavioral: Cognitive Enrichment

  • Experimental
    Participants receive a 12-week cognitive enrichment program comprising eight physician-led Vitality

    Participants receive both 12-week enrichment components: the upgraded physical and nutrition program and the AI-enabled large-screen cognitive program. Delivery comprises eight physician-led Vitality Camp sessions, four volunteer-led reinforcement activities, and between-session practice support.

    Behavioral: Physical Enrichment · Behavioral: Cognitive Enrichment

Interventions

  • BehavioralPhysical Enrichment

    A 12-week community-based program delivered through eight physician-led Vitality Camp sessions and four volunteer-led reinforcement activities. Content includes age-appropriate aerobic, resistance, balance, and flexibility exercises, Baduanjin-based movements, practical nutrition education, and supported practice between sessions.

  • BehavioralCognitive Enrichment

    A 12-week community-based program delivered through eight physician-led Vitality Camp sessions and four volunteer-led reinforcement activities. Health education is combined with age-adapted games presented on an AI-enabled interactive large screen to engage memory, attention, processing speed, visuospatial ability, and executive function, with supported practice between sessions.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Intrinsic Capacity

    The intrinsic capacity composite is the equally weighted mean of four domain z scores standardized using the CEEEC-II baseline distribution: cognition \[the mean of standardized MemTrax correct-recognition accuracy and reverse-coded log-transformed correct-response time\], locomotion \[Short Physical Performance Battery total score\], vitality \[Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form total score\], and psychological capacity \[reverse-coded Patient Health Questionnaire-9 total score\]. Higher scores indicate better intrinsic capacity. The primary estimand is the adjusted marginal mean difference at Week 12 between cognitive-on and cognitive-off clusters, averaged over physical-factor levels and adjusted for baseline intrinsic capacity and community-level clustering.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after intervention initiation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Intrinsic Capacity Composite Score: Physical Enrichment Main Effect

    The same intrinsic capacity composite score is used. The key secondary estimand is the adjusted marginal mean difference at Week 12 between physical-on and physical-off clusters, averaged over cognitive-factor levels and adjusted for baseline intrinsic capacity and community-level clustering. Higher scores indicate better intrinsic capacity.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after intervention initiation

  2. Cognition Assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)

    Cognitive function is assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, which evaluates attention and concentration, executive functions, memory, language, visuoconstructional skills, conceptual thinking, calculations, and orientation. The total score ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function. A score of 26 or above is generally considered within the normal range.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after intervention initiation

  3. MemTrax Correct-Recognition Accuracy

    Correct-recognition accuracy is calculated from valid MemTrax trials according to the prespecified test validity algorithm and is expressed as a percentage from 0% to 100%. Higher values indicate better recognition performance.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after intervention initiation

  4. MemTrax Correct-Response Time

    Response time for correct MemTrax responses is summarized in milliseconds from valid trials according to the prespecified test validity algorithm. Lower response time indicates faster processing among valid correct responses.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after intervention initiation

  5. Short Physical Performance Battery Total Score

    The Short Physical Performance Battery assesses standing balance, usual-pace gait speed over 4 meters, and five repeated chair stands. Each component is scored from 0 to 4, producing a total score from 0 to 12. Higher scores indicate better lower-extremity physical function.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after intervention initiation

  6. Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form Total Score

    Nutritional status is assessed using the Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form. The total score ranges from 0 to 14, with higher scores indicating better nutritional status. Scores of 12-14 indicate normal nutritional status, 8-11 indicate risk of malnutrition, and 0-7 indicate malnutrition.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after intervention initiation

  7. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Total Score

    Depressive symptoms are assessed using the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire. The total score ranges from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms and poorer psychological capacity.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after intervention initiation

  8. Systolic Blood Pressure

    Seated systolic blood pressure is measured in millimeters of mercury using a standardized protocol after an appropriate rest period. The prespecified analysis uses the mean of valid readings.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after intervention initiation

  9. Health-Related Quality of Life Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Index

    Health-related quality of life is assessed using the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level descriptive system covering mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression. Health states are converted to an index value using the prespecified value set; higher index values indicate better health-related quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after intervention initiation

  10. EQ Visual Analogue Scale

    Participants rate their current health on the EuroQol visual analogue scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst health they can imagine and 100 represents the best health they can imagine.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after intervention initiation

  11. Medication Adherence Assessed by the 4-Item Morisky-Green-Levine Scale

    Medication adherence is assessed using the 4-item Morisky-Green-Levine self-report scale. The total score ranges from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating poorer medication adherence. A score of 0 indicates high adherence, 1-2 medium adherence, and 3-4 low adherence.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after intervention initiation

  12. Physical Activity in Metabolic Equivalent Minutes per Week

    Physical activity is summarized as metabolic equivalent of task minutes per week from the prespecified physical activity questionnaire. Higher values indicate a greater volume of physical activity.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after intervention initiation

  13. Basic Activities of Daily Living

    Basic activities of daily living include ambulation, feeding, dressing, personal hygiene, continence, and toileting. The study score ranges from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating greater limitation and poorer functional independence.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after intervention initiation

  14. Instrumental Activities of Daily Living

    Independent living skills are assessed using the Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scale. The study score ranges from 0 to 14, with higher scores indicating greater limitation and poorer independent function.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after intervention initiation

  15. Number of Falls

    The number of participant-reported falls occurring during the intervention period is recorded. Falls resulting in injury or medical attention are additionally classified for safety reporting.

    Time frame: During the 12-week intervention period

  16. Number of Hospitalizations

    The number of all-cause hospital admissions occurring during the intervention period is recorded for each participant.

    Time frame: During the 12-week intervention period

  17. Recurrent Stroke

    The occurrence of a new ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke during the intervention period is recorded based on participant or family report and available clinical documentation.

    Time frame: During the 12-week intervention period

  18. Dietary Behavior Score

    Dietary behaviors relevant to stroke and cardiometabolic risk management are assessed using the prespecified study questionnaire. The scoring direction and calculation follow the finalized questionnaire and data dictionary.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after intervention initiation

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Participating Community Health Service Centers in Kunshan
    Kunshan, Jiangsu 215300, China
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — The plan for sharing de-identified individual participant data has not yet been finalized. Any future sharing will require approval by the principal investigator and the responsible institution, consistency with participant consent and applicable ethics approvals, and compliance with relevant data protection requirements.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Aug 2026; primary completion for Jan 2027, 4 months later.

Of 3,108 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Stroke, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46. This study's planned 4 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 3,252 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 18, 2026
First posted
Aug 21, 2026
StartEst.
Aug 31, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jan 3, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jan 3, 2027
Last update
Aug 21, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07778771
Lead sponsor
Duke Kunshan University
Collaborators
Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Kunshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Responsible party
Lijing Yan (Professor, Duke Kunshan University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 21, 2026
Start date
Aug 31, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 3, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 3, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 21, 2026

Study contacts

Yikang Yao, Graduate Student
Contact
yikang.yao@duke.edu
+86-18962917333
Lijing Yan, Professor
Contact
lijing.yan@duke.edu
+86-512-3665-7057
Lijing Yan, Professor
principal investigator · Duke Kunshan University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion