ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07773636ECGSU1Updated Aug 19, 2026

An Evaluation Study of Nursing Assistants' Performance of Electrocardiograms in Emergency Departments as Part of a Delegation of Medical Procedures

An interventional study of electrocardiogram by nursing assistant and electrocardiogram in ECG, sponsored by University Hospital, Angers. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-19.

Primary conditionnone(registry's first term: Emergencies)No conditionIs this wrong?Emergencies describes something many studies share rather than a condition a study is about. The study names no condition we can place it under, so it is not compared with other studies by condition.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Angers · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,450
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

ECG is a simple diagnosis tool which provide a lot of diagnosis and therapeutic decisions. The last few years, the admission number in french emergency department increases in parallel with the ECG acquisition request. ECG acquisition is often made by a nurse, medical skill legally delegate to nurse since 2002. Outside hospital, since 2022, a ministerial decree has extended ECG acquisition to first-aider. The medical delegation of ECG acquisition to nursing assistant could be a way to give back nursing time and would allow to make ECG faster. ECGSU 1 study investigates if the ECG acquisition by a nursing assistant in emergency room reception, for patients admit in emergency department, is qualitatively performant in compare to qualified workers.

Materials and Method ECGSU 1 study is a non-inferiority, transversal, monocentric, prospective and open trial. The study compares the suitability ratio for ECG's interpretability criteria of ECG made by nursing assistant and made by care workers in current practices (doctors, medical students, nurses). The ECG's interpretability criteria are defined by actual recommendations. The suitability ratio for ECG's interpretability criteria will be considered as reliable if all the interpretability criteria are fulfilled for ECG examination. This examination will be conducted by a blind adjudication committee. 2450 patients will be recruited in 24 months in the emergency department of the CHU of Angers.

02

Conditions studied

  • ECG

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • nursing assistant
  • ECG interpretability criteria
  • act delegation
  • emergency department
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Angers is the lead sponsor of 478 studies on the registry; 120 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • all major and conscient patient admit in the emergency departement of CHU of Angers
  • indication of aquisition in the emergency room reception under prescription medical and/or in context of pre-established protocols
  • patient who has been affiliated or beneficiary from social security system
  • patient deliberate consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • people under L1121-5 to L1121_8 of french law public heath articles, namely pregnant women, laboring women, nursing women, people deprived of freedom from legal decision, minor, people under legal protection (guardianship)
  • people involved in another interventional study changing standard of care or could influence study evaluation criterias
  • pacemaker carrier
  • unable to free consent
  • medical emergency needing immediate acquisition
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
2,450 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Nursing assitant

    Procedure: electrocardiogram by nursing assistant

  • Active comparator
    Current practices

    Procedure: electrocardiogram

Interventions

  • Procedureelectrocardiogram by nursing assistant

    ECG are made by nursing assistant

  • Procedureelectrocardiogram

    ECG are made by care workers in current practices (doctors, medical students, nurses)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of compliance with ECG interpretability criteria when ECGs are performed by nursing assistants compared to healthcare professionals in routine practice

    The suitability ratio for ECG interpretability criteria will be considered as reliable if all the interpretability criteria are fulfilled for ECG examination. This examination will be conducted by a blind adjudication committee.

    Time frame: Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Measure of time for making ECG between admission, randomisation and making it

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. suitability ratio for ECG interpretability criteria between groups in the context of chest pain protocol (secondary)

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. team acceptability of the protocol implementation using a satisfaction questionnaire

    Time frame: through study completion, an average 2 years

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 19, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07773636
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 19, 2026
Start date
Oct 24, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 23, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 23, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 19, 2026

Study contacts

Lucile BRUERE
Contact
Lucile.Bruere@chu-angers.fr
241353637 ext. +33
Lucile BRUERE
Contact
Lucile.Bruere@chu-angers.fr
Lucile Lucile.Bruere@chu-angers.fr
principal investigator · University Hospital of Angers

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion