ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT07773571Updated Aug 19, 2026

ICCA-Based ICU Physiological State Space Monitor

An observational study in Critical Illness, sponsored by Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-19.

Sponsored by Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
60,000
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Critically ill patients can deteriorate rapidly across multiple organ systems. Most intensive care unit (ICU) risk tools rely on measurements collected at a single time point and may not fully capture how physiology evolves or how quickly a patient recovers from disturbance. This single-center retrospective observational study will use routinely collected data from the ICCA reporting database at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University to develop and internally validate a research prototype called the ICU Physiological State Space Monitor. Adult ICU admissions will be represented as daily state vectors across 10 physiological domains. The study will characterize each patient's position and movement in a multidimensional state space, identify high-risk regions and possible critical transitions, and quantify physiological resilience using trajectory features such as variability, autocorrelation, curvature, recovery slope, and cross-domain coupling. The primary validation outcome is a composite clinical deterioration event within 72 hours after an eligible index patient-day. The monitor is an analytic and visualization framework for retrospective research and will not be deployed for real-time clinical decision-making in this study.

Read the detailed description

This is a single-center, retrospective, non-interventional methodological cohort study using routinely collected structured data from the ICCA reporting-layer database at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University. The source population comprises adult ICU patients admitted between September 2021 and May 31, 2026 who have an extractable and uniquely identifiable ICU encounter. No intervention will be assigned, no clinical decision will be altered, and no additional examination, treatment, follow-up visit, or biospecimen collection will be performed.

The unit of participant-level registration is the patient, while the principal analytic structure is the ICU encounter and the patient-day. ICU admission time will serve as the common temporal anchor. Monitoring, laboratory, fluid, medication, organ-support, diagnostic, and demographic data will be extracted from the ICCA reporting layer and aggregated primarily into consecutive 24-hour windows. Alternative 12-hour or shorter windows may be evaluated in sensitivity analyses.

Daily physiological state vectors will be constructed across 10 domains: oxygenation; ventilation and respiratory drive; hemodynamic perfusion; renal-fluid balance; hepatic-metabolic clearance; inflammation-immune activation; coagulation-blood integrity; brain-autonomic regulation; bioenergetic and acid-base status; and treatment-support burden. Prespecified data-governance rules will be used for variable-source mapping, unit harmonization, time alignment, limited carry-forward, missing-data handling, and physiological-range checks.

Principal component analysis will provide the primary low-dimensional state-space representation. UMAP may be used for supplementary visualization and local-structure exploration but will not be the sole primary analytical framework. Enhanced trajectory features will include state position, displacement, trajectory length, speed, acceleration, turning angle, curvature, local variability, lag-1 autocorrelation, recovery slope, and cross-domain coupling. These features will be used to characterize high-risk regions, possible basin crossings and critical transitions, and physiological resilience.

Eligible records will be divided chronologically into an earlier derivation cohort and a later temporal validation cohort, with an intended split of approximately 70% and 30%, respectively. The exact cutoff will be locked before analysis. The primary analysis will evaluate the association between state-space and trajectory features and a composite clinical deterioration outcome occurring within 72 hours after each eligible index patient-day. Multivariable logistic regression or discrete-time risk models will be used for the primary outcome. ICU and in-hospital mortality may be evaluated using Cox regression or competing-risk methods, and other outcomes will be analyzed with appropriate regression or time-to-event models. Internal validation will use the temporal validation cohort and bootstrap resampling to assess discrimination, calibration, and robustness.

The source data will remain in the hospital-controlled information environment. Investigators will use a deidentified research dataset without direct identifiers and without access to the reidentification key. Only aggregated results, model parameters, and approved figures will be released. The study seeks a waiver of written informed consent because it is retrospective, non-interventional, uses deidentified existing data, and does not affect participants' current or future care.

02

Conditions studied

  • Critical Illness

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Intensive Care Unit
  • Physiological State Space
  • Trajectory
  • Electronic Health Records
  • Physiological Resilience
03

In context

Critical Illness

1,780 studies on the registry are indexed under Critical Illness; 442 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60,000 is above the median of 140 across 814 observational studies indexed under Critical Illness.

Browse Critical Illness studies →

Lead sponsor

Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital is the lead sponsor of 652 studies on the registry; 291 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Adult patients admitted to an ICU at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University between September 2021 and May 31, 2026 who have an extractable, uniquely identifiable ICU encounter in the ICCA reporting-layer database and meet the prespecified eligibility criteria. The study will use a fixed-time-window census of all eligible records. The principal participant count will be based on unique patients; ICU encounters and patient-days will form the analytic units for longitudinal modeling.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older.
  • Admission to an ICU at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University between September 2021 and May 31, 2026, with a uniquely identifiable ICU encounter in the ICCA reporting-layer database.
  • ICU length of stay of at least 24 hours.
  • Availability of core variables from at least four physiological domains and at least one patient-day suitable for modeling.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Duplicate import of the same ICU encounter that cannot be reliably deduplicated.
  • Severe missingness, inconsistency, or irreconcilable error in key identifiers, ICU admission/discharge times, or core timestamps.
  • Test data, demonstration data, or records determined through data governance to be non-genuine patient records.
  • Inability to lock the primary source mapping for key variables, or overall data quality insufficient to support construction of the physiological state vector.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
60,000 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Derivation Cohort

    This cohort will be used to construct the physiological state vectors, estimate standardization parameters, develop the low-dimensional state-space representation, characterize trajectory features, and fit the primary prediction/association models.

    Other: Multidimensional ICU Physiological State and Trajectory Features

  • Temporal Validation Cohort

    This cohort will be held out for temporal internal validation of state-space features, trajectory measures, and associations with prespecified clinical outcomes.

    Other: Multidimensional ICU Physiological State and Trajectory Features

Interventions

  • OtherMultidimensional ICU Physiological State and Trajectory Features

    The exposure of interest is the participant's multidimensional physiological state and trajectory derived from routinely collected ICU monitoring, laboratory, fluid, medication, organ-support, diagnostic, and demographic data. Daily state vectors will cover 10 physiological domains. Enhanced trajectory features will include state position, displacement, trajectory length, speed, acceleration, turning angle, curvature, local variability, lag-1 autocorrelation, recovery slope, and cross-domain coupling. The investigators will not assign any exposure, treatment, or clinical intervention.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Composite Clinical Deterioration Within 72 Hours

    A binary composite outcome defined by the occurrence of at least one of the following events during the 72-hour window after an eligible index patient-day: ICU death; new initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation; new initiation of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT); new initiation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); or a prespecified significant escalation in vasoactive medication support. A participant/index window meeting more than one component will be counted once for the composite outcome.

    Time frame: Within 72 hours following each eligible index patient-day

Secondary outcomes

  1. ICU mortality

    Death from any cause before discharge from the ICU.

    Time frame: From ICU admission through ICU discharge, an average of approximately 5 days

  2. In-Hospital Mortality

    Death from any cause before discharge from the index hospitalization.

    Time frame: From hospital admission through hospital discharge, an average of approximately 30 days

  3. Duration of Invasive Mechanical Ventilation

    Total number of calendar days during which invasive mechanical ventilation is used during the ICU stay.

    Time frame: From ICU admission through ICU discharge, an average of approximately 5 days

  4. Duration of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

    Total number of calendar days during which CRRT is used during the ICU stay.

    Time frame: From ICU admission through ICU discharge, an average of approximately 5 days

  5. Duration of Vasoactive Medication Exposure

    Total number of calendar days with recorded vasoactive medication support during the ICU stay.

    Time frame: From ICU admission through ICU discharge, an average of approximately 5 days

  6. ICU Length of Stay

    Time from ICU admission to ICU discharge, reported in days.

    Time frame: From ICU admission through ICU discharge, an average of approximately 5 days

  7. Hospital Length of Stay

    Time from hospital admission to hospital discharge, reported in days.

    Time frame: From hospital admission through hospital discharge, an average of approximately 30 days

Other outcomes

  1. Estimated 72-Hour Composite Deterioration Risk by Physiological State-Space Location

    Estimated probability of the 72-hour composite deterioration outcome associated with locations in the low-dimensional physiological state space derived from the prespecified state-space model. The estimated probability will be reported as a percentage ranging from 0% to 100%. High-risk bands, pockets, and local risk landscapes will be considered descriptive features of the estimated risk surface rather than separate outcome measures.

    Time frame: Within 72 hours following each eligible index patient-day

  2. State-Space Displacement Between Consecutive Patient-Days

    Magnitude of change in the participant's position in the PCA-derived low-dimensional physiological state space between two consecutive eligible patient-days, calculated using the prespecified trajectory algorithm and reported in standardized state-space units.

    Time frame: Across consecutive eligible patient-days from ICU admission through ICU discharge, an average of approximately 5 days

  3. Physiological State-Space Trajectory Length

    Cumulative path length of the participant's trajectory across consecutive positions in the PCA-derived physiological state space, calculated as the accumulated state-space displacement and reported in standardized state-space units.

    Time frame: From the first through the last eligible patient-day during the ICU stay, an average of approximately 5 days

  4. Physiological State-Space Trajectory Speed

    Rate of change in physiological state-space position between consecutive eligible patient-days, calculated from state-space displacement over elapsed time and reported in standardized state-space units per day.

    Time frame: Across consecutive eligible patient-days from ICU admission through ICU discharge, an average of approximately 5 days

  5. Physiological State-Space Trajectory Acceleration

    Change in physiological state-space trajectory speed between successive eligible patient-day intervals, calculated using the prespecified trajectory algorithm and reported in standardized state-space units per day squared.

    Time frame: Across consecutive eligible patient-days from ICU admission through ICU discharge, an average of approximately 5 days

  6. Physiological State-Space Turning Angle

    Angular change in trajectory direction between successive trajectory segments derived from consecutive physiological state-space positions, reported in degrees.

    Time frame: Across consecutive eligible patient-days from ICU admission through ICU discharge, an average of approximately 5 days

  7. Physiological State-Space Trajectory Curvature

    Curvature of the participant's physiological state-space trajectory derived from consecutive state-space positions using the prespecified trajectory algorithm. Higher values indicate greater local directional change in the trajectory.

    Time frame: Across consecutive eligible patient-days from ICU admission through ICU discharge, an average of approximately 5 days

  8. Local Physiological State-Space Variability

    Within-participant variability in physiological state-space position across consecutive eligible patient-days, calculated using the prespecified trajectory analysis and reported in standardized state-space units. Higher values indicate greater short-term physiological variability.

    Time frame: Across consecutive eligible patient-days from ICU admission through ICU discharge, an average of approximately 5 days

  9. Lag-1 Autocorrelation of Physiological State-Space Trajectory

    Lag-1 autocorrelation coefficient quantifying the correlation between consecutive physiological state-space observations within the participant's trajectory. The coefficient ranges from -1 to 1, with higher positive values indicating greater persistence of the preceding physiological state.

    Time frame: Across consecutive eligible patient-days from ICU admission through ICU discharge, an average of approximately 5 days

  10. Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve for 72-Hour Composite Deterioration

    Discrimination of the prespecified state-space and trajectory prediction model in the temporal validation cohort, assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for the 72-hour composite deterioration outcome. AUROC ranges from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating better discrimination.

    Time frame: Within 72 hours following each eligible index patient-day in the temporal validation cohort

  11. Calibration Slope for Predicted 72-Hour Composite Deterioration Risk

    Calibration of the prespecified state-space and trajectory prediction model in the temporal validation cohort, assessed using the calibration slope comparing predicted probabilities with observed 72-hour composite deterioration outcomes. A calibration slope of 1 indicates ideal calibration.

    Time frame: Within 72 hours following each eligible index patient-day in the temporal validation cohort

  12. Brier Score for Prediction of 72-Hour Composite Deterioration

    Overall prediction error of the prespecified state-space and trajectory prediction model in the temporal validation cohort, assessed using the Brier score, calculated as the mean squared difference between predicted probabilities and observed binary 72-hour composite deterioration outcomes. The Brier score ranges from 0 to 1, with lower values indicating better predictive accuracy.

    Time frame: Within 72 hours following each eligible index patient-day in the temporal validation cohort

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Duggal A, Scheraga R, Sacha GL, Wang X, Huang S, Krishnan S, Siuba MT, Torbic H, Dugar S, Mucha S, Veith J, Mireles-Cabodevila E, Bauer SR, Kethireddy S, Vachharajani V, Dalton JE. Forecasting disease trajectories in critical illness: comparison of probabilistic dynamic systems to static models to predict patient status in the intensive care unit. BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 6;14(2):e079243. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079243. PubMed 38320842 ↗
  • Xu Z, Mao C, Su C, Zhang H, Siempos I, Torres LK, Pan D, Luo Y, Schenck EJ, Wang F. Sepsis subphenotyping based on organ dysfunction trajectory. Crit Care. 2022 Jul 3;26(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04071-4. PubMed 35786445 ↗
  • Soo A, Zuege DJ, Fick GH, Niven DJ, Berthiaume LR, Stelfox HT, Doig CJ. Describing organ dysfunction in the intensive care unit: a cohort study of 20,000 patients. Crit Care. 2019 May 23;23(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2459-9. PubMed 31122276 ↗
  • Scheffer M, Bolhuis JE, Borsboom D, Buchman TG, Gijzel SMW, Goulson D, Kammenga JE, Kemp B, van de Leemput IA, Levin S, Martin CM, Melis RJF, van Nes EH, Romero LM, Olde Rikkert MGM. Quantifying resilience of humans and other animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Nov 20;115(47):11883-11890. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1810630115. Epub 2018 Oct 29. PubMed 30373844 ↗
  • Scheffer M, Carpenter SR, Lenton TM, Bascompte J, Brock W, Dakos V, van de Koppel J, van de Leemput IA, Levin SA, van Nes EH, Pascual M, Vandermeer J. Anticipating critical transitions. Science. 2012 Oct 19;338(6105):344-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1225244. PubMed 23087241 ↗
  • Thoral PJ, Peppink JM, Driessen RH, Sijbrands EJG, Kompanje EJO, Kaplan L, Bailey H, Kesecioglu J, Cecconi M, Churpek M, Clermont G, van der Schaar M, Ercole A, Girbes ARJ, Elbers PWG; Amsterdam University Medical Centers Database (AmsterdamUMCdb) Collaborators and the SCCM/ESICM Joint Data Science Task Force. Sharing ICU Patient Data Responsibly Under the Society of Critical Care Medicine/European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Joint Data Science Collaboration: The Amsterdam University Medical Centers Database (AmsterdamUMCdb) Example. Crit Care Med. 2021 Jun 1;49(6):e563-e577. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004916. PubMed 33625129 ↗
  • Pollard TJ, Johnson AEW, Raffa JD, Celi LA, Mark RG, Badawi O. The eICU Collaborative Research Database, a freely available multi-center database for critical care research. Sci Data. 2018 Sep 11;5:180178. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2018.178. PubMed 30204154 ↗
  • Johnson AEW, Bulgarelli L, Shen L, Gayles A, Shammout A, Horng S, Pollard TJ, Hao S, Moody B, Gow B, Lehman LH, Celi LA, Mark RG. MIMIC-IV, a freely accessible electronic health record dataset. Sci Data. 2023 Jan 3;10(1):1. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01899-x. PubMed 36596836 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Deidentified participant-level data will not be made publicly available because the source data are governed by institutional privacy, ethics, and information-security requirements. The data will remain in the hospital-controlled environment. Aggregated results, model parameters, analytic methods, or approved code may be shared where permitted by the ethics committee and institutional data-governance procedures.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jun 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2027, 18 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 4, 2026
First posted
Aug 19, 2026
StartActual
Jun 15, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2029
Last update
Aug 19, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 19, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07773571
Responsible party
Ming Zhong (Director, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 19, 2026
Start date
Jun 15, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 19, 2026

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion