ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT07773545HelmED RCTUpdated Aug 19, 2026

The Effect of Visual Patient Education on Helmet Use Behaviour in Elderly Patients After a Bicycle, E-bike, or Moped Accident

An interventional study of Educational video in Helmet Use, Cyclists and Video Information, sponsored by Erasmus Medical Center. Active, not recruiting at 3 sites in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 60 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-19.

Primary conditionnone(registry's first term: Emergencies)No conditionIs this wrong?Emergencies describes something many studies share rather than a condition a study is about. The study names no condition we can place it under, so it is not compared with other studies by condition.

Sponsored by Erasmus Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2022, registered Aug 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
228
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
60 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) targeting individuals aged 60 and older who present to the emergency department following an accident. The study examines the effect of watching an educational video on helmet use specifically, whether it leads to increased helmet usage in the future. Individuals aged 60 or older who were not wearing a helmet while riding a bicycle, e-bike, or (e)-moped at the time of the accident are eligible for inclusion.

Read the detailed description

The present study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate whether a brief online educational intervention delivered after an ED visit can increase helmet use among older adults. Eligible participants are patients aged 60 years or older who were not wearing a helmet at the time of their bicycle, e-bike, or moped accident and who present to one of the participating emergency departments.

Following informed consent and completion of a brief baseline questionnaire, participants will be randomly allocated to either the intervention group or the control group. Participants assigned to the intervention group will receive standard emergency care in addition to a short online educational video promoting helmet use. The video is designed to provide evidence-based information regarding the burden of bicycle- and moped-related head injuries, the protective effects of helmet use, and the potential health benefits of wearing a helmet during future rides. Participants in the control group will receive standard emergency care alone without the educational video.

The primary objective is to determine whether exposure to the educational video results in a higher proportion of helmet users six months after the index ED visit compared with standard care alone. Helmet use at six months will be assessed through a structured telephone interview.

Secondary objectives include evaluating the association between helmet use at six months and symptoms of anxiety and depression, as measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). In addition, demographic characteristics, accident characteristics (including accident location and weather conditions), injury characteristics (including injury type, anatomical injury location, and presence of multiple injuries), and patient characteristics (including age, educational level, and intoxication status) will be collected to describe the study population and explore factors associated with subsequent helmet use.

02

Conditions studied

  • Helmet Use
  • Cyclists
  • Video Information

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Helmet use
  • Emergency Department
  • behavioral change
  • educational intervention
  • video intervention
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Erasmus Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 478 studies on the registry; 183 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥60 years
  • Attending the ED after a (electric) bicycle or scooter traffic accident
  • Signed by patient
  • Maximum points (15) on Glasgow Coma Scale

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Linguistic barrier
  • Illiteracy or blindness
  • Helmet use during the accident
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
228 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Educational video

    Participants assigned to the intervention group will receive standard emergency care in addition to a short online educational video promoting helmet use.

    Behavioral: Educational video

  • No intervention
    Control Group

    Participants in the control group will receive standard emergency care alone without the educational video.

Interventions

  • BehavioralEducational video

    The video is designed to provide evidence-based information regarding the burden of bicycle- and scooter-related head injuries, the protective effects of helmet use, and the potential health benefits of wearing a helmet during future rides.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Helmet use

    Self-reported helmet use (single-item survey question, yes/no), assessed 6 months after ED visit.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient attitude towards helmet use

    Patients' attitude towards helmet use was assessed across three questions, using a study-specific questionnaire administered at follow-up: (1) Has your opinion regarding bicycle helmet use changed following your accident? (More positive/more negative/no changes) 2) Would you advise other cyclists to wear a bicycle helmet? (yes/no) 3) If bicycle helmet use was made mandatory, would you consider this an appropriate public health- and safety measure? (yes/no)

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

3 sites
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data will be entered and managed via Castor. Investigators will be able to review pseudo-anonymized data after 2-step-verification log-in.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Sep 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2026, 48 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 12, 2026
First posted
Aug 19, 2026
StartActual
Sep 1, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Sep 2026
CompletionEst.
Sep 2026
Last update
Aug 19, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 19, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07773545
Responsible party
Tugce Atalik-Hoogeweij (PhD candidate, Erasmus Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 19, 2026
Start date
Sep 1, 2022
Primary completion
Sep 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 19, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion