ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07772856LIBERATE-K HDUpdated Aug 19, 2026

Liberalizing Potassium Restrictions in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis

An interventional study of Liberalized Potassium Diet and Low Potassium Diet in End Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD), Hemodialysis and Diet Intervention, sponsored by University of Ontario Institute of Technology. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-19.

Sponsored by University of Ontario Institute of Technology · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
148
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

People with end-stage kidney disease who receive hemodialysis are often told to strictly limit foods high in potassium, such as fruits, vegetables, legumes, nuts, and whole grains. This advice is intended to prevent high blood potassium levels (hyperkalemia), which can cause dangerous heart rhythm problems. However, these restrictions can make eating difficult, reduce diet quality, and lower quality of life. New research suggests that not all sources of potassium affect the body in the same way. Potassium added to highly processed foods is more easily absorbed than potassium naturally found in whole foods like fruits and vegetables. Large studies have found little evidence that eating potassium-rich whole foods increases blood potassium levels in people on dialysis. Clinical guidelines are beginning to shift, but no high-quality clinical trial has tested whether a more flexible, food-based approach is safe for people receiving hemodialysis. This study will compare two dietary approaches in 148 adults on hemodialysis: the usual low potassium diet and a "liberalized" potassium diet that encourages minimally processed foods while limiting highly processed foods with potassium additives. Participants will receive dietitian support and grocery assistance for 12 weeks. The investigators will closely monitor blood potassium levels to ensure safety. The investigators will also examine whether the liberalized diet is as safe as standard care, and whether it improves diet quality and quality of life. The investigators will also study factors that influence the participant's ability to follow the diet in real-world settings. If safe, this approach could reduce unnecessary food restrictions, improve diet quality, and enhance quality of life for people receiving hemodialysis, while maintaining patient safety.

Read the detailed description

Current potassium guidelines are highly restrictive, limit nutritious whole foods, and contribute to poor diet quality and reduced quality of life - yet largely rely on expert consensus rather than robust trial evidence. To our knowledge, LIBERATE K-HD would be the first RCT to evaluate the safety and sustainability of a liberalized potassium diet in patients receiving hemodialysis, directly addressing this critical evidence gap. By shifting the focus from strict potassium restriction to whole, minimally processed foods, this approach has the potential to simplify dietary advice, improve patient satisfaction, and enhance overall nutrition without increasing the risk of hyperkalemia. The results will directly inform clinical practice guidelines and renal dietetic practice, providing patient-centered evidence to support more flexible and equitabledietary recommendations. The behavioural and adherence data generated will further identify key determinants of sustained dietary change, including food literacy, self-efficacy, and dietary burden, offering guidance for behaviour change counselling and responsible implementation of a liberalized potassium approach in routine dialysis care. If effective, it could support more flexible and patient-centered dietary recommendations that improve both health outcomes and patient well-being.

02

Conditions studied

  • End Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD)
  • Hemodialysis
  • Diet Intervention
  • Hyperkalemia
  • Potassium Bioavailability

Keywords

  • end stage kidney disease
  • hemodialysis
  • diet intervention
  • hyperkalemia
  • potassium bioavailability
03

In context

Kidney Failure, Chronic

2,108 studies on the registry are indexed under Kidney Failure, Chronic; 273 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 148 is above the median of 57 across 1,569 interventional studies indexed under Kidney Failure, Chronic.

Browse Kidney Failure, Chronic studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Ontario Institute of Technology is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age ≥18 years on maintenance HD >3 months
  2. ≥1 serum potassium concentration >5.0 mmol/L on routine bloodwork in past 12 months
  3. Able to provide consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Treatment with potassium binders within the preceding 7 days
  2. Average Urea reduction rate over the past 3 months \<65%
  3. >2 missed scheduled dialysis sessions in the previous month
  4. Patients receiving \<3 hemodialysis sessions per week (ex/ incremental dialysis)
  5. Average serum potassium concentration >6.0 mmol/L over the past 3 months
  6. Swallowing difficulties or other GI issues preventing adequate intake
  7. Residing in an institutional setting (e.g., Long-term care homes) where meals are provided
  8. >11%
  9. Unable to comply with study procedures due to cognitive impairment, language barrier or for any additional reason specified by the attending clinician
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
148 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Liberalized Potassium Diet

    The intervention arm will liberalize their potassium intake to include fruits, vegetables, whole grains, nuts and legumes to achieve a daily potassium intake of \~2600-3000 mg per day.

    Behavioral: Liberalized Potassium Diet

  • Active comparator
    Low Potassium Diet

    The control group will limit higher potassium fruits, vegetables, juices, and grains, to achieve a potassium intake of \~2000 mg/day.

    Behavioral: Low Potassium Diet

Interventions

  • BehavioralLiberalized Potassium Diet

    For 12 weeks, the liberalized potassium diet group (n=74) will increase their intake of minimally processed foods that are higher in potassium, including fruits, vegetables, nuts, legumes and whole grains, while limiting highly processed foods rich in potassium (\>200 mg/serving) and potassium additives. The liberalized diet will provide \~2600-3000. Participants will also be counselled to use cooking techniques to reduce potassium in root vegetables. The liberalized diet will provide \~2600-3000 mg potassium daily, reflecting the mean potassium intake of Canadian adults. Participants will receive weekly individualized counselling (30-60 min) during the first 4 weeks, followed by sessions (weeks 8 \& 12), reflecting usual care and to reinforce adherence. During weeks 1 to 4, weekly home deliveries of groceries will be provided to support early dietary adoption and adherence. During weeks 5-12, participants will receive weekly grocery gift cards to reduce financial barriers and support.

  • BehavioralLow Potassium Diet

    The control group (n= 74) will limit higher potassium fruits, vegetables, juices, and grains, to achieve a potassium intake of \~2000 mg/day. Participants will also be counselled to use cooking techniques (e.g., double-boiling root vegetables) to reduce potassium. Consistent with standard of care, participants will receive monthly education by a registered dietitian using standardized low potassium education materials that contain lists of foods to 'choose' and 'avoid', and individualized to ensure budget, cooking abilities and patient preferences are addressed, as needed. Participants will receive weekly grocery gift cards for 12 weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time-averaged serum potassium

    Time-averaged serum potassium is calculated as the mean of all weekly serum potassium measurements (mmol/L) for a participant over the defined study period, providing an integrated measure of potassium exposure over time and reducing the influence of isolated or transient fluctuations. Time-averaged serum potassium will be calculated as the area under the serum potassium-time curve divided by the total observation time.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Safety - Severe Hyperkalemia

    Incidence of clinically meaningful, severe hyperkalemia defined as incident non-hemolyzed serum potassium \>6.5 mmol/L at any time point during the study.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Dietary Nutrient Intake

    Dietary intake will be assessed using the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Recall (ASA24-Canada-2018). The ASA24-C is a self-administered, web-based recall available in English and French (\~25 minutes) that incorporates Canadian foods and the Canadian Nutrient File for nutrient analysis. From the ASA24-C, we will calculate mean nutrient intakes, including potassium (mg/day).

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  3. Health-Related Quality of Life

    Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the EQ-5D-5L, a validated, widely used generic indicator of overall health status. It is comprised of five questions assessing the dimension of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  4. Diet Quality

    From the ASA24-C, diet quality will be assessed using the Healthy Eating Food Index-2019 (HEFI-2019) score (0-80).

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  5. Ultra-processed food consumption

    From the ASA24-C, ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption will be assessed using the NOVA classification system, which categorizes foods according to the degree of industrial processing. It will be calculated as the proportion of total energy intake from ultra-processed foods (% energy from UPF's, NOVA group 4)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Barriers and Facilitators to Adoption of Dietary Intervention

    In both study groups, to compare the barriers and facilitators that impact behaviour change and real-world implementation of the dietary interventions, at baseline and after the dietary intervention, using a validated questionaire

    Time frame: 12 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Aug 2026; primary completion for Jul 2030, 47 months later.

Of 347 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Kidney Failure, Chronic, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 47. This study's planned 47 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 425 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 46.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 7, 2026
First posted
Aug 19, 2026
StartEst.
Aug 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jul 1, 2030
CompletionEst.
Sep 1, 2030
Last update
Aug 19, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 19, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07772856
Lead sponsor
University of Ontario Institute of Technology
Responsible party
JoAnne Arcand (Associate Professor, University of Ontario Institute of Technology) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 19, 2026
Start date
Aug 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 1, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 19, 2026

Study contacts

JoAnne Arcand, PhD, RD
Contact
JoAnne.Arcand@ontariotechu.ca
905-721-8668 ext. 3796
Arti Sharma Parpia, MSc, RD
Contact
Arti.Parpia@unityhealth.to
416-864-5228
Ron Wald, MD
principal investigator · Unity Health Toronto
JoAnne Arcand, PhD, RD
principal investigator · University of Ontario Institute of Technology

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion