ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07772232Updated Aug 19, 2026

Comparison of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate and Robotic Water Jet Ablation for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

An interventional study of Device - HoLEP with MOSES 2.0 and RWJA with Hydros Robotic System in Benign Prostate Hypertrophy(BPH) and Lower Urinary Track Symptoms, sponsored by The Methodist Hospital Research Institute. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to male participants aged 50 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-19.

Sponsored by The Methodist Hospital Research Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years to 80 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

This study compares two FDA-approved surgical treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH): Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) with MOSES 2.0 technology and Robotic Water Jet Ablation (RWJA) using the Hydros Robotic System. Men with BPH and prostate volumes between 50 and 180 mL will be randomly assigned to one of the two procedures. The study will measure changes in prostate volume, PSA, urinary flow, and bladder emptying at 12 months, along with safety, sexual function, continence, and healthcare utilization outcomes, which will be followed for up to 5 years after surgery.

Read the detailed description

This prospective, randomized controlled trial is designed to compare the safety, effectiveness, and long-term durability of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) utilizing MOSES 2.0 technology with Robotic Water Jet Ablation (RWJA) performed using the Hydros Robotic System for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The trial will enroll 100 men aged 50 to 80 years who present with moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to BPH and prostate volumes between 50 and 180 mL. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either HoLEP or RWJA and will be monitored for five years following treatment.

The primary objective is to compare objective measures of treatment efficacy and durability at 12 months, specifically changes in prostate volume, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, urinary flow rate (Qmax), and post-void residual urine volume (PVR). Secondary objectives include assessment of perioperative outcomes, safety profiles, patient-reported urinary and sexual function, treatment durability, reintervention rates, and healthcare resource utilization. Outcomes will be measured using validated instruments, such as the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM), Male Sexual Health Questionnaire-Ejaculatory Dysfunction (MSHQ-EjD), and Incontinence Severity Index (ISI).

Although both procedures are established and FDA-approved therapies for BPH, direct comparative evidence is limited. This study seeks to address this evidence gap by generating high-quality comparative effectiveness data to inform clinical decision-making and patient counseling. The results may clarify the relative benefits and tradeoffs of each procedure, particularly in terms of symptom improvement, preservation of sexual function, durability of treatment response, and long-term healthcare utilization.

02

Conditions studied

  • Benign Prostate Hypertrophy(BPH)
  • Lower Urinary Track Symptoms

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • HOLEP
  • MOSES 2.0
  • Robotic Waterjet Ablation
  • Hydros Robotic System
  • Compare Effectiveness
03

In context

Prostatic Hyperplasia

827 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Hyperplasia; 179 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is close to the median of 92 across 626 interventional studies indexed under Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Browse Prostatic Hyperplasia studies →

Lead sponsor

The Methodist Hospital Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 160 studies on the registry; 59 are open to participants now.

Of its 28 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 18 (64%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male, age 50-80 years
  2. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥ 12
  3. Prostate size (TRUS): 50-180 mL
  4. Diagnosis of LUTS due to BPH
  5. Uroflow Qmax ≤ 15 mL/sec
  6. Mentally capable, able to comply with study procedures, written provided
  7. Able to follow study instructions and complete all required visits

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. ≥ 42
  2. History of prostate cancer
  3. Suspected or history of bladder cancer
  4. Active or untreated bladder stones at screening
  5. Indwelling catheter for more than 3 months before baseline
  6. Active urinary tract infection
  7. History of urethral stricture or bladder neck stenosis
  8. Damage to the external urethral sphincter
  9. Previous prostate surgery or lower urinary tract surgery
  10. Use of obligatory anticoagulants (if not stoppable) or known coagulopathy (except ASA 100 mg/d)
  11. to general and spinal anesthesia
  12. Any condition that could interfere with study participation or outcomes, per investigator judgment
  13. Lacks legal or mental capacity to consent
  14. Simultaneous participation in another therapeutic urological trial
  15. Known or persistent abuse of medication, drugs, or alcohol
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    HoLEP with MOSES 2.0

    Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate using MOSES 2.0 pulse-modulation technology, performed per institutional standard of care.

    Device: Device - HoLEP with MOSES 2.0

  • Active comparator
    RWJA with Hydros Robotic System

    Robotic-assisted waterjet ablation of the prostate using the Hydros Robotic System, performed per institutional standard of care.

    Device: RWJA with Hydros Robotic System

Interventions

  • DeviceDevice - HoLEP with MOSES 2.0

    Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate using MOSES 2.0 pulse-modulation technology, performed per institutional standard of care.

  • DeviceRWJA with Hydros Robotic System

    Device - RWJA (Hydros Robotic System) / Aquablation therapy (often referred to by its commercial name, "Aquablation").

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Prostate Volume

    Measured via transrectal ultrasound (TRUS); change from baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months post-intervention

  2. Change in Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)

    Serum PSA level; change from baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months post-intervention

  3. Change in Urinary Flow Rate (Qmax)

    Peak urinary flow rate via uroflowmetry; change from baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months post-intervention

  4. Change in Post-Void Residual Volume (PVR)

    Bladder scan-measured PVR; change from baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months post-intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence and Severity of Adverse Events

    Adverse events graded by the Clavien-Dindo classification system.

    Time frame: From patient hospital discharge through 3 and 12 months post-surgery

  2. Operative Time

    Total procedure time, start to finish.

    Time frame: Day (duration) of surgical procedure

  3. Hemostasis Time

    Time required to achieve hemostasis intraoperatively.

    Time frame: Day (duration) of surgical procedure

  4. Perioperative Change in Hemoglobin

    Hemoglobin level change from baseline to immediate postoperative measurement.

    Time frame: Baseline to immediate postoperative period (when patient is in the recovery room post surgery)

  5. Time to Catheter-Free Status

    Duration from end of surgery to catheter removal.

    Time frame: From surgery day until catheter removal

  6. Length of Hospital Stay / Discharge Time

    Time from surgery to hospital discharge.

    Time frame: Day of surgical procedure through hospital discharge

  7. Change in IPSS/QoL Score

    International Prostate Symptom Score / Quality of Life index.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months post-surgery

  8. Change in SHIM Score

    Sexual Health Inventory for Men.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months post-surgery

  9. Change in MSHQ-EjD Score

    Male Sexual Health Questionnaire - Ejaculatory Dysfunction.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months post-surgery

  10. Change in Incontinence Outcomes

    Incontinence Severity Index (ISI) score and Cough Stress Test (CST) result.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months post-surgery

  11. Long-Term Durability of Functional Improvements

    Composite tracking of IPSS, Qmax, PVR, PSA, and prostate volume.

    Time frame: 24, 36, 48, and 60 months post-intervention

  12. Post-Operative Medication Use

    Number of prescriptions written and filled (initial fills and refills), e.g., alpha-blockers, 5-alpha reductase inhibitors.

    Time frame: Through 60 months post-intervention

  13. Reintervention Rate

    Repeat procedures or additional therapies for BPH/LUTS.

    Time frame: Through 60 months post-intervention

  14. Unplanned Healthcare Encounters

    Emergency visits, urgent care visits, and add-on clinic visits related to the procedure.

    Time frame: Through 60 months post-intervention

  15. Incidence of Urethral Stricture Requiring Intervention

    New urethral stricture or bladder neck stenosis requiring treatment.

    Time frame: Through 60 months post-intervention

  16. Unanticipated Advanced Diagnostics

    Unplanned MRI, cystoscopy, or prostate cancer biomarker testing.

    Time frame: Through 60 months post-intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Aug 2026; primary completion for Aug 2029, 36 months later.

Of 152 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Prostatic Hyperplasia, half reached primary completion within 25 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 48. This study's planned 36 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 203 studies reached it within 26 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 48.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 9, 2026
First posted
Aug 19, 2026
StartEst.
Aug 3, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Aug 3, 2029
CompletionEst.
Aug 3, 2033
Last update
Aug 19, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 19, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07772232
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 19, 2026
Start date
Aug 3, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 3, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 3, 2033 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 19, 2026

Study contacts

Hazem Elmansy, MD
Contact
hmelmansy@houstonmethodist.org
346-516-1481
Miguel Valdivia y Alvarado, MD
Contact
mvaldiviayalvarado@houstonmethodist.org
346-356-3622

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion