ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07771387EPIRESPUpdated Aug 18, 2026

Early Predictors of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Extremely Preterm Infants

An observational study in Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia, sponsored by Medical University of Vienna. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Austria. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-18.

Sponsored by Medical University of Vienna · Observational

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
140
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) remains one of the most common complications in extremely preterm infants despite advances in neonatal intensive care. Early identification of infants at high risk for BPD could facilitate individualized treatment strategies and improve long-term respiratory outcomes. However, current prediction models rely primarily on conventional clinical variables and have limited predictive accuracy.

This prospective observational study aims to evaluate the predictive value of novel physiological, imaging, and biomarker-based indicators for the development of BPD in infants born before 26 weeks of gestation. Participants admitted to the neonatal intensive care units of the Medical University of Vienna will undergo non-invasive assessments during routine clinical care. These include respiratory function monitoring during neonatal transition, lung ultrasound, diaphragmatic ultrasound, targeted neonatal echocardiography, forced oscillation technique, neurally adjusted ventilatory assist-derived diaphragmatic electrical activity, electrical impedance tomography, and proteomic analyses of plasma and tracheal aspirate samples.

The association between these novel indicators and respiratory disease severity will be assessed using the Respiratory Severity Score (RSS). Their ability to predict BPD will be evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and uni- and multivariable logistic regression models. Predictive performance will be assessed using the C-statistics.

The primary objectives are to determine the correlation between the novel indicators and the RSS and to evaluate their diagnostic accuracy for predicting BPD. Secondary objectives include identifying the combination of indicators that provides the best prediction of BPD, evaluating longitudinal changes in respiratory and cardiovascular parameters during the neonatal period, assessing the effects of respiratory interventions and treatments on these indicators, and investigating associations with survival and major neonatal morbidities.

A total of 140 extremely preterm infants is planned for inclusion in the study. The results are expected to improve early risk stratification and contribute to the development of individualized strategies for preventing and managing BPD.

Read the detailed description

Background:

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) remains one of the most frequent and clinically relevant complications of extreme prematurity. Although advances in perinatal and neonatal care have substantially improved the survival of infants born at the limits of viability, the incidence of BPD has remained relatively unchanged. BPD is associated with prolonged respiratory support, recurrent respiratory infections, pulmonary hypertension, impaired lung function throughout childhood and adulthood, adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes, and increased healthcare utilization.

Current prediction of BPD is primarily based on conventional clinical variables, including gestational age, birth weight, duration of respiratory support, oxygen requirement, and the Respiratory Severity Score (RSS), calculated as the product of mean airway pressure (MAP) and the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂). Although these parameters provide valuable information regarding disease severity, they do not directly characterize the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of lung injury or capture the complex interactions between pulmonary mechanics, ventilation distribution, respiratory muscle function, cardiovascular adaptation, and inflammatory responses.

Several novel monitoring technologies have become available in neonatal intensive care over the past decade. These include lung ultrasound, targeted neonatal echocardiography, respiratory function monitoring, electrical impedance tomography, neurally adjusted ventilatory assist, forced oscillation technique, and advanced proteomic analyses. These technologies provide quantitative physiological information that may identify infants at increased risk of developing BPD before irreversible lung injury occurs. However, their predictive value when evaluated in combination has not yet been systematically assessed in a comprehensive prospective cohort.

This study aims to investigate whether physiological, imaging, and molecular biomarkers obtained during the neonatal period improve the early prediction of BPD compared with conventional clinical indicators.

Study Objectives:

The primary objective is to determine the predictive value of novel physiological, imaging, and biomarker-based indicators for the development of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in extremely preterm infants.

Specific objectives include:

  • evaluating the association between novel measurements and the respiratory severity score (RSS);
  • determining the diagnostic performance of each parameter for predicting BPD;
  • identifying combinations of predictors that provide optimal discrimination between infants who develop BPD and those who do not;
  • evaluating longitudinal changes of physiological parameters during the first weeks of life;
  • investigating the effects of respiratory interventions and routine clinical management on these measurements.

Study Design:

This is a prospective, single-center, observational clinical study performed at the neonatal intensive care units of the Medical University of Vienna.

No experimental intervention will be performed. All patients will receive standard neonatal intensive care according to local protocols. Study-related assessments consist of non-invasive physiological measurements that are performed alongside routine clinical care whenever possible.

Study Population:

Eligible participants are infants born before 26 completed weeks of gestation who are admitted to the neonatal intensive care units of the Medical University of Vienna.

Written informed consent will be obtained from parents or legal guardians before study inclusion according to institutional regulations.

The a-priori sample size calculation was based on previously published data on the predictive performance of lung ultrasound (LUS) and the Forced Oscillation Technique (FOT). Assuming a BPD incidence of approximately 30%, a statistical power of 95%, a two-sided significance level of 5%, and an anticipated dropout rate of 30%, the required sample size was estimated to be 140 infants.

Study Procedures:

Each participant will undergo repeated physiological and imaging assessments during the neonatal period.

  1. Respiratory Function Monitoring During neonatal stabilization immediately after birth, respiratory function monitoring will be used to continuously record ventilatory parameters during mask ventilation, CPAP, or mechanical ventilation.

    Measured variables include:

    • peak inspiratory pressure,
    • expiratory tidal volume,
    • respiratory rate,
    • leak around the face mask,
    • airway pressure curves,
    • ventilation effectiveness. These measurements characterize the quality of respiratory support during neonatal transition and may provide early markers of lung injury.
  2. Lung Ultrasound:

    Serial lung ultrasound examinations will be performed during the first 28 days of life.

    The Lung Ultrasound Score (LUS) will be calculated using standardized scoring systems reflecting pulmonary aeration.

    Additionally, diaphragmatic ultrasound will quantify:

    • diaphragmatic excursion,
    • diaphragmatic contractility,
    • respiratory muscle function. These measurements provide information regarding pulmonary aeration and respiratory muscle performance.
  3. Targeted Neonatal Echocardiography Targeted neonatal echocardiography (TnEcho) will be performed repeatedly from birth until 36 weeks' postmenstrual age.

    Cardiovascular assessments include evaluation of:

    • ductus arteriosus,
    • pulmonary artery pressure,
    • ventricular function,
    • pulmonary vascular resistance,
    • systemic blood flow,
    • pulmonary hypertension,
    • cardiac output. Cardiopulmonary interactions are expected to influence respiratory outcomes and may contribute to BPD development.
  4. Forced Oscillation Technique The Forced Oscillation Technique (FOT) will be performed during the first two postnatal weeks to assess respiratory mechanics.

    Primary measurements include respiratory system reactance and resistance. Additional follow-up assessments will be performed at approximately 3 years and 5 years of age to investigate long-term pulmonary function in survivors.

  5. Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist In infants receiving NAVA ventilation, the electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi) will be continuously recorded.

    Variables include:

    • peak EAdi,
    • minimum EAdi,
    • neural respiratory drive,
    • breathing effort. These measurements quantify respiratory muscle activation and patient-ventilator interaction.
  6. Electrical Impedance Tomography Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) will be performed repeatedly during the first 14 postnatal days.

    EIT provides continuous bedside imaging of regional lung ventilation without ionizing radiation.

    Derived parameters include:

    • center of ventilation,
    • ventilation distribution,
    • global inhomogeneity index,
    • overdistension,
    • atelectasis/collapse,
    • regional ventilation delay,
    • end-expiratory lung impedance changes. Measurements will also be obtained during clinically indicated PEEP or continuous distending pressure (CDP) optimization procedures.
  7. Proteomic Analysis Blood plasma and tracheal aspirate samples will be collected at predefined intervals during the first 28 days of life whenever clinically indicated samples are obtained.

    Proteomic analyses will investigate inflammatory mediators, growth factors, extracellular matrix proteins, and additional molecular biomarkers associated with lung injury and repair.

    The aim is to identify molecular signatures associated with subsequent development of BPD.

  8. Clinical Data Collection

Clinical variables routinely collected during hospitalization include:

  • gestational age,
  • birth weight,
  • sex,
  • antenatal corticosteroid exposure,
  • Apgar scores,
  • surfactant administration,
  • respiratory support,
  • ventilator settings,
  • oxygen supplementation,
  • respiratory severity score,
  • duration of invasive ventilation,
  • duration of non-invasive respiratory support,
  • postnatal corticosteroid therapy,
  • pulmonary hypertension,
  • patent ductus arteriosus,
  • late-onset sepsis,
  • necrotizing enterocolitis,
  • intraventricular hemorrhage,
  • retinopathy of prematurity,
  • survival,
  • duration of hospitalization.

Statistical Analysis:

Continuous variables will be summarized using appropriate descriptive statistics according to their distribution.

Categorical variables will be presented as frequencies and percentages.

Novel physiological indicators will first be correlated with the Respiratory Severity Score (RSS), calculated as:

RSS = Mean Airway Pressure × Fraction of Inspired Oxygen (MAP × FiO₂) Correlation analyses will use Pearson or Spearman coefficients depending on data distribution.

The predictive ability of each novel indicator for BPD will be evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

For each parameter, the following will be calculated:

  • area under the ROC curve (AUC),
  • optimal cut-off values,
  • sensitivity,
  • specificity,
  • positive predictive value,
  • negative predictive value,
  • likelihood ratios. Logistic regression analyses will be performed to investigate associations between candidate predictors and BPD.

Initially, univariable logistic regression models will be fitted for each predictor separately.

Subsequently, multivariable logistic regression models will evaluate combinations of physiological variables while adjusting for important clinical covariates such as gestational age, birth weight, sex, and antenatal corticosteroid exposure.

Model performance will be assessed using:

  • C-statistic (AUC),
  • calibration,
  • odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals,
  • likelihood ratio tests,
  • internal validation where appropriate. Mutual correlations among novel biomarkers will also be investigated to determine complementary or overlapping information provided by the different technologies.

Primary Outcomes:

  1. Correlation between each indicator and the Respiratory Severity Score.
  2. Diagnostic accuracy of each predictor for bronchopulmonary dysplasia as assessed by receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Secondary Outcomes:

Secondary analyses include:

  1. prediction of BPD using individual physiological parameters;
  2. comparison of multivariable prediction models;
  3. identification of the strongest independent predictors of BPD;
  4. comparison of physiological measurements in intubated and non-intubated infants;
  5. longitudinal changes in lung ultrasound, diaphragmatic ultrasound, targeted echocardiography, forced oscillation measurements, electrical diaphragmatic activity, electrical impedance tomography, and proteomic biomarkers during the first four postnatal weeks;
  6. physiological changes observed during routine PEEP or continuous distending pressure optimization procedures;
  7. effects of respiratory interventions, surfactant administration, corticosteroid therapy, and other treatments on physiological measurements;
  8. associations between physiological markers and major neonatal morbidities;
  9. survival until hospital discharge;
  10. respiratory outcomes during early childhood;
  11. longitudinal pulmonary function assessed by Forced Oscillation Technique at 3 and 5 years of age.

Expected Significance:

This study will comprehensively evaluate several innovative physiological monitoring techniques within a single cohort of extremely preterm infants. By integrating respiratory mechanics, lung imaging, cardiovascular assessment, respiratory muscle activity, ventilation distribution, and molecular biomarkers, the study aims to identify early predictors of bronchopulmonary dysplasia that outperform currently available clinical indicators.

Improved early risk stratification may facilitate individualized respiratory management, optimize therapeutic decision-making, improve patient selection for future interventional studies, and ultimately contribute to reducing the burden of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in extremely preterm infants.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia

Keywords

  • Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia
  • Infant, Extremely Premature
  • Lung
  • Ultrasonography
  • Echocardiography
  • Electric Impedance Tomography
  • Diaphragm
  • Proteomics
  • Respiration
03

In context

Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia

362 studies on the registry are indexed under Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia; 85 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 140 is close to the median of 150 across 99 observational studies indexed under Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia.

Browse Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical University of Vienna is the lead sponsor of 1,109 studies on the registry; 184 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Preterm infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care units of the Medical University of Vienna.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Preterm infants born at \<26 weeks' gestational age, as determined by the best obstetric estimate based on the first day of the last menstrual period and/or first-trimester ultrasonography.
  • Admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of the Medical University of Vienna immediately after birth.
  • Written obtained prospectively from a parent or other legally authorized representative prior to study participation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Major congenital anomaly or anticipated alternative cause for respiratory failure.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
140 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD)

    No BPD: no support. BPD grade 1: nasal cannula ≤ 2 L/min. BPD grade 2: nasal cannula \> 2 L/min or noninvasive positive airway pressure. BPD grade 3: invasive mechanical ventilation.

    Time frame: At 36 weeks' postmenstrual age

  2. Respiratory Severity Score (RSS)

    Daily median Respiratory Severity Score (RSS), calculated as the product of the mean airway pressure (MAP, cmH₂O) and the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂), using all recorded ventilator settings during a 24-hour period.

    Time frame: Day of Life 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 21and Day 28.

  3. Peak inspiratory pressure (RFM-PIP)

    Peak inspiratory pressure during neonatal transition and resuscitation assessed by the Respiratory Function Monitor (RFM)

    Time frame: First hour of life.

  4. Expiratory tidal volume (RFM-VTe)

    Expiratory tidal volume during neonatal transition and resuscitation assessed by the Respiratory Function Monitor (RFM)

    Time frame: Frist hour of life

  5. Lung Ultrasound Score (LUS)

    Lung ultrasound is performed in six lung regions, comprising the upper anterior, lower anterior, and lateral regions of each hemithorax. Each region is assigned a score from 0 to 3 according to the most severe ultrasound pattern observed: 0, normal aeration with A-lines; 1, at least three separated B-lines; 2, coalescent B-lines or a white-lung pattern; and 3, extended consolidation. The regional scores were summed to obtain a total LUS score ranging from 0 (minimum) to 18 (maximum), with higher scores indicating more severe loss of lung aeration.

    Time frame: Day of life 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, and Day 28.

  6. Diaphragm shortening fraction (DSF)

    In M-Mode, the minimal (TET) and the maximal thickness (TIT) during a breathing cycle are measured three times and mean values are considered for the diaphragmatic shortening fraction (DSF) which is determined by the following formula: DSF(%) = 100x(TIT-TET)/TET.

    Time frame: Day of life 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, and Day 28.

  7. Patent Ductus Arteriosus (PDA) status

    PDA status (TnEcho): open/closed (binary variable)

    Time frame: Day of life 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, 32 weeks gestational age (GA) and 36 weeks GA

  8. PDA - shunt pattern

    PDA - shunt direction (TnECHO): non restrictive left-to-right, restrictive left-to-right, bi-directional, right-to-left, no shunt

    Time frame: Day of life 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, 32 weeks gestational age (GA) and 36 weeks GA

  9. Patent Ductus Arteriosus Score

    Patent Ductus Arteriosus Score (PDA Score): Each item is assigned 0, 1, or 2 points. The total score is calculated as the sum of all item scores, ranging from 0 (minimum) to 12 points (maximum). A higher score indicates greater hemodynamic compromise due to the PDA. Items: Mitral E-wave velocity (cm/s), IVRT (ms), pulmonary vein D-wave velocity (cm/s), LA:Ao ratio, LVO (mL/min/kg), and descending aortic flow and/or celiac/middle cerebral artery flow.

    Time frame: Day of life 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, 32 weeks gestational age (GA) and 36 weeks GA

  10. ECHO-Indices of pulmonary hypertension

    tricuspid regurgitation jet-derived right ventricular systolic pressure

    Time frame: Day of life 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, 32 weeks gestational age (GA) and 36 weeks GA

  11. ECHO-Indices of pulmonary hypertension

    interventricular septal curvature represented as eccentricity index

    Time frame: Day of life 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, 32 weeks gestational age (GA) and 36 weeks GA

  12. ECHO-Indices of pulmonary hypertension

    pulmonary vascular resistance indices derived from right ventricular ejection time and pulmonary artery acceleration time

    Time frame: Day of life 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, 32 weeks gestational age (GA) and 36 weeks GA

  13. Respiratory Oscillometry

    Respiratory reactance (Xrs) \[cmH2 O⋅sec/Lt\]

    Time frame: Day of life 1, Day 3, Day 7 and Day 14 (when intubated) and 3 and 5 years of age

  14. Respiratory Oscillometry

    Respiratory resistance (Rrs) \[cmH2 O⋅s/L\].

    Time frame: Day of life 1, Day 3, Day 7 and Day 14 (when intubated) and 3 and 5 years of age

  15. Neurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA)

    NAVA Level \[cmH2 O/μV\] Values will be averaged over a representative period during which the patient is in a restful state.

    Time frame: Day of life 3, Day 7 and Day 14

  16. Neurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA)

    Edimax (maximum electrical activity of the diaphragm during inspiration) \[μV\] Edimin (minmal electrical activity of the diaphragm during inspiration) \[μV\] All values will be averaged over a representative period during which the patient is in a restful state.

    Time frame: Day of life 3, Day 7 and Day 14

  17. Neurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA)

    Inspiration time \[sec\]

    Time frame: Day of life 3, Day 7 and Day 14

  18. Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT)

    Center of ventilation: CoV

    Time frame: Day of life 7 and Day 14

  19. Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT)

    Regional ventilation delay: RVD

    Time frame: Time Frame: Day of life 7 and Day 14

  20. Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT)

    Global inhomogeneity index: GI

    Time frame: Day of life 7 and Day 14

  21. Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT)

    Regional respiratory system compliance

    Time frame: Day of life 7 and Day 14

  22. Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT)

    Regional time constant

    Time frame: Day of life 7 and Day 14

  23. Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT)

    VQ matching

    Time frame: Day of life 7 and Day 14

  24. Proteomics

    Plasma and tracheal protein profiles from 50 µL blood (approximately one drop of blood on a dried blood spot card) and 1 mL of tracheal aspirate.

    Time frame: Day of life 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 14, and Day 28.

  25. ECHO-Indices of volume loading

    pulmonary vein velocity \[m/s\]

    Time frame: Day of life 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, 32 weeks gestational age (GA) and 36 weeks GA

  26. ECHO-Indices of volume loading

    mitral inflow E/A

    Time frame: Day of life 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, 32 weeks gestational age (GA) and 36 weeks GA

  27. ECHO-Indices of volume loading

    isovolumetric relaxation time

    Time frame: Day of life 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, 32 weeks gestational age (GA) and 36 weeks GA

  28. ECHO-Indices of qualitative ventricular function

    TAPSE (Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion) \[sec\]

    Time frame: Day of life 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, 32 weeks gestational age (GA) and 36 weeks GA

  29. ECHO-Indices of qualitative ventricular function

    Fractional shortening (FS) \[%\]

    Time frame: Day of life 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, 32 weeks gestational age (GA) and 36 weeks GA

  30. ECHO-Indices of qualitative ventricular function

    Left and right cardiac output \[mL/min/kg\]

    Time frame: Day of life 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, 32 weeks gestational age (GA) and 36 weeks GA

  31. ECHO-Indices of qualitative ventricular function

    Global strain

    Time frame: Day of life 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, 32 weeks gestational age (GA) and 36 weeks GA

Secondary outcomes

  1. Composite outcome: Death or Grade 3 BPD

    Death: death before 36 weeks' postmenstrual age BPD grade 3: invasive mechanical ventilation at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age

    Time frame: At 36 weeks' postmenstrual age

  2. Ventilation parameters

    Days of invasive ventilaion Days of non-invasive ventilation (excluding CPAP) Days of CPAP Days of HFNC Days of FiO2-supplement

    Time frame: Time to 36 weeks' postmenstrual age

  3. Major morbidities

    necrotizing enterocolitis sepsis intraventricular hemorrhage periventricular leukomalacia retinopathy of prematurity

    Time frame: Time to 36 weeks' postmenstrual age

  4. Neurological outcome

    Neurodevelopmental outcomes at two and five years of corrected age were assessed using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development during standard follow-up visits.

    Time frame: at two and five years of corrected age

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in this study may be shared. Derived variables used in the analyses, together with a data dictionary and the statistical analysis code, may also be provided. Direct identifiers, exact dates, free-text entries, imaging raw data, and variables that could enable participant re-identification will not be shared. Data will be available upon reasonable request, subject to approval of the proposed research, a data-sharing agreement, and applicable ethical and institutional requirements of the Medical University of Vienna. Raw recordings will only be made available where participant confidentiality, consent, data ownership, and file-transfer requirements permit.

Time frame: De-identified individual participant data and supporting information will be available from 3 months until 5 years after publication of the study results.

Access criteria: Qualified researchers whose proposed use of the data has been approved by the study investigators and, where required, by the relevant ethics committee and the Medical University of Vienna will be granted access. Researchers may access de-identified individual participant data underlying the published results, the data dictionary, and the relevant statistical analysis code. Access will be provided following submission of a methodologically sound research proposal, completion of applicable institutional and legal review, and signature of a data-sharing agreement. Approved data will be transferred through a secure, access-controlled institutional platform. The data may only be used for the approved research purpose and may not be redistributed or used to attempt participant re-identification.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Sep 2026; primary completion for Dec 2029, 39 months later.

Of 46 non-industry observational studies under Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia, half reached primary completion within 56 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 84. This study's planned 39 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 48 studies reached it within 56 months; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 84.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 3, 2026
First posted
Aug 18, 2026
StartEst.
Sep 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2029
CompletionEst.
Jun 30, 2030
Last update
Aug 18, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07771387
Responsible party
Tobias Werther (Assoc. Prof. Priv. Doz. DDr., Medical University of Vienna) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 18, 2026
Start date
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 18, 2026

Study contacts

Tobias Werther, MD, PhD
Contact
tobias.werther@meduniwien.ac.at
+43140400 67400

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion