CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07767786Updated Aug 17, 2026

Effects of Pecha Kucha on Presentation Skills in Nursing Students

An interventional study of PowerPoint + Pecha Kucha summary and PowerPoint only in Nursing Education, Presentation Skills and Pecha Kucha, sponsored by Izmir Katip Celebi University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-17.

Sponsored by Izmir Katip Celebi University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
272
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background: Pecha Kucha may support concise and organized health education presentations, but its contribution when added to conventional PowerPoint presentations remains unclear.

Method: In this randomized, posttest-only controlled study, 272 first-year nursing students were assigned to PowerPoint-only or PowerPoint-plus-Pecha Kucha groups. Presentation skills, motivation, and satisfaction were assessed after the presentations.

02

Conditions studied

  • Nursing Education
  • Presentation Skills
  • Pecha Kucha

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Health Education
  • Nursing Education
  • Nursing Students
  • Pecha Kucha
  • Presentation Skills
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • First-year nursing students enrolled in the Healthy Living and Nursing Course during the study period.
  • Voluntary participation in the study and provision of informed consent.
  • No previous structured training in the Pecha Kucha presentation technique.
  • Completion of the assigned presentation and post-intervention data collection forms.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not participating in the assigned presentation.
  • Withdrawal from the study at any stage.
  • Incomplete completion of the data collection instruments.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
272 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PowerPoint + Pecha Kucha summary

    Participants received a 25-minute structured training session on the Pecha Kucha presentation technique. They then prepared and delivered a 25-minute PowerPoint presentation on an assigned health education topic, followed by a 6-minute 40-second Pecha Kucha summary consisting of 20 slides displayed for 20 seconds each.

    Other: PowerPoint + Pecha Kucha summary

  • Active comparator
    PowerPoint only

    Participants prepared and delivered a conventional 25-minute PowerPoint presentation on the assigned health education topic. They did not receive Pecha Kucha training or use the Pecha Kucha presentation format during the study.

    Other: PowerPoint only

Interventions

  • OtherPowerPoint + Pecha Kucha summary

    Participants received a 25-minute structured training session on the Pecha Kucha presentation technique. The training included the purpose and principles of Pecha Kucha, the 20 × 20 format, automatic slide progression, visual slide preparation, timing, and presentation delivery. Participants then prepared and delivered a 25-minute PowerPoint presentation on an assigned health education topic, followed by a 6-minute 40-second Pecha Kucha summary consisting of 20 slides displayed for 20 seconds each.

  • OtherPowerPoint only

    Participants prepared and delivered a conventional 25-minute PowerPoint presentation on the assigned health education topic. No Pecha Kucha training was provided, and the Pecha Kucha presentation format was not used during the study.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Presentation Skills Assessed With the Presentation Skills Assessment Form (PSAF)

    Presentation skills were assessed using the Presentation Skills Assessment Form (PSAF), which consists of 25 items scored as 0, 2, or 4. Total scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better presentation skills.

    Time frame: Immediately post-intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Motivation Assessed With the Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (IMMS)

    Motivation was assessed using the Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (IMMS), which consists of 24 items rated on a five-point Likert scale. Total scores range from 24 to 120, with higher scores indicating greater motivation toward the instructional material.

    Time frame: Immediately post-intervention

  2. Satisfaction With the Presentation Method Assessed Using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Satisfaction with the presentation method was assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 ("not satisfied at all") to 10 ("very satisfied"), with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.

    Time frame: Immediately post-intervention

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Ege Universty
    Izmir, Bornova 35000, Turkey (Türkiye)
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Google Scholar

Related links

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be publicly shared due to participant confidentiality and ethical considerations. De-identified data may be made available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request, subject to institutional and ethical approval.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07767786
Lead sponsor
Izmir Katip Celebi University
Responsible party
Devrim Özge YILMAZ (Principal Investigator, Izmir Katip Celebi University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 17, 2026
Start date
Mar 13, 2023
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2024
Completion
Aug 30, 2024
Last update
Aug 17, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion