ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07762118Updated Nov 5, 2026

Brain Stimulation Paired With Structured Language Learning in Adults

An interventional study of Active transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) and Sham transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) in Language Development and Learning, sponsored by General Neuro Inc.. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-05.

Sponsored by General Neuro Inc. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

Updated Nov 5, 2026Now Enrolling by invitationStart date movedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study investigates whether transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) delivered during structured language-learning sessions affects the rate and quality of second-language acquisition in adults.

Adults who are learning or planning to learn a new language are randomly assigned in equal numbers to receive either active stimulation or sham (placebo) stimulation while completing structured language-learning content. Participants wear a non-invasive transcranial electrical stimulation headset that delivers a low-level electrical current through electrodes resting on the scalp, targeting cortical regions associated with language. Sessions typically last 20 to 30 minutes and may be completed at home or in person at a participating language program.

Language proficiency is measured with a standardized assessment before and after the intervention period, with additional app-derived performance metrics and participant-reported measures collected throughout. A follow-up assessment may be conducted up to 12 months after the intervention ends to evaluate whether any observed effects persist.

In this study the device is applied as a learning aid in healthy adults. It is not used to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.

Read the detailed description

The study is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled investigation. Participants are randomized 1:1 to active or sham stimulation, with stratification by site or cohort as applicable. Neither participants nor the research team conducting outcome assessments are aware of assignment during data collection. Stimulation assignment is held by the Sub-Investigator and is not disclosed to the Principal Investigator until all outcome data are collected and locked and primary analyses are finalized.

Sessions may be delivered by decentralized at-home administration, on-site administration at partner language programs and educational institutions, or a hybrid of the two.

The protocol declares a bounded parameter envelope within which specific stimulation parameters, learning content, partner sites, and assessment instruments may be selected per cohort without protocol amendment. All parameters operate within the LOTES-2023 limited-output standard for transcranial electrical stimulation devices. For adult participants the declared envelope permits 0 to 4 mA average absolute current, a maximum current density of 2 mA/cm2 at the electrode contact area, and a maximum session duration of 60 minutes subject to a 6000 mC total-charge-per-session ceiling. Anticipated session durations are 20 to 30 minutes. Any modality within the transcranial electrical stimulation family may be used, including tDCS, tACS, tRNS, and tPCS.

Intended cortical targets are the left perisylvian region and adjacent association cortex, including Broca's area and Wernicke's area. Montages use standard cephalic or extracephalic placements with at least one electrode positioned on the head.

Because assessment instruments and specific stimulation parameters are selected per cohort within the declared envelope, each enrollment cohort has a cohort-specific Statistical Analysis Plan finalized and locked prior to unblinding of that cohort.

02

Conditions studied

  • Language Development
  • Learning

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • transcranial electrical stimulation
  • tES
  • transcranial direct current stimulation
  • tDCS
  • second language acquisition
  • language learning
  • neuromodulation
  • healthy volunteers
03

In context

Language

243 studies on the registry are indexed under Language; 76 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is close to the median of 65 across 158 interventional studies indexed under Language.

Browse Language studies →

Lead sponsor

General Neuro Inc. is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 years or older
  • Able to understand the consent materials and the process in English, or in another language for which an IRB-approved consent form is available
  • Willing and able to participate in structured language-learning activities for the duration of the intervention period
  • Able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of epilepsy or any seizure disorder
  • Active skin disease, open wounds, or significant skin irritation at electrode contact sites
  • Implanted electronic medical devices where stimulation would be per device manufacturer guidance or investigator judgment after individual risk assessment
  • Significant cognitive impairment that would interfere with or study participation
  • Any other condition that, in the investigator's judgment, would compromise participant safety or the integrity of the study data
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active Stimulation

    Participants receive active transcranial electrical stimulation delivered through a non-invasive scalp-mounted headset while completing structured language-learning content. Stimulation amplitude and session duration are selected per cohort from the declared parameter envelope, with current ramping at session start and end. Sessions are typically 20 to 30 minutes.

    Device: Active transcranial electrical stimulation (tES)

  • Sham comparator
    Sham Stimulation

    Participants receive sham stimulation through the same non-invasive scalp-mounted headset while completing the same structured language-learning content. Sham provides the sensory experience of stimulation onset without sustained current delivery. The specific validated sham approach is selected and documented per cohort.

    Device: Sham transcranial electrical stimulation (tES)

Interventions

  • DeviceActive transcranial electrical stimulation (tES)

    Non-invasive transcranial electrical stimulation delivered by a scalp-mounted headset within the LOTES-2023 limited-output envelope, paired with structured language-learning content. Adult declared range 0 to 4 mA average absolute current, maximum current density 2 mA/cm2 at the electrode contact area, and maximum session duration 60 minutes subject to a 6000 mC per-session total charge limit. Electrodes are placed in standard cephalic or extracephalic montages targeting the left perisylvian region and adjacent association cortex.

  • DeviceSham transcranial electrical stimulation (tES)

    Sham stimulation delivered by the same scalp-mounted headset, providing the initial cutaneous sensory experience of stimulation onset without sustained current delivery, paired with the same structured language-learning content. The specific validated sham approach is selected per cohort and documented in the corresponding cohort plan.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in Pearson PTE Express overall score

    Change in the overall score on the Pearson Test of English (PTE) Express, a computer-delivered, remotely proctored assessment of English language proficiency covering listening, reading, speaking, and writing. The overall score is reported on the Global Scale of English and ranges from 10 to 90, with higher scores indicating greater English proficiency.

    Time frame: Baseline to end of intervention period, up to 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of adverse events

    Number and severity of adverse events reported, including tingling, itching or warmth under the electrodes, skin redness, headache, fatigue, difficulty sleeping, dizziness or lightheadedness, phosphenes, and skin irritation.

    Time frame: Through the intervention period and follow-up, up to 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Balboa-Bandeira Y, Zubiaurre-Elorza L, Ibarretxe-Bilbao N, Ojeda N, Pena J. Effects of transcranial electrical stimulation techniques on second and foreign language learning enhancement in healthy adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia. 2021 Sep 17;160:107985. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107985. Epub 2021 Aug 8. PubMed 34371068 ↗
  • Simonsmeier BA, Grabner RH, Hein J, Krenz U, Schneider M. Electrical brain stimulation (tES) improves learning more than performance: A meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 Jan;84:171-181. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.11.001. Epub 2017 Nov 8. PubMed 29128578 ↗
  • Floel A, Rosser N, Michka O, Knecht S, Breitenstein C. Noninvasive brain stimulation improves language learning. J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Aug;20(8):1415-22. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20098. PubMed 18303984 ↗
  • Meinzer M, Jahnigen S, Copland DA, Darkow R, Grittner U, Avirame K, Rodriguez AD, Lindenberg R, Floel A. Transcranial direct current stimulation over multiple days improves learning and maintenance of a novel vocabulary. Cortex. 2014 Jan;50:137-47. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.07.013. Epub 2013 Aug 6. PubMed 23988131 ↗

Related links

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data are not planned to be shared. De-identified study data may be shared with academic collaborators under data sharing agreements, as described in the study protocol.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2031, 56 months after the start.

Of 93 interventional studies with no phase under Language, half reached primary completion within 33 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 64. This study's planned 56 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 3, 2026
First posted
Aug 13, 2026
StartActual
Sep 8, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jun 1, 2031
CompletionEst.
Jun 1, 2032
Last update
Nov 5, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Recruiting→Enrolling by invitation
changed Nov 5, 2026
Start date
Sep 1, 2026→Sep 8, 2026 (actual)
Nov 5, 2026
Contact
No study contact listed any more: removed a•••@generalneuro.com · •••3348; removed l•••@generalneuro.com
Nov 5, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 5, 2026
    Recruiting→Enrolling by invitation
    Start date Sep 1, 2026→Sep 8, 2026 (now actual)
    Contact No study contact listed any more: removed a•••@generalneuro.com · •••3348; removed l•••@generalneuro.com
    + 2 other changes: verification date and site details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07762118
Lead sponsor
General Neuro Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 13, 2026
Start date
Sep 8, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2031 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 1, 2032 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 5, 2026

Study contacts

Alec Sheffield, PhD
principal investigator · General Neuro Inc.

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion