ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07757165ESMGCUpdated Aug 11, 2026

The Necessity of Surgery in Patients With mGC Achieving Radiological Response After Conversion Therapy

A Phase 2 interventional study of Surgical radical resection (primary lesion + metastatic lesion) and Without surgery, continuing with the original medical treatment in Advanced Metastatic Gastric Cancer, sponsored by Fudan University. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-11.

Sponsored by Fudan University · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2025, registered Jul 2026).
  • Started Nov 2025; still recruiting 1 year later.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
126
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 58 studies in Stomach Neoplasms by Fudan University — 27 open to participants now, 31 under way, 3 of them phase 3. Stomach Neoplasms · Fudan University.

Planned enrollment
19th of 48
126 · median 90
Started
2025
with 7 others
Phase 2
32 of 58
12 open now
Primary completion
2028-10
later than 22 of 30 live
Registered
57th of 58
by date

Among the 58 studies in Stomach Neoplasms by Fudan University, this one is the 19th largest by planned enrollment of the 48 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 8 that started in 2025, is one of 32 in phase 2, reaches primary completion later than 22 of the 30 other live ones, and was the 57th registered.

Stomach Neoplasms

3,401 studies on the registry are indexed under Stomach Neoplasms; 993 are open to participants now.

Browse Stomach Neoplasms studies →

Open to participants now

27 of the 58 studies in Stomach Neoplasms by Fudan University are open now, in 1 country. Recruiting first, the newest first:

21 more — sign in →

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 27 open studies →

Where they have run

Who these studies take

Of the 704 Stomach Neoplasms studies recruiting now, 376 (53%) set no upper age limit and 194 (28%) stop at 75 or younger; 28 take children under 18; 69 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 75 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 58 studies in Stomach Neoplasms by Fudan University, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The core of this study lies in directly addressing the most pressing clinical uncertainty in the current field: For patients with advanced metastatic gastric cancer who have achieved significant radiological remission after conversion therapy, should the addition of radical surgical intervention on top of the best medical treatment bring clear survival benefits to these patients? Answering this question is of extreme importance and urgency, directly affecting the treatment decisions, quality of life, and survival outcomes of a large number of patients.

Read the detailed description

The innovation and scientific nature of this study lie in its adoption of a multi-center, randomized controlled Phase II study design for the first time. It directly compares the efficacy differences between "surgery + postoperative adjuvant therapy" and "simple continuation of medical treatment" for this specific population, aiming to eliminate selection bias and confirm the causal relationship. We strictly limited the enrolled population to those with "significant imaging remission and technically resectable at R0 level" by MDT assessment, ensuring the homogeneity of the research subjects and the specificity of the questions. The primary research endpoint was set as progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), R0 resection rate, quality of life (QoL), and treatment-related toxic side effects, allowing for a comprehensive evaluation.

Carrying out this study has significant scientific and clinical value. Its results will provide Level 1 evidence-based medical evidence for the treatment strategy of this population. If the surgical group shows superiority, it will firmly establish the position of surgery and promote it to become the standard treatment; if the results are negative (equivalence between the two groups or the surgical group is inferior), it will avoid a large number of patients suffering from unnecessary surgical trauma, promoting the treatment model to return to a core of systematic treatment, thereby changing global clinical guidelines. At the same time, the study has important health economics significance, helping to allocate limited medical resources to truly benefit patients. Through exploratory research on biological specimens, it can also deepen the understanding of the biological behavior of advanced gastric cancer and provide clues for more precise patient screening in the future.

03

Conditions studied

  • Advanced Metastatic Gastric Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Advanced metastatic gastric cancer
  • Conversion therapy
  • Radiological response
  • Surgery
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age and : The age range is 18 to 75 years (inclusive), and the participant must voluntarily participate in this study and sign the patient informed consent approved by the ethics committee.
  2. Pathological Diagnosis: Gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma confirmed by histological or cytological examination.
  3. Disease Staging: Newly diagnosed, unresectable stage IV disease (according to the 8th edition of the AJCC staging system), confirmed by the multidisciplinary team (MDT) of the research center to be unable to undergo radical surgical resection. The types of include but are not limited to: unresectable distant lymph node metastasis (such as beyond the abdominal aorta trunk, supraclavicular lymph nodes, etc.); distant organ metastasis (such as liver, lungs, peritoneum, ovaries, etc.).
  4. Conversion Therapy and Efficacy:

    1. Has received 4-6 cycles of standard conversion therapy. The treatment plan should be based on the latest clinical guidelines and molecular typing (such as fluorouracil/platinum double or triple drug chemotherapy, combined with anti- treatment (for HER2-positive patients) or (PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, such as when CPS ≥ 5 or MSI-H, etc.).
    2. After conversion therapy, according to the 1.1 standard, confirmed by the independent imaging assessment committee (IRC) or at least two senior radiologists, the efficacy reaches complete response (CR) or partial response (PR).
  5. Surgical Feasibility Assessment: Re-evaluated by the MDT of the research center (must include senior gastrointestinal surgeons, oncologists, and radiologists), it is considered that all known lesions (primary and metastatic lesions) can be technically achieved R0 resection, and the patient is expected to be safely and tolerably able to undergo surgery.
  6. Physical Condition: (ECOG) performance status score (PS) of 0 or 1.
  7. Good Organ Function (measured within 14 days before randomization), meeting the following laboratory test value standards:

    1. Hematological System:

      (ANC) ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L count (PLT) ≥ 100 × 10⁹/L (Hb) ≥ 90 g/L

    2. Liver Function:

      Serum total (TBIL) ≤ 1.5 times the (ULN) (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤ 2.5 × ULN (if liver metastasis, then ≤ 5 × ULN)

    3. Renal Function:

    Serum creatinine (Cr) ≤ 1.5 × ULN, or rate (Ccr) ≥ 50 mL/min (Cockcroft-Gault formula)

  8. Female patients of childbearing age must have a negative serum pregnancy test within 7 days before randomization, and all patients (regardless of gender) must agree to take effective measures during the study and within 6 months after treatment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pathological type: Other pathological types, such as squamous cell carcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, undifferentiated carcinoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), etc.
  2. Treatment and efficacy:

    1. During the conversion therapy, disease progression (PD) was confirmed after assessment.
    2. Previously received systemic anti-tumor treatment for advanced gastric cancer (except for conversion therapy).
    3. Previously received radical radiotherapy for the stomach or lesions.
  3. Surgical :

    1. According to MDT assessment, there are residual lesions that cannot be surgically removed (such as diffuse peritoneal metastasis that cannot achieve satisfactory tumor reduction, extensive liver metastasis that cannot preserve sufficient functional liver tissue, etc.).
    2. There are severe internal medical comorbidities that significantly affect surgical safety, and the anesthesiology and surgical physicians have evaluated that the surgical risk is extremely high, for example:

    Uncontrolled heart failure ( cardiac function class III-IV), unstable angina or myocardial infarction within 6 months.

    Severe (COPD) or other severe respiratory diseases, which are expected to be intolerant to general anesthesia.

    Uncontrollable severe infection.

  4. Past and coexisting disease history:

    1. In the past 5 years, had other active malignant tumors, except for cured skin basal cell carcinoma, cervical carcinoma in situ, etc.
    2. Had any uncontrolled severe clinical problems (such as severe mental or neurological diseases) that affected the compliance with the protocol or interfered with the interpretation of the research results.
  5. Laboratory test abnormalities: Any serious and uncontrolled laboratory test abnormalities were found. The investigator considered that participating in this study would bring significant risks.
  6. Pregnancy and lactation: Pregnant or lactating women.
  7. Other: Known to have a severe allergic history to any drugs (chemotherapy drugs, targeted drugs, immunotherapies, anesthetics, etc.) used in the study protocol. The investigator believed that there were any other situations that were not suitable for participating in this clinical study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(18)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Line of therapy

A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.

“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.

HER2

HER2 is a protein, made from the ERBB2 gene, that drives the growth of some cancers. A study may look for a level of the protein, extra copies of the gene, or a particular change in it.

In breast cancer, protein tests are read as HER2-positive, HER2-low or HER2-negative; other cancers use their own rules. Check which test result the study requires.

PD-1, PD-L1 and checkpoint inhibitors

PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4 are proteins that act as brakes on the immune system. Checkpoint inhibitors, such as pembrolizumab or nivolumab, block them so the immune system can attack a cancer.

PD-L1 can also be measured in a tumour sample. Some scores count stained tumour cells only (TPS); others also count certain immune cells (CPS). The study names the score and the minimum it uses.

RECIST

The standard rules for measuring tumours on CT or MRI scans, to tell whether a cancer is shrinking, stable or growing during treatment.

“Measurable disease per RECIST 1.1” usually means at least one tumour 10 mm or more at its longest on a CT scan, or a lymph node 15 mm or more across its short axis.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
126 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    The surgical group

    Surgical radical resection (primary lesion + metastatic lesion) + postoperative adjuvant therapy

    Procedure: Surgical radical resection (primary lesion + metastatic lesion)

  • Experimental
    The non-surgical group

    Without surgery, continue with the original medical treatment plan until the disease progresses or intolerable toxicity occurs.

    Drug: Without surgery, continuing with the original medical treatment

Interventions

  • ProcedureSurgical radical resection (primary lesion + metastatic lesion)

    Surgical radical resection (primary lesion + metastatic lesion)

  • DrugWithout surgery, continuing with the original medical treatment

    Without surgery, continue with the original medical treatment plan until the disease progresses or intolerable toxicity occurs.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 2-year PFS

    Two-year progression-free survival rate

    Time frame: 2 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. 2-year OS

    2 year Overall Survival

    Time frame: 2 year

  2. The R0 resection rate

    The R0 resection rate of surgery group

    Time frame: 2 year

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Janjigian YY, Shitara K, Moehler M, Garrido M, Salman P, Shen L, Wyrwicz L, Yamaguchi K, Skoczylas T, Campos Bragagnoli A, Liu T, Schenker M, Yanez P, Tehfe M, Kowalyszyn R, Karamouzis MV, Bruges R, Zander T, Pazo-Cid R, Hitre E, Feeney K, Cleary JM, Poulart V, Cullen D, Lei M, Xiao H, Kondo K, Li M, Ajani JA. First-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric, gastro-oesophageal junction, and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (CheckMate 649): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021 Jul 3;398(10294):27-40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00797-2. Epub 2021 Jun 5. PubMed 34102137 ↗
  • Bang YJ, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, Chung HC, Shen L, Sawaki A, Lordick F, Ohtsu A, Omuro Y, Satoh T, Aprile G, Kulikov E, Hill J, Lehle M, Ruschoff J, Kang YK; ToGA Trial Investigators. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010 Aug 28;376(9742):687-97. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61121-X. Epub 2010 Aug 19. PubMed 20728210 ↗
  • Smyth EC, Nilsson M, Grabsch HI, van Grieken NC, Lordick F. Gastric cancer. Lancet. 2020 Aug 29;396(10251):635-648. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31288-5. PubMed 32861308 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Nov 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2028, 35 months after the start.

Of 295 non-industry phase 2 interventional studies under Stomach Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 57 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 33 and three quarters within 76. This study's planned 35 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 360 studies reached it within 50 months; a quarter within 31 and three quarters within 75.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 29, 2026
First posted
Aug 11, 2026
StartActual
Nov 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Oct 30, 2028
CompletionEst.
Oct 30, 2030
Last update
Aug 11, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07757165
Lead sponsor
Fudan University
Responsible party
Dazhi Xu (Director of Gastric Surgery Department, Fudan University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 11, 2026
Start date
Nov 1, 2025
Primary completion
Oct 30, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 30, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 11, 2026

Study contacts

Xu Dazhi Director of Gastric Surgery Department, Doctoral candidate
Contact
xudzh@shca.org.cn
+8618121299796
Yang Han, Doctoral candidate
Contact
hanyang0811@163.com
+8618121299599

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion