ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07754344Updated Aug 10, 2026

Dural Medical Adhesive for Watertight Sealing in Dural Repair

A Phase 3 interventional study of Dural medical adhesive and Standard dural reinforcement surgery in Spinal Dural Defect, Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage and Spinal Neurosurgery, sponsored by Medprin Regenerative Medical Technologies Co., Ltd.. Completed at 6 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-10.

Sponsored by Medprin Regenerative Medical Technologies Co., Ltd. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 2 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2024, registered Aug 2026).
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
141
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a prospective, multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled superiority clinical trial of dural medical adhesive for watertight sealing after primary spinal dural repair to prevent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage. A total of 141 patients with intraoperative CSF leakage after primary dural repair from 7 medical centers will be enrolled at a 2:1 randomization ratio (94 in adhesive group, 47 in standard treatment control group). Intraoperative watertight sealing success rate is the primary outcome. Postoperative CSF leakage rate at day 10±5 and day 90±7, drainage volume/duration, and adverse events/serious adverse events within 90 days are secondary outcomes to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the investigational device.

Read the detailed description

The investigational product is dural medical adhesive indicated for watertight sealing of dural defects in spinal surgery to prevent CSF leakage. This superiority trial adopts a prospective, multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled design with 7 participating neurosurgical centers across China. Eligible patients are adults with visible CSF leakage after one-layer primary dural repair confirmed by intraoperative visualization, Valsalva maneuver or hemostatic sponge test. Subjects are randomly assigned 2:1 via sealed envelopes to two groups.

Intervention group: standard primary dural repair + dural medical adhesive evenly coated on the repair site for instant watertight sealing; a second application is allowed if persistent leakage occurs after first use.

Control group: standard treatment including autologous fat/fascia/muscle graft or reinforced suture after primary repair without medical adhesive.

All participants receive follow-up at postoperative day 10±5 (Visit 1) and day 90±7 (Visit 2). Primary efficacy endpoint is intraoperative successful watertight sealing without CSF leakage. Secondary endpoints include postoperative CSF leakage incidence at two time points, postoperative drainage volume and indwelling duration, and overall safety profiles including all adverse events and serious adverse events within 90 days post-operation. Statistical analyses will be performed on Full Analysis Set (FAS) and Per Protocol Set (PPS) for efficacy, and Safety Set (SS) for safety evaluation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spinal Dural Defect
  • Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage
  • Spinal Neurosurgery

Keywords

  • dural repair
  • CSF leak
  • dural sealant
  • spinal surgery
03

In context

Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak

41 studies on the registry are indexed under Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 141 is above the median of 74 across 24 interventional studies indexed under Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak.

Browse Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak studies →

Lead sponsor

Medprin Regenerative Medical Technologies Co., Ltd. is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 18-75 years old, any gender.
  • Undergoing spinal surgery with dural incision, traumatic tear or defect requiring primary repair.
  • Intraoperative confirmed CSF leakage after primary dural repair via naked eye, microscopy, Valsalva maneuver or hemostatic sponge test.
  • Patient or legal guardian voluntarily signs written form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participated in another interventional clinical trial within 1 month before surgery.
  • Severe cardiac, hepatic, renal or hematological disease unable to tolerate spinal surgery.
  • Known to any component of dural medical adhesive (polyethylenimine, 4-arm PEG succinimidyl glutarate, brilliant blue, ε-poly-L-lysine hydrochloride).
  • History of severe anaphylaxis or immunodeficiency disorders.
  • Expected survival less than 3 months post-operation.
  • Pregnant, lactating female or women planning pregnancy within 3 months after surgery.
  • Poor treatment compliance judged by investigator, unable to complete full follow-up visits.
  • Unable to understand trial information and cooperate with assessment.
  • Intraoperative dural defect that cannot receive primary sutured repair.
  • Class III contaminated surgical wound or active infection at operation site.
  • Any other condition judged inappropriate for trial participation by investigator.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
141 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Dural Medical Adhesive Treatment Group

    After routine primary suture repair of spinal dural defects and intraoperative confirmation of cerebrospinal fluid leakage, evenly apply the investigational dural medical adhesive to the sutured repair area. After the adhesive is fully cured, perform Valsalva maneuver / hemostatic sponge test to recheck watertight sealing status. One additional application of the adhesive is permitted if leakage persists after the first application. Postoperative routine drainage and standardized follow-up are implemented.

    Device: Dural medical adhesive

  • Active comparator
    Standard Conventional Treatment Control Group

    After routine primary suture repair of spinal dural defects with confirmed intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage, adopt clinically conventional reinforcement measures: autologous fat/fascia/muscle transplantation or supplementary interrupted suturing for leak blocking, without using any dural sealing adhesive products. Recheck sealing effect intraoperatively by Valsalva maneuver / hemostatic sponge test, followed by postoperative routine drainage and identical follow-up schedule as the experimental group.

    Procedure: Standard dural reinforcement surgery

Interventions

  • DeviceDural medical adhesive

    After primary suture repair of spinal dural defect with intraoperative confirmed cerebrospinal fluid leakage, evenly coat the adhesive over the sutured area. After curing, use Valsalva maneuver or hemostatic sponge test to check sealing effect. One repeated application is permitted if leakage persists. Postoperative drainage and unified follow-up schedule are performed.

  • ProcedureStandard dural reinforcement surgery

    After primary suture repair of spinal dural defect with intraoperative confirmed cerebrospinal fluid leakage, adopt conventional clinical reinforcement methods including autologous fat/fascia/muscle graft or supplementary suturing, without using any dural sealing adhesive products. Intraoperative sealing verification and postoperative follow-up schedule are identical to the experimental group.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Intraoperative Watertight Sealing Success Rate

    Proportion of subjects with no intraoperative CSF leakage confirmed by direct vision, Valsalva maneuver or hemostatic sponge test after assigned intervention.

    Time frame: Intraoperatively (Visit 0)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative CSF Leakage Rate at Day 10±5

    Incidence of clinically confirmed CSF leakage via drainage fluid volume, MRI imaging or intracranial hypotension symptoms within 10±5 days post-surgery.

    Time frame: Postoperative day 10±5 (Visit 1)

  2. Postoperative CSF Leakage Rate at Day 90±7

    Incidence of delayed CSF leakage, pseudomeningocele or wound CSF leakage confirmed by MRI or clinical manifestations within 90±7 days post-operation.

    Time frame: Postoperative day 90±7 (Visit 2)

  3. Postoperative Drainage Volume and Drain Indwelling Duration

    Daily drainage fluid volume from surgical drain and total catheter retention time for patients with postoperative drainage tube placement.

    Time frame: Postoperative day 10±5 (Visit 1)

  4. Incidence of All Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events

    Overall occurrence rate of treatment-emergent adverse events and serious adverse events related or unrelated to the dural medical adhesive throughout the 90-day follow-up period.

    Time frame: From surgery to postoperative day 90±7

07

Study locations

6 sites
  • Peking University Third Hospital
    Beijing, China
  • Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University
    Beijing, China
  • Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
    Guangzhou, China
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
    Nanchang, China
  • Shenzhen Second People's Hospital
    Shenzhen, China
  • Xi'an Honghui Hospital
    Xi'an, China
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from May 2024 to primary completion in Jun 2025, 12 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 4, 2026
First posted
Aug 10, 2026
StartActual
May 29, 2024
Primary completionActual
Jun 19, 2025
CompletionActual
Jul 28, 2025
Last update
Aug 10, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07754344
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 10, 2026
Start date
May 29, 2024
Primary completion
Jun 19, 2025
Completion
Jul 28, 2025
Last update
Aug 10, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion