ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07830797Updated Sep 21, 2026

Absorbable Hemostatic Fluid Gelatin Trial

A Phase 3 interventional study of Absorbable Hemostatic Fluid Gelatin and Absorbable Hemostatic Fluid Gelatin SURGIFLO Haemostatic Matrix in Surgical Bleeding, sponsored by Medprin Regenerative Medical Technologies Co., Ltd.. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-21.

Sponsored by Medprin Regenerative Medical Technologies Co., Ltd. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
324
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of an absorbable hemostatic fluid gelatin for surgical hemostasis. Subjects are patients undergoing elective/semi-elective surgeries in General Surgery, Orthopedics, and Gynecology. The test group receives the investigational device, while the control group receives a marketed predicate device (SURGIFLO). The primary outcome is the 5-minute hemostasis success rate at the Target Bleeding Site (TBS).

Read the detailed description

This trial enrolls 324 participants (162 per group) across General Surgery, Orthopedics, and Gynecology, with equal allocation per specialty (108 each). Each subject has one Target Bleeding Site (TBS). After conventional hemostasis fails or is not applicable, subjects are randomized to receive either the test or control device. Time from product application (T0) to hemostasis (TF) is recorded. Postoperative follow-up extends to 4 months, assessing adverse events, drainage volume, and laboratory changes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Surgical Bleeding

Keywords

  • Hemostasis
  • Absorbable Gelatin
  • Fluid Gelatin
  • Surgical Hemostasis
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Medprin Regenerative Medical Technologies Co., Ltd. is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 1. Age ≥18 years;
  • 2. Scheduled for elective/semi-elective surgery in General Surgery, Orthopedics, or Gynecology;
  • 3. Signed . (Intra-op): 1. Presence of a suitable Target Bleeding Site (TBS).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Allergy to porcine gelatin or refusal of porcine-derived products;
  • 2. >1.5 or \<100×10⁹/L;
  • 3. Severe hepatic/renal dysfunction;
  • 4. Pregnancy/lactation;
  • 5. Participation in another trial within 30 days;
  • 6. Unsuitable per investigator.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
324 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Absorbable Hemostatic Fluid Gelatin

    Composed of fluid gelatin preloaded in a syringe with catheter components; gelatin derived from porcine skin. Applied to TBS and covered with moist gauze during surgery.

    Device: Absorbable Hemostatic Fluid Gelatin

  • Active comparator
    SURGIFLO™ Hemostatic Matrix

    This product is a flowable hemostatic material made from a porcine skin-derived gelatin matrix, intended to control bleeding from capillaries, veins, and small arteries during surgical procedures

    Device: Absorbable Hemostatic Fluid Gelatin SURGIFLO Haemostatic Matrix

Interventions

  • DeviceAbsorbable Hemostatic Fluid Gelatin

    Composed of fluid gelatin preloaded in a syringe with catheter components; gelatin derived from porcine skin. Applied to TBS and covered with moist gauze during surgery.

  • DeviceAbsorbable Hemostatic Fluid Gelatin SURGIFLO Haemostatic Matrix

    This product is a flowable hemostatic material made from a porcine skin-derived gelatin matrix, intended to control bleeding from capillaries, veins, and small arteries during surgical procedures

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 5-Minute Hemostasis Success Rate

    Time frame: Intraoperative (Day of surgery)

Secondary outcomes

  1. 3-Minute Hemostasis Success Rate

    Time frame: Intraoperative (Day of surgery)

  2. Wound Hemostasis Time (T)

    Time frame: Intraoperative (Day of surgery)

  3. Total Postoperative Drainage Volume

    Time frame: Perioperative period (time from end of surgery to patient's removal of drainage tube)

  4. Device Usability Evaluation

    Evaluate device usability on the day of surgery. Evaluation items include: 1. Convenience of device assembly; 2. Convenience of product use; 3. Wound adhesion quality; 4. Wound applicability (evaluating applicability across different wound types, such as diffuse bleeding wounds, irregular wounds, and deep cavity wounds, etc.). A 1-5 scoring scale is used: 5=Excellent, 4=Good, 3=Fair, 2=Poor, 1=Very Poor/Unacceptable. Items scoring \<3 (Poor, Very Poor, Unacceptable) require special attention, and the reasons must be documented.

    Time frame: Intraoperative (Day of surgery)

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07830797
Collaborators
Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Southern Medical University, China, Xi'an Honghui Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 21, 2026
Start date
Sep 8, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 8, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 21, 2026

Study contacts

Yuchuan Zhang
Contact
zhangyuchuan@medprin.com
+86 18666661546

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion