ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07753954IRENAUpdated Aug 10, 2026

Medical Imaging to Re-evaluate Elacestrant Clinical Usage

A Phase 2 interventional study of Elacestrant in ER+ / HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer, sponsored by Jules Bordet Institute. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-10.

Sponsored by Jules Bordet Institute · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
160
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether elacestrant, an oral selective oestrogen receptor degrader, can improve outcomes in patients with oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer without detectable ESR1 mutation after progression on endocrine therapy plus a CDK4/6 inhibitor.

The study aims to answer two key questions:

  • Does [18F]-fluor-oestradiol positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FES-PET/CT) result (homogeneous vs. heterogeneous) determine the efficacy of elacestrant in participants with advanced/metastatic ER-positive breast cancer and ESR1-mut-nd?
  • Does 18F-FES-PET/CT imaging predict patient outcomes, including progression-free survival, overall survival, or tumor response?

There is no comparison group in this study. All participants receive elacestrant. Researchers will compare outcomes in people who have different levels of estrogen-receptor heterogeneity on FES-PET/CT imaging.

Participants in the study will:

  • Take elacestrant 345 mg orally once a day, in 28-day treatment cycles (the dose may be lowered to 258 mg if needed due to side effects).
  • Undergo 18F-FES-PET/CT and 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging both at the beginning of the study and as part of routine clinical evaluation every 8 weeks
  • Undergo blood sample collection every 8 weeks
  • If selected for a sub-study, undergo an additional FES-PET/CT scan 4 weeks after starting treatment
02

Conditions studied

  • ER+ / HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Advanced breast cancer
  • ER+
  • HER2-
  • Elacestrant
  • Imaging
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

14,825 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 3,319 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 160 is above the median of 72 across 10,896 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Jules Bordet Institute is the lead sponsor of 106 studies on the registry; 27 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 18 years old
  2. performance status ≤ 1
  3. Must have or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of breast cancer with evidence of locally advanced disease not amenable to therapy with curative intent or disease not amenable to curative therapy.
  4. Documentation of ER-positive (≥10% positive stained cells) and negative (0-1+ by immunohistochemistry [IHC] or 2+ and negative by in situ hybridization [ISH] test) advanced or metastatic breast cancer according to the most recent American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines as per local assessment. ER-positive/HER2-negative status should be confirmed in metastatic setting, with exception of patients with bone and lung only disease, where this might not possible.
  5. Must be appropriate candidates for endocrine monotherapy.
  6. Must have previously received no more than 1 line of endocrine therapy:

    • a) Radiological or objective evidence of disease progression on prior treatment with a CDK4/6 inhibitor in combination with endocrine therapy (either an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant) for advanced disease after at least 12 months of treatment.
    • b) Patients receiving CDK4/6 inhibitor-based therapy in the setting are also eligible provided that disease progression is confirmed after finishing treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitor but no more than 12 months following CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment completion in this scenario, this will count as 1 line of ET for mBC.
  7. ESR1 mutation not detected, test performed after ET plus CDK4/6 inhibitor. This local determination will be performed in blood using a validated assay.
  8. No to perform 18F-FES-PET/CT.

    - a) Patients will not be selected when treated with SERMs or SERDs ≤ 5 weeks prior to inclusion as these drugs interfere with the accessibility of the ER.

  9. ≥ 6 months.
  10. At screening FDG-PET/CT at least two "target" lesions are required to fulfil the following criteria:

    • a) anatomically transaxial diameter ≥ 1.5 cm AND
    • b) metabolically assessable with a maximum standard uptake value corrected for lean body mass (SUVmax) ≥ 1.5 x SUVmean + 2 standard deviations (SD) of the liver measured in a 3-cm-diameter spherical volume of interest (VOI) in normal liver parenchyma.
    • c) In case of suspected liver metastasis, a lesion should have a SUVmax ≥ 2 x SUVmean + 3 SD of the blood pool measured in a 1 cm-diameter VOI within descending thoracic aorta. Lesions pre-treated with irradiation are not eligible for consideration as "target" lesions.
  11. Female participants must be women, defined by 1 of the following criteria:

    • a) Prior bilateral oophorectomy (≥ 28 days prior to Day 1 of treatment).
    • b) Age ≥ 60 years with amenorrhea ≥ 1 year since last menses.
    • c) Age \< 60 years: i. Cessation of regular menses for at least 12 consecutive months with no alternative pathological or physiological cause; OR ii. serum oestradiol and/or FSH levels within the laboratory's reference range for post-menopausal females
    • d) Pre- or perimenopausal women, who do not meet the criteria for post-menopausal status must be concurrently receiving a LHRH analogue (goserelin), as per standard of care, for at least 28 days (if shorter, post-menopausal levels of serum oestradiol/FSH must be confirmed analytically) prior to study enrolment and are planning to continue LHRH agonist treatment during the study.
  12. Resolution of all toxic effects of prior therapies or surgical procedures to Grade ≤ 1 (except for toxicities not considered a safety risk for the patient at Investigator's discretion).
  13. Adequate organ function as defined below:

    • a) Haematologic function: i. ≥ 1.0 x 109/L. ii. count ≥ 75 x 109/L. iii. ≥ 9.0 g/dL.
    • b) Renal function: i. Estimated ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m2 or creatinine. clearance calculated by equation ≥ 30 mL/min.
    • c) Hepatic function i. (ALT) ≤ 3x (ULN; in the presence of liver metastases, ALT ≤ 5x ULN).

    ii. Total ≤ ULN or total bilirubin ≤ 1.5x ULN with direct bilirubin ≤ ULN of the laboratory in participants with documented Gilbert's Syndrome.

    - d) Chemistry i. Potassium, sodium, calcium (corrected for albumin), magnesium, and phosphorus v6.0 Grade ≤ 1. If screening assessments are abnormal, chemistry assessments may be repeated up to 2 times; participants may receive appropriate supplementation or treatment (e.g., for hypercalcemia) prior to re-assessment e) Coagulation i. (INR) ≤ 1.5

  14. Subject is willing and able to comply with the protocol for the duration of the study including treatment and scheduled visits and examinations.
  15. Signed Form (ICF) obtained prior to any study related procedure.

    Inclusion criterion applicable to FRANCE only:

  16. Affiliated to the French Social Security System (applicable only to participants treated in France)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prior treatment with elacestrant, or an SERD or ER antagonist.
  2. Prior chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic disease.
  3. Prior anti-cancer or investigational drug treatment within the following windows:

    • a) Fulvestrant treatment (last injection) \< 5 weeks before first dose of study drug.
    • b) Any other endocrine therapy \< 14 days before first dose of study drug.
    • c) Chemotherapy or other anti-cancer therapy \< 21 days before first dose of study drug.
    • d) Any investigational anti-cancer drug therapy \< 28 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is shorter) before the first dose of study drug.
  4. Radiation therapy (other than CNS directed) within 14 days before the first dose of study drug. CNS directed radiation therapy within 28 days before the first dose of study drug.
  5. Active or newly diagnosed , including meningeal carcinomatosis. Note: Patients with stable brain or subdural metastases are allowed if the subject has completed local therapy and was on a stable or decreasing dose of at pre-study treatment period baseline for management of brain metastasis for at least 4 weeks before starting treatment in this study. Any signs (e.g., radiologic) or symptoms of brain metastases must be stable for at least 4 weeks before starting study treatment. If anticonvulsant medication is required, participants must be stable on a non-enzyme inducing anticonvulsant regimen (Appendix 1).
  6. Participants with advanced, symptomatic visceral spread, that are at risk of life-threatening complications in the short term, including massive uncontrolled effusions (peritoneal, pleural, pericardial), pulmonary lymphangitis, or liver involvement >50%.
  7. Intact uterus with a history of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (atypical endometrial hyperplasia or higher-grade lesion).
  8. Diagnosis of any other within 5 years before enrollment, except for adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or second primary breast cancer.
  9. Any of the following within 6 months before enrolment: myocardial infarction, severe/unstable angina, ongoing cardiac dysrhythmias of NCI CTCAE v6.0 Grade ≥2, prolonged ≥ Grade 2 (i.e., > 480 msec), uncontrolled atrial fibrillation of any grade, coronary/peripheral artery bypass graft, heart failure ≥ Class II as defined by the guidelines, or cerebrovascular accident including .
  10. Coagulopathy or any history of coagulopathy within the past 6 months, including history of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. However, participants with the following conditions will be allowed to participate:

    • a) Adequately treated catheter-related venous thrombosis occurring > 28 days prior to the first dose of study drug.
    • b) Treatment with an anticoagulant, e.g., warfarin or heparin, for a thrombotic event occurring > 6 months before enrolment, or for an otherwise stable and allowed medical condition (e.g., well controlled atrial fibrillation), provided dose and coagulation parameters (as defined by local standard of care) are stable for at least 28 days prior to the first dose of study drug and provided that an AI would be an appropriate therapy for the subject.
  11. Known difficulty in tolerating oral medications or conditions which would impair absorption of oral medications such as: uncontrolled nausea or vomiting (i.e., CTCAE ≥ Grade 3 despite antiemetic therapy), ongoing gastrointestinal obstruction/motility disorder, malabsorption syndrome, or prior gastric bypass.
  12. Unable or unwilling to avoid prescription medications, over-the-counter medications, dietary/herbal supplements (e.g., St. John's wort), and/or foods (e.g., grapefruit, pomelos, star fruit, Seville oranges and their juices) that are moderate/strong inhibitors or inducers of activity (Appendix 1). Participation will be allowed if the medication, supplements, and/or foods are discontinued for at least 5 half-lives or 14 days (whichever is longer) prior to initiation of study treatment study enrolment and for the duration of the study.
  13. Major surgery \< 28 days before the first dose of study drug
  14. Pregnant and/or lactating women, or intending to become pregnant during the study.
  15. Women of refusing to use 1 highly effective method of prior study entry, during the course of the study and at least 120 days after the last administration of study treatment.
  16. Men with childbearing potential partner refusing to use condom during the course of this study and for at least 120 days after the last administration of the study treatment.
  17. Participant with a significant medical, neuro-psychiatric, or surgical condition, currently uncontrolled by treatment, which, in the principal investigator's opinion, may interfere with completion of the study.
  18. Known reactions to the study drugs or to any .

    Exclusion criterion applicable to FRANCE ONLY:

  19. Vulnerable persons according to the article L.1121-6 of the "Code de la Santé Publique" (CSP), adults who are the subject of a measure of legal protection or unable to express their consent according to article L.1121-8 of the CSP.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(31)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

HER2

HER2 is a protein, made from the ERBB2 gene, that drives the growth of some cancers. A study may look for a level of the protein, extra copies of the gene, or a particular change in it.

In breast cancer, protein tests are read as HER2-positive, HER2-low or HER2-negative; other cancers use their own rules. Check which test result the study requires.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant

Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

CTCAE grade

The US National Cancer Institute’s scale of how severe an adverse event is — any unwanted medical event during a study, such as a symptom, an illness or an abnormal test result, whether or not a treatment caused it. Whether it did is judged separately.

1
Mild.
2
Moderate.
3
Severe.
4
Life-threatening.
5
Death due to the event.

“Side effects of earlier treatment resolved to grade 1 or less” means they have settled to mild or gone.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Brain metastases

Cancer deposits in the brain from a cancer that started elsewhere in the body (CNS metastases include the spinal cord).

Studies differ: some leave out any brain metastases, some accept ones treated and stable for some weeks. Check what this study allows.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

CYP3A (CYP3A4) inhibitors and inducers

CYP3A is a group of enzymes, mainly CYP3A4, in the liver and gut that break down many medicines. Some medicines, supplements and foods (grapefruit, St John’s wort) slow them down or speed them up, which changes how much of a study drug stays in the body.

Studies list them so they can be avoided or switched; bring a list of everything you take, including supplements.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
160 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Elacestrant Treatment for ER-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer Without ESR1 Mutation

    Drug: Elacestrant

Interventions

  • Elacestrant is an orally available tetrahydronaphthalene compound that acts as selective oestrogen receptor alpha (ERα) antagonist with receptor degrading activity (e.g., selective oestrogen receptor degrader, SERD) and is being developed as a monotherapy agent and in combinations for the treatment of oestrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Progression-free survival in participants with ESR1-mut-nd

    To determine the efficacy of elacestrant by 18F-FES-PET/CT result (homogeneous vs. heterogeneous) in participants with advanced/metastatic ER-positive breast cancer and ESR1-mut-nd.

    Time frame: From first day of treatment until 6 months after first day of treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by central review as per (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors) RECIST v1.143/ PET Response Criteria In Solid Tumours (PERCIST)

    To determine the efficacy of elacestrant, PFS, by central review as per RECIST v1.143/ PERCIST39,44 by 18F-FES-PET/CT result.

    Time frame: From the date of treatment initiation to the date of disease progression or death from any cause, up to the clinical data cut-off (approx. 2 years after the last participant has tarted treatment with elacestrant)

  2. Objective Response Rate (ORR) by central review, defined as per RECIST v1.143/ PERCIST

    To evaluate the efficacy of elacestrant, by objective response rate (ORR), in the full analysis set and by 18F-FES-PET/CT result.

    Time frame: From the date of treatment initiation to the date of disease progression or death from any cause, up to the clinical data cut-off (approx. 2 years after the last participant has tarted treatment with elacestrant)

  3. Overall Survival (OS), defined as time from the date of treatment start to the date of death from any cause.

    To evaluate the efficacy of elacestrant, by OS, in the full analysis set and by 18F-FES PET/CT result.

    Time frame: From the date of treatment initiation to the date of disease progression or death from any cause, up to the clinical data cut-off (approx. 2 years after the last participant has tarted treatment with elacestrant)

  4. PFS and OS rates at 6-month and at 12-month

    To determine the efficacy of elacestrant by PFS and OS at landmark timepoints of 6stuyd-month and 12-month rate.

    Time frame: From the date of treatment initiation to the date of disease progression or death from any cause, up to the clinical data cut-off (approx. 2 years after the last participant has tarted treatment with elacestrant)

  5. Time to subsequent chemotherapy, defined as time from the date of start of elacestrant to the date of subsequent chemotherapy start or cancer-related death, whichever comes first.

    To evaluate the impact of 18F-FES-PET/CT homogeneity on time to subsequent chemotherapy.

    Time frame: From the date of treatment initiation to the date of disease progression or death from any cause, up to the clinical data cut-off (approx. 2 years after the last participant has tarted treatment with elacestrant)

  6. Association between 18F-FES-PET/CT heterogeneity score and progression-free survival in participants treated with elacestrant.

    To retrospectively find the optimal 18F-FES-PET/CT homogeneity threshold to demonstrate the superiority in PFS in participants treated with elacestrant.

    Time frame: From the date of treatment initiation to the date of disease progression or death from any cause, up to the clinical data cut-off (approx. 2 years after the last participant has tarted treatment with elacestrant)

  7. Incidence, nature, and severity of adverse events, graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 6.0 (NCI CTCAE, v6.0).

    To evaluate the safety and tolerability of elacestrant.

    Time frame: From the date of treatment initiation to the date of disease progression or death from any cause, up to the clinical data cut-off (approx. 2 years after the last participant has tarted treatment with elacestrant)

Other outcomes

  1. Exploratory objective: PFS in participants treated with elacestrant according to predefined 18F-FES-PET/CT heterogeneity threshold categories.

    To assess PFS across predefined strata of 18F-FES-PET/CT heterogeneity threshold.

    Time frame: From the date of treatment initiation to the date of disease progression or death from any cause, up to the clinical data cut-off (approx. 2 years after the last participant has tarted treatment with elacestrant)

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge MA. From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med. 2009 May;50 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):122S-50S. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.057307. PubMed 19403881 ↗
  • Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026. PubMed 19097774 ↗
  • van Geel JJL, Moustaquim J, Boers J, Elias SG, Smeets EMM, Knip JJ, Glaudemans AWJM, de Vries EFJ, Hospers GAP, van Kruchten M, Stokkel M, Oprea-Lager DE, Menke-van der Houven van Oordt WC, de Vries EGE, Schroder CP; IMPACT-Metastatic Breast Consortium. Intrapatient 16alpha-[18F]Fluoro-17beta-Estradiol PET Heterogeneity as a Prognostic Factor for Endocrine Therapy Response and Survival in Patients with Estrogen Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer. J Nucl Med. 2025 Feb 3;66(2):194-200. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268984. PubMed 39848768 ↗
  • Cortés J, Bidard FC, Bardia A, et al. 188O EMERALD trial analysis of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with ER+/HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer (mBC) comparing oral elacestrant vs standard of care (SoC) endocrine therapy. ESMO Open. 2023;8(1).
  • Pinker K, Riedl CC, Ong L, Jochelson M, Ulaner GA, McArthur H, Dickler M, Gonen M, Weber WA. The Impact That Number of Analyzed Metastatic Breast Cancer Lesions Has on Response Assessment by 18F-FDG PET/CT Using PERCIST. J Nucl Med. 2016 Jul;57(7):1102-4. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.166629. Epub 2016 Mar 16. PubMed 26985059 ↗
  • Lobo-Martins S, Agostinetto E, de Azambuja E, Gebhart G. Tumour heterogeneity in molecular imaging for breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2024 Nov;35(11):1061-1062. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.07.726. Epub 2024 Aug 6. No abstract available. PubMed 39098453 ↗
  • Gennari A, Brain E, De Censi A, Nanni O, Wuerstlein R, Frassoldati A, Cortes J, Rossi V, Palleschi M, Alberini JL, Matteucci F, Piccardo A, Sacchetti G, Ilhan H, D'Avanzo F, Ruffilli B, Nardin S, Monti M, Puntoni M, Fontana V, Boni L, Harbeck N; ET-FES Collaborative Group. Early prediction of endocrine responsiveness in ER+/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC): pilot study with 18F-fluoroestradiol (18F-FES) CT/PET. Ann Oncol. 2024 Jun;35(6):549-558. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.02.007. Epub 2024 Feb 28. PubMed 38423389 ↗
  • Liu C, Hu S, Xu X, Zhang Y, Wang B, Song S, Yang Z. Evaluation of tumour heterogeneity by 18F-fluoroestradiol PET as a predictive measure in breast cancer patients receiving palbociclib combined with endocrine treatment. Breast Cancer Res. 2022 Aug 26;24(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13058-022-01555-7. PubMed 36028895 ↗
  • Iqbal R, Yaqub M, Bektas HO, Oprea-Lager DE, de Vries EGE, Glaudemans AWJM, Aftimos P, Gebhart G, Beelen AP, Schuit RC, Windhorst AD, Boellaard R, Menke-van der Houven van Oordt CW. [18F]FDG and [18F]FES PET/CT Imaging as a Biomarker for Therapy Effect in Patients with Metastatic ER+ Breast Cancer Undergoing Treatment with Rintodestrant. Clin Cancer Res. 2023 Jun 1;29(11):2075-2084. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-2720. PubMed 36735488 ↗
  • van Kruchten M, de Vries EGE, Brown M, de Vries EFJ, Glaudemans AWJM, Dierckx RAJO, Schroder CP, Hospers GAP. PET imaging of oestrogen receptors in patients with breast cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Oct;14(11):e465-e475. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70292-4. PubMed 24079874 ↗
  • Liao GJ, Clark AS, Schubert EK, Mankoff DA. 18F-Fluoroestradiol PET: Current Status and Potential Future Clinical Applications. J Nucl Med. 2016 Aug;57(8):1269-75. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.175596. Epub 2016 Jun 15. PubMed 27307345 ↗
  • Besret L, d'Heilly S, Aubert C, Bluet G, Gruss-Leleu F, Le-Gall F, Caron A, Andrieu L, Vincent S, Shomali M, Bouaboula M, Voland C, Ming J, Roy S, Rao S, Carrez C, Jouannot E. Translational strategy using multiple nuclear imaging biomarkers to evaluate target engagement and early therapeutic efficacy of SAR439859, a novel selective estrogen receptor degrader. EJNMMI Res. 2020 Jun 29;10(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13550-020-00646-w. PubMed 32601772 ↗
  • Groheux D, Vaz SC, Ulaner GA, Cook GJR, Woll JPP, Mann RM, Poortmans P, Cardoso F, Jacene H, Graff SL, Rubio IT, Peeters MV, Dibble EH, de Geus-Oei LF. Joint EANM-SNMMI guidelines on the role of 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT in no special type breast cancer: differences and agreements with European and American guidelines. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024 Jul;51(9):2701-2705. doi: 10.1007/s00259-024-06694-x. No abstract available. PubMed 38693453 ↗
  • Mankoff D, Balogova S, Dunnwald L, Dehdashti F, DeVries E, Evangelista L, Van Kruchten M, Vaz SC, Fowler A, Linden H, Ulaner GA. Summary: SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for Estrogen Receptor Imaging of Patients with Breast Cancer Using 16alpha-[18F]Fluoro-17beta-Estradiol PET. J Nucl Med. 2024 Feb 1;65(2):221-223. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266938. PubMed 38071554 ↗
  • Jeselsohn R, Buchwalter G, De Angelis C, Brown M, Schiff R. ESR1 mutations-a mechanism for acquired endocrine resistance in breast cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct;12(10):573-83. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.117. Epub 2015 Jun 30. PubMed 26122181 ↗
  • Bardia A, Cortes J, Bidard FC, Neven P, Garcia-Saenz J, Aftimos P, O'Shaughnessy J, Lu J, Tonini G, Scartoni S, Paoli A, Binaschi M, Wasserman T, Kaklamani V. Elacestrant in ER+, HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer with ESR1-Mutated Tumors: Subgroup Analyses from the Phase III EMERALD Trial by Prior Duration of Endocrine Therapy plus CDK4/6 Inhibitor and in Clinical Subgroups. Clin Cancer Res. 2024 Oct 1;30(19):4299-4309. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-1073. PubMed 39087959 ↗
  • Cardoso F, Paluch-Shimon S, Schumacher-Wulf E, Matos L, Gelmon K, Aapro MS, Bajpai J, Barrios CH, Bergh J, Bergsten-Nordstrom E, Biganzoli L, Cardoso MJ, Carey LA, Chavez-MacGregor M, Chidebe R, Cortes J, Curigliano G, Dent RA, El Saghir NS, Eniu A, Fallowfield L, Francis PA, Franco Millan SX, Gilchrist J, Gligorov J, Gradishar WJ, Haidinger R, Harbeck N, Hu X, Kaur R, Kiely B, Kim SB, Koppikar S, Kuper-Hommel MJJ, Lecouvet FE, Mason G, Mertz SA, Mueller V, Myerson C, Neciosup S, Offersen BV, Ohno S, Pagani O, Partridge AH, Penault-Llorca F, Prat A, Rugo HS, Senkus E, Sledge GW, Swain SM, Thomssen C, Vorobiof DA, Vuylsteke P, Wiseman T, Xu B, Costa A, Norton L, Winer EP. 6th and 7th International consensus guidelines for the management of advanced breast cancer (ABC guidelines 6 and 7). Breast. 2024 Aug;76:103756. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103756. Epub 2024 May 28. PubMed 38896983 ↗
  • Andre F, Solovieff N, Su F, Bardia A, Neven P, Yap YS, Tripathy D, Lu YS, Slamon D, Chia S, Joshi M, Chakravartty A, Lteif A, Taran T, Arteaga CL. Acquired gene alterations in patients treated with ribociclib plus endocrine therapy or endocrine therapy alone using baseline and end-of-treatment circulating tumor DNA samples in the MONALEESA-2, -3, and -7 trials. Ann Oncol. 2025 Jan;36(1):54-64. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.09.010. Epub 2024 Sep 21. PubMed 39313156 ↗
  • AlFakeeh A, Brezden-Masley C. Overcoming endocrine resistance in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Curr Oncol. 2018 Jun;25(Suppl 1):S18-S27. doi: 10.3747/co.25.3752. Epub 2018 Jun 13. PubMed 29910644 ↗
  • Brett JO, Spring LM, Bardia A, Wander SA. ESR1 mutation as an emerging clinical biomarker in metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2021 Aug 15;23(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s13058-021-01462-3. PubMed 34392831 ↗
  • Rugo HS, Lerebours F, Ciruelos E, Drullinsky P, Ruiz-Borrego M, Neven P, Park YH, Prat A, Bachelot T, Juric D, Turner N, Sophos N, Zarate JP, Arce C, Shen YM, Turner S, Kanakamedala H, Hsu WC, Chia S. Alpelisib plus fulvestrant in PIK3CA-mutated, hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer after a CDK4/6 inhibitor (BYLieve): one cohort of a phase 2, multicentre, open-label, non-comparative study. Lancet Oncol. 2024 Dec;25(12):e629-e638. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00673-9. PubMed 39637900 ↗
  • Andre F, Ciruelos E, Rubovszky G, Campone M, Loibl S, Rugo HS, Iwata H, Conte P, Mayer IA, Kaufman B, Yamashita T, Lu YS, Inoue K, Takahashi M, Papai Z, Longin AS, Mills D, Wilke C, Hirawat S, Juric D; SOLAR-1 Study Group. Alpelisib for PIK3CA-Mutated, Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019 May 16;380(20):1929-1940. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1813904. PubMed 31091374 ↗
  • Vasseur A, Cabel L, Hego C, Takka W, Trabelsi Grati O, Renouf B, Lerebours F, Loirat D, Brain E, Cottu P, Sablin MP, Pierga JY, Callens C, Renault S, Bidard FC. Fulvestrant and everolimus efficacy after CDK4/6 inhibitor: a prospective study with circulating tumor DNA analysis. Oncogene. 2024 Apr;43(16):1214-1222. doi: 10.1038/s41388-024-02986-6. Epub 2024 Feb 27. PubMed 38413796 ↗
  • Piccart M, Hortobagyi GN, Campone M, Pritchard KI, Lebrun F, Ito Y, Noguchi S, Perez A, Rugo HS, Deleu I, Burris HA 3rd, Provencher L, Neven P, Gnant M, Shtivelband M, Wu C, Fan J, Feng W, Taran T, Baselga J. Everolimus plus exemestane for hormone-receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative advanced breast cancer: overall survival results from BOLERO-2dagger. Ann Oncol. 2014 Dec;25(12):2357-2362. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu456. Epub 2014 Sep 17. PubMed 25231953 ↗
  • Baselga J, Campone M, Piccart M, Burris HA 3rd, Rugo HS, Sahmoud T, Noguchi S, Gnant M, Pritchard KI, Lebrun F, Beck JT, Ito Y, Yardley D, Deleu I, Perez A, Bachelot T, Vittori L, Xu Z, Mukhopadhyay P, Lebwohl D, Hortobagyi GN. Everolimus in postmenopausal hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 9;366(6):520-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1109653. Epub 2011 Dec 7. PubMed 22149876 ↗
  • Hortobagyi GN, Stemmer SM, Burris HA, Yap YS, Sonke GS, Paluch-Shimon S, Campone M, Blackwell KL, Andre F, Winer EP, Janni W, Verma S, Conte P, Arteaga CL, Cameron DA, Petrakova K, Hart LL, Villanueva C, Chan A, Jakobsen E, Nusch A, Burdaeva O, Grischke EM, Alba E, Wist E, Marschner N, Favret AM, Yardley D, Bachelot T, Tseng LM, Blau S, Xuan F, Souami F, Miller M, Germa C, Hirawat S, O'Shaughnessy J. Ribociclib as First-Line Therapy for HR-Positive, Advanced Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 3;375(18):1738-1748. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1609709. Epub 2016 Oct 7. PubMed 27717303 ↗
  • Trapani D, Martins-Branco D, Curigliano G, Gennari A, Pentheroudakis G, Harbeck N; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Electronic address: clinicalguidelines@esmo.org. Updated treatment recommendations for systemic treatment: from the ESMO Metastatic Breast Cancer Living Guideline. Ann Oncol. 2025 Nov;36(11):1414-1418. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2025.07.017. Epub 2025 Aug 12. No abstract available. PubMed 40930896 ↗
  • Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Hicks DG, Dowsett M, McShane LM, Allison KH, Allred DC, Bartlett JM, Bilous M, Fitzgibbons P, Hanna W, Jenkins RB, Mangu PB, Paik S, Perez EA, Press MF, Spears PA, Vance GH, Viale G, Hayes DF; American Society of Clinical Oncology; College of American Pathologists. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014 Feb;138(2):241-56. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2013-0953-SA. Epub 2013 Oct 7. PubMed 24099077 ↗
  • Chandarlapaty S, Chen D, He W, Sung P, Samoila A, You D, Bhatt T, Patel P, Voi M, Gnant M, Hortobagyi G, Baselga J, Moynahan ME. Prevalence of ESR1 Mutations in Cell-Free DNA and Outcomes in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the BOLERO-2 Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2016 Oct 1;2(10):1310-1315. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.1279. PubMed 27532364 ↗
  • Andre F, Ciruelos EM, Juric D, Loibl S, Campone M, Mayer IA, Rubovszky G, Yamashita T, Kaufman B, Lu YS, Inoue K, Papai Z, Takahashi M, Ghaznawi F, Mills D, Kaper M, Miller M, Conte PF, Iwata H, Rugo HS. Alpelisib plus fulvestrant for PIK3CA-mutated, hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative advanced breast cancer: final overall survival results from SOLAR-1. Ann Oncol. 2021 Feb;32(2):208-217. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.11.011. Epub 2020 Nov 25. PubMed 33246021 ↗
  • Lobo-Martins SL, Branco DM, Aftimos PG, et al. 355P EVERolimus effectiveness after proGREssion on CDK4/6 inhibitors for ENdocrine receptor-positive/HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer: EVERGREEN quasi-experimental study. Annals of Oncology. 2024;35:S365-S366.
  • Wolff AC, Hammond MEH, Allison KH, Harvey BE, Mangu PB, Bartlett JMS, Bilous M, Ellis IO, Fitzgibbons P, Hanna W, Jenkins RB, Press MF, Spears PA, Vance GH, Viale G, McShane LM, Dowsett M. Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jul 10;36(20):2105-2122. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.77.8738. Epub 2018 May 30. PubMed 29846122 ↗
  • Allison KH, Hammond MEH, Dowsett M, McKernin SE, Carey LA, Fitzgibbons PL, Hayes DF, Lakhani SR, Chavez-MacGregor M, Perlmutter J, Perou CM, Regan MM, Rimm DL, Symmans WF, Torlakovic EE, Varella L, Viale G, Weisberg TF, McShane LM, Wolff AC. Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Testing in Breast Cancer: ASCO/CAP Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Apr 20;38(12):1346-1366. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02309. Epub 2020 Jan 13. PubMed 31928404 ↗
  • Gennari A, Andre F, Barrios CH, Cortes J, de Azambuja E, DeMichele A, Dent R, Fenlon D, Gligorov J, Hurvitz SA, Im SA, Krug D, Kunz WG, Loi S, Penault-Llorca F, Ricke J, Robson M, Rugo HS, Saura C, Schmid P, Singer CF, Spanic T, Tolaney SM, Turner NC, Curigliano G, Loibl S, Paluch-Shimon S, Harbeck N; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Electronic address: clinicalguidelines@esmo.org. ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-1495. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.09.019. Epub 2021 Oct 19. No abstract available. PubMed 34678411 ↗
  • Loibl S, Andre F, Bachelot T, Barrios CH, Bergh J, Burstein HJ, Cardoso MJ, Carey LA, Dawood S, Del Mastro L, Denkert C, Fallenberg EM, Francis PA, Gamal-Eldin H, Gelmon K, Geyer CE, Gnant M, Guarneri V, Gupta S, Kim SB, Krug D, Martin M, Meattini I, Morrow M, Janni W, Paluch-Shimon S, Partridge A, Poortmans P, Pusztai L, Regan MM, Sparano J, Spanic T, Swain S, Tjulandin S, Toi M, Trapani D, Tutt A, Xu B, Curigliano G, Harbeck N; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Electronic address: clinicalguidelines@esmo.org. Early breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2024 Feb;35(2):159-182. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.11.016. Epub 2023 Dec 13. No abstract available. PubMed 38101773 ↗
  • Abdelwahab Yousef AJ. Male Breast Cancer: Epidemiology and Risk Factors. Semin Oncol. 2017 Aug;44(4):267-272. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Nov 9. PubMed 29526255 ↗
  • Siegel RL, Giaquinto AN, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 Jan-Feb;74(1):12-49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21820. Epub 2024 Jan 17. PubMed 38230766 ↗
  • Bardia A, Chandarlapaty S, Linden HM, Ulaner GA, Gosselin A, Cartot-Cotton S, Cohen P, Doroumian S, Paux G, Celanovic M, Pelekanou V, Ming JE, Ternes N, Bouaboula M, Lee JS, Bauchet AL, Campone M. AMEERA-1 phase 1/2 study of amcenestrant, SAR439859, in postmenopausal women with ER-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Nat Commun. 2022 Jul 15;13(1):4116. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31668-8. PubMed 35840573 ↗
  • Cancer Today

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Sep 2026; primary completion for Aug 2031, 59 months later.

Of 1,070 non-industry phase 2 interventional studies under Breast Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 56 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 34 and three quarters within 87. This study's planned 59 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,302 studies reached it within 51 months; a quarter within 30 and three quarters within 82.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 17, 2026
First posted
Aug 10, 2026
StartEst.
Sep 13, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Aug 19, 2031
CompletionEst.
Aug 19, 2031
Last update
Aug 10, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07753954
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 10, 2026
Start date
Sep 13, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 19, 2031 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 19, 2031 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 10, 2026

Study contacts

Tabatha Delsaute
Contact
irena.ctc@hubruxelles.be
+32 (0)2 541 34 56
Margot Morelle
Contact
irena.ctc@hubruxelles.be
+32 (0)2 541 39 76
Martine Piccart, MD, PhD
study chair · Jules Bordet Institute

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Elacestrant

Start the discussion