ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07746765GusTaConUpdated Nov 3, 2026

A Study of Continued Use of Guselkumab in Participants With Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis in Real World Setting

An observational study in Crohn Disease and Colitis, Ulcerative, sponsored by Janssen Sciences Ireland UC. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-03.

Sponsored by Janssen Sciences Ireland UC (part of Johnson & Johnson) · Observational

Updated Nov 3, 2026Start date movedStudy completion movedGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
35
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to find out how long a participant keeps taking guselkumab or continues with their treatment plan without stopping (treatment persistence) in participants with moderate to severe Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) in real-world setting. CD and UC are inflammatory bowel diseases, a group of inflammatory conditions of the colon and small intestine.

02

Conditions studied

  • Crohn Disease
  • Colitis, Ulcerative
03

In context

Crohn Disease

1,992 studies on the registry are indexed under Crohn Disease; 478 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 35 is below the median of 185 across 645 observational studies indexed under Crohn Disease.

Browse Crohn Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Janssen Sciences Ireland UC is the lead sponsor of 29 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (50%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population will include participants with confirmed diagnosis of moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) disease receiving guselkumab in routine clinical practice.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participant must be eligible for biologic treatment and initiate guselkumab according to the approved indications as described in the current version of the summary of product characteristics (SmPC) of the drug
  • Participant must have a confirmed diagnosis of moderate-to-severe CD or UC recorded in their medical records
  • Participant must sign an form (ICF) allowing data collection and source data verification in accordance with local requirements

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • to guselkumab per the label
  • Is currently enrolled in an interventional clinical study
  • Has been previously exposed to interleukin (IL)-23 inhibitors, including Tremfya (guselkumab), Skyrizi (risankizumab) and Omvoh (mirikizumab). As an exception, participants with history of Ustekinumab exposure may be included
  • History of more than 4 lines of advanced inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) therapy (biologics and/or small molecules)
  • Is unable to provide
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
35 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis (UC) or Crohn's Disease (CD)

    Participants with confirmed diagnosis of moderate to severe crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) treated with guselkumab in accordance with routine clinical practice as per the approved prescribing label will be enrolled. No drug will be provided as a part of this study. Only data available from clinical practice and medical records will be collected within this study.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to Guselkumab Discontinuation

    Persistence with guselkumab treatment will be assessed through time to guselkumab discontinuation which is defined as the time at which the next infusion should have taken place for a participant after their last scheduled infusion. It will be used to measure the guselkumab persistence in participants.

    Time frame: Up to Week 96

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants with Early Responses to Guselkumab Measured Using Bowel Urgency

    Number of participants with early responses to guselkumab measured using bowel urgency will be assessed via participant diaries.

    Time frame: At Weeks 0 (baseline), 1, 2, 4, 8, 12

  2. Number of Participants with Early Responses to Guselkumab Measured Using Patient Reported Outcome (PRO-2) Components

    Number of participants with early responses to guselkumab will be assessed using PRO-2 components and reported via participant diaries. Measurements captured include stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and abdominal pain.

    Time frame: At Weeks 0 (baseline), 1, 2, 4, 8, 12

  3. Number of Participants Achieving Clinical Response for CD as Measured by Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) Score

    HBI score is used to assess disease severity and treatment effectiveness. The HBI consists of a 5-part questionnaire, assessing general wellbeing, abdominal pain, number of liquid stools per day, abdominal mass and complications. Clinical response for CD is defined as the reduction in HBI by greater than or equal to (\>=)3 points from baseline or achieving HBI less than or equal to (\<=) 4.

    Time frame: At Weeks 0 (baseline), 12, 48 and 96

  4. Number of Participants Achieving Clinical Response for Ulcerative Colitis (UC) as Measured by Partial Mayo Score (PMS)

    PMS is used to assess disease severity and treatment effectiveness. The PMS comprises 3 categories: rectal bleeding, SF, and physician assessment. These are rated from 0-3 and are totaled to give a total score that ranges from 0-12. Higher score indicates severe disease. Clinical response for UC is defined as the PMS score less than (\<) 4 or \>= 30 percent (%) reduction from baseline.

    Time frame: At Weeks 0 (baseline), 12, 48 and 96

  5. Number of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission for CD as Measured by HBI Score

    HBI score is used to assess disease severity and treatment effectiveness. The HBI consists of a 5-part questionnaire, assessing general wellbeing, abdominal pain, number of liquid stools per day, abdominal mass and complications. Clinical remission for CD is defined as a HBI score \<= 4.

    Time frame: At Weeks 0 (baseline), 12, 48 and 96

  6. Number of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission for UC as Measured by PMS

    PMS is used to assess disease severity and treatment effectiveness. The PMS comprises 3 categories: rectal bleeding, SF, and physician assessment. These are rated from 0-3 and are totaled to give a total score that ranges from 0-12. Higher score indicates severe disease. Clinical remission for UC is defined as the PMS score \< 2 and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0.

    Time frame: At Weeks 0 (baseline), 12, 48 and 96

  7. Number of Participants Achieving Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission for CD

    Corticosteroid-free clinical remission for CD is defined as no use of corticosteroids for at least 30 days and a HBI score \<= 4.

    Time frame: At Weeks 0 (baseline), 12, 48 and 96

  8. Number of Participants Achieving Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission for UC

    Corticosteroid-free clinical remission for UC is defined as no use of corticosteroids for at least 30 day, PMS score \< 2 and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0.

    Time frame: At Weeks 48 and 96

  9. Number of Participants Achieving Corticosteroid-Free PRO-2 Remission for CD

    Corticosteroid-free PRO-2 remission for CD is defined as an AP score \<=1 and a mean SF score \<=3, and no worsening of AP or SF compared with baseline with no use of corticosteroids for at least 30 days.

    Time frame: At Weeks 12, 48 and 96

  10. Number of Participants Achieving Corticosteroid-Free PRO-2 Remission for UC

    Corticosteroid free PRO-2 remission for UC is defined as an SF subscore of 0 or 1, where the SF subscore has not increased from baseline, and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0 with no use of corticosteroids for at least 30 days.

    Time frame: At Weeks 12, 48 and 96

  11. Characteristics of Participants Receiving Guselkumab Treatment: Age

    Characteristics of participants (age) receiving guselkumab treatment will be reported.

    Time frame: At Baseline

  12. Characteristics of Participants Receiving Guselkumab Treatment: Sex

    Characteristics of participants (sex) receiving guselkumab treatment will be reported.

    Time frame: At Baseline

  13. Characteristics of Participants Receiving Guselkumab Treatment: Previous Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Medication Usage

    Characteristics of participants (previous IBD medication use) receiving guselkumab treatment will be reported.

    Time frame: At Baseline

  14. Characteristics of Participants Receiving Guselkumab Treatment: Smoking Status and History

    Characteristics of participants (smoking status and history) receiving guselkumab treatment will be reported.

    Time frame: At Baseline

  15. Characteristics of Participants Receiving Guselkumab Treatment: Height

    Characteristics of participants (height) receiving guselkumab treatment will be reported.

    Time frame: At Baseline

  16. Characteristics of Participants Receiving Guselkumab Treatment: Weight

    Characteristics of participants (weight) receiving guselkumab treatment will be reported.

    Time frame: At Baseline

  17. Characteristics of Participants Receiving Guselkumab Treatment: Disease Severity At Index

    Characteristics of participants (disease severity at index) receiving guselkumab treatment will be reported.

    Time frame: At Baseline

  18. Characteristics of Participants Receiving Guselkumab Treatment: Age at Diagnosis

    Characteristics of participants (age at diagnosis) receiving guselkumab treatment will be reported.

    Time frame: At Baseline

  19. Characteristics of Participants Receiving Guselkumab Treatment: Disease Duration

    Characteristics of participants (disease duration) receiving guselkumab treatment will be reported.

    Time frame: At Baseline

  20. Characteristics of Participants Receiving Guselkumab Treatment: Comorbid Diagnoses

    Characteristics of participants (comorbid diagnoses) receiving guselkumab treatment will be reported.

    Time frame: At Baseline

  21. Characteristics of Participants Receiving Guselkumab Treatment: History of UC/CD

    Characteristics of participants (history of UC/CD) receiving guselkumab treatment will be reported.

    Time frame: At Baseline

  22. Characteristics of Participants Receiving Guselkumab Treatment: Previous IBD-Related Surgeries

    Characteristics of participants (Previous IBD-related surgeries) receiving guselkumab treatment will be reported.

    Time frame: At Baseline

  23. UC Phenotype According to the Montreal Classification: Extent of Disease

    Extent of disease (E1, ulcerative proctitis \[limited to rectum\]; E2, left-sided colitis \[up to splenic flexure\]; E3, extensive colitis \[beyond splenic flexure\]) in participants with UC will be assessed according to Montreal classification.

    Time frame: At Baseline

  24. UC Phenotype According to Montreal Classification: Severity

    Severity (S0, clinical remission; S1, mild; S2, moderate; S3, severe) in participants with UC will be assessed according to Montreal classification.

    Time frame: At Baseline

  25. CD Phenotype According to Montreal Classification: Age at Diagnosis

    Age at diagnosis (A1, \<17 years; A2, 17-40 years, A3, \>40 years) in participants with CD will be assessed according to Montreal classification.

    Time frame: At Baseline

  26. CD Phenotype According to Montreal Classification: Location

    Location (L1, ileal; L2, colonic; L3, ileocolonic; L4, isolated upper disease) in participants with CD will be assessed according to Montreal classification.

    Time frame: At Baseline

  27. CD Phenotype According to Montreal Classification: Behavior

    Behavior (B1, non-structuring, non-penetrating; B2, structuring; B3, penetrating; p, perianal disease modifier) in participants with CD will be assessed according to Montreal classification.

    Time frame: At Baseline

  28. Number of Participants with Adverse Events (AE)

    An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product based on appropriate medical judgment. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment.

    Time frame: Up to Week 96

  29. Number of Participants with C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Normalization

    CRP normalization is defined as less than or equal to (\<=) 5 microgram per liter (mg/L) since baseline (among participants with elevated CRP at baseline). C-reactive protein is a marker of inflammation that will be measured by physicians following routine clinical practice.

    Time frame: At Weeks 0 (baseline), 4, 12, 48 and 96

  30. Change in CRP Levels

    Change in CRP levels since guselkumab initiation will be reported. C-reactive protein is a marker of inflammation that will be measured by physicians following routine clinical practice.

    Time frame: At Weeks 0 (baseline), 4, 12, 48 and 96

  31. Number of Participants with Fecal Calprotectin (Fcal) Normalization

    Fcal normalization is defined as percentage of Fcal \<= 250 microgram per gram (mcg/g) since baseline (among participants with calprotectin elevation at baseline). Fcal is a marker of inflammation that will be measured by physicians following routine clinical practice where higher values indicate greater intestinal inflammation.

    Time frame: At Weeks 0 (baseline), 4, 12, 48 and 96

  32. Change in Fcal Levels

    Change in Fcal levels since guselkumab initiation will be reported. Fcal is a marker of inflammation that will be measured by physicians following routine clinical practice where higher values indicate greater intestinal inflammation.

    Time frame: At Weeks 0 (baseline), 4, 12, 48 and 96

  33. Number of Participants Receiving Concomitant IBD Medications During Guselkumab Treatment

    Number of participants receiving concomitant IBD medications during guselkumab treatment will be reported.

    Time frame: Up to Week 96

  34. Health-Related Quality of life (HRQoL) as Measured by Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ)

    The SIBDQ is a HRQoL tool measuring physical, social, and emotional status in IBD participants. The SIBDQ is a 10-item survey measuring HRQoL over the last 2 weeks (frequency of bowel movement, abdominal cramps, fatigue, lack of energy, worry of surgery, fear of no toilet, ability to relax, irritable, impact on leisure, impact on intimacy). The total score ranges from 10 to 70, where high score indicates better QoL.

    Time frame: At Weeks 0 (baseline), 12, 48, and 96

  35. HR-QoL as Measured by Bowel Urgency

    HRQoL as measured by bowel urgency will be reported. Bowel urgency from participants will be asked as yes or no.

    Time frame: At Weeks 0 (baseline), 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96

  36. HR-QoL of Participants with CD Receiving Guselkumab Treatment as Measured by PRO-2 Components

    The CD PRO-2 consists of 2 items: abdominal pain (AP) and stool frequency (SF). AP is a numeric variable with a score between 0-3 and is self-reported by the participant for the 3 days preceding assessment as 0 (no pain), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate) or 3 (severe pain). SF is also a numeric variable calculated the number of liquid stools a participant has experienced over the past 3 days.

    Time frame: At Weeks 0 (baseline), 4, 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96

  37. HR-QoL of Participants with UC Receiving Guselkumab Treatment as Measured by PRO-2 Components

    The UC PRO-2 is composed of rectal bleeding and stool frequency. Rectal bleeding is a numeric variable with a score between 0-3 and is self-reported by the participants for the 3 days preceding assessment as 0 (None), 1 (Streaks of blood with stool in less than half of the cases), 2 (Obvious blood with stools in most cases) or 3 (Blood alone passes). SF is also a numeric variable calculated the number of liquid stools a participant has experienced over the past 3 days.

    Time frame: At Weeks 0 (baseline), 4, 8,12, 24, 48, 72, 96

  38. HRQoL as Measured by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy- Fatigue (FACIT-F) Questionnaire

    The FACIT-F scale is a 13-item instrument designed to assess fatigue/tiredness and its impact on daily activities and functioning in chronic diseases. The instrument includes items such as tiredness, weakness, listlessness, lack of energy, and the impact of these feelings on daily functioning over the last 7 days. Scores are numeric and range from 0 to 52 with higher scores indicating less fatigue.

    Time frame: At Weeks 0 (baseline), 12, 48, and 96

  39. HRQoL as Measured by Inflammatory Bowel Disease Fatigue (IBD-F) Scale Score

    The IBD-F is a self-assessment scale to be used to diagnose fatigue or to monitor fatigue level over time. The IBD-F scale consists of three sections: Section I - identifies the level and duration of fatigue (5 questions); Section II - assesses the impact of fatigue on daily activities (30 questions); and Section III - can identify causes and other factors related to fatigue (5 questions). Score ranges from 0 to 4 where 0 denotes no fatigue and 4 denotes extreme fatigue.

    Time frame: At Weeks 0 (baseline), 12, 48, and 96

  40. Number of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Response in Participants with CD as Measured by Simple Endoscopy Score-CD (SES-CD) Total Score

    Endoscopic response defined as 50% improvement from baseline in SES-CD total score, or SES-CD total score \<4. SES-CD score can range from 0 to 56. Higher scores indicating more severe disease.

    Time frame: Up to Week 96

  41. Number of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Remission in Participants with CD as Measured by SES-CD Total Score

    Endoscopic remission is defined as SES-CD total score \<=4 with at least 2 points reduction from baseline and no subscore \>1 in any individual component. SES-CD score can range from 0 to 56. Higher scores indicating more severe disease.

    Time frame: Up to Week 96

  42. Number of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Improvement in Participants with UC as Measured by Mayo Score

    Endoscopic improvement is defined as Mayo score \<=1. The Mayo clinic score is a composite index with total score ranging from 0 to 12. Higher scores indicate worse disease activity.

    Time frame: Up to Week 96

  43. Number of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Normalization in Participants with UC as Measured by Mayo Score

    Endoscopic normalization is defined as Mayo score =0. The Mayo clinic score is a composite index with a total score ranging from 0 to 12. Higher scores indicate worse disease activity.

    Time frame: Up to Week 96

  44. Number of Participants Achieving Histological Improvement in Participants with UC

    Histological improvement defined as neutrophil infiltration in \<5% of crypts, no crypt destruction, no erosions and ulcerations or granulation tissue according to the Geboes grading system, that is, Geboes score \<=3.1.

    Time frame: Up to Week 96

  45. Number of Participants Achieving Histological Remission in Participants with UC

    Histological remission is defined as the absence of neutrophils from the mucosa (both lamina propria and epithelium), no crypt destruction, no erosions, ulcerations or granulation tissue according the Geboes grading system, that is, Geboes score \<=2B.0.

    Time frame: Up to Week 96

  46. Number of Participants Achieving IUS (Transmural) Response in Participants with CD as Measured by Bowel Wall Thickness (BWT)

    Intestinal Ultrasound (IUS) response is defined as reduction of BWT of \>=25% or normalization (\<=3 millimeters \[mm\]) of the most affected segment at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96 in participants with increased BWT (\>3 mm) at baseline (Week 0).

    Time frame: At Weeks 0 (baseline), 24, 48, 72, 96

  47. Number of Participants Achieving IUS (Transmural) Remission in Participants with CD as Measured by BWT

    IUS remission is defined as normalization of BWT (\<=3 mm) and vascularity (no signal or short signal in color doppler of the most affected segment) at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, in participants with increased BWT (\> 3 mm) at baseline (Week 0).

    Time frame: At Weeks 0 (baseline), 24, 48, 72, 96

  48. Number of Participants Achieving IUS (Transmural) Response in Participants with UC as Measured by BWT

    IUS response is defined as reduction of BWT of \>=25% accompanied by a decrease of at least one grade in color doppler signal, and decrease in Milan Ultrasound Criteria (MUC) score \>= 2 points from baseline (Week 0).

    Time frame: At Weeks 0 (baseline), 24, 48, 72, 96

  49. Number of Participants Achieving IUS (Transmural) Remission in Participants with UC as Measured by BWT

    IUS remission is defined as normalization of BWT and all other IUS parameters or normalization of BWT with a color doppler signal (CDS) grade of 0 or 1; a MUC score of \<6.2 (corresponds to a Mayo endoscopic score \[MES\] of \<1, whereas a MUC score of \<4.3 points aligns with a MES of 0).

    Time frame: At Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96

  50. Change from Baseline in Satisfaction with Guselkumab Treatment as per Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Total Score

    TSQM-9 is an abbreviated version of the 14-item TSQM, and is a reliable and valid measure to assess treatment satisfaction. It consists of 9 items distributed in the domains: side effects, effectiveness, convenience, and global satisfaction, with scores at each domain ranging from 0 to 100. Here, higher scores indicating greater satisfaction for that domain. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: At Weeks 0 (baseline), 12, 48, 96

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The data sharing policy of Johnson \& Johnson Innovative Medicine is available at innovativemedicine.jnj.com/our-innovation/clinical-trials/transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project site at yoda.yale.edu

Data sharing details ↗ · www.jnj.com

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

2 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for Aug 2029, 32 months later.

Of 73 industry-sponsored observational studies under Crohn Disease, half reached primary completion within 36 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 28 and three quarters within 60. This study's planned 32 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 304 studies reached it within 42 months; a quarter within 29 and three quarters within 88.

Start moved twice since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026: Sep 2026 → Nov 2026, last on Nov 3, 2026.

Completion moved twice since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026: Sep 2029 → Nov 2029, last on Nov 3, 2026.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 31, 2026
First posted
Aug 5, 2026
StartEst.
Nov 12, 2026was Sep 2026
Primary completionEst.
Aug 3, 2029
CompletionEst.
Nov 12, 2029was Sep 2029
Last update
Nov 3, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Start date
Sep 30, 2026→Nov 12, 2026
moved 2 times, Sep 25, 2026 – Nov 3, 2026
Study completion
Sep 30, 2029→Nov 12, 2029
moved 2 times, Sep 25, 2026 – Nov 3, 2026
Show all 2 updates
  1. Nov 3, 2026
    Start date Oct 30, 2026→Nov 12, 2026
    Study completion Oct 30, 2029→Nov 12, 2029
    + 1 other change: verification date
  2. Sep 25, 2026
    Start date Sep 30, 2026→Oct 30, 2026
    Study completion Sep 30, 2029→Oct 30, 2029
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07746765
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 5, 2026
Start date
Nov 12, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 3, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 12, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 3, 2026

Study contacts

Study Contact
Contact
Participate-In-This-Study1@its.jnj.com
844-434-4210
Janssen Sciences Ireland UC Clinical Trial
study director · Janssen Sciences Ireland UC

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion