ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07745517Updated Aug 4, 2026

Evaluating Interventions for Breast Cancer Screening in Ghana

An interventional study of Community Health Nurse-Led Breast Cancer Screening Education and Text Messaging Breast Cancer Screening Educational Intervention in Breast Cancer Screening, sponsored by University of Huddersfield. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Ghana. Open to female participants aged 25 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-04.

Sponsored by University of Huddersfield · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
828
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
25 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study aims to implement two interventions to determine the most effective one that can improve Ghanaian women's decision to get their breasts examined by a healthcare professional. The two interventions are (1) a system where community health nurses will be leveraged to educate women on breast cancer screening; (2) a system where women will be sent text messages about breast cancer screening. Both interventions will be carried out over five months. A survey will be conducted before the intervention is introduced. Then, after the sixth month, another survey will be implemented to determine whether there have been changes. Only women who are 25 years or older will be included in the study.

Read the detailed description

Research Design This study will employ a randomised controlled trial (RCT) design. Specifically, a multi-arm parallel RCT design will be used. Participants will be assigned to receive either a CHN-led intervention, a text messaging intervention, or be in the control group. This parallel RCT will be a superiority trial in nature (Spieth et al., 2016). It will seek to compare the two interventions and establish the intervention that is most effective in improving screening uptake, enhancing knowledge, and promoting positive health beliefs. Essentially, participants in the CHN-led and text messaging groups will receive the same information but delivered through distinct media. The baseline for this study will be collected as part of a larger prospective longitudinal study in Ghana, India, and Nepal (ID: SREIC/2025/067).

Description of interventions CHN-led intervention: Participants in this group will engage in structured CHN-led education sessions on breast cancer screening for five months. Each month will focus on a specific theme. The sessions will be facilitated by trained community health nurses who are experienced in health education and culturally competent in working with the study communities. The CHN will receive a brief orientation and training on the study protocol, educational content, and facilitation techniques to ensure consistency in facilitation. This intervention will take the form of bi-weekly sessions that last 60 minutes over five months. These sessions will cover understanding and demystifying breast cancer and its screening (month one), risk factors of breast cancer (month two), suggestive signs and symptoms to prompt early healthcare seeking (month three), costs and benefits of undergoing breast cancer screening (month four), and building confidence and intention to get screened (month five). The intervention will be interactive, incorporating group discussions and culturally tailored educational materials (a take-home pamphlet) to maximise engagement. To ensure engagement, the CHN will be required to monitor attendance, conduct post-session reflections, and do follow-up calls for those who may miss the session. In all five, CHNs will be recruited. Each CHN will serve 5 groups, each consisting of 11 participants.

Text messaging intervention: For this intervention, participants will receive text messages on breast cancer screening for five months. Similar to the CHN-led intervention, the text messaging intervention will cover the following topics: cover understanding and demystifying breast cancer and its screening (month one), risk factors of breast cancer (month two), suggestive signs and symptoms to prompt early healthcare seeking (month three), costs and benefits of undergoing breast cancer screening (month four), and building confidence and intention to get screened (Asare et al., 2024). Informed by the findings of Bonful et al. (2022), text messages will be sent to participants between 6:00am and 8:00pm two times a week - Wednesdays and Saturdays.

Control group: The control group will receive no interventions, but the standard care provided at the community level. This standard of care is the usual community healthcare information that borders on environmental hygiene, healthy eating, exercising, family planning and reproductive health, and motivations to seek prompt healthcare.

Sampling and randomisation procedures Previous studies have found a significantly lower risk of breast cancer among young women (\<25 years) (Okyere et al., 2024; Xu \& Xu, 2023). Hence, only women aged ≥25 years will be eligible to participate in the study. Prospective participants must be people who will be residing in the Danfa community for the next nine months. Any woman who is below the eligible age or who knows for a fact that they will be unavailable throughout the duration of the study will be excluded. A list of all eligible participants will be drawn from the baseline study that will precede the RCT. With this baseline information, a simple random sampling technique will be used to select participants into the RCT.

To ensure balance across groups and minimise confounding, a priori stratification will be employed before randomisation. Participants will be stratified by age (≤50 years vs. >50 years) and screening history at baseline (i.e., ever undergone breast examination or no breast examination). After stratification, block randomisation will be used to assign participants to one of the three study arms in a 1:1:1 ratio. This technique will be adopted to guarantee that the number of participants in each stratum remains balanced throughout the study. This will be achieved by listing all participants and applying Microsoft Excel's random number generator to assign individuals to either arm of the study.

A study by Okyere et al. (2024) estimates a breast cancer screening prevalence of 18.39%. This study posits a 20% increase in screening uptake through the interventions. Therefore, with a power of 80% and design effect of 1.2, the sample size is estimated as:

Where:

  • Zα is the Z-value for the significance level (for α=0.05, one-tailed: Zα=1.645),
  • Zβ is the Z-value for the power (for 80% power, Zβ=0.84),
  • p0 is the baseline proportion (control arm),
  • p1 is the intervention arm proportion.

Adjusted sample size for design effect (effect=1.2):

Final sample size adjusted for non-response (rate=5%):

Total sample size for three arms:

Substituting the figures, the total sample size will be 828 (i.e., 276 participants per arm).

Data collection procedures Before the RCT, a baseline survey will be conducted. Three research assistants will be recruited and trained to assist with the collection of data. The research assistants will be people with at least a bachelor's degree in public health or nursing and have at least 12 months of experience conducting public health surveys. They will undertake a one-week intensive training that will cover issues of ethical responsibility, the research methodology, interrogation of the questionnaire, and some role plays.

The baseline survey will collect information about the socio-demographic characteristics of the participants (e.g., age in completed years, highest level of education attained, marital status, employment status, religion, health insurance coverage, and exposure to media), risk factors (i.e., family history, smoking status, alcohol consumption, etc.), and reproductive health characteristics (e.g., age at menarche, menopausal status, age at first sex, use of oral contraceptives, etc.). And so, the baseline study will assess the state of depression and anxiety among participants using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and generalised anxiety disorder (GAD-7) scale, respectively (Shevlin et al., 2022). Additionally, baseline assessment of the participants' attitudes to screening will be done using the attitude to cancer screening (ASCS-15) scale (Sarkhani et al., 2023). Each participant recruited into the baseline (pre-intervention survey) will be assigned a unique code that will be used to follow up on them after the implementation of the intervention.

Five months after the implementation of the intervention, a follow-up data collection will be conducted to measure key outcomes of interest. These include the proportion of women who would have the intention to screen post-intervention, the proportion of women who would have been screened post-intervention, the proportion of women with good attitudes to breast cancer screening post-intervention, and the breast cancer literacy rate post-intervention. Participants will be contacted in-person to minimise non-response and loss to follow-up. The questionnaire will be designed and administered using REDCAP (Harris et al., 2019). The data collection will be stored on my student OneDrive, which will be accessible only to my supervisors.

Data analyses All statistical analyses will be performed in STATA version 18 (StataCorp, College Station, TX) and Rv4.3.2. The study will adhere to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines. Descriptive analyses will be performed to compare screening uptake, attitude to screening, and screening intentions at baseline and post-intervention. Pearson's chi-square test will be used to assess whether the observed prevalence differs significantly. To mitigate attrition bias, the study will implement a rigorous intention-to-treat (ITT) approach, wherein all randomised participants will be analysed within their originally assigned groups, irrespective of adherence to the intervention or dropout status. This analytical strategy preserves the benefits of randomisation, provides an unbiased estimate of the intervention's effectiveness, and enhances the generalisability of the findings (Spieth et al., 2016)

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer Screening

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Screening
  • Literacy
  • Experimental Studies
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

14,825 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 3,319 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 828 is above the median of 72 across 10,896 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Huddersfield is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
25 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Must be a female aged 25 years or older
  • Must be resident in the Danfa community
  • Must be someone who can confirm their availability for at least the next eight months after the initiation of the trial

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Males
  • Females aged \<25 years
  • Women who are not resident in the study setting
  • Women who cannot be available for at least the next eight months after the initiation of the trial
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
828 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm 1

    Participants assigned to this arm will receive a structured community health nurse (CHN)-led breast cancer screening education programme delivered over five months. Trained CHNs will facilitate ten biweekly 60 minute interactive sessions, with each month focusing on a specific theme: understanding breast cancer and screening, risk factors, signs and symptoms, costs and benefits of screening, and building confidence and intention to undergo screening. CHNs will receive standardized training on the study protocol, educational content, and facilitation methods to ensure intervention fidelity. Sessions will incorporate group discussions and culturally appropriate take-home pamphlets to enhance engagement. Attendance will be monitored, post-session reflections conducted, and follow-up phone calls made to participants who miss sessions. Five CHNs will each facilitate five groups of eleven participants.

    Other: Community Health Nurse-Led Breast Cancer Screening Education

  • Experimental
    Arm 2

    Participants assigned to this arm will receive a structured breast cancer screening text messaging programme over five months. Messages will be delivered twice weekly on Wednesdays and Saturdays between 6:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. The intervention will cover the same monthly themes as the CHN-led arm to ensure consistency: understanding breast cancer and screening, risk factors, signs and symptoms, costs and benefits of screening, and building confidence and intention to undergo screening. Message content will be evidence-informed and culturally appropriate, drawing on established breast cancer education materials and previous intervention studies. The timing and frequency of message delivery are based on evidence indicating that twice-weekly messaging within these hours enhances participant engagement and message uptake

    Other: Text Messaging Breast Cancer Screening Educational Intervention

  • Placebo comparator
    Arm 3

    Participants assigned to the control arm will receive the standard community-based healthcare routinely provided through existing primary healthcare services, with no additional breast cancer screening intervention. Standard care consists of general health education delivered by community health workers and focuses on topics such as environmental hygiene, healthy eating, physical activity, family planning, reproductive health, and the importance of seeking timely healthcare. No structured breast cancer education or text messaging will be provided during the study period. This group will serve as the comparator for evaluating the effectiveness of the CHN-led and text messaging interventions.

    Other: Control Arm - standard of care

Interventions

  • OtherCommunity Health Nurse-Led Breast Cancer Screening Education

    The Community Health Nurse-led intervention differs from conventional health education programmes by using trained community health nurses who are embedded within the local healthcare system to deliver structured, interactive, and culturally responsive breast cancer screening education. Unlike one-time awareness campaigns, this intervention provides repeated biweekly sessions over five months, allowing progressive learning, reinforcement of key messages, and opportunities to address participant concerns and misconceptions.

  • OtherText Messaging Breast Cancer Screening Educational Intervention

    The text messaging intervention is distinguished by its use of a structured, evidence-informed mobile health approach to deliver breast cancer screening information directly to participants' mobile phones. Unlike generic health reminder messages, the intervention follows the same thematic structure as the CHN-led programme, ensuring delivery of comprehensive breast cancer screening education rather than isolated screening prompts.

  • OtherControl Arm - standard of care

    The control group will receive standard community-level healthcare information routinely provided through existing primary healthcare services and will not receive any additional breast cancer screening-specific education, text messages, or structured intervention activities during the study period. This distinguishes the control condition from the intervention groups by maintaining usual care while allowing evaluation of the added effect of community health nurse-led education and text messaging interventions.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical breast examination uptake

    The proportion of women who would have had their breasts examined by a health care professional and the proportion of women who would have practiced breast self-examination.

    Time frame: Five months after the intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Breast cancer literacy

    The proportion of women who are knowledgeable of breast cancer risk factors, and the suggestive signs and symptoms of breast cancer.

    Time frame: Five months after the implementation of the intervention.

  2. Attitude to breast cancer screening

    The proportion of women with a positive attitude towards breast cancer screening.

    Time frame: Five months after the implementation of the intervention.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Danfa Community
    Accra, Greater Accra Region, Ghana
    • Alfred E Yawson, PhD · Contactaeyawson@ug.edu.gh · +233244662711
    • Joshua Okyere, MPhil · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Xu H, Xu B. Breast cancer: Epidemiology, risk factors and screening. Chin J Cancer Res. 2023 Dec 30;35(6):565-583. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2023.06.02. PubMed 38204449 ↗
  • Spieth PM, Kubasch AS, Penzlin AI, Illigens BM, Barlinn K, Siepmann T. Randomized controlled trials - a matter of design. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016 Jun 10;12:1341-9. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S101938. eCollection 2016. PubMed 27354804 ↗
  • Shevlin M, Butter S, McBride O, Murphy J, Gibson-Miller J, Hartman TK, Levita L, Mason L, Martinez AP, McKay R, Stocks TV, Bennett KM, Hyland P, Vallieres F, Valiente C, Vazquez C, Contreras A, Peinado V, Trucharte A, Bertamini M, Panzeri A, Bruno G, Granziol U, Mignemi G, Spoto A, Vidotto G, Bentall RP. Measurement invariance of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) across four European countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Mar 1;22(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03787-5. PubMed 35232409 ↗
  • Sarkhani N, Negarandeh R, Heshmatian ME. Investigating the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the attitude scale for cancer screening. BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 23;23(1):2068. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16981-1. PubMed 37872519 ↗
  • Okyere J, Ayebeng C, Dickson KS. Clicks and checks: investigating the association between internet usage frequency and women's uptake of clinical breast examination in Ghana. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):1113. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11576-x. PubMed 39334073 ↗
  • Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O'Neal L, McLeod L, Delacqua G, Delacqua F, Kirby J, Duda SN; REDCap Consortium. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9. PubMed 31078660 ↗
  • Bonful HA, Addo-Lartey AA, Sefenu RS, Nwameme A, Abagre TA, Awua AK, Adu-Aryee NA, Dedey F, Adanu RMK, Okuyemi KS. Developing a culturally tailored short message service (SMS) intervention for improving the uptake of cervical cancer screening among Ghanaian women in urban communities. BMC Womens Health. 2022 May 10;22(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01719-9. PubMed 35538476 ↗
  • Asare M, Obiri-Yeboah D, Enyan NIE, Nuer-Allornuvor G, Fosu ES, Ken-Amoah S, Akakpo PK. An intervention to increase cervical cancer screening among women living with HIV: A mixed methods study. Patient Educ Couns. 2024 Jan;118:107993. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107993. Epub 2023 Oct 5. PubMed 37844427 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — The trial forms part of the principal investigator's doctoral research. As such, these plans are not a priority at the moment. Any decisions made will be addressed in an amendment to the registration.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Nov 2027, 13 months later.

Of 2,661 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Breast Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 33 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 66. This study's planned 13 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 2,771 studies reached it within 33 months; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 66.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 29, 2026
First posted
Aug 4, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Nov 30, 2027
CompletionEst.
Nov 30, 2027
Last update
Aug 4, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 4, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07745517
Lead sponsor
University of Huddersfield
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 4, 2026
Start date
Oct 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 4, 2026

Study contacts

Joshua Okyere, MPhil
Contact
joshua.okyere@hud.ac.uk
+233249004634
Padam Simkhada, PhD
study chair · University of Chester
Bibha Simkhada, PhD
study chair · University of Huddersfield

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion