CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07742111Updated Aug 3, 2026

Potential of Virtual Reality in Primary Chronic Low Back Pain

An interventional study of Pain science education and virtual reality in Low Back Pain, sponsored by Aveiro University. Recruiting at 1 site in Portugal. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-03.

Sponsored by Aveiro University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2026; still recruiting 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a single-case experimental design study enrolling individuals with chronic low back pain who will be receiving pain science education and virtual reality over 3 weeks.

Read the detailed description

The main objective of this study is to evaluate the potential of virtual reality in reducing pain intensity in individuals with primary chronic low back pain. Secondary objectives include analysing the impact of virtual reality on pain catastrophizing and fear of movement, as well as exploring participants' perspectives on the integration of virtual reality into the intervention plan.

The study will be divided into three phases: baseline assessment, intervention, and post-intervention assessment. The baseline assessment phase will have a different duration for each participant.

At baseline, participants will complete several paper-based questionnaires (sociodemographic and anthropometric data; pain location, intensity and characteristics; pain catastrophizing; fear of movement; pain during movement; and pain-related disability). After completing all questionnaires, participants will receive a paper diary to complete daily at home. This diary will record information such as pain intensity, fear of movement, and pain catastrophizing.

Participants will return to the office only on the first day of the intervention phase, which will coincide with the first session. Sessions will be individual, will last between 30 and 45 minutes, and will take place with an interval of one to two days. The intervention phase will end on the 29th day of the study for all participants and consists of pain science education and virtual reality.

On the final day of the study (i.e., the 35th day), participants will complete the same questionnaires administered at baseline, with the addition of the Global Perceived Effect scale. At that time, the diary provided at the beginning of the study will be collected.

02

Conditions studied

  • Low Back Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Low back pain
  • Virtual reality
  • Pain science education
03

In context

Low Back Pain

2,818 studies on the registry are indexed under Low Back Pain; 482 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 12 is below the median of 60 across 2,268 interventional studies indexed under Low Back Pain.

Browse Low Back Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Aveiro University is the lead sponsor of 57 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Individuals with primary chronic low back pain aged ≥18 years, who present a moderate pain intensity (≥4 on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale) and a mild level of fear of movement.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • have a diagnosis of spondylolisthesis or lumbar spinal stenosis;
  • are experiencing an exacerbation of low back pain symptoms at the time of screening;
  • present with constant and widespread nonspecific pain;
  • are in an active phase of rheumatoid arthritis;
  • have a progressive neurological disease;
  • are currently pregnant or within 6 months postpartum;
  • have a diagnosed psychiatric disorder;
  • have a malignant disease;
  • have serious cardiac conditions;
  • have contraindications to physical exercise in general;
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
12 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Virtual reality and pain science education

    There is only one arm. Participants will receive pain science education and virtual reality. This is a single case experimental design study.

    Other: Pain science education and virtual reality

Interventions

  • OtherPain science education and virtual reality

    The intervention period will take place between the 5th and the 29th day of the study (i.e., 3 weeks), noting that each participant will have a specific day to start the intervention. Three sessions will be conducted per week, with a total of 6 to 10 sessions per participant. The first 6 sessions will last 45 minutes, and the remaining 4 sessions will last 30 minutes. The sessions will combine Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) and Virtual Reality (VR) using the Meta Quest 3S.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain intensity

    Measured using the numeric pain rating scale (end points: 0-10); 0 - minimum score, 10 - maximum score; higher scores mean higher pain intensity.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1)

  2. Pain intensity

    Measured using the numeric pain rating scale (end points: 0-10); 0 - minimum score, 10 - maximum score; higher scores mean higher pain intensity.

    Time frame: Daily (from day 1 to day 35)

  3. Pain intensity

    Measured using the numeric pain rating scale (end points: 0-10); 0 - minimum score, 10 - maximum score; higher scores mean higher pain intensity.

    Time frame: End of the intervention (day 35)

Secondary outcomes

  1. pain mechanism

    Assessed using the PainDetect questionnaire; range score: -1 (minimum) to 38 (maximum); scores are interpreted as a neuropathic component is unlikely (\<12), result is ambiguous (13-18) and neuropathic component is likely (\>19).

    Time frame: Baseline (day 1)

  2. pain mechanism

    Assessed using the PainDetect questionnaire; -1 (minimum) to 38 (maximum); scores are interpreted as a neuropathic component is unlikely (\<12), result is ambiguous (13-18) and neuropathic component is likely (\>19).

    Time frame: End of the intervention (day 35)

  3. Pain intensity during movement

    Measured using the numeric pain rating scale (end points: 0-10); 0 - minimum score, 10 - maximum score; higher scores mean higher pain intensity.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 1)

  4. Pain intensity during movement

    Measured using the numeric pain rating scale (end points: 0-10); 0 - minimum score, 10 - maximum score; higher scores mean higher pain intensity.

    Time frame: End of the intervention (day 35)

  5. Perceived disability

    Assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index; scores: 0 (minimum to 100 (maximum); higher scores mean higher disability

    Time frame: Baseline (day 1)

  6. Perceived disability

    Assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index; scores: 0 (minimum to 100 (maximum); higher scores mean higher disability

    Time frame: End of the intervention (day 35)

  7. Catastrophizing

    Assessed using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale; score range: 0 (minimum to 52 (maximum); higher scores mean higher catastrophizing.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 1)

  8. Catastrophizing

    Assessed using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale; score range: 0 (minimum to 52 (maximum); higher scores mean higher catastrophizing.

    Time frame: End of the intervention (day 35)

  9. Fear of movement

    Assessed using the Tampa Scale of kinesiophobia; score range: 13 (minimum to 52 (maximum); higher scores mean higher fear of movement.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 1)

  10. Fear of movement

    Assessed using the Tampa Scale of kinesiophobia; score range: 13 (minimum to 52 (maximum); higher scores mean higher fear of movement.

    Time frame: End of the intervention (day 35)

  11. Knowledge on pain neurophysiology

    Assessed using the Neurophysiology of Pain questionnaire; score range: 0 (minimum and 19 (maximum) and higher scores mean better pain knowledge.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 1)

  12. Knowledge on pain neurophysiology

    Assessed using the Neurophysiology of Pain questionnaire; score range: 0 (minimum and 19 (maximum) and higher scores mean better pain knowledge.

    Time frame: End of the intervention (day 35)

  13. Global perception of change

    Assessed using the Global Rating of Change Scale, which has 7 itens (1 = no changes; 2 = almost the same; 3 = slightly better; 4 = with some improvements; 5 = moderately better; 6 = better; and 7 = much better)and higher scores mean higher perceived improvement

    Time frame: End of the intervention (day 35)

Other outcomes

  1. Catastrophizing

    3 items of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale will be used daily (items 1, 2 and 13) each rated using a 5-item Likert scale; total score ranging from 0 (minimum) to 12 (maximum) with higher scores meaning higher catastrophizing.

    Time frame: Daily (from day 1 to day 35)

  2. Fear of movemently

    3 items of the TAMPA Scale will be used daily (items 1, 3 and 12), each rated using a 4-item Likert scale; total score ranging from 3 (minimum) to 12 (maximum), with higher scores meaning higher fear of movement.

    Time frame: Daily (from day 1 to day 35)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • General Community
    Amarante, 4600, Portugal
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 3, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07742111
Lead sponsor
Aveiro University
Responsible party
Anabela G Silva (Professor, Aveiro University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 3, 2026
Start date
May 1, 2026
Primary completion
Oct 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 3, 2026

Study contacts

Anabela Silva, PhD
Contact
asilva@ua.pt
+351 234247119
Emanuel Leite, BSc
Contact
emanuelleite@ua.pt
+351 234401558
Anabela Silva, PhD
study chair · University of Aveiro

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion