ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07755839CanCOG®Updated Aug 10, 2026

CanCOG®: Pilot Trial of Cognitive Rehabilitation for Cancer Survivors

An interventional study of CanCOG® - Cogntive Rehabilitation in Cancer in Cancer-related Cognitive Impairment, Cancer-related Cognitive Dysfunction and Cancer-related Cognitive Difficulties, sponsored by Aveiro University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Portugal. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-10.

Sponsored by Aveiro University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) affects a large proportion of non-central nervous system cancer survivors and can negatively impact cognitive functioning and daily life. Cognitive rehabilitation has shown promising results in addressing these difficulties. The goal of this pilot randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of the CanCOG®- Cognitive Rehabilitation in Cancer program in Portuguese adult cancer survivors with CRCI.

Adult non-central nervous system cancer survivors (n=60) will be randomly assigned to receive either the CanCOG® intervention or treatment as usual.

CanCOG® is a structured cognitive rehabilitation program designed to help cancer survivors manage cognitive difficulties through cognitive training exercises, psychoeducation, and compensatory strategy training. The program consists of six weekly sessions of 1 hour and 30 minutes each, delivered over six consecutive weeks. Sessions are administered in person in small groups (3-9 participants) and are led by a trained professional.

The main focus of the study is to assess feasibility outcomes, including recruitment, retention, adherence to the intervention, and completion of study assessments, as well as acceptability and participant satisfaction.

The study will also explore preliminary effects of the intervention on cognitive functioning (both perceived and objective), symptoms of anxiety and depression, and quality of life. Participants will complete assessments at baseline (2 weeks after the intervention), 2 weeks after the intervention, and at 3- and 6-month follow-ups. Some participants (10-15) will also take part in interviews to provide feedback on their experience with the program.

Read the detailed description

Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is a frequent consequence of cancer and its treatments in non-central nervous system survivors and has been associated with persistent difficulties in multiple cognitive domains, including attention, memory, and executive functioning.

Cognitive rehabilitation approaches aim to improve cognitive functioning and promote the use of compensatory strategies to support daily functioning in individuals experiencing CRCI. The CanCOG® program is a structured group-based cognitive rehabilitation intervention delivered by trained professionals and incorporating cognitive training exercises, psychoeducation, and strategy training.

This study is a pilot randomized controlled trial designed to inform the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and study procedures, as well as to provide preliminary evidence regarding potential intervention effects.

The intervention consists of six weekly in-person group sessions (1 hour and 30 minutes each), delivered over six consecutive weeks in small groups of 3 to 9 participants.

Outcomes will be assessed using a comprehensive neuropsychological and psychosocial evaluation battery covering global cognition, memory, attention, executive functioning, psychological distress, and quality of life, using validated instruments. Assessments will be conducted at baseline, post-intervention, and at 3- and 6-month follow-up time points.

Data will be collected in Portuguese healthcare units. The study has been submitted to and approved by the relevant Ethics Committee, and complies with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

02

Conditions studied

  • Cancer-related Cognitive Impairment
  • Cancer-related Cognitive Dysfunction
  • Cancer-related Cognitive Difficulties
  • Depression and Anxiety Symptoms
  • Quality of Life

Keywords

  • cancer
  • cancer survivors
  • cognitive rehabilitation
  • cognition
  • non-pharmacological interventions
  • RCT
  • Pilot study
  • crci
  • cancer-related cognitive impairment
03

In context

Depression

8,577 studies on the registry are indexed under Depression; 1,720 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 81 across 7,063 interventional studies indexed under Depression.

Browse Depression studies →

Lead sponsor

Aveiro University is the lead sponsor of 59 studies on the registry; 14 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 to 65 years whose native language is European Portuguese;
  • Diagnosis of cancer not involving the central nervous system (non-CNS cancer);
  • Disease stage I to III;
  • Completion of primary cancer treatment at least 6 months and no more than 5 years prior to enrollment (with the exception of ongoing hormone therapy and immunotherapy);
  • Score \< 51 on the Perceived Cognitive Abilities subscale of the FACT-Cog v3. Stable psychiatric and neurological medication regimen for at least 3 months prior to enrollment;
  • Educational level equal to or higher than the 3rd year of primary education;
  • Ability to read and write in Portuguese and provide to participate.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of current severe psychiatric disorders (e.g., schizophrenia, psychosis, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder);
  • Diagnosis of communication disorders;
  • Diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorders or other severe medical conditions (e.g., history of stroke, encephalitis, dementia or neurodegenerative disease, epilepsy, or traumatic brain injury);
  • Presence of or other tumors;
  • History of substance abuse (alcohol or drugs);
  • Current or prior participation in another cognitive rehabilitation intervention.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cognitive rehabilitation intervention

    Participants allocated to this arm will receive the CanCOG® cognitive rehabilitation intervention in addition to usual care. Following baseline assessment (2 weeks before the intervention), participants will attend the intervention over a 6-week period and complete study assessments 2 weeks after the intervention and at 3- and 6-month follow-up time points. Participants will be asked to complete neuropsychological and psychosocial assessments at each evaluation point. A subset of participants (10-15) may also be invited to participate in a semi-structured interview to explore the acceptability of the intervention, perceived benefits, barriers to participation, and overall satisfaction with the program and study procedures.

    Behavioral: CanCOG® - Cogntive Rehabilitation in Cancer

  • No intervention
    Treatment-as-usual

    Participants allocated to this arm will continue to receive the usual care and support available through their healthcare providers and will not receive the CanCOG® intervention during the study period. Participants will complete the same schedule of neuropsychological and psychosocial assessments as the intervention group at baseline, post-intervention, and at 3- and 6-month follow-up time points.

Interventions

  • BehavioralCanCOG® - Cogntive Rehabilitation in Cancer

    CanCOG® is a structured cognitive rehabilitation program designed for cancer survivors experiencing cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI). The intervention is delivered in person in small groups of 3 to 9 participants by a trained professional and consists of six weekly sessions of 90 minutes each over six consecutive weeks. The program combines psychoeducation about CRCI, cognitive training exercises targeting domains such as attention, memory, and executive functioning, and compensatory strategy training to support everyday cognitive functioning and self-management of cognitive difficulties.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility - Screening rate

    Screening rate will be assessed as the proportion of potentially eligible cancer survivors who undergo eligibility screening.

    Time frame: Baseline (2 weeks before intervention), post-intervention (2 weeks after), and 3-month and 6-month follow-ups.

  2. Feasibility - Eligibility rate

    The eligibility rate will be assessed as the proportion of screened individuals who meet the eligibility criteria. Reasons for ineligibility will be documented whenever available.

    Time frame: Baseline (2 weeks before intervention), post-intervention (2 weeks after), and 3-month and 6-month follow-ups

  3. Feasibility - Consent rate

    Consent rate will be assessed as the proportion of eligible individuals who provide informed consent. Reasons for refusal to participate will be documented whenever available.

    Time frame: Baseline (2 weeks before intervention), post-intervention (2 weeks after), and 3-month and 6-month follow-ups.

  4. Feasibility - Retention rate

    Retention rate will be assessed as the proportion of participants who remain enrolled until study completion. Reasons for withdrawal will be documented whenever available.

    Time frame: Baseline (2 weeks before intervention), post-intervention (2 weeks after), and 3-month and 6-month follow-ups

  5. Feasibility - Assesment completion rate

    Assessment completion rate will be assessed as the proportion of participants completing assessments at each assessment time point. Reasons for missed assessments will be documented whenever available.

    Time frame: Baseline (2 weeks before intervention), post-intervention (2 weeks after), and 3-month and 6-month follow-ups

  6. Feasibility - Intervention adherence

    Intervention adherence will be assessed as the proportion of intervention sessions attended by participants allocated to the intervention group. Reasons for missed sessions will be documented whenever available.

    Time frame: Baseline (2 weeks before intervention), post-intervention (2 weeks after), and 3-month and 6-month follow-ups

  7. Feasibility - Intervention fidelity

    Intervention fidelity, the extent to which the intervention is delivered according to the intervention manual and session plans, will be assessed through facilitator-completed fidelity checklists.

    Time frame: Baseline (2 weeks before intervention), post-intervention (2 weeks after), and 3-month and 6-month follow-ups

  8. Acceptability - Participant retention and intervention adherence

    Acceptability of the intervention will be assessed using participant retention (proportion of participants who remain enrolled until study completion) and intervention adherence (proportion of intervention sessions attended by participants allocated to the intervention group).

    Time frame: Baseline ( 2 weeks before intervention), post-intervention (2 weeks after), and 3-month and 6-month follow-up.

  9. Acceptability - Qualitative feedback

    Acceptability will be assessed through semi-structured interviews conducted with 10-15 participants from the intervention group. Interviews will explore participants' perceptions of the intervention content, format, duration, group delivery, perceived usefulness, and barriers or facilitators to participation.

    Time frame: Post-intervention (2 weeks after)

  10. Acceptability - ACRIS-CS

    Acceptability will also be assessed through the Acceptability of Cognitive Rehabilitation Interventions Survey-Cancer Survivors (ACRIS-CS). This 11-item instrument evaluates participants' perceptions of the intervention's acceptability, including its perceived usefulness, appropriateness, and overall satisfaction. Higher scores indicate greater acceptability of the cognitive rehabilitation intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline (2 weeks before intervention) and post-intervention (2 weeks after).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Perceived cognitive functioning

    Perceived cognitive functioning will be assessed with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function version 3 (FACT-Cog v3). It consists of a 37-item self-report questionnaire composed of four subscales: Perceived Cognitive Impairments (CogPCI), Perceived Cognitive Abilities (CogPCA), Comments from Others (CogOth), and Impact on Quality of Life (CogQoL). The higher the score, the better the perceived functioning.

    Time frame: Baseline (2 weeks before intervention), post-intervention (2weeks after), 3-month and 6-month follow-ups.

  2. Objective cognitive functioning (Global cognition)

    Global cognition will be assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The instrument's scores range from 0 to 30, with lower scores indicating poorer cognitive performance.

    Time frame: Baseline (2 weeks before intervention), Post-intervention (2 weeks after), and 3-month and 6-month follow-up.

  3. Objective cognitive functioning (Verbal learning and memory)

    The test includes immediate recall across five learning trials, delayed recall after 30 minutes, and a recognition trial, allowing the assessment of acquisition, retention, and recognition processes. Lower scores indicate poorer performance.

    Time frame: Baseline (2 weeks before intervention), post-intervention (2 weeks after), and 3-month and 6-month follow-up.

  4. Objective cognitive functioning (Attention and processing speed)

    Attention and processing speed will be assessed with the Trail Making Test Part A (TMT-A) and D2 Test of Attention. TMT- A: Performance is based on completion time and errors. Higher adjusted scores correspond to better performance. D2 Test of Attention: The scoring of this test provides the following results: Total Characters Processed, Total Correct Responses, Total Efficiency and Concentration Index. Higher scores suggest better performance.

    Time frame: Baseline (2 weeks before intervention), post-intervention (2 weeks after), and 3-month and 6-month follow-up.

  5. Objective cognitive functioning (Executive functioning and cognitive flexibility)

    Executive functioning and cognitive flexibility will be assessed using the Trail Making Test Part B (TMT-B). Performance is based on completion time and errors. Higher adjusted scores correspond to better performance.

    Time frame: Baseline (2 weeks before intervention), post-intervention (2 weeks after), and 3-month and 6-month follow-up.

  6. Objective cognitive functioning (Working memory)

    Working memory will be assessed using the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale's (WAIS) - Digit Span subtest. It consists of three components: Digit Span forward, Digit Span Backward, and Digit Span sequencing. Higher scores indicate better performance.

    Time frame: Baseline (2 weeks before intervention), post-intervention (2 weeks after), and 3-month and 6-month follow-up.

  7. Objective cognitive functioning (Verbal fluency)

    Verbal fluency will be assessed with the Verbal Fluency Test (VFT). For the VFT, participants are required to remember, in one minute, the maximum number of words possible started by a specific letter or belonging to a specific category. A higher number of words recalled indicates better cognitive performance.

    Time frame: Baseline (2 weeks before intervention), post-intervention (2 weeks after), and 3-month and 6-month follow-up.

  8. Objective cognitive functioning (Inhibitory control)

    Inhibitory control will be assessed with the Stroop Color and Word Test. It consists of three tasks: reading words, naming colors, and identifying the color in which each word is written, regardless of the word's meaning. The performance is scored as the number of correct responses completed within the specified time for each condition. Higher scores indicate better performance.

    Time frame: Baseline (2 weeks before intervention), post-intervention (2 weeks after), and 3-month and 6-month follow-up.

  9. Anxiety Symptoms

    Anxiety symptoms will be assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7). It consists of seven items evaluating the presence of anxiety-related symptoms. Scores range from zero to 21, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety severity.

    Time frame: Baseline (2 weeks before intervention), post-intervention (2 weeks after), and 3-month and 6-month follow-ups.

  10. Depressive Symptoms

    Depressive symptoms will be assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), a 9-item self-report measure of depression severity based on DSM criteria. Total scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline (2 weeks before intervention) , post-intervention (2 weeks after), and 3-month and 6-month follow-up.

  11. Health-related quality of life

    Health-related quality of life will be assessed using a validated cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire, the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, version 3 (EORTC QLQ-C30, version 3). The EORTC QLQ-C30, is a 30-item instrument including global health status/quality of life, functional, and symptom scales. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better functioning/global quality of life and worse symptom burden on the symptom scales.

    Time frame: Baseline (2 weeks before intervention), post-intervention (2 weeks after), and 3-month and 6-month follow-up.

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Yang Y, Von Ah D. Cancer-related cognitive impairment: updates to treatment, the need for more evidence, and impact on quality of life-a narrative review. Ann Palliat Med. 2024 Sep;13(5):1265-1280. doi: 10.21037/apm-24-70. Epub 2024 Sep 9. PubMed 39260437 ↗
  • Von Ah D, Crouch A. Cognitive Rehabilitation for Cognitive Dysfunction after Cancer and Cancer Treatment: Implications for Nursing Practice. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2020 Feb;36(1):150977. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2019.150977. Epub 2020 Jan 17. PubMed 31959511 ↗
  • Von Ah D, Carpenter JS, Saykin A, Monahan P, Wu J, Yu M, Rebok G, Ball K, Schneider B, Weaver M, Tallman E, Unverzagt F. Advanced cognitive training for breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Oct;135(3):799-809. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2210-6. Epub 2012 Aug 24. PubMed 22918524 ↗
  • Vardy JL, Pond GR, Bell ML, Renton C, Dixon A, Dhillon HM. A randomised controlled trial evaluating two cognitive rehabilitation approaches for cancer survivors with perceived cognitive impairment. J Cancer Surviv. 2023 Dec;17(6):1583-1595. doi: 10.1007/s11764-022-01261-5. Epub 2022 Oct 15. PubMed 36241767 ↗
  • Teresi JA, Yu X, Stewart AL, Hays RD. Guidelines for Designing and Evaluating Feasibility Pilot Studies. Med Care. 2022 Jan 1;60(1):95-103. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001664. PubMed 34812790 ↗
  • Stelwagen J, Meuleman AT, Lubberts S, Steursma G, Kruyt LM, Donkerbroek JW, Meijer C, Walenkamp AME, Lefrandt JD, Rakers SE, Huitema RB, de Jong MAA, Wiegman EM, van den Bergh ACM, de Jong IJ, van Rentergem JAA, Schagen SB, Nuver J, Gietema JA. Cognitive Impairment in Long-Term Survivors of Testicular Cancer More Than 20 Years after Treatment. Cancers (Basel). 2021 Nov 12;13(22):5675. doi: 10.3390/cancers13225675. PubMed 34830829 ↗
  • Sousa TV, Viveiros V, Chai MV, Vicente FL, Jesus G, Carnot MJ, Gordo AC, Ferreira PL. Reliability and validity of the Portuguese version of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) scale. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Apr 25;13:50. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0244-2. PubMed 25908249 ↗
  • Sanft T, Day A, Peterson L, Rodriguez MA, Ansbaugh S, Armenian S, Baker KS, Ballinger T, Broderick G, Demark-Wahnefried W, Dickinson K, Fairman NP, Friedman DL, Goldman M, Henry NL, Hill-Kayser C, Hudson M, Khakpour N, Koura D, McDonough AL, Melisko M, Mooney K, Moore HCF, Moryl N, Neuman H, O'Connor T, Overholser L, Paskett ED, Patel C, Pirl W, Porpiglia A, Ruddy KJ, Schapira L, Shockney L, Smith S, Syrjala KL, Tevaarwerk A, Yang EH, Zee P, McMillian NR, Freedman-Cass DA. NCCN Guidelines(R) Insights: Survivorship, Version 1.2022. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022 Oct;20(10):1080-1090. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.0052. PubMed 36240847 ↗
  • Saita K, Amano S, Kaneko F, Okamura H. A scoping review of cognitive assessment tools and domains for chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairments in cancer survivors. Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Feb 20;17:1063674. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1063674. eCollection 2023. PubMed 36891148 ↗
  • Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, Griffey R, Hensley M. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):65-76. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7. PubMed 20957426 ↗
  • Pfledderer CD, von Klinggraeff L, Burkart S, da Silva Bandeira A, Lubans DR, Jago R, Okely AD, van Sluijs EMF, Ioannidis JPA, Thrasher JF, Li X, Beets MW. Consolidated guidance for behavioral intervention pilot and feasibility studies. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 Apr 6;10(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01485-5. PubMed 38582840 ↗
  • Oppegaard KR, Mayo SJ, Armstrong TS, Anguera JA, Kober KM, Miaskowski C. The Multifactorial Model of Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2023 Feb 17;50(2):135-147. doi: 10.1188/23.ONF.135-147. PubMed 37677800 ↗
  • Oliveira AF, Sosa-Napolskij M, Torres A, Queiroz DF, Bartolo A, Sousa H, Monteiro S, Van Dyk K, Ercoli LM, Santos IM. CanCOG(R): Cultural Adaptation of the Evidence-Based UCLA Cognitive Rehabilitation Intervention Program for Cancer Survivors in Portugal. Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jan 2;11(1):141. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11010141. PubMed 36611601 ↗
  • Oliveira AF, Santos IM, Fernandes S, Bem-Haja P, Torres A. Validation study of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function-Version 3 for the Portuguese population. BMC Psychol. 2022 Dec 14;10(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-01018-w. PubMed 36517827 ↗
  • Oliveira AF, Marques-Fernandes SA, Bartolo A, Bem-Haja P, Torres A, Santos IM. Establishing Diagnostic Cut-Off Scores for the Perceived Cognitive Impairment Subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function-Version 3 in Portuguese Cancer Survivors. Psychooncology. 2025 Sep;34(9):e70278. doi: 10.1002/pon.70278. PubMed 40954944 ↗
  • Monteiro, S., Bártolo, A., Torres, A., Pereira, A., & Albuquerque, E. (2019). Examining the construct validity of the Portuguese version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 among college students. PSICOLOGIA, 33(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v33i2.1421
  • Mackenzie L, Marshall K. Effective non-pharmacological interventions for cancer related cognitive impairment in adults (excluding central nervous system or head and neck cancer): systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2022 Apr;58(2):258-270. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.21.06898-2. Epub 2021 Sep 9. PubMed 34498828 ↗
  • Lange M, Joly F, Vardy J, Ahles T, Dubois M, Tron L, Winocur G, De Ruiter MB, Castel H. Cancer-related cognitive impairment: an update on state of the art, detection, and management strategies in cancer survivors. Ann Oncol. 2019 Dec 1;30(12):1925-1940. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz410. PubMed 31617564 ↗
  • Hopewell S, Chan AW, Collins GS, Hrobjartsson A, Moher D, Schulz KF, Tunn R, Aggarwal R, Berkwits M, Berlin JA, Bhandari N, Butcher NJ, Campbell MK, Chidebe RCW, Elbourne D, Farmer A, Fergusson DA, Golub RM, Goodman SN, Hoffmann TC, Ioannidis JPA, Kahan BC, Knowles RL, Lamb SE, Lewis S, Loder E, Offringa M, Ravaud P, Richards DP, Rockhold FW, Schriger DL, Siegfried NL, Staniszewska S, Taylor RS, Thabane L, Torgerson D, Vohra S, White IR, Boutron I. CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials. BMJ. 2025 Apr 14;389:e081123. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-081123. PubMed 40228833 ↗
  • Haywood D, Dauer E, Baughman FD, Lawrence BJ, Rossell SL, Hart NH, O'Connor M. "Is My Brain Ever Going to Work Fully Again?": Challenges and Needs of Cancer Survivors with Persistent Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment. Cancers (Basel). 2023 Nov 8;15(22):5331. doi: 10.3390/cancers15225331. PubMed 38001592 ↗
  • Freitas S, Simoes MR, Alves L, Santana I. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): normative study for the Portuguese population. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2011 Nov;33(9):989-96. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2011.589374. Epub 2011 Jul 4. PubMed 22082082 ↗
  • Fernandes HA, Richard NM, Edelstein K. Cognitive rehabilitation for cancer-related cognitive dysfunction: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer. 2019 Sep;27(9):3253-3279. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04866-2. Epub 2019 May 30. PubMed 31147780 ↗
  • Ercoli LM, Petersen L, Hunter AM, Castellon SA, Kwan L, Kahn-Mills BA, Embree LM, Cernin PA, Leuchter AF, Ganz PA. Cognitive rehabilitation group intervention for breast cancer survivors: results of a randomized clinical trial. Psychooncology. 2015 Nov;24(11):1360-7. doi: 10.1002/pon.3769. Epub 2015 Mar 10. PubMed 25759235 ↗
  • Ercoli LM, Castellon SA, Hunter AM, Kwan L, Kahn-Mills BA, Cernin PA, Leuchter AF, Ganz PA. Assessment of the feasibility of a rehabilitation intervention program for breast cancer survivors with cognitive complaints. Brain Imaging Behav. 2013 Dec;7(4):543-53. doi: 10.1007/s11682-013-9237-0. PubMed 23955490 ↗
  • Eldridge SM, Lancaster GA, Campbell MJ, Thabane L, Hopewell S, Coleman CL, Bond CM. Defining Feasibility and Pilot Studies in Preparation for Randomised Controlled Trials: Development of a Conceptual Framework. PLoS One. 2016 Mar 15;11(3):e0150205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150205. eCollection 2016. PubMed 26978655 ↗
  • Duivon M, Lange M, Binarelli G, Lefel J, Hardy-Leger I, Kiasuwa-Mbengi R, Meric JB, Charles C, Joly F. Improve the management of cancer-related cognitive impairment in clinical settings: a European Delphi study. J Cancer Surviv. 2024 Dec;18(6):1974-1997. doi: 10.1007/s11764-023-01436-8. Epub 2023 Nov 7. PubMed 37934312 ↗
  • Dos Santos M, Hardy-Leger I, Rigal O, Licaj I, Dauchy S, Levy C, Noal S, Segura C, Delcambre C, Allouache D, Parzy A, Barriere J, Petit T, Lange M, Capel A, Clarisse B, Grellard JM, Lefel J, Joly F. Cognitive rehabilitation program to improve cognition of cancer patients treated with chemotherapy: A 3-arm randomized trial. Cancer. 2020 Dec 15;126(24):5328-5336. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33186. Epub 2020 Sep 30. PubMed 32996583 ↗
  • Demos-Davies K, Lawrence J, Seelig D. Cancer related cognitive impairment: a downside of cancer treatment. Front Oncol. 2024 Apr 23;14:1387251. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1387251. eCollection 2024. PubMed 38715789 ↗
  • Cherrier MM, Anderson K, David D, Higano CS, Gray H, Church A, Willis SL. A randomized trial of cognitive rehabilitation in cancer survivors. Life Sci. 2013 Oct 17;93(17):617-22. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2013.08.011. Epub 2013 Sep 5. PubMed 24012579 ↗
  • Chan AW, Boutron I, Hopewell S, Moher D, Schulz KF, Collins GS, Tunn R, Aggarwal R, Berkwits M, Berlin JA, Bhandari N, Butcher NJ, Campbell MK, Chidebe RCW, Elbourne DR, Farmer AJ, Fergusson DA, Golub RM, Goodman SN, Hoffmann TC, Ioannidis JPA, Kahan BC, Knowles RL, Lamb SE, Lewis S, Loder E, Offringa M, Ravaud P, Richards DP, Rockhold FW, Schriger DL, Siegfried NL, Staniszewska S, Taylor RS, Thabane L, Torgerson DJ, Vohra S, White IR, Hrobjartsson A. SPIRIT 2025 statement: updated guideline for protocols of randomized trials. Nat Med. 2025 Jun;31(6):1784-1792. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03668-w. Epub 2025 Apr 29. PubMed 40295741 ↗
  • Cavaco, S., Pinto, C., Gonçalves, A., Gomes, F., Pereira, A., & Malaquias, C. (2008). Auditory Verbal Learning Test. Psychologica, 49. https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-8606_49_10
  • Cavaco S, Goncalves A, Pinto C, Almeida E, Gomes F, Moreira I, Fernandes J, Teixeira-Pinto A. Auditory Verbal Learning Test in a Large Nonclinical Portuguese Population. Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2015;22(5):321-31. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2014.927767. Epub 2015 Jan 12. PubMed 25580839 ↗
  • Cavaco S, Goncalves A, Pinto C, Almeida E, Gomes F, Moreira I, Fernandes J, Teixeira-Pinto A. Trail Making Test: regression-based norms for the Portuguese population. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2013 Mar;28(2):189-98. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acs115. Epub 2013 Jan 7. PubMed 23299183 ↗
  • Bell ML, Whitehead AL, Julious SA. Guidance for using pilot studies to inform the design of intervention trials with continuous outcomes. Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Jan 18;10:153-157. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S146397. eCollection 2018. PubMed 29403314 ↗
  • Ahles TA, Root JC. Cognitive Effects of Cancer and Cancer Treatments. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2018 May 7;14:425-451. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050817-084903. Epub 2018 Jan 18. PubMed 29345974 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Sep 2026; primary completion for Jun 2027, 9 months later.

Of 3,468 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Depression, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 41. This study's planned 9 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 3,566 studies reached it within 21 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 41.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 29, 2026
First posted
Aug 10, 2026
StartEst.
Sep 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2027
CompletionEst.
May 2028
Last update
Aug 10, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07755839
Lead sponsor
Aveiro University
Collaborators
Foundation for Science and Technology, Portugal
Responsible party
Sofia Alexandra Marques Fernandes (Principal Investigator, Aveiro University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 10, 2026
Start date
Sep 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Completion
May 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 10, 2026

Study contacts

Sofia A Marques-Fernandes, M.Sc.
Contact
sofiafernandes6@ua.pt
965252831 ext. 00351

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion