CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07733804Updated Jul 29, 2026

Clinical Performance of Restorations in Teeth Affected by Molar Incisor Hypomineralization

An interventional study of Restoration with Short Fiber-Reinforced Composite and Micro-Hybrid Composite (EverX Flow + G-ænial Posterior) and Restoration with Glass Hybrid Restorative Material (EQUIA Forte HT) in Molar Incisor Hypomineralization, sponsored by Marmara University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 6 Years to 12 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-29.

Sponsored by Marmara University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 1 month after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2020, registered May 2021).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
31
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study evaluated the clinical performances of a glass hybrid restoration and direct posterior micro-hybrid composite restorations with short fiber reinforced composite (SFRC) after Selective Caries Removal in restorations of first permanent molars (FPMs) that were affected by Molar Incisor Hypomineralization (MIH).

Read the detailed description

This study is being carried out in the Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Dental School, Marmara University in Türkiye. The study reviewed and approved by The Human Research Ethics Committee of Marmara University, Dental School with the protocol number of 2019-355. Informed consent forms were obtained from parents or guardians before the child participated in the study.

Study design: A split-mouth, randomized, controlled clinical study was done. The children who were diagnosed with MIH on the basis of clinical examination at the Pediatric Dentistry Clinics of Dental School, Marmara University, Turkey were enrolled in the study. No children were excluded based on gender, social or economic status.

The inclusion criteria were:

  1. Cooperative children
  2. Good oral hygiene, no periodontal disease or bad habits,
  3. Presence of at least two permanent molars with MIH involving dentin with 31 split-mouth design study according to the clinical and radiological examination.
  4. Had a normal occlusal relationship with natural dentition, and had at least one adjacent tooth contact
  5. According to the split mouth working design, an equal number of teeth were selected from the right and left sides.

The exclusion criteria were;

  1. History of bruxism, known inability to return for recall appointments and allergies to ingredients of glass ionomer based restorative materials.
  2. Cavity with restorations, hypoplasia, fracture or cracks, abrasion, erosion, abfraction, fistula, abscess or pathological mobility, pain, pulp exposure were excluded
02

Conditions studied

  • Molar Incisor Hypomineralization

Keywords

  • Molar Incisor hypomineralization
  • glass hybrid
  • short fiber reinforced composite
03

In context

Molar Hypomineralization

121 studies on the registry are indexed under Molar Hypomineralization; 41 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 31 is below the median of 52 across 94 interventional studies indexed under Molar Hypomineralization.

Browse Molar Hypomineralization studies →

Lead sponsor

Marmara University is the lead sponsor of 576 studies on the registry; 136 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Cooperative children.
  • Good oral hygiene, no periodontal disease or bad habits.
  • The presence of at least two permanent molars with MIH involving dentin with a split-mouth design study according to the clinical and radiological examination.
  • Had a normal occlusal relationship with natural dentition, and had at least one adjacent tooth contact.
  • According to the split mouth working design, an equal number of teeth were selected from the right and left sides.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of bruxism, known inability to return for recall appointments and allergies to ingredients of glass ionomer based restorative materials.
  • Cavity with restorations, hypoplasia, fracture or cracks, abrasion, erosion, abfraction, fistula, abscess or pathological mobility, pain, pulp exposure were excluded
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
31 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    glass hybrid

    Isolation was maintained using cotton rolls and a saliva ejector. MIH lesions were restored with Equia Forte HT (GC Corporation, Europe) according to manufacturer's orders. For mixing the encapsulated Equia Forte HT Bulk Fill Glass Hybrid, Capsule Mixer CM-II (GC Europe) was used for 10 sec under +/- 4,000RPM. The automatically mixed study material (10 s) was slowly injected into the cavity. The overflowing excesses were cleaned by hand tools. After 45 sec the restoration material was formed into shape. After a 2.5-min setting time, the occlusion was checked using fine carbon paper and then adjusted. Equia Coat (GC) was applied and light cured for 20 s (D-Light Duo, GC, 1,400 mW/cm2 ). After finishing the restoration procedure, the children were instructed not to eat for at least 1 h.

    Procedure: Restoration with Glass Hybrid Restorative Material (EQUIA Forte HT)

  • Active comparator
    short fiber reinforced composite (SFRC)

    Teeth were restored as same protocol with micro-hybrid composite (G-aenial, GC, Europe). LED light (GC- D-Light) was used at standard mode 1400 mW/cm2, at 50-60 ºC, for 20 sec. Immediately after heat application, occlusal interferences were checked. The restorations were trimmed and adapted using high-speed, water-cooled fine diamond burs (125 μm, Intensiv SA, Switzerland),) than polished after the estimated setting time.

    Procedure: Restoration with Short Fiber-Reinforced Composite and Micro-Hybrid Composite (EverX Flow + G-ænial Posterior)

Interventions

  • ProcedureRestoration with Short Fiber-Reinforced Composite and Micro-Hybrid Composite (EverX Flow + G-ænial Posterior)

    Following selective caries removal, the cavity was restored with a short fiber-reinforced flowable composite (EverX Flow) as a dentin replacement, followed by placement of a conventional microhybrid composite resin (G-ænial Posterior) as the occlusal enamel replacement.

  • ProcedureRestoration with Glass Hybrid Restorative Material (EQUIA Forte HT)

    Following selective caries removal, the cavity was restored with a glass hybrid restorative material (EQUIA Forte HT). After finishing and polishing, a light-cured resin coating (EQUIA Forte Coat) was applied to the restoration.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical Performance of Restorations Assessed Using the Modified United States Public Health Service Criteria

    The clinical performance of the restorations will be evaluated using the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria, including retention, marginal adaptation, marginal discoloration, anatomical form, color match, secondary caries, and postoperative sensitivity. Each criterion will be rated as Alpha, Bravo, or Charlie, with Alpha indicating the best clinical outcome and Charlie indicating an unacceptable outcome or restoration failure. For most criteria, Alpha and Bravo ratings will be considered clinically satisfactory, whereas Charlie ratings will be considered clinically unsatisfactory. For secondary caries, Alpha indicates the absence of caries and Bravo indicates the presence of secondary caries.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12, 24, 36, and 60 months after restoration placement

  2. Restoration Survival

    Restoration survival will be assessed at each follow-up visit (12, 24, 36, and 60 months after restoration placement) using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. A restoration will be considered to have survived if it remains clinically functional without requiring replacement. Survival probabilities will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups using the log-rank test.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12, 24, 36, and 60 months after restoration placement

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Marmara University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Pediatric Dentistry
    Istanbul, 34854, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07733804
Lead sponsor
Marmara University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 29, 2026
Start date
Apr 1, 2020
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2020
Completion
Aug 1, 2020
Last update
Jul 29, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion