CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07730320Updated Jul 28, 2026

The Aim of This Study is to Compare the Outcome of Piezosurgery Versus Conventional Osteotomy in Maxillary Old Malunited Fractures in Terms of Intraoperative Blood Loss and Duration of Surgery..

An interventional study of PIEZO ELECTRIC DEVICE (PIEZOSURGERY) and GROUP B CONVENTIONAL METHOD ( Mallet and OSTEOTOME in Maxilla Fracture and Malunited Maxilla Fracture, sponsored by Allama Iqbal Medical College. Completed at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 15 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-28.

Sponsored by Allama Iqbal Medical College · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2024, registered Jul 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
15 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To compare the outcomes of piezosurgery and conventional osteotomy in Le Fort I osteotomy for old malunited maxillary fractures in terms of mean duration of surgery and intraoperative blood loss.

Read the detailed description

The development of Piezosurgery was fueled by the need for greater precision and safety in bone surgery than when the standard bur and saw are used. Ultrasonic vibrations have been used to cut tissue for two decades .However, it is only in the last 18 years that it has been used routinely for standard clinical applications in many different fields of surgery. Piezosurgery decreases the risk of damage to the surrounding soft tissues and critical structures (nerves, vessels, and mucosa), particularly during an osteotomy.

Although, in theory, execution of the osteotomy itself is faster if made with the reciprocating saw, the total surgical time is actually shorter when a piezoelectric device is used because less maneuvers to protect the soft tissues are required and a clearer surgical field and increased visibility is produced.

Microvibrations of 60 to 200 m/s at 24 to 29 kHz are applied to cut in mineralized tissue while soft tissue remains unharmed.The literature reports the following possible causes of post bilateral sagittal split osteotomy facial nerve injury direct trauma to the nerve by the osteotomy, direct trauma to the nerve when the mandibular ramus is moved posterior, and postoperative hematoma at the operation site causing pressure necrosis of the nerve.

The objective of the present study was to compare the outcome of Piezosurgery in Lefort I osteotomy of patients having old Malunited Lefort I maxillary fracture as compared to the conventional method in terms of mean operative time and intraoperative blood loss. In this regard, the present survey was conducted from the patients of Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore. Therefore, 60 patients were included by using non-probability consecutive sampling who were undergoing dental treatment after fulfilling the inclusion criteria.

02

Conditions studied

  • Maxilla Fracture
  • Malunited Maxilla Fracture
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Allama Iqbal Medical College is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Malunited Lefort I Fracture of Maxilla for more than three weeks old
  • Untreated Maxillary Fractures.
  • Lefort I fracture on CT SCAN FACE with 3D reconstruction
  • Individuals with ASA1 and ASA2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous Maxillofacial Treatment
  • Lactating mothers and Pregnant Females
  • Any Bone pathology or bone disease determined on Xray
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    GROUP A (PIEZOSURGERY)

    Piezoelectric surgical devices are tools based on ultrasonic microvibrations that are utilized for precise bone cutting and low risk to the surrounding soft tissues, thereby decreasing intraoperative blood loss and Duration of surgery. In one ARM ( GROUP A) , all those patients having maxillary old Malunited fractures, Lefort I osteostomy will be performed with piezoelectric device

    Procedure: PIEZO ELECTRIC DEVICE (PIEZOSURGERY)

  • Active comparator
    GROUP B ( Conventional Method)

    Group B osteotomy will be performed in patients having old Malunied Maxillary fractures with rotary bur and then chisel/mallet which is conventional method. This method increases duration of surgery as well as intraoperative blood loss

    Procedure: GROUP B CONVENTIONAL METHOD ( Mallet and OSTEOTOME

Interventions

  • ProcedurePIEZO ELECTRIC DEVICE (PIEZOSURGERY)

    Previously for various maxillofacial procedures osteotomy was performed with rotary burs, In our study patients with Old Malunited Maxillary Fractures , osteotomy will be performed with PIezoelectric device.

  • ProcedureGROUP B CONVENTIONAL METHOD ( Mallet and OSTEOTOME

    In group B Intraoperative blood loss and mean duration of surgery will be measured after perfoming Lefort I osteotomy in patients having Maxillary Old Malunited fractures using bur and chisel/mallet. outcomes wiil be compared with Group A

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. INTROPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS

    It was measured in millilitres of increase in irrigation fluid collected during surgery and subtracting the amount of irrigation fluid from the total volume of blood and fluid in the suction bottle. it was classified as low 300 cc medium 400cc high 500cc or more

    Time frame: DURING SURGERY from the start of osteotomy

  2. Mean Duration of Surgery

    It was measured in minutes from the start of maxillary vestibular incision till the disimpaction of maxilla post bone osteotomy during surgery

    Time frame: During surgery from the start of maxillary vestibular incision till maxilla is disimpacted post bone osteotomy

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Allama Iqbal Medical College/Jinnah Hospital Lahore
    Lahore, Punjab Province 55400, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Publications

  • 1. Labanca M, Azzola F, Vinci R, Rodella L. Piezoelectric surgery: twenty years of use. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;46:265-269. 2. Gülnahar Y, Kösger H, Tutar Y. Comparison of piezosurgery and conventional surgery by heat shock protein 70 expression. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;42:508-510. 3. Pavlíková G, Foltán R, Burian M, et al. Piezosurgery prevents brain tissue damage: experimental study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;40:840-844. 4. Vercellotti T. Technological characteristics and clinical indications of piezoelectric bone surgery. Minerva Stomatol. 2004;53:207-214.
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 28, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07730320
Lead sponsor
Allama Iqbal Medical College
Responsible party
Maham Azam (Postgraduate Trainee, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Allama Iqbal Medical College) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 28, 2026
Start date
Mar 4, 2024
Primary completion
Aug 29, 2024
Completion
Sep 2, 2024
Last update
Jul 28, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion