CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07727226Updated Jul 28, 2026

Endoscopists' Perspectives on the Use of Single-Use Gastroscopes in Elective and Subacute Patients in the Endoscopy Unit

An interventional study of Ambu aScope Gastro and Reusable diagnostic gastroscopes (Olympus) in Upper Gastrointestinal Disorder, sponsored by Zealand University Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-28.

Sponsored by Zealand University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
300
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this clinical trial is to investigate whether single-use gastroscopes perform comparably to reusable gastroscopes when used in an endoscopy unit during a period of reduced endoscope reprocessing capacity.

The main question the study aims to answer is:

- How do endoscopists evaluate the performance of single-use gastroscopes compared with reusable gastroscopes in elective and subacute patients undergoing gastroscopy in the endoscopy unit?

Researchers will compare single-use and reusable gastroscopes to determine whether they provide comparable clinical performance. In addition, the study will evaluate the economic consequences of temporarily implementing single-use gastroscopes during a period of reduced reprocessing capacity, as well as compare selected clinical outcomes, including technical success, procedural complications, and the frequency of endoscopic findings.

Participants undergoing gastroscopy during the first study period will be examined using a single-use gastroscope. Participants undergoing gastroscopy during the second study period will be examined using a reusable gastroscope.

02

Conditions studied

  • Upper Gastrointestinal Disorder

Keywords

  • Gastroscopy
  • Upper endoscopy
  • Gastroscope
  • Single-use
  • Reusable
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Elective or subacute gastroscopy in the endoscopy unit
  • Age ≥ 18 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Surveillance gastroscopy for Barrett's esophagus
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
300 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Single-use gastroscope

    During the first study period, all gastroscopies performed in the endoscopy unit between 11:00 and 15:00 will be carried out using single-use gastroscopes.

    Device: Ambu aScope Gastro

  • Active comparator
    Reusable gastroscope

    During the second study period, all gastroscopies performed in the endoscopy unit between 11:00 and 15:00 will be carried out using reusable gastroscopes.

    Device: Reusable diagnostic gastroscopes (Olympus)

Interventions

  • DeviceAmbu aScope Gastro

    CE-marked single-use gastroscopes from Ambu are used in the single-use group.

  • DeviceReusable diagnostic gastroscopes (Olympus)

    Reusable diagnostic gastroscopes from Olympus are used in the reusable group.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Endoscopist-rated composite usability score

    Comparison of the composite endoscopist-rated performance score of single-use and reusable gastroscopes. The composite score will be calculated as the mean of all items rated on a 5-point Likert-scale questionnaire.

    Time frame: Procedure day (immediately after completion of the procedure)

  2. Cost per gastroscopy during the single-use period compared with the reusable period

    Cost per gastroscopy (EUR) will be calculated for each study period using hospital administrative and procedural data. The calculation will include: * Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG) reimbursement value for gastroscopy * Purchase cost of the single-use gastroscope * Reprocessing cost of reusable gastroscopes * Staff time required for preparation and post-procedure work for each gastroscope type * Additional hospital costs associated with transferring patients to other hospitals or private providers due to reduced endoscope reprocessing capacity.

    Time frame: During the gastroscopy procedure and completion of all procedure-related activities (same day).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Technical success of single-use gastroscopes vs reusable gastroscopes

    Technical success will be determined by retrospective review of the endoscopy report and medical record using predefined study criteria. Technical success is defined as successful advancement of the gastroscope to the second part of the duodenum and the ability to identify or exclude the suspected diagnosis. In procedures with an impassable stenosis or tumor, technical success is defined as successful identification of the lesion and obtaining biopsies sufficient for diagnostic evaluation when clinically indicated. The outcome will be reported as the proportion of procedures meeting the predefined criteria for technical success.

    Time frame: During the procedure

  2. Cross-over rate

    Frequency of gastroscopies requiring cross-over to another gastroscope

    Time frame: During the procedure

  3. Frequency of predefined endoscopic findings

    Endoscopic findings will be determined by retrospective review of the endoscopy report using predefined study categories. The frequency of each predefined endoscopic finding will be compared between the single-use and reusable gastroscope groups.

    Time frame: During the procedure

  4. Complications

    Complications related to gastroscopy

    Time frame: 24 hours and 72 hours follow-up after the procedure

  5. 30-day mortality

    Mortality within 30 days after the procedure

    Time frame: 30 days after the procedure

  6. Duration of procedure

    The time from intubation with the gastroscope until removal of the gastroscope from the esophagus

    Time frame: During the procedure

  7. Technical success rate of therapeutic endoscopic procedures

    Technical success of therapeutic endoscopic procedures will be determined by retrospective review of the endoscopy report and medical record using predefined study criteria. Therapeutic procedures include, but are not limited to, endoscopic hemostasis of bleeding ulcers, variceal band ligation, stent placement, foreign body removal, and dilation. Success is defined as successful completion of the intended therapeutic intervention according to the predefined criteria for each procedure (e.g., successful hemostasis, successful band ligation, successful stent deployment, or successful removal of foreign bodies). The outcome will be reported as the proportion of therapeutic procedures meeting the predefined criteria for technical success and compared between the single-use and reusable gastroscope groups.

    Time frame: During the procedure

  8. Diagnostic adequacy rate of endoscopic biopsies

    Diagnostic adequacy of endoscopic biopsies will be determined by retrospective review of the pathology report and endoscopy report using predefined study criteria. A biopsy will be considered adequate if the pathological examination provides sufficient information to either establish or exclude the suspected diagnosis. The outcome will be reported as the proportion of biopsies considered diagnostically adequate among procedures where biopsies were obtained and compared between the single-use and reusable gastroscope groups.

    Time frame: After completion of the pathology examination (up to 2 months after the procedure)

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Rommele C, Ayoub M, Scheppach MW, Muzalyova A, Wanzl J, Tadic V, Braun G, Weber T, Roser D, Nagl S, Messmann H, Ebigbo A. Single-use versus reusable gastroscopes for the initial assessment of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a prospective randomized noninferiority trial. Endoscopy. 2026 May;58(5):481-490. doi: 10.1055/a-2735-1114. Epub 2025 Oct 29. PubMed 41161323 ↗
  • Weusten BLAM, Bisschops R, Dinis-Ribeiro M, di Pietro M, Pech O, Spaander MCW, Baldaque-Silva F, Barret M, Coron E, Fernandez-Esparrach G, Fitzgerald RC, Jansen M, Jovani M, Marques-de-Sa I, Rattan A, Tan WK, Verheij EPD, Zellenrath PA, Triantafyllou K, Pouw RE. Diagnosis and management of Barrett esophagus: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2023 Dec;55(12):1124-1146. doi: 10.1055/a-2176-2440. Epub 2023 Oct 9. PubMed 37813356 ↗
  • Le NNT, Hernandez LV, Vakil N, Guda N, Patnode C, Jolliet O. Environmental and health outcomes of single-use versus reusable duodenoscopes. Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Dec;96(6):1002-1008. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.06.014. Epub 2022 Jun 17. PubMed 35718068 ↗
  • Bang JY, Sutton B, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S. Concept of disposable duodenoscope: at what cost? Gut. 2019 Nov;68(11):1915-1917. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318227. Epub 2019 Feb 12. No abstract available. PubMed 30772837 ↗
  • Deb A, Perisetti A, Goyal H, Aloysius MM, Sachdeva S, Dahiya D, Sharma N, Thosani N. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy-Associated Infections: Update on an Emerging Issue. Dig Dis Sci. 2022 May;67(5):1718-1732. doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07441-8. Epub 2022 Mar 9. PubMed 35262904 ↗
  • Cennamo V, Botter A, Landi S, Graziosi F, Bassi M, Dabizzi E, Ghersi S, Cerone G, Bonfiglioli R. Can single-use versus standard duodenoscope improve ergonomics in ERCP? A comparative, simulation-based pilot study. Endosc Int Open. 2024 Mar 18;12(3):E419-E427. doi: 10.1055/a-2231-7393. eCollection 2024 Mar. PubMed 38504744 ↗
  • Barakat MT, Banerjee S. Novel Algorithms for Reprocessing, Drying and Storing Endoscopes. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2020 Oct;30(4):677-691. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2020.06.003. Epub 2020 Jul 30. PubMed 32891225 ↗
  • Rommele C, Ayoub M, Wanzl J, Tadic V, Braun G, Weber T, Scheppach MW, Roser D, Matic K, Nagl S, Messmann H, Ebigbo A. Clinical evaluation of a novel single-use therapeutic gastroscope: a pilot feasibility study. Endoscopy. 2025 Apr;57(4):339-344. doi: 10.1055/a-2436-7933. Epub 2024 Oct 8. PubMed 39379048 ↗
  • Han ZL, Lin BT, Wang ZJ, Chen X, Xi YY, Wang JF, Qiao WG, Huang Y, Lin ZZ, Huang SH, Chua TY, Liu SD, Luo XB. Evaluation of a novel disposable esophagogastroduodenoscopy system in emergency, bedside, and intraoperative settings: Pilot study (with videos). Dig Endosc. 2023 Nov;35(7):857-865. doi: 10.1111/den.14548. Epub 2023 Apr 5. PubMed 36905288 ↗
  • Ebigbo A, Tadic V, Schlottmann J, Braun G, Prinz F, Wanzl J, Ayoub M, Kraus L, Scheppach M, Nagl S, Schnoy E, Weber T, Probst A, Messmann H, Rommele C. Evaluation of a single-use gastroscope in patients presenting with suspected upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: a pilot feasibility study (One-Scope I). Endoscopy. 2023 Oct;55(10):940-944. doi: 10.1055/a-2089-5969. Epub 2023 May 9. PubMed 37160261 ↗
  • van der Ploeg K, de Jonge PJF, Lammers WJ, Koch AD, Vos MC, Paulsen V, Aabakken L, Bruno M. Performance of a single-use gastroscope for esophagogastroduodenoscopy: Prospective evaluation. Endosc Int Open. 2024 Mar 18;12(3):E428-E434. doi: 10.1055/a-2271-2303. eCollection 2024 Mar. PubMed 38504741 ↗
  • Li DF, Shi RY, Tian YH, Xu ZL, Zhou YS, Sun XJ, Cai JW, Fang YY, Peng H, Wang JM, Dong T, Cai YD, Yao J, Wang LS. The feasibility and safety of disposable endoscope vs. conventional endoscope for upper gastrointestinal tract examination: a multicenter, randomized, parallel, non-inferiority trial. Z Gastroenterol. 2022 Sep;60(9):1314-1319. doi: 10.1055/a-1555-0568. Epub 2021 Nov 12. PubMed 34768288 ↗
  • Luo X, Ji M, Zhang S, Chen X, Zong Y, Zhang X, Hu H, Hao X, Shao L, Sun C, Shi H, Wang J, Wang B, Li P. Disposable versus reusable gastroscopes: a prospective randomized noninferiority trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Aug;96(2):250-261. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.03.024. Epub 2022 Apr 4. PubMed 35381230 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07727226
Lead sponsor
Zealand University Hospital
Responsible party
Camilla Kjelkvist-Born (Principal Investigator, Zealand University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 27, 2026
Start date
Jul 27, 2026
Primary completion
Oct 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 28, 2026

Study contacts

Camilla Kjelkvist-Born, MD
Contact
camkj@regionsjaelland.dk
+4528263875
Marie Louise Malmstrøm, MD, PhD
Contact
malmstroem@gmail.com
Lasse Bremholm Hansen, PhD,ass.prof
study chair · Surgical department of Zealand University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion