ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07723248Himalayas-1Updated Nov 3, 2026

A Study to Learn About the Investigational Drug Rinzimetostat (ORIC-944) in Patients With mCRPC Who Were Previously Treated With Abiraterone Acetate (Himalayas-1)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Rinzimetostat and Darolutamide in Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer, sponsored by ORIC Pharmaceuticals. Recruiting at 15 sites in 2 countries. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-03.

Sponsored by ORIC Pharmaceuticals · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2026; still recruiting 3 months later.
Updated Nov 3, 2026First site in Puerto Rico8 sites addedGo to Updates ↓

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
600
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 3,595 studies in Prostatic Neoplasms with a site in United States — 607 open to participants now, 977 under way, 101 of them phase 3. Prostatic Neoplasms · United States.

Planned enrollment
202nd of 3,023
600 · median 48
Started
2026
with 175 others
Phase 3
284 of 3,595
42 open now
Primary completion
2028-03
later than 643 of 971 live
Registered
3,543rd of 3,595
by date

Among the 3,595 studies in Prostatic Neoplasms with a site in United States, this one is the 202nd largest by planned enrollment of the 3,023 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 176 that started in 2026, is one of 284 in phase 3, reaches primary completion later than 643 of the 971 other live ones, and was the 3,543rd registered.

Prostatic Neoplasms

7,047 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms; 1,579 are open to participants now.

Browse Prostatic Neoplasms studies →

Open to participants now

607 of the 3,595 studies in Prostatic Neoplasms with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

602 more — sign in →

All 607 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 1,228 Prostatic Neoplasms studies recruiting now, 927 (75%) set no upper age limit and 76 (6%) stop at 75 or younger; 67 take children under 18; 82 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · male · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 3,595 studies in Prostatic Neoplasms with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Himalayas-1 is a randomized, open-label, global, multicenter phase 3 study evaluating whether the combination of rinzimetostat with darolutamide is more effective compared to physician's choice of control; ARPI (darolutamide or enzalutamide) or docetaxel for treating patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who were previously treated with abiraterone acetate.

The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate superiority in radiographic progression free survival (rPFS) of the investigational arm of rinzimetostat + darolutamide combination versus physician's choice of control: ARPI (darolutamide or enzalutamide) or docetaxel.

03

Conditions studied

  • Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer

Keywords

  • prostate cancer
  • advanced prostate cancer
  • hormone dependent malignancy
  • hormone resistant
  • relapsed
  • refractory
  • androgen receptor (AR) signaling
  • metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
  • androgen pathway modulator-resistant (APMR)
  • metastatic castration sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC)
  • androgen pathway modulator-naïve/sensitive (APMN/S)
  • polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2)-controlled dysregulation
  • embryonic ectoderm development (EED)
  • enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2)
  • ORIC-944
  • rinzimetostat
  • mevrometostat
  • darolutamide
  • enzalutamide
  • docetaxel
  • abiraterone
  • abiraterone acetate
  • efficacy
  • safety
  • open-label
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate without small cell features
  • Progressive disease in the setting of surgical or medical castration with evidence of disease progression on treatment with abiraterone acetate in the mCSPC setting or mCRPC setting is required
  • disease in bone documented on bone scan, or in soft tissue documented on CT/MRI scan
  • (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1
  • Adequate organ function

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior treatment for prostate cancer at any stage with cytotoxic chemotherapy, radioligand therapy (ie, 177Lu -PSMA-617, radium-223), ARPIs including apalutamide, darolutamide, and enzalutamide, PARP monotherapy or other systemic anticancer treatment (approved drugs or experimental compounds such as, antibody therapy, immunotherapy, gene or cell therapy, angiogenesis inhibitors, CDK4/6 inhibitors, PRC2 inhibitors) with the following exceptions:

    1. Treatment with first-generation antiandrogen agents (eg, bicalutamide, flutamide, nilutamide), but must be discontinued prior to the first dose of study medication
    2. Docetaxel treatment is allowed for mCSPC, as long as no signs of failure or disease progression occurred during treatment or within 3 months of treatment completion
  • Any other anticancer therapy (drug or vaccine which does not meet exclusion criterion 1 above) within 28 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to randomization
  • Known or suspected or active
  • cardiovascular disease defined as:
  • Any medical (including active or clinically significant bacterial, fungal, or viral infection) or psychiatric condition including recent (within the past year) or active suicidal ideation/behavior or laboratory abnormality that may increase the risk of study participation or, in the investigator's judgment, make the patient inappropriate for the study
  • Active inflammatory gastrointestinal disease, chronic diarrhea, or previous gastric resection or lap-band surgery are excluded
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Line of therapy

A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.

“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Brain metastases

Cancer deposits in the brain from a cancer that started elsewhere in the body (CNS metastases include the spinal cord).

Studies differ: some leave out any brain metastases, some accept ones treated and stable for some weeks. Check what this study allows.

Leptomeningeal disease

Cancer that has spread to the leptomeninges, the thin layers covering the brain and spinal cord, and the fluid between them. It is not the same as brain metastases.

Criteria often treat it separately, and many studies leave it out even where treated brain metastases are allowed.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
600 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Investigational Arm

    Rinzimetostat + darolutamide

    Drug: Rinzimetostat · Drug: Darolutamide

  • Active comparator
    Physician's Choice

    Control Arm

    Drug: Darolutamide · Drug: Enzalutamide · Drug: Docetaxel

Interventions

  • DrugRinzimetostat

    400 mg once daily (QD)

    Also known as: ORIC-944

  • 600 mg twice daily (BID)

    Also known as: Nubeqa

  • 160 mg once daily (QD)

    Also known as: Xtandi

  • 75 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) every 21 days for up to 10 cycles

    Also known as: Taxotere

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Radiographic Progression Free Survival assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) per RECIST v1.1 and Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 (PCWG3)

    Radiographic Progression Free Survival is defined as the time from the date of randomization to first evidence of radiographic progression as assessed in soft tissue by RECIST 1.1 or in bone per PCWG3 guideline by BICR, or death, whichever occurs first

    Time frame: Randomization up to ~2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival (OS)

    OS is defined as time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause

    Time frame: 5 years

  2. Objective response rate (ORR)

    ORR is defined as proportion of patients with measurable soft tissue disease at baseline who have a confirmed objective response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR)

    Time frame: Randomization up to ~2 years

  3. Duration of Response (DoR)

    DOR is defined as time of first response to first documentation of radiographic progression or death, whichever occurs first

    Time frame: Randomization up to ~2 years

  4. Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) response

    Defined as the proportion of patients with a confirmed ≥50% and ≥90% decline in PSA from baseline as per the PCWG3 criteria, along with the maximum decline in PSA occurring at any point on study

    Time frame: Randomization up to ~2 years

  5. Time to PSA progression

    Measured from the start of treatment until criteria for PSA progression are met as per PCWG3

    Time frame: Randomization up to ~2 years

  6. Time to initiation of antineoplastic therapy

    Time from randomization to first symptomatic skeletal event (symptomatic bone fractures, spinal cord compression, surgery or radiation to the bone whichever is first)

    Time frame: Randomization up to ~4 years

  7. Time to first symptomatic skeletal event

    Time from randomization to first symptomatic skeletal event (symptomatic bone fractures, spinal cord compression, surgery or radiation to the bone whichever is first) Compare patient reported outcomes (PROs) between the investigational treatment and control arms

    Time frame: Randomization up to ~4 years

  8. Change from baseline in patient reported pain symptoms per Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF)

    Analysis of Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) will be based on the pain severity score (mean of individual BPI-SF items 3, 4, 5 and 6), the pain interference score (the mean of items 9A-9G), and the single BPI-SF Item 3 which asks the patient to rate pain at its worst in the last 24 hours

    Time frame: Randomization up to ~4 years

  9. Change from baseline in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) per Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (FACT-P)

    Change from baseline in HRQoL (FACT-P total score) will be presented. The FACT-P total score will be calculated based on the participant responses to the 39 items in the FACT-P questionnaire. Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 Likert-type scale and then combined to produce the FACT-P total score (0-156), with higher scores representing better health-related quality of life

    Time frame: Randomization up to ~4 years

  10. Change from baseline in social/family well-being per Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (FACT-P)

    Change from baseline in social/family well-being score will be presented. The social/family well-being score will be calculated based on 7 items in the FACT-P questionnaire; score range 0-28. Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 Likert-type scale

    Time frame: Randomization up to ~4 years

  11. Change from baseline in functioning well-being per Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (FACT-P)

    Change from baseline in functioning well-being score will be presented. The functioning well-being score will be calculated based on 7 items in the FACT-P questionnaire; score range 0-28. Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 Likert-type scale

    Time frame: Randomization up to ~4 years

  12. Change from baseline in physical well-being per Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (FACT-P)

    Change from baseline in physical well-being score will be presented. The physical well-being score will be calculated based on 7 items in the FACT-P questionnaire; score range 0-28. Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 Likert-type scale

    Time frame: Randomization up to ~4 years

  13. Change from baseline in symptoms per Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (FACT-P)

    Change from baseline prostate cancer symptoms (PCS) score will be presented. The PCS score will be calculated based on 12 items in the FACT-P questionnaire; score range 0-48. Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 Likert-type scale

    Time frame: Randomization up to ~4 years

  14. Change from baseline in patient reported health status per European Quality of Life 5-Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L)

    Participants will self-rate their current state of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression by choosing 1 of 5 possible responses that record the level of severity (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, or extreme problems) within each dimension. The questionnaire also includes a visual analog scale to self-rate general health state on a scale from "the worst health you can imagine" to "the best health you can imagine."

    Time frame: Randomization up to ~4 years

  15. Symptomatic toxicity as measured by items from the Patient-Reported Outcome CTCAE (PRO-CTCAE)

    Each selected PRO-CTCAE items will be assessed related to one or more attributes that include counts for the frequency, severity, and/or interference with usual or daily activities

    Time frame: Randomization up to ~2 years

  16. Overall side effect burden as measured by the FACT- GP5

    The FACT-GP5 question assesses overall side effect burden with the following response options "I am bothered by side effects of treatment," is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4) and counts will be presented

    Time frame: Randomization up to ~2 years

  17. Time to confirmatory deterioration in patient-reported pain symptoms per BPI-SF Item 3 "worst pain in 24 hours"

    Defined as the time from randomization to onset of pain progression, which is defined as \> 2-point increase from baseline in the score from the BPI-SF Question 3 that is confirmed at the next consecutive assessment \> 4 weeks apart or an initial deterioration followed by death before the next assessment

    Time frame: Randomization up to ~4 years

  18. Time to definitive deterioration in patient-reported health related quality of life (HRQoL) per FACT-P

    Defined as the time from randomization to onset of definitive deterioration in FACT-P total score, which is defined as \>10 point decrease from baseline and no subsequent observations with a \<10 point decrease from baseline FACT-P total score

    Time frame: Randomization up to ~4 years

  19. Time to definitive deterioration in patient-reported physical well-being per FACT-P

    Time to definitive deterioration in physical well-being (PWB) per FACT-P is defined as the time from randomization to onset of definitive deterioration in physical well-being, which is defined as ≥3-point

    Time frame: Randomization up to ~4 years

  20. Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs)

    Type, incidence, relationship to study treatments, severity, and seriousness of AEs \[as graded by National Cancer Institute (NCI) common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) v6.0\] and other clinical assessments

    Time frame: Randomization up to ~2 years

  21. Evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of rinzimetostat in combination with darolutamide

    Rinzimetostat characterized by predose and postdose plasma concentrations at selected time points

    Time frame: Randomization up to ~1 year

07

Study locations

15 of 15 sites recruiting
  • Oncura Health
    Glendale, California 91204, United States
    Recruiting
  • SSAK Partners, LLC
    Coral Springs, Florida 33065, United States
    Recruiting
  • First Urology PSC
    Jeffersonville, Indiana 40207, United States
    Recruiting
  • Cancer And Hematology Centers Of Western Michigan
    Holland, Michigan 49424, United States
    Recruiting
  • Urology Specialists of the Carolinas - University Place
    Charlotte, North Carolina 29464, United States
    Recruiting
  • Gabrail Cancer Center Research
    Canton, Ohio 44718, United States
    Recruiting
  • MidLantic Urology LLC
    Bala-Cynwyd, Pennsylvania 19004, United States
    Recruiting
  • Keystone Urology Specialists
    Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17604, United States
    Recruiting
  • Carolina Urologic Research Center
    Myrtle Beach, South Carolina 29572, United States
    Recruiting
  • Urology Associates
    Nashville, Tennessee 37209, United States
    Recruiting
  • Urology Clinics Of North Texas
    Dallas, Texas 75231, United States
    Recruiting
  • Urology Partners of North Texas (UPNT)
    Fort Worth, Texas 76132, United States
    Recruiting
  • Houston Metro Urology (HMU)
    Houston, Texas 77027, United States
    Recruiting
  • Summit Urology
    Murray, Utah 84107, United States
    Recruiting
  • BRCR Global (Network)
    San Juan, 00917, Puerto Rico
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

2 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Aug 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2028, 19 months after the start.

Of 126 industry-sponsored phase 3 interventional studies under Prostatic Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 38 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 53. This study's planned 19 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 265 studies reached it within 57 months; a quarter within 31 and three quarters within 100.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 18, 2026
First posted
Jul 23, 2026
StartActual
Aug 3, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Mar 2028
CompletionEst.
Sep 2030
Last update
Nov 3, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Sites
8 sites added — first site in Puerto Rico
Show 8 added (7 United States, 1 Puerto Rico)
  • SSAK Partners, LLC · Coral Springs, United States
  • Cancer And Hematology Centers Of Western Michigan · Holland, United States
  • Carolina Urologic Research Center · Myrtle Beach, United States
  • Urology Associates · Nashville, United States
  • BRCR Global (Network) · San Juan, Puerto Rico
  • Oncura Health · Glendale, United States
  • MidLantic Urology LLC · Bala-Cynwyd, United States
  • Keystone Urology Specialists · Lancaster, United States
across 2 updates, Oct 5, 2026 – Nov 3, 2026
Show all 2 updates
  1. Nov 3, 2026
    3 sites added
    Show 3 added (3 United States)
    • Oncura Health · Glendale, United States
    • MidLantic Urology LLC · Bala-Cynwyd, United States
    • Keystone Urology Specialists · Lancaster, United States
    + 1 other change: verification date
  2. Oct 5, 2026
    5 sites added — first site in Puerto Rico
    Show 5 added (4 United States, 1 Puerto Rico)
    • SSAK Partners, LLC · Coral Springs, United States
    • Cancer And Hematology Centers Of Western Michigan · Holland, United States
    • Carolina Urologic Research Center · Myrtle Beach, United States
    • Urology Associates · Nashville, United States
    • BRCR Global (Network) · San Juan, Puerto Rico
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07723248
Lead sponsor
ORIC Pharmaceuticals
Collaborators
Bayer
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 23, 2026
Start date
Aug 3, 2026
Primary completion
Mar 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 3, 2026

Study contacts

ORIC Clinical Call Center
Contact
clinical@oricpharma.com

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion