CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07720401Updated Sep 1, 2026

The Effect of Intradialytic Exercise on Postural Abnormalities

An interventional study of Supervised Intradialytic Multimodal Exercise Program in End-Stage Renal Disease and Hemodialysis Complication, sponsored by Pardis Specialized Wellness Institute. Recruiting at 1 site in Iran. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-01.

Sponsored by Pardis Specialized Wellness Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
98
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized, assessor-blinded controlled trial will evaluate the preliminary efficacy and safety of a 12-week supervised intradialytic multimodal exercise program for improving postural abnormalities in adults receiving maintenance hemodialysis. Participants will be randomized to either supervised intradialytic exercise plus usual care or usual care alone. The exercise program will be performed three times per week during scheduled hemodialysis sessions and will include postural correction exercises, resistance-band strengthening, core stabilization, stretching, breathing exercises, and seated aerobic cycling. The primary outcome will be change in thoracic kyphosis angle from baseline to Week 12. Secondary outcomes will include craniovertebral angle, balance, mobility, functional exercise capacity, gait speed, physical activity level, adherence, and adverse events. The findings may provide preliminary evidence on the feasibility, safety, and potential clinical value of incorporating postural correction exercises into routine hemodialysis care.

Read the detailed description

Falls represent one of the most consequential complications in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), with approximately 25% of dialysis patients experiencing at least one fall annually. Fall-related injuries in this population, including hip fractures, vertebral fractures, and joint dislocations, contribute to significant functional deterioration, diminished quality of life, restricted mobility, and increased healthcare expenditure. Among the many factors driving this fall burden, postural abnormalities have emerged as clinically significant yet persistently underinvestigated contributors. In particular, thoracic hyperkyphosis and forward head posture (FHP) are now recognized as highly prevalent structural deformities in dialysis patients that directly impair postural stability, physical function, and overall safety.

The clinical impact of thoracic hyperkyphosis and FHP extends across multiple physiological domains. Hyperkyphosis, characterized by excessive posterior curvature of the thoracic spine, displaces the body's center of gravity anteriorly, impairing postural control and forcing compensatory adaptations in the lumbar spine and hips. When these compensatory mechanisms are overwhelmed, as is common in the context of the sarcopenia and muscle weakness that accompany ESRD, hyperkyphosis leads to impaired gait, reduced walking speed, diminished balance, and substantially heightened fall susceptibility. Beyond its musculoskeletal effects, thoracic hyperkyphosis restricts thoracic cage mobility, reduces vital capacity, and compromises cardiopulmonary function.

FHP, defined as anterior displacement of the head relative to the shoulder plumb line in the sagittal plane, generates disproportionate loading of the posterior cervical musculature and disrupts the normal biomechanics of the cervical spine. This misalignment reduces both static and dynamic balance by destabilizing the vestibular and proprioceptive feedback systems that depend on neutral cervical alignment. FHP has been associated with increased postural sway and instability in older adults, as well as altered thoracic shape and impaired respiratory function through weakening of the accessory breathing musculature. Critically, hyperkyphosis and FHP are biomechanically coupled: as thoracic kyphosis increases, compensatory anterior head translation increases proportionally to maintain horizontal gaze, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of progressive postural dysfunction and functional decline.

Despite the scale and clinical consequences of this problem, effective corrective strategies for dialysis patients remain largely untested. Evidence from general and older adult populations, however, strongly supports the role of targeted exercise in correcting both hyperkyphosis and FHP. Combined strengthening and stretching exercise programs, specifically targeting the thoracic extensors, scapular stabilizers, and deep cervical flexors while stretching the shortened anterior chain muscles, are found to produce significant reductions in kyphosis angle and improvements in craniovertebral angle across populations with postural deformities. These findings indicate that exercise-based postural correction is not only feasible but reliably effective in older adults with comparable musculoskeletal profiles to dialysis patients, making translation to the ESRD population a logical and clinically justified step.

The key challenge lies in delivering such exercise to a population with significant barriers to participation in community or home-based programs, including transportation dependence, fatigue, and medically complex comorbidities. Intradialytic exercise (IDE), supervised physical activity performed during scheduled hemodialysis sessions, offers a uniquely practical solution. By embedding exercise within the unavoidable treatment time of dialysis, IDE eliminates the need for additional healthcare visits, ensures direct professional supervision, and capitalizes on the structure of the dialysis schedule to provide consistent physical stimulation.

Despite this accumulating evidence, no published trial has specifically examined the effect of intradialytic exercise on the structural postural abnormalities of thoracic hyperkyphosis and FHP in hemodialysis patients. The present randomized controlled trial therefore aims to determine whether a 12-week supervised, multimodal intradialytic exercise program can improve spinal and cervical postural alignment, dynamic balance, physical function, and health-related quality of life in hemodialysis patients, providing the evidence needed to justify integrating postural correction into standard dialysis care.

02

Conditions studied

  • End-Stage Renal Disease
  • Hemodialysis Complication

Keywords

  • Intradialytic Exercise
  • Hemodialysis
  • Postural Abnormalities
  • Hyperkyphosis
  • Forward Head Posture
  • Balance
  • Physical Function
  • Quality of Life
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-80 years
  • Diagnosed with ESRD and receiving stable maintenance hemodialysis for at least 3 months at the participating center, with a dialysis frequency of three sessions per week
  • Confirmed presence of at least one postural abnormality (hyperkyphosis ≥53° in women or ≥55° in men, or CVA \<53°) assessed at screening
  • Written informed consent obtained, indicating decision-making capacity and willingness to participate
  • Medical clearance from attending nephrologist to participate in supervised exercise during dialysis
  • Ability to sit upright in a dialysis chair and perform seated or supported standing exercises
  • Ability to communicate in Persian and understand study instructions

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unstable cardiovascular status, including recent (within 3 months) myocardial infarction, unstable angina, decompensated congestive heart failure (NYHA Class III-IV), or uncontrolled arrhythmia
  • Active infection, acute febrile illness, or acute medical condition requiring hospitalization
  • Hemodynamic instability defined as systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg or >200 mmHg, or severe orthostatic hypotension, at screening or prior to exercise sessions
  • Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus with labile glycemic control (blood glucose \<4 mmol/L or >22 mmol/L at dialysis session start)
  • Severe musculoskeletal pain at rest or with minimal activity (Numeric Pain Rating Scale ≥7/10) that would preclude exercise participation
  • Inability to perform seated exercises, walk independently, or maintain upright posture; severe neurological disability
  • Recent fracture (within 6 months) of vertebral column, pelvis, or lower extremities
  • Severe peripheral neuropathy or vascular disease (ABI \<0.6) precluding lower limb exercise
  • Dyspnea at rest or with activities of daily living corresponding to NYHA Class IV
  • Participation in a structured exercise program targeting postural correction, resistance, or balance training ≥3 times per week in the preceding 3 months
  • Severe cognitive impairment (MMSE \<18) preventing informed consent or adherence to exercise instruction
  • Pregnancy or planned pregnancy during the study period
  • Life expectancy \<6 months as determined by the attending nephrologist
  • Scheduled kidney transplantation within the study period
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
98 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intradialytic Exercise Group

    Participants (n = 15) assigned to the exercise group will undergo a 12-week supervised multimodal intradialytic exercise program, performed during their scheduled hemodialysis sessions three times per week (36 sessions total). Each session is 40-45 minutes in duration and is conducted during the second hour of the dialysis session, supervised by a qualified exercise physiologist or physical therapist who is present at the dialysis unit.

    Behavioral: Supervised Intradialytic Multimodal Exercise Program

  • No intervention
    Control Group

    Patients allocated to the control group (n = 15) will receive their standard nephrological care as determined by the attending nephrologist. Throughout the 12-week period, all control participants will be instructed to maintain their standard treatment regimen and their habitual dietary and physical activity patterns. Control participants will not receive any structured exercise instruction, postural correction advice, or exercise-related supervision as part of the trial. Usual care includes routine hemodialysis (three sessions per week, 3.5-4 hours per session), standard medications, and dietitian consultations.

Interventions

  • BehavioralSupervised Intradialytic Multimodal Exercise Program

    Exercises include thoracic extension, scapular retraction, deep cervical flexor activation, pectoral stretching, seated rowing, shoulder external rotation, seated knee extension, hip flexion, ankle pumps, and cycle ergometry. Resistance exercises will be performed for 1-3 sets of 10-15 repetitions and progressed every two weeks according to RPE, tolerance, and absence of adverse symptoms. Exercise will be stopped if the participant develops chest pain, severe dyspnea, dizziness, nausea, muscle cramps, pallor, arrhythmia, systolic blood pressure \>180 mmHg or \<90 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure \>110 mmHg, oxygen saturation \<90%, or any symptom judged unsafe by the supervising clinician.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Thoracic Kyphosis Angle From Baseline to Week 12

    Thoracic kyphosis will be assessed using a Debrunner Kyphometer, a validated non-radiographic instrument for measuring thoracic curvature. Participants stand in a relaxed upright position while the device arms are placed over the T2-T3 and T11-T12 spinous processes. Three measurements are obtained and averaged. The outcome is recorded in degrees (°), with higher values indicating greater kyphosis. Hyperkyphosis is defined as ≥53° in women and ≥55° in men. Negative change indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Pre-test (Baseline) and 3 Months Later (Post-test, Week 12)

  2. Change in craniovertebral angle, measured in degrees, from baseline to Week 12

    Forward head posture will be measured using digital photogrammetry and craniovertebral angle (CVA) analysis. Reflective markers are placed on the tragus and the C7 spinous process. Standardized lateral photographs are captured at a fixed distance and analyzed using Kinovea software (version 0.9.5 or later). CVA is defined as the angle between a horizontal line passing through C7 and the line connecting C7 to the tragus. Three photographs are obtained and averaged. Larger CVA values indicate improved head posture. A CVA ≥53° is considered normal posture, whereas lower values indicate forward head posture. Positive change indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Pre-test (Baseline) and 3 Months Later (Post-test, Week 12)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) From Baseline to Week 12

    Participants rise from a standard chair, walk 3 meters, turn, return, and sit down. Time is recorded in seconds from standing initiation to sitting completion. Two measurement trials are performed and averaged. Lower scores indicate better mobility and balance. TUG values ≥12 seconds indicate increased fall risk. The Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test is measured on a continuous scale ranging from 0 seconds to no predefined maximum value, with lower scores indicating better performance and higher scores indicating worse mobility and greater fall risk.

    Time frame: Pre-test (Baseline) and 3 Months Later (Post-test, Week 12)

  2. Change in Berg Balance Scale Score From Baseline to Week 12

    Static and dynamic balance will be quantified using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), a 14-item performance-based assessment. Each item is scored from 0 (unable to perform) to 4 (independent performance), yielding a total score of 0 to 56 points. Higher scores indicate better balance. Established risk thresholds are: 41-56 = low fall risk; 21-40 = medium fall risk; 0-20 = high fall risk. A cut-off of ≤45 has been identified as clinically significant for elevated fall risk in older adults and patients with chronic kidney disease. The Berg Balance Scale total score ranges from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating better balance and lower scores indicating worse balance performance.

    Time frame: Pre-test (Baseline) and 3 Months Later (Post-test, Week 12)

  3. Change in Six-Minute Walk Distance From Baseline to Week 12

    Physical function will be evaluated using the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) according to standardized guidelines. Participants walk as far as possible along a 30-meter corridor during 6 minutes. The total distance walked is recorded in meters. Higher distances indicate better functional exercise capacity. The 6MWT is validated and responsive to exercise interventions in hemodialysis populations. A change of approximately 25-30 meters is considered clinically meaningful. The Six-Minute Walk Test is measured as total walking distance (meters) with a minimum value of 0 meters and no predefined maximum value; higher distances indicate better functional exercise capacity, whereas lower distances indicate poorer physical function.

    Time frame: Pre-test (Baseline) and 3 Months Later (Post-test, Week 12)

  4. Change in Gait Speed From Baseline to Week 12

    Habitual gait speed will be assessed over a 4-meter walking course using a stopwatch. Participants are instructed to walk at their comfortable, usual pace. The time elapsed is recorded in seconds and converted to meters per second (m/s). Two trials are performed and averaged. A gait speed \<1.0 m/s is internationally recognized as a threshold associated with increased fall risk, frailty, and adverse health outcomes in older adults and dialysis patients. Gait Speed is recorded in meters per second (m/s), with a minimum value of 0 m/s and no predefined maximum value. Higher gait speed indicates better mobility and physical function, whereas lower gait speed indicates poorer mobility and increased health risk.

    Time frame: Pre-test (Baseline) and 3 Months Later (Post-test, Week 12)

  5. Change in LoPAQ Total Physical Activity Score From Baseline to Week 12

    Daily physical activity level will be assessed using the Low Physical Activity Questionnaire (LoPAQ). The questionnaire evaluates occupational, transportation, household, leisure, and sedentary activities. Results are expressed as MET-minutes/week using standardized metabolic equivalent values. Activity levels are categorized as low (\<600 MET-min/week), moderate (600-3000 MET-min/week), or high (\>3000 MET-min/week). Higher scores indicate greater physical activity. The Low Physical Activity Questionnaire does not have a fixed maximum score. Scores range from 0 MET-minutes/week to no predefined upper limit, with higher scores indicating greater physical activity and lower scores indicating lower physical activity levels.

    Time frame: Pre-test (Baseline) and 3 Months Later (Post-test, Week 12)

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Pardis specialized wellness institute
    Isfahan, Iran
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Tabibi MA, Cheema B, Salimian N, Correa HL, Ahmadi S. The effect of intradialytic exercise on dialysis patient survival: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Nephrol. 2023 Apr 17;24(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12882-023-03158-6. PubMed 37069527 ↗
  • Greenwood SA, Young HML, Briggs J, Castle EM, Walklin C, Haggis L, Balkin C, Asgari E, Bhandari S, Burton JO, Billany RE, Bishop NC, Bramham K, Campbell J, Chilcot J, Cooper NJ, Deelchand V, Graham-Brown MPM, Hamilton A, Jesky M, Kalra PA, Koufaki P, McCafferty K, Nixon AC, Noble H, Saynor Z, Taal MW, Tollit J, Wheeler DC, Wilkinson TJ, Worboys H, Macdonald JH. Evaluating the effect of a digital health intervention to enhance physical activity in people with chronic kidney disease (Kidney BEAM): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial in the UK. Lancet Digit Health. 2024 Jan;6(1):e23-e32. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00204-2. Epub 2023 Nov 14. PubMed 37968170 ↗
  • Chae TS, Kim DS, Ko MH, Won YH. Effect of Pre- and Post-Dialysis Exercise on Functional Capacity Using Portable Ergometer in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients. Ann Rehabil Med. 2024 Aug;48(4):239-248. doi: 10.5535/arm.240005. Epub 2024 Aug 30. PubMed 39210749 ↗
  • Lee CL, Wang PC, Chen YL, Chen ZY, Uen CC, Lai HY, Shiao CC. Comparisons of Intradialytic Exercise Versus Home-Based Exercise in Hemodialysis Patients: A Narrative Review. Biomedicines. 2024 Oct 16;12(10):2364. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12102364. PubMed 39457675 ↗
  • Zou ZH, Zhang JQ, Yi ZH, Chen X, Qing W. Effects of intradialytic exercise on frailty in maintenance hemodialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Physiol. 2025 Nov 6;16:1600219. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1600219. eCollection 2025. PubMed 41281915 ↗
  • Sepehri S, Sheikhhoseini R, Piri H, Sayyadi P. The effect of various therapeutic exercises on forward head posture, rounded shoulder, and hyperkyphosis among people with upper crossed syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Feb 1;25(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07224-4. PubMed 38302926 ↗
  • Mylonas K, Chatzis G, Makrypidi V, Chrysanthopoulos G, Gkrilias P, Tsekoura M, Billis E, Tsepis E, Tsirogiannis G, Fousekis K. Reliability of photogrammetric evaluation of the craniovertebral angle, swayback posture, and knee hyperextension in university students. J Phys Ther Sci. 2025 Apr;37(4):171-175. doi: 10.1589/jpts.37.171. Epub 2025 Apr 1. PubMed 40171184 ↗
  • Nepomuceno APFA, Cury AC, Pinheiro LSP, Sabino GS, Souza TR, Fonseca ST, Ocarino JM, Resende RA. Validity, reliability, and clinical usefulness of instruments for measuring thoracic kyphosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Braz J Phys Ther. 2025 Sep-Oct;29(5):101246. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2025.101246. Epub 2025 Aug 7. PubMed 40780025 ↗
  • Lambert K, Lightfoot CJ, Jegatheesan DK, Gabrys I, Bennett PN. Physical activity and exercise recommendations for people receiving dialysis: A scoping review. PLoS One. 2022 Apr 28;17(4):e0267290. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267290. eCollection 2022. PubMed 35482797 ↗
  • Ribeiro HS, Andrade FP, Leal DV, Oliveira JS, Wilund KR, Viana JL. How is exercise being prescribed for patients on hemodialysis? A scoping review. J Nephrol. 2023 Jun;36(5):1307-1319. doi: 10.1007/s40620-022-01513-8. Epub 2022 Nov 22. PubMed 36418777 ↗
  • Pender D, McGowan E, McVeigh JG, McCullagh R. The Effects of Intradialytic Exercise on Key Indices of Sarcopenia in Patients With End-stage Renal Disease: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2023 Jan 13;5(1):100252. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2022.100252. eCollection 2023 Mar. PubMed 36968168 ↗
  • Hu H, Liu X, Chau PH, Choi EPH. Effects of intradialytic exercise on health-related quality of life in patients undergoing maintenance haemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Qual Life Res. 2022 Jul;31(7):1915-1932. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-03025-7. Epub 2021 Nov 3. PubMed 34731388 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual participant data (IPD) underlying the results reported in the published article will be shared after de-identification (text, tables, figures, and appendices). Supporting documents including the study protocol and statistical analysis plan (SAP) will also be made available.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07720401
Lead sponsor
Pardis Specialized Wellness Institute
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 22, 2026
Start date
Aug 25, 2026
Primary completion
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 1, 2026

Study contacts

Nasrin Salimian
Contact
statisrin@gmail.com
+98913251202
Mohammad Ali Tabibi, Dr
Contact
m.tabibi@ut.ac.ir
+989133184624
Mohammad Ali Tabibi, Dr
principal investigator · Pardis Specialized Wellness Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion