ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07714278Updated Aug 14, 2026

Effectiveness of Video-Based Movement Analysis-Guided Personalized Rehabilitation in Patients With Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN)

An interventional study of ReMap and Usual Care in Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN), sponsored by Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in South Korea. Open to participants aged 19 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-14.

Sponsored by Seoul National University Bundang Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
19 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to quantify motor control abnormalities using video-based movement analysis in patients with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) and to evaluate the effectiveness of an analysis-guided personalized rehabilitation intervention. The study enrolls adult patients diagnosed with breast cancer, colorectal cancer, or gynecological cancer.

This is a randomized crossover trial where participants have an equal (50%) chance of being assigned to either Group A or Group B. The total participation period for each participant is approximately 8 weeks, which includes outcome assessments at baseline, week 4, and week 8.

The study consists of two periods:

Phase 1 (First 4 weeks): Group A participates in the 'ReMAP' rehabilitation exercise program, while Group B receives usual care.

Phase 2 (Next 4 weeks): Group A switches to usual care, while Group B participates in the 'ReMAP' rehabilitation exercise program.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN)

Keywords

  • Falls
  • Rehabilitation
  • Postural Balance
  • Motor Control
  • Motion Analysis
  • Breast Cancer
  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Gynecological Cancer
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

14,825 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 3,319 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 150 is above the median of 72 across 10,896 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital is the lead sponsor of 376 studies on the registry; 56 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients aged 19 years or older.
  • Diagnosed with breast cancer, colorectal cancer, or gynecological cancer, and currently receiving chemotherapy or under follow-up observation after completing treatment.
  • History of treatment with neurotoxic chemotherapeutic agents (e.g., taxane, platinum, etc.) or experiencing related symptoms.
  • Symptoms or risk of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) ( Grade >= 1).
  • Able to walk independently (with or without assistive devices).
  • Able to understand the study purpose and procedures and voluntarily provide written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Peripheral neuropathy clearly attributable to causes other than CIPN, such as diabetic neuropathy.
  • Severe central nervous system disorders (e.g., stroke, Parkinson's disease, etc.) or severe musculoskeletal disorders that make functional assessment or exercise performance difficult.
  • Severe cognitive impairment that interferes with study participation or the ability to follow instructions.
  • Recent significant injury due to a fall, or cases where exercise performance is deemed medically unsafe.
  • Recurrent or progressive cancer with an unstable general systemic condition.
  • Any other condition or clinical reason that, in the opinion of the investigator, makes participation in the study inappropriate.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

CTCAE grade

The US National Cancer Institute’s scale of how severe an adverse event is — any unwanted medical event during a study, such as a symptom, an illness or an abnormal test result, whether or not a treatment caused it. Whether it did is judged separately.

1
Mild.
2
Moderate.
3
Severe.
4
Life-threatening.
5
Death due to the event.

“Side effects of earlier treatment resolved to grade 1 or less” means they have settled to mild or gone.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active Comparator: Group A (ReMAP then Usual Care)

    Participants randomized to Group A will first perform the 4-week 'ReMAP' rehabilitation program (Phase 1), and then cross over to receive 4 weeks of usual care (Phase 2).

    Behavioral: ReMap · Behavioral: Usual Care

  • Active comparator
    Active Comparator: Group B (Usual Care then ReMAP)

    Participants randomized to Group B will first receive 4 weeks of usual care (Phase 1), and then cross over to perform the 4-week 'ReMAP' rehabilitation program (Phase 2).

    Behavioral: ReMap · Behavioral: Usual Care

Interventions

  • BehavioralReMap

    The intervention is conducted over a total of 4 weeks, with 3 sessions per week, for a total of 12 sessions, with each session lasting approximately 40-60 minutes. Each session consists of warm-up, breathing training, upper and lower extremity exercises, trunk and total-body coordination exercises, and cool-down, following a structured progression with gradually increasing difficulty. The program begins with the "Body Awareness and Basic Adaptation" phase and progresses through "Movement Expansion," "Coordination and Dynamic Balance," and finally, the "Functional Activity Integration" phase. Week 1: Postural alignment and body midline awareness training (goal : Postural alignment) Week 2 : Lateral weight shifting and upper/lower extremity coordination training (goal : Coordination) Week 3 : Movement balance and functional gait pattern training (goal : Dynamic balance) Week 4 : Complex movement and functional movement integration training (goal : Functional integration)

  • BehavioralUsual Care

    During the initial 4 weeks, the control group maintains usual care and routine self-management without any structured rehabilitation. This usual care includes standard pharmacological treatment, symptom management, and general lifestyle education guided by their healthcare providers; no study-specific exercise programs are provided. Participants are instructed to maintain ordinary activities of daily living but advised not to initiate any new exercise regimens or rehabilitation programs during this period. The control group follows the exact same assessment schedule as the intervention group to track CIPN symptoms, functional status, and fall risks. For ethical considerations, a wait-list design is applied: control participants will cross over to receive the identical 4-week ReMAP-CIPN rehabilitation program immediately after their 4-week post-baseline evaluation.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in mobility assessed by the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test

    The TUG test measures the time (in seconds) it takes for a participant to rise from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back, and sit down. Shorter completion times indicate better mobility and dynamic balance. This is the primary outcome of the study, which served as the basis for the sample size calculation.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8 (Primary comparison is the change from baseline to Week 4)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in health-related quality of life assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30

    The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire evaluating the quality of life of cancer patients. It includes functional scales, symptom scales, and a global health status. Scores range from 0 to 100. For functional scales and global health, higher scores represent better functioning/QoL. For symptom scales, higher scores represent worse symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8

  2. Change from baseline in chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) symptoms assessed by the EORTC QLQ-CIPN20

    The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 CIPN twenty-item subscale (EORTC QLQ-CIPN20) will be used to assess sensory, motor, and autonomic CIPN symptoms. Scores range from 20 to 80, which are then converted to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores represent more severe symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8

  3. Change from baseline in disability and functioning assessed by the WHODAS 2.0 (World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0)

    The WHODAS 2.0 is a 36-item instrument used to measure health and disability in daily life across six domains. Scores range from 0 (no disability) to 100 (full disability), with higher scores indicating greater functional impairment.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8

  4. Change from baseline in fall risk assessed by the Fall Assessment Scale - Korean version (FAS-K)

    The FAS-K is a clinical assessment tool used to evaluate the objective risk of falls in adult patients based on 14 risk-associated items (e.g., age, history of falls, cognitive status, medications, and mobility). Each item is scored as 1 (Yes) or 0 (No). The total score ranges from 0 to 14, with higher scores indicating a higher clinical risk of falls.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8

  5. Change from baseline in walking endurance assessed by the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)

    The 6MWT measures the maximum distance (in meters) a participant can walk quickly on a flat, hard surface in 6 minutes. Longer distances indicate better walking endurance and functional exercise capacity.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8

  6. Change from baseline in handgrip strength

    Handgrip strength is measured in kilograms (kg) using a digital hand dynamometer. Higher values indicate greater upper extremity muscle strength.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8

  7. Change from baseline in kinematic parameters of movement assessed by video-based motion analysis

    Video-based motion analysis will evaluate 6 designated tasks (including gait, weight shifting, and postural balance) captured from anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral views. Quantitative assessment metrics will include sway control, verticality control, alignment, coordination, and smoothness.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2028, 23 months after the start.

Of 2,661 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Breast Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 33 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 66. This study's planned 23 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 2,771 studies reached it within 33 months; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 66.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 15, 2026
First posted
Jul 20, 2026
StartActual
Jun 30, 2026
Primary completionEst.
May 31, 2028
CompletionEst.
May 31, 2028
Last update
Aug 14, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07714278
Responsible party
Eun Joo Yang (Clinical Associate Professor, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 20, 2026
Start date
Jun 30, 2026
Primary completion
May 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
May 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 14, 2026

Study contacts

Eun Joo Yang, MD, PhD
study director · Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion