ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07712770PRECISEUpdated Jul 17, 2026

Pilot Radioembolisation Clinical Trial Assessing Safety and Efficacy in Recurrent Glioma

An Early Phase 1 interventional study of SIR-Spheres® in Recurrent Glioblastoma IDH Wildtype and Recurrent Glioblastoma, sponsored by Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Australia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-17.

Sponsored by Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute · Early Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is testing a new way of treating brain tumours using tiny radioactive beads called SIR-Spheres® (90Y-labelled Resin Microspheres). These microspheres are placed into the blood vessels that feed the tumour. The treatment gives off radiation inside the tumour to try to stop it from growing.

This type of treatment is called Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT), Transarterial Radioembolisation (TARE), or radioembolisation. It is already an accepted treatment for patients with liver cancer. In this study, we are testing if this treatment can be done safely in the brain and how well it works.

Read the detailed description

This study is testing a new approach to treat people with the most aggressive type of adult brain tumour, glioblastoma. It will determine whether a treatment called selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) (also know as Transarterial Radioembolisation (TARE), or radioembolisation) is safe and effective in patients with recurrent or progressive glioblastoma. Small radioactive beads (SIR-Spheres®) are administered directly into the blood vessels that feed the tumour. This aims to selectively damage cancer cells and spare healthy tissue. PRECISE will investigate whether SIRT may reduce the volume of the tumour or slow its growth. Participants will undergo a detailed assessment to confirm they are suitable for the treatment. Those enrolled will have a planning procedure to map the blood vessels supplying the tumour, followed by SIRT treatment. Participants will also have scans and medical follow-ups after the procedure to monitor how they are going and whether the treatment is working. Safety of participants will be closely monitored by a team of specialist doctors. This study may represent the initial step towards a new treatment option for people with gliomas, who currently have very few alternatives once standard treatments have failed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Recurrent Glioblastoma IDH Wildtype
  • Recurrent Glioblastoma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • glioblastoma
  • SIR-spheres
  • Selective Internal Radiation Therapy
  • SIRT
  • Transarterial Radioembolisation
  • TARE
  • radioembolisation
03

In context

Glioblastoma

2,132 studies on the registry are indexed under Glioblastoma; 464 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 12 is below the median of 36 across 1,753 interventional studies indexed under Glioblastoma.

Browse Glioblastoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 14 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age ≥18 years at the time of screening
  2. Histomolecular diagnosis of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma (as per WHO 2021)
  3. Prior treatment with radiotherapy and an alkylating agent
  4. Presence of on brain MRI, as defined by RANO 2.0 criteria
  5. Radiologically confirmed disease progression as per RANO 2.0 criteria
  6. Lesion confined to a single focus, with a maximum diameter ≤6 cm, and located in a vascular territory amenable to selective intra-arterial catheterisation as assessed on baseline imaging and confirmed by planning angiography, cone beam CT, and [99mTc]Tc-MAA SPECT/CT (where available)
  7. Stable neurological status; patients with epilepsy may be included if seizures are controlled on a stable dose of anti-epileptic medication
  8. performance status 0-2
  9. Estimated of ≥3 months, in the opinion of the investigator
  10. Adequate haematologic, renal, hepatic, and coagulation function at screening, defined as:

    • ≥9 g/dL
    • ≥1.5 x 109/L
    • count ≥100 x 109/L
    • Serum creatinine ≤1.5 x , or ≥30 mL/min (Cockcroft-Gault formula)
    • Total ≤1.5 x ULN (except patients with known Gilbert's syndrome)
    • (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT) ≤2.5 x ULN
    • (INR) ≤1.5 x ULN
    • Prothrombin time (PT) or activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) ≤1.5 x ULN
  11. Ability to understand and comply with study requirements and provide written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Multifocal glioma recurrence
  2. Tumour located in the posterior fossa or involving/risking critical subcortical structures (e.g. thalamus, hypothalamus, basal ganglia, internal capsule, cerebral peduncle, midbrain, brainstem, or optic pathways)
  3. Prior treatment with VEGF inhibitors
  4. Prior re-irradiation for progressive or recurrent disease
  5. Any local (surgery or radiotherapy) or systemic anti-cancer therapy within 28 days prior to the planned dose of the treatment
  6. Concurrent use of any anti-cancer therapies, investigational drugs, or biological agents not specified in the protocol
  7. to MRI, including but not limited to non-compatible implantable devices or severe claustrophobia
  8. Contraindications to catheter-based angiography, including but not limited to known bleeding disorders, significant vascular abnormalities precluding safe access, and severe allergy to contrast agents
  9. Pregnancy or breastfeeding. Women of and men with partners of childbearing potential must agree to use effective during the study and for at least 4 months after the last procedure.
  10. Any severe or uncontrolled medical condition that, in the investigator's judgement, would pose an unacceptable risk to the patient or interfere with protocol compliance
  11. Cognitive or psychiatric conditions that would limit the ability to provide or adhere to study procedures
  12. Known or allergy to 90Y-resin microspheres or any component of the investigational product
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(17)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Measurable disease

The amount of disease can be tracked with a defined measurement, so the study can see whether it shrinks or grows. It might be a tumour measured on a scan or, in some blood cancers such as myeloma, a marker measured in blood or urine.

The criteria or the study team say which measurement counts — having no tumour visible on a scan does not by itself rule you out.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Early Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
12 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention

    SIR-Spheres® will be administered intra-arterially by selective catheterisation of tumour-feeding arteries. The prescribed activity will be determined on an individual basis. The administered activity of SIR-Spheres® will be selected to achieve adequate coverage of the target, taking into account tumour burden within the treated volume, while keeping dose to normal brain within acceptable limits.

    Device: SIR-Spheres®

Interventions

  • DeviceSIR-Spheres®

    Single administration of SIR-Spheres® on Day 1 with optional one-time retreatment if clinically indicated

    Also known as: 90Y-labelled Resin Microspheres

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Safety - Treatment-related adverse events

    Rate of any treatment-related adverse events within the first 30 days after TARE, according to CTCAE, version 6.0.

    Time frame: From SIR-sphere administration (Day 1) to 30 days post SIR-sphere administration.

  2. Safety - Severe treatment-related adverse events

    Rate of any severe treatment-related adverse events (grade ≥3-5) within the first 30 days after TARE, according to CTCAE version 6.0

    Time frame: From SIR-sphere administration (Day 1) to 30 days post SIR-sphere administration.

  3. 30-day mortality

    Rate of all-cause mortality within 30 days following TARE.

    Time frame: From SIR-sphere administration (Day 1) to 30 days post SIR-sphere administration.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Technical success of TARE

    Technical success rate, defined as successful selective catheterisation and administration of SIR-Spheres® to the target volume without significant non-target deposition.

    Time frame: 6 months after the last patient has been enrolled

  2. Confirmation of dose delivery

    Confirmation of dose delivery to the target volume as assessed by post-treatment PET/CT.

    Time frame: 6 months after the last patient has been enrolled.

  3. Objective response rate (ORR)

    Objective response rate (ORR) according to RANO 2.0 and PET RANO 1.0 criteria.

    Time frame: 6 months after the last patient has been enrolled

  4. Disease control rate (DCR)

    Disease control rate (DCR) according to RANO 2.0 and PET RANO 1.0 criteria.

    Time frame: 6 months after the last patient has been enrolled

  5. Clinical and radiographic progression-free survival (PFS)

    Clinical and radiographic progression-free survival (PFS) according to NANO, RANO 2.0 and PET RANO 1.0 criteria.

    Time frame: 6 months after the last patient has been enrolled

  6. Overall survival (OS)

    Overall survival (OS)

    Time frame: Up to 6 months after the last patient has been enrolled.

  7. Change from baseline in health-related quality of life measured using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30).

    The EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of multi-item functional and symptom scales transformed to scores ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better functioning/global health status on the functional and global health scales, whereas higher scores indicate worse symptom burden on the symptom scales.

    Time frame: Assessed up to 6 months after enrolment

  8. Change from baseline in brain cancer-specific quality of life measured using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Brain Neoplasm Module (EORTC QLQ-BN20).

    The EORTC QLQ-BN20 comprises symptom scales transformed to scores ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater symptom burden (worse quality of life).

    Time frame: Assessed up to 6 months after enrolment

  9. Safety following repeat administration of SIR-Spheres® administration

    Rate and severity of treatment-related adverse events in participants who proceed to a second SIR-Spheres® administration compared with participants receiving a single administration.

    Time frame: Assessed up to 6 months after enrolment

Other outcomes

  1. To evaluate the correlation between organ at risk radiation dosimetry and adverse events

    Correlation between absorbed dose (Gy) to normal brain, as estimated on post-treatment 90Y PET, and the incidence of treatment-related adverse events, as classified by CTCAE version 6.0

    Time frame: 6 months after the last patient has been enrolled

  2. To evaluate the concordance between pre-treatment predicted and post-treatment delivered absorbed dose distributions to tumour and normal brain using voxel-based dosimetry

    Correlation between absorbed dose estimates to tumour and normal brain derived from pre-treatment \[99mTc\]Tc-MAA SPECT/CT and post-treatment 90Y PET dosimetry

    Time frame: 6 months after the last patient has been enrolled

  3. To investigate circulating biomarkers and potential mechanisms of resistance, for patients treated with this approach.

    Change in circulating biomarker levels from baseline over time, including the identification of molecular or cellular markers associated with treatment response or resistance.

    Time frame: 6 months after the last patient has been enrolled

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Data sharing to occur at publication.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07712770
Lead sponsor
Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute
Collaborators
Austin Health
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 17, 2026
Start date
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 17, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion