CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07706257Updated Jul 16, 2026

Gingival Unit Graft Versus Free Gingival Graft: 18-Month Digital Color Analysis

An observational study in Gingival Recession, Mucogingival Surgery and Keratinized Tissue Deficiency, sponsored by Bezmialem Vakif University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-16.

Sponsored by Bezmialem Vakif University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
40
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this retrospective clinical study is to compare the long-term aesthetic integration and clinical outcomes of two periodontal plastic surgery techniques: Gingival Unit Grafting (GUG) and Free Gingival Grafting (FGG). The study evaluates the effectiveness of these procedures in increasing keratinized tissue width and assesses the color integration of the grafted tissues with the surrounding gingiva over an 18-month follow-up period using objective digital color analysis based on CIE Lab and RGB parameters.

Read the detailed description

This single-center retrospective study included patients treated with either Gingival Unit Grafts (GUG) or Free Gingival Grafts (FGG) for the management of Cairo Type 2 and Type 3 gingival recessions between March 2022 and December 2022. Clinical and photographic records obtained at baseline and during follow-up visits up to 18 months were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was the evaluation of color integration of the grafted tissues using objective digital color analysis based on CIE Lab and RGB parameters. Secondary outcomes included changes in keratinized tissue width. The aim of the study was to compare the long-term aesthetic integration and clinical performance of GUG and FGG and to determine which technique provides superior color matching with the surrounding tissues.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gingival Recession, Mucogingival Surgery
  • Keratinized Tissue Deficiency

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Gingival Unit Graft
  • Free Gingival Graft
  • Aesthetics
  • Digital color analysis
  • Color matching
03

In context

Gingival Recession

402 studies on the registry are indexed under Gingival Recession; 98 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is close to the median of 44 across 29 observational studies indexed under Gingival Recession.

Browse Gingival Recession studies →

Lead sponsor

Bezmialem Vakif University is the lead sponsor of 345 studies on the registry; 58 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population consists of adult patients seeking treatment for localized gingival recessions on mandibular incisors at a university faculty of dentistry.

Inclusion criteria

  • Systemically healthy individuals aged between 18 and 65 years
  • No systemic diseases contraindicating periodontal surgery
  • Not taking medications known to exert adverse effects on periodontal tissues
  • Presenting with Cairo Type 2 (RT2) or Type 3 (RT3) localized gingival recessions on mandibular incisors
  • Presence of ≤1 mm of attached gingiva resulting in difficulty maintaining plaque control
  • Full-mouth plaque and gingival index scores ≤1
  • Bleeding on probing (BOP) \<10%
  • No history of prior soft tissue surgery in the designated area

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals who are pregnant or lactating.
  • Presenting with gingival recession or prosthetic restorations at the donor site (maxillary premolar palatal region).
  • Cases demonstrating caries, abrasions, or restorations on the root surfaces of the related teeth.
  • Individuals with known allergies to dental impression materials.
  • Periodontal pocket depth greater than 3 mm.
  • Tooth malposition.
  • Endodontic complications.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Gingival Unit Graft (GUG) Group

    Patients who underwent periodontal plastic surgery using Gingival Unit Grafts for keratinized tissue gain

    Procedure: Gingival Unit Grafting

  • Conventional Free Gingival Graft (FGG) Group

    Patients who underwent periodontal plastic surgery using Conventional Free Gingival Grafts for keratinized tissue gain

    Procedure: Conventional Free Gingival Grafting

Interventions

  • ProcedureGingival Unit Grafting

    Harvesting a gingival unit graft and transplanting it to the recipient area to increase keratinized tissue width and assess long-term aesthetic integration.

  • ProcedureConventional Free Gingival Grafting

    Harvesting a conventional free gingival graft and transplanting it to the recipient area to increase keratinized tissue width and serve as a control group for aesthetic integration.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Aesthetic Integration (Color Evaluation)

    Objective assessment of color integration between the grafted tissue and the surrounding gingiva using digital color analysis. Color parameters were evaluated based on the CIE Lab\* color space system and RGB color channels obtained from standardized clinical photographs. The degree of color matching between grafted and adjacent tissues was assessed over the follow-up period.

    Time frame: Baseline and 18 months post-surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Keratinized Tissue Width (KTW)

    The clinical measurement of the width of keratinized tissue in millimeters, evaluated from the gingival margin to the mucogingival junction using a standard periodontal probe to determine the amount of tissue gain.

    Time frame: Baseline and 18 months post-surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Bezmialem Vakif University, Faculty of Dentistry
    Istanbul, Fatih 34093, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 16, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07706257
Lead sponsor
Bezmialem Vakif University
Responsible party
Sanubar Shakiliyeva (Lecturer, DDS, PhD, Bezmialem Vakif University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 15, 2026
Start date
Mar 1, 2022
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2024
Completion
Dec 31, 2024
Last update
Jul 16, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion