CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07704034Updated Sep 3, 2026

Wearable-Triggered Digital Safety Net for Real-Time Monitoring & Intervention in Leptomeningeal Metastasis

An interventional study of Calibration Phase and Stepped Wedge Intervention Phase in Leptomeningeal Metastasis, sponsored by Case Comprehensive Cancer Center. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-03.

Sponsored by Case Comprehensive Cancer Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Device feasibility

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
48
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This research study is for participants diagnosed with leptomeningeal metastasis disease (LMM), a condition where cancer has spread to the fluid and membranes surround the brain and spinal cord. The purpose of this study is to find out whether a consumer Smartwatch can continuously monitor the participant's health and detect early signs of neurological decline and whether sending an automatic alert to the participant's doctor when a change is detected can help reduce the number of participant hospitalizations.

Read the detailed description

LMM is a condition where cancer has spread to the fluid and membranes surrounding the brain and spinal cord. It is a common complication of cancer and affects about 5-15% of all cancer patients. It causes rapid neurological decline and survival is usually around 6-12 months. LMM is treated with chemotherapy radiation, but this does not improve neurological function or quality of life. Many of the current assessments for LMM are not good detecting progression and symptoms are often missed.

There will be two parts to this study. Smartwatches will be used to continuously capture data such as gait stability, heart rate variability (HRV), step count, and sleep, which are affected by LMM. The first part of this study is to learn whether this can help detect early signs of neurological decline. The second part of this study will test whether sending an automatic alert to the participant's doctor when a change is detected can help reduce the amount of times the participants are admitted to the hospital unexpectedly.

02

Conditions studied

  • Leptomeningeal Metastasis

Keywords

  • Brain and Nervous System
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants must have leptomeningeal metastasis (LMM) diagnosed per clinical, imaging, and/or CSF/cytology criteria (cytology, flow cytometry, or circulating tumor DNA), arising from any solid or hematologic tumor primary.
  • Participants must be undergoing active anti-cancer therapy (systemic, intrathecal, and/or radiation) or active surveillance for LMM.
  • Age ≥18 years at the time of study enrollment. Because no safety or dosing data are available for wearable monitoring studies in children with LMM, participants under 18 years of age are excluded.
  • Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥50 at time of study enrollment [See Appendix I], to ensure feasibility of wearing the device for ≥10 hours/day.
  • Participants must have access to a compatible smartphone:

    • iPhone running iOS 16 or higher and willingness to wear Apple Watch ≥10 hours/day; OR
    • Android smartphone compatible with the study application and willingness to wear Samsung Galaxy Watch ≥10 hours/day.
  • Ability to provide informed consent (or a legally authorized representative [LAR] is available and willing to provide consent on the participant's behalf, if appropriate).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Anticipated life expectancy \<4 weeks at time of screening, per the treating physician.
  • Severe dermatologic or musculoskeletal conditions precluding smartwatch wear (e.g., significant skin conditions on the wrist or forearm where the device will be placed, including tattoos that may substantially interfere with optical sensor function).
  • Inability to adhere to study procedures after training, as assessed by the study team at enrollment.
  • No access to a compatible smartphone (participant or caregiver) to interface with the watch application for symptom documentation and data transfer.
  • Inability to give informed consent due to severe aphasia, severe cognitive impairment, or other language barrier, unless a legally authorized representative is available and willing to participate.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Device feasibility
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
48 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    A - Crossover at month 2

    Participants cross-over to Stepped Wedge Intervention Phase at month 2.

    Device: Calibration Phase · Device: Stepped Wedge Intervention Phase

  • Experimental
    B - Crossover at month 3

    Participants cross-over to Stepped Wedge Intervention Phase at month 3.

    Device: Calibration Phase · Device: Stepped Wedge Intervention Phase

  • Experimental
    C - Crossover at month 4

    Participants cross-over to Stepped Wedge Intervention Phase at month 4.

    Device: Calibration Phase · Device: Stepped Wedge Intervention Phase

Interventions

  • DeviceCalibration Phase

    Apple Watch Series 6+ or Samsung Galaxy Watch 4+ worn 10+ hours/day for 4+ days/week for 6 months. Passive wearable data collection from in-house cross-platform app to find out patient-specific digital signal thresholds for neurological decline, symptom logging, daily sync reminders, and monthly EORTC-QLQ-C30 surveys.

  • DeviceStepped Wedge Intervention Phase

    Apple Watch Series 6+ or Samsung Galaxy Watch 4+ worn 10+ hours/day for 4+ days/week for 5 months. Active monitoring with alerts using the data collected from the in-house cross-platform app and sent to study neuro-oncologist.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Predicting Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) decline

    Karnofsky Performance scale of 100-0. Sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), and lead time of participant-specific thresholds. Assessed from calibration phase data if there is a greater than10-point KPS decline.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Predicting neurological progression

    Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and lead time of participant-specific thresholds. Assessed from calibration phase data.

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Days in hospital per participant-month during silent monitoring periods

    Taken from EMR by staff blinded to alert status. Defined as incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% CIs using mixed-effects negative binomial regression.

    Time frame: 5 months

  4. Days in hospital per participant-month during active alerting periods

    Taken from EMR by staff blinded to alert status. Defined as incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% CIs using mixed-effects negative binomial regression.

    Time frame: 5 months

  5. Participant completion

    80% or more of participants completing 3 months or more of active monitoring with median wear of 10 or more hours on 4 or more days/week

    Time frame: 5 months

  6. Recruitment rate

    number of participants enrolled within 9-12 months

    Time frame: 12 months

  7. Dropout rate

    Number of participants who do not complete study, assessed at study completion

    Time frame: 12 months

  8. Alert pathway feasibility

    Alert frequency per participant-month and proportion judged clinically relevant.

    Time frame: 5 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of unplanned hospitalizations and ED visits per participant-month

    Evaluate the efficacy of alert pathway in reducing unplanned hospitalization and ED visits. EMR review throughout Phase 2 during active vs. silent periods.

    Time frame: 5 months

  2. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 ( EORTC-QLQ-C30) total and subscale scores

    EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30 item validated questionnaire to determine the participant's quality of life. The questions are in a 4- point scale from 1 ("Not at all)" to 4 ("Very much"). A higher functional or global health score represents a higher quality of life, while a higher symptom score means a higher level of reported symptoms. Change in EORTC-QLQ-C30 will be measured from baseline at each time point.

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Progression-free survival (PFS)

    Time from enrollment to first radiographic or clinical progression; assessed throughout treatment period

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Overall survival (OS)

    Time from enrollment to death; assessed throughout treatment period and via medical record review

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Wearable data quantity across iOS and Android platforms

    Assessed at each treatment visit per participant per month (mean, variance)

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. Time from alert trigger to clinician-documented neurological progression

    Evaluate the efficacy of alert pathway in reducing unplanned hospitalization and ED visits. EMR review throughout Phase 2 during active vs. silent periods.

    Time frame: 5 months

  7. Wearable data quality across iOS and Android platforms

    Assessed at each treatment visit per participant per month (mean, variance)

    Time frame: 12 months

  8. Participant symptoms

    Logged per type per participant per month. Assessed at each treatment visit

    Time frame: 12 months

  9. Variance in accelerometry

    This device is used to track changes in physical activity and sleep patterns. Assessed at study completion

    Time frame: 12 months

  10. Variance in heart rate variability (HRV)

    This device assess HRV, which is where the amount of time between heartbeats fluctuate slightly. The participant's heart data will be collected and used to see if there any changes from the participant's month 1 mean. Assessed at study completion

    Time frame: 12 months

  11. Variance in gait metrics

    This device assesses the speed, step length and asymmetry to see if changes these can predict any clinical events by days to weeks.

    Time frame: 12 months

  12. Reasons for dropout

    Collected via exit questionnaire at withdrawal or study completion

    Time frame: 12 months

  13. Participant device wear

    Collected via exit survey and structured questionnaires at each visit for participant reported quality of life (QOL)

    Time frame: 12 months

  14. Participant symptom logging

    Collected via exit survey and structured questionnaires at each visit for participant reported quality of life (QOL).

    Time frame: 12 months

  15. Participant app usage

    Collected via exit survey and structured questionnaires at each visit for participant reported quality of life (QOL).

    Time frame: 12 months

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Cleveland Clinic, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Data will only be shared in aggregate statistics. There is no universal standard for "raw" wearable data, making IPD sharing less useful without providing the entire technical infrastructure used by the original team. This trial is expected to generate massive datasets (gigabytes per participant). Curating, de-identifying, and hosting this volume of IPD for public access requires significant long-term funding and technical oversight that may be beyond the scope of this Investigator-Initiated Trial (IIT).

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07704034
Lead sponsor
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 15, 2026
Start date
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 15, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 15, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 3, 2026

Study contacts

Andrew Dhawan, MD, DPhil
Contact
dhawana@ccf.org
216-444-5322
Andrew Dhawan, MD, DPhil
principal investigator · Cleveland Clinic, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion