ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07702240ES-ERCPUpdated Jul 14, 2026

Esketamine Versus Sufentanil for Sedation in Patients Undergoing ERCP

An interventional study of Esketamine and Sufentanil in Biliary Tract Diseases and Procedural Sedation and Analgesia, sponsored by Ren Da. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-14.

Sponsored by Ren Da · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
530
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study compares two anesthesia medications, esketamine and sufentanil, used together with propofol during ERCP procedures. The goal is to find out which combination provides better safety and comfort for people undergoing ERCP.

Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either esketamine or sufentanil during sedation. Researchers will monitor blood oxygen levels, blood pressure, and recovery time during and after the procedure to evaluate safety and effectiveness.

Read the detailed description

This randomized controlled trial compares the effects of intravenous esketamine and intravenous sufentanil as adjuncts to propofol sedation in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

The study aims to evaluate differences in intraoperative hemodynamic stability, oxygenation, sedation quality, and recovery profiles between the two sedation strategies.

Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either esketamine or sufentanil in combination with propofol during the ERCP procedure. Sedation will be titrated to achieve an adequate level of sedation based on clinical assessment.

Standard monitoring will be applied throughout the procedure, including continuous pulse oximetry and non-invasive blood pressure measurement at predefined time points. Hemodynamic instability, including hypotension and oxygen desaturation, will be managed according to predefined clinical protocols.

Adverse events will be recorded throughout the perioperative period and assessed for severity and relatedness to the study interventions.

The study is designed to reflect routine clinical anesthesia practice while systematically comparing two commonly used adjunct analgesic strategies for procedural sedation in ERCP patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Biliary Tract Diseases
  • Procedural Sedation and Analgesia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)
  • Procedural Sedation and Analgesia
  • Esketamine
  • Sufentanil
  • Propofol
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Frail Patients
03

In context

Biliary Tract Diseases

59 studies on the registry are indexed under Biliary Tract Diseases; 12 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 530 is above the median of 84 across 37 interventional studies indexed under Biliary Tract Diseases.

Browse Biliary Tract Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Ren Da as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged ≥18 years
  • Patients scheduled to undergo endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)
  • (ASA) physical status I-III
  • (BMI) between 18.5 and 30 kg/m²
  • Patients requiring sedation for ERCP
  • Ability to provide written voluntarily

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy or to propofol, esketamine, sufentanil, or related medications
  • Severe hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥180 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥110 mmHg)
  • Severe dysfunction of the heart, lungs, liver, or kidneys
  • History of central nervous system disorders or psychiatric disorders
  • Anticipated difficult airway
  • History of psychiatric disorders or contraindications to ketamine use
  • Inability to communicate or provide
  • Requirement for general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation or intraoperative conversion to general anesthesia with intubation
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
530 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Esketamine arm

    Participants receive intravenous esketamine in combination with propofol for procedural sedation during ERCP. Esketamine is administered as an adjunct analgesic during induction of sedation, while propofol is continuously infused and titrated according to clinical sedation requirements.

    Drug: Esketamine

  • Active comparator
    Sufentanil arm

    Participants receive intravenous sufentanil in combination with propofol for procedural sedation during ERCP. Sufentanil is administered as an adjunct analgesic during induction of sedation, while propofol is continuously infused and titrated according to clinical sedation requirements.

    Drug: Sufentanil

Interventions

  • Intravenous esketamine is administered as an adjunct analgesic during induction of sedation for ERCP. It is used in combination with continuously infused propofol, with dosing titrated to achieve adequate procedural sedation. This regimen differs from the comparator arm in that esketamine is used as the primary analgesic agent instead of an opioid.

  • Intravenous sufentanil is administered as an adjunct analgesic during induction of sedation for ERCP. It is used in combination with continuously infused propofol, with dosing titrated to achieve adequate procedural sedation. This regimen differs from the comparator arm in that sufentanil is used as the opioid-based analgesic instead of esketamine.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of intraoperative hypoxemia

    Hypoxemia is defined as peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂) \< 90% lasting ≥ 10 seconds. Peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂) were recorded at six predefined time points: T0, T1, T2, T3, T4, T5.

    Time frame: Six time points:T0, upon arrival in the procedure room (baseline); T1, after anesthesia induction; T2, when the endoscope passed the vocal cords; T3, when the endoscope passed the duodenal papilla; T4, at the end of the procedure; and T5, upon recovery.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of intraoperative hypotension

    Hypotension was defined as a reduction in mean arterial pressure (MAP) of ≥30% from baseline or a systolic arterial pressure (SAP) \<90 mmHg. Systolic arterial pressure (SAP), diastolic arterial pressure (DAP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were recorded at six predefined time points: T0, T1, T2, T3, T4, T5.

    Time frame: Six time points:T0, upon arrival in the procedure room (baseline); T1, after anesthesia induction; T2, when the endoscope passed the vocal cords; T3, when the endoscope passed the duodenal papilla; T4, at the end of the procedure; and T5, upon recovery.

Other outcomes

  1. induction time

    Time from administration of the study drug to successful insertion of the endoscope

    Time frame: During anesthesia induction

  2. Recovery time

    Time from discontinuation of propofol administration to recovery of consciousness, defined as achieving an Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) score of 5. The score ranges from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating a higher level of alertness. Recovery was defined as achieving an OAA/S score of 5 (responds readily to name spoken in a normal tone).

    Time frame: From the end of the procedure to recovery from sedation

  3. Patient body movements

    Number of patient body movements during the procedure requiring additional propofol administration or interfering with the procedure

    Time frame: Throughout the procedure

  4. Endoscopist satisfaction

    Endoscopist satisfaction with sedation conditions, assessed using a 10-point numeric rating scale (1 = extremely dissatisfied, 10 = extremely satisfied).

    Time frame: Immediately after completion of the procedure

  5. Patient satisfaction

    Patient satisfaction with the anesthesia experience, assessed using a 10-point numeric rating scale (1 = extremely dissatisfied, 10 = extremely satisfied)

    Time frame: Before discharge from the recovery room (PACU)

  6. Total propofol dose

    The total amount of propofol administered during the procedure, including the induction dose and additional doses required to maintain adequate sedation

    Time frame: From induction of sedation to the end of the procedure

  7. Aldrete recovery score

    Recovery from sedation was assessed using the modified Aldrete recovery score, which evaluates activity, respiration, circulation, consciousness, and oxygen saturation. The score ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating better recovery

    Time frame: Upon arrival at the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and before discharge from PACU

  8. Airway intervention

    The need for airway interventions to manage sedation-related respiratory compromise, including chin lift, jaw thrust, oral airway insertion, or mask ventilation during the procedure

    Time frame: From induction of sedation to the end of the procedure

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Jul 2026; primary completion for Mar 2028, 20 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 3, 2026
First posted
Jul 14, 2026
StartEst.
Jul 10, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Mar 10, 2028
CompletionEst.
Mar 10, 2028
Last update
Jul 14, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07702240
Lead sponsor
Ren Da
Responsible party
Ren Da (Attending Anesthesiologist, Beijing Friendship Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jul 14, 2026
Start date
Jul 10, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 10, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 10, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 14, 2026

Study contacts

Tingting Fan, PhD
Contact
fantt_aki@126.com
86+13439211460

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Esketamine

Start the discussion