CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07701785Updated Jul 14, 2026

Superior Parietal iTBS for PD-MCI

An interventional study of Accelerated intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) rTMS to right superior parietal lobule (rSPL) in Parkinson Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment, sponsored by Medical University of South Carolina. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 50 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-14.

Sponsored by Medical University of South Carolina · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
50 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this study is to determine the whether a short-term, high-dose form of non-invasive brain stimulation (intermittent theta burst stimulation; iTBS) is a promising and safe treatment for mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease (PD-MCI).

Read the detailed description

Dementia occurs in 80% of people with Parkinson's disease (PD) within 20 years of diagnosis. Cognitive interventions in PD have centered on individuals with mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI). A lack of efficacy of pharmacological interventions in PD-MCI has driven interest in nonpharmacological approaches. The most promising of these is intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), a noninvasive brain stimulation method that is FDA-approved for several psychiatric conditions. Though iTBS has shown little to no benefit in PD-MCI thus far, there are modifiable issues with past interventions including exclusively targeting prefrontal cortex when cholinergic denervation in posterior cortex is strongly associated with cognitive decline in PD, and substantial underdosing compared to efficacious iTBS interventions (6,000 vs at least 18,000 pulses). Interventions will likely have better outcomes if they target the right superior parietal lobule (rSPL), a cortical region impacted by cholinergic denervation in PD that is essential to maintaining attention, and use accelerated iTBS (a-iTBS) to deliver a stimulation dose commensurate with FDA-approved protocols in a shorter timeframe. However, before the efficacy of such an intervention can be evaluated, it must be established as safe, tolerable and feasible in PD-MCI. This project therefore aims to evaluate the safety, tolerability and feasibility of a three-day a-iTBS intervention stimulating the rSPL with 18,000 total pulses.

02

Conditions studied

  • Parkinson Disease
  • Mild Cognitive Impairment

Keywords

  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
  • Theta Burst Stimulation
  • Parkinson's Disease
  • Cognitive Impairment
  • Neuromodulation
03

In context

Parkinson Disease

4,487 studies on the registry are indexed under Parkinson Disease; 1,082 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 40 across 3,294 interventional studies indexed under Parkinson Disease.

Browse Parkinson Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical University of South Carolina is the lead sponsor of 852 studies on the registry; 165 are open to participants now.

Of its 128 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 101 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • 50-85 years of age
  • Diagnosis of Parkinson's disease based on UK Brain Bank diagnostic criteria
  • Parkinson's disease with mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI) diagnosis per Movement Disorders Society Task Force Level II Diagnostic Criteria4 (i.e., scores ≥1.5 standard deviations below appropriate norms on 2 neuropsychological tests) as determined by a clinical neuropsychologist
  • Stable on Parkinson's disease medications for 30 days (not expected to change through the course of the treatment)
  • Has a caregiver willing and able to reliably complete a questionnaire focused on the participant's daily functioning

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Claustrophobia or inability to lie supine in the scanner for an extended period of time
  • Barriers to making contact between the TMS coil and the skin (e.g. braids that cannot be removed)
  • Contraindications to MRI/TMS safety screening: This includes but is not limited to implanted medical devices (e.g., pacemakers), metallic objects or fragments, non-removable hair clips or piercings, and medications that reduce seizure threshold.
  • Individuals with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and/or active substance abuse disorder.
  • History of significant or unstable condition/s or treatments for these condition/s that may impact cognition (as determined by the study investigators) such as significant cardiac (e.g. heart failure), infectious (e.g. HIV, urinary tract infection), or metabolic disease (e.g. labile diabetes), cancer (e.g. brain cancer, chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment), developmental disorder (e.g. autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability), or other neurologic disease (e.g. multiple sclerosis, moderate to severe brain injury, seizures).
  • History of a seizure disorder.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Accelerated iTBS

    Participants will undergo accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) targeting the right superior parietal lobule (rSPL) using a MagVenture MagPro system with a cooled butterfly coil, with Brainsight neuronavigation identifying the stimulation site. Resting motor threshold (rMT) will be determined on the first stimulation visit using Parameter Estimation by Sequential Testing (PEST). Stimulation for the intervention will be delivered at 120% rMT. Stimulation sessions will occur over three consecutive days. Each day will include 10 sessions separated by 10-15 min. Each session delivers 600 pulses (50 Hz triplets; 2 s on/8 s off; \~190 seconds), totaling 6,000 pulses/day and 18,000 pulses overall. Coil position/angle and scalp-to-cortex distance are tracked; tolerability/acceptability (headache, pain, scalp irritation, facial twitching, fatigue, fear/anxiety) will be assessed before and after sessions.

    Device: Accelerated intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) rTMS to right superior parietal lobule (rSPL)

Interventions

  • DeviceAccelerated intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) rTMS to right superior parietal lobule (rSPL)

    Participants in this single-arm study will receive a accelerated course of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) over superior parietal lobule, which is identified with MNI coordinates from past studies. The stimulation will be delivered using a MagVenture MagPro TMS System with a butterfly, active cooling coil at 120% of resting motor threshold. Each participant will complete 3 consecutive treatment days, undergoing10 rTMS sessions per day (600 pulses/session), totaling 18,000 pulses across the study. Safety, tolerability, adherence, and feasibility data will be collected for the intervention.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Serious Adverse Events

    Number of serious adverse events experienced by study participants caused by the iTBS protocol

    Time frame: Week 4, 5 minutes before and 5 minutes after stimulation sessions on Days 1-3

  2. Feasibility of the study protocol

    Feasibility will be defined as the proportion of participants enrolled that complete all intervention procedures

    Time frame: Week 0 through completion of study (8 weeks)

  3. Tolerability of TMS procedures

    A questionnaire evaluating the presence and severity of commonly experienced side effects of TMS (i.e. headache, pain, scalp irritation, facial twitching, fatigue, fear/anxiety) within the past 24 hours and during stimulation. Ratings will be on a 6-point Likert scale from 0 (no symptoms) to 5 (severe symptoms).

    Time frame: Week 4, 5 minutes before and 5 minutes after stimulation sessions on Days 1-3

  4. Test-retest reliability of the Continuous Temporal Expectancy Test (CTET)

    The CTET is a tablet-administered measure designed to assess sustained attention and distractibility. Participants will be shown a grid with black and white squares on a tablet that rotate after either a longer duration (target stimulus; 1070ms) or a shorter duration (non-target stimulus; 800ms) and must press the screen when they identify a target stimulus. Participants will complete 10 one-minute trials. Half of the trials are performed without a distractor present, and the other half are performed with an audio-video distractor presented on an adjacent laptop screen. The primary outcome is the distractibility score, defined as the difference in latency (in ms) to identifying the target stimulus between distractor and non-distractor trials.

    Time frame: Week 0 (4 weeks pre-intervention) to Week 4, Day 1 (30 minutes prior to intervention)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Continuous Temporal Expectancy Task (CTET) Distractibility Score

    Change in CTET Distractibility Score (\[distraction trial latency in ms\] - \[non-distraction trial latency in ms\]). Higher scores indicate worse performance.

    Time frame: Week 4, Day 1 (30 minutes prior to intervention) to Week 4, Day 3 (15 minutes after intervention) to Week 8 (4 weeks post-intervention)

  2. Change in NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery (NIHTB-CB) Composite Scores

    The NIHTB-CB is a performance-based, iPad-administered suite of 7 tests that ascertain abilities in different cognitive domains (i.e. executive function, episodic memory, working memory, processing speed, language). It was developed using advanced psychometric techniques to minimize measurement error and produces normed subtest and composite scores. We will use the fully-corrected T-score (range T=0-100; Mean T=50, SD=10; higher scores indicating better cognition) of the Fluid Cognition Composite and Crystallized Cognition Composite, which are normed for age, sex, years of education, and race/ethnicity.

    Time frame: Week 4, Day 1 (30 minutes prior to intervention intervention) to Week 4, Day 3 (15 minutes after intervention) to Week 8 (4 weeks post-intervention)

  3. Change in daily functioning

    Change in caregiver ratings on the ECog-12, a questionnaire designed to measure the participant's everyday cognition and functional decline based on 12 Likert scale items ranging from 1 (no change compared to 10 years earlier) to 4 (consistently much worse).

    Time frame: Week 0 (1 month pre-intervention) to Week 8 (1 month post-intervention)

  4. Change in Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) Raw Score

    The Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) is a self-report measure of depressive symptoms comprised of 21 questions rated on a Likert scale from 0 (least severe) to 3 (most severe).

    Time frame: Week 4, Day 1 (pre-intervention) to Week 8 (1 month post-intervention)

  5. Change in Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) Score

    The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) is a self-report measure of depressive symptoms comprised of 21 questions rated on a Likert scale from 0 (least severe) to 3 (most severe).

    Time frame: Week 1, Day 1 (pre-intervention) to Week 8 (one-month follow-up)

  6. Change in Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) Raw Score

    The Apathy Evaluation Scale is a self-report measure of apathy symptoms comprised of 18 Likert scale items rated from 0 (least severe) to 3 (most severe).

    Time frame: Week 4, Day 1 (pre-intervention) to Week 8 (1-month post-intervention)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Medical University of South Carolina
    Charleston, South Carolina 29425, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Demographic information on trial participants and data acquired throughout the trial will be shared upon request to the principal investigator.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07701785
Lead sponsor
Medical University of South Carolina
Collaborators
National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
Responsible party
Sam Crowley (Assistant Professor-Faculty, Medical University of South Carolina) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 14, 2026
Start date
Aug 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 30, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 14, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion