ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07693998PNEUpdated Jul 9, 2026

Pain Neuroscience Education for Chronic Pain

An interventional study of Therapeutic Exercise and Education in Pain Neuroscience and Therapeutic exercise and education in the neuroscience of pain: the placebo effect in Fibromyalgia (FM), Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) and Chronic Pain, sponsored by University of Valencia. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-09.

Sponsored by University of Valencia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
84
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 151 studies in Fibromyalgia with a site in Spain — 16 open to participants now, 21 under way, none of them phase 3. Fibromyalgia · Spain.

Planned enrollment
54th of 135
84 · median 66
Started
2026
with 5 others
No phase
113 of 151
14 open now
Primary completion
2026-12
later than 16 of 20 live
Registered
148th of 151
by date
Lead sponsor
7 of 151
University of Valencia

Among the 151 studies in Fibromyalgia with a site in Spain, this one is the 54th largest by planned enrollment of the 135 interventional ones, is one of 6 that started in 2026, is one of 113 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 16 of the 20 other live ones, and was the 148th registered.

By phase

151 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

No phasethis study113 · 14 open
Observational15 · 2 open
Phase 314 · 0 open
Phase 46 · 0 open
Phase 23 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 2004; this study’s year is marked. 6 started in 2026.

Size and results

Median enrollment 66 across the 135 interventional studies, 90 across the 15 observational. Of the 107 that completed or were terminated, 10 (9%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 151 studies in Fibromyalgia with a site in Spain, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Chronic pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, with a high prevalence in Spain (25.9%) and an average duration of 6.83 years, highlighting its significant health and social impact. Among its manifestations, chronic low back pain (CLBP) is the most common, affecting 58.1% of individuals with chronic pain, while fibromyalgia (FM) accounts for 10.4%. In both cases, a relevant proportion of patients do not present a clear organic cause, which complicates diagnosis and treatment and reflects the complexity of nonspecific chronic pain.

CLBP is associated with a high functional and occupational impact, being one of the main causes of temporary disability. FM, on the other hand, is characterized by widespread musculoskeletal pain accompanied by fatigue, sleep disturbances, and emotional symptoms, constituting a condition with systemic involvement. Both conditions can occur throughout the lifespan, with variations in prevalence depending on age, sex, social class, and the presence of comorbidities.

Aging introduces relevant differences in pain experience and treatment response. At the physiological level, changes occur in the musculoskeletal system, such as the progressive loss of muscle mass (especially type II fibers) and decreased bone mineral density, which increases the risk of sarcopenia and frailty. In contrast, young adults show greater anabolic capacity, better hypertrophic response, and higher neuromuscular efficiency, favoring faster adaptations to exercise. These differences justify the need to consider age as a key factor in the therapeutic approach.

In addition to structural changes, central sensitization plays a fundamental role in the chronification of pain. This process involves sustained hyperexcitability of the central nervous system, with a reduced pain threshold and altered inhibitory mechanisms, contributing to the persistence of pain even in the absence of significant tissue damage.

Therapeutic exercise (TE) is one of the main non-pharmacological interventions for chronic pain and has demonstrated effectiveness in reducing pain and improving functionality. However, its long-term effects are limited, largely due to adherence issues related to pain, as well as psychological, social, and educational factors. Educational level influences both the understanding of the intervention and adherence, generally being higher in young adults, which may affect treatment outcomes.

In this context, Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) has emerged as a complementary strategy aimed at improving understanding of pain mechanisms and promoting adaptive behavioral changes. The combination of PNE and TE has shown positive effects in patients with CLBP and FM, especially in variables related to pain and psychosocial factors.

However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the impact of this combination on objective functional parameters, such as spinal movement during functional activities. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the effectiveness of the combined intervention of PNE and TE not only on pain but also on biomechanical variables such as range, velocity, and quality of movement, using precise measurement instruments.

Read the detailed description

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) combined with Therapeutic Exercise (TE) in individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and fibromyalgia (FM). Chronic pain conditions are frequently associated with maladaptive pain beliefs, pain catastrophizing, central sensitization, and functional limitations. PNE has been proposed as an educational approach to improve patients' understanding of pain mechanisms and promote adaptive coping strategies, potentially enhancing the effects of exercise-based interventions.

The study is designed as a randomized controlled clinical trial including participants with either CLBP or FM. Participants will be stratified according to age (\<65 years and ≥65 years) and clinical condition (CLBP or FM) and then randomly assigned to one of two intervention groups: (1) PNE combined with TE, or (2) placebo education combined with the same TE program.

The intervention period will last eight weeks. All participants will perform a standardized therapeutic exercise program focused on physical function and movement. Participants allocated to the experimental group will additionally receive PNE sessions addressing contemporary pain neuroscience concepts, including pain mechanisms, central sensitization, the influence of psychosocial factors, fear of movement, and self-management strategies. Participants in the control group will receive placebo educational sessions focused on anatomy and biomechanics, matched for duration and attention.

Assessments will be conducted at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and during follow-up periods at 4, 12, and 24 weeks after treatment completion. The study will examine changes in pain-related, psychological, sensory, and functional outcomes over time and compare responses between clinical conditions and age groups.

The results of this study may contribute to understanding the added value of PNE when combined with therapeutic exercise and whether age and clinical diagnosis influence treatment response in individuals with chronic pain.

03

Conditions studied

  • Fibromyalgia (FM)
  • Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)
  • Chronic Pain

Keywords

  • chronic low back pain
  • therapeutic exercise
  • pain neuroscience education
  • fibromyalgia
  • chronic pain
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Fibromyalgia (FM)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of fibromyalgia according to the 2010/2011 American College of -Rheumatology criteria
  • Ability to understand and follow study instructions ( [MMSE] score >23)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Changes in medication during the month prior to enrollment
  • Disorders affecting the central or peripheral nervous system

Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic low back pain lasting at least 3 months
  • Low back pain occurring on 3 or more days per week
  • Pain located between the lower rib margin and the gluteal folds
  • Ability to understand and follow study instructions (Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] score >23)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Changes in medication during the month prior to enrollment
  • Disorders affecting the central or peripheral nervous system
  • History of spinal surgery
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
84 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    EG Fibromyalgia

    Fibromyalgia Intervention Group: Exercise and Pain Education

    Other: Therapeutic Exercise and Education in Pain Neuroscience

  • Placebo comparator
    CG Fibromyalgia

    Fibromyalgia Control Group: Exercise and Placebo Education

    Other: Therapeutic exercise and education in the neuroscience of pain: the placebo effect

  • Experimental
    EG Chronic Low Back Pain

    Experimental Group for Chronic Low Back Pain: Exercise and Pain Education

    Other: Therapeutic Exercise and Education in Pain Neuroscience

  • Placebo comparator
    CG Chronic Low Back Pain

    Experimental Group for Chronic Low Back Pain: Exercise and Placebo Education

    Other: Therapeutic exercise and education in the neuroscience of pain: the placebo effect

Interventions

  • OtherTherapeutic Exercise and Education in Pain Neuroscience

    For the experimental group, the intervention consists of an 8-week therapeutic exercise program combined with education on the neuroscience of pain, comprising 3 exercise sessions and 1 educational session per week.

  • OtherTherapeutic exercise and education in the neuroscience of pain: the placebo effect

    For the control group, the intervention consists of a therapeutic exercise program combined with placebo education, which introduces basic concepts of anatomy and biomechanics. The intervention lasts 8 weeks, with 3 exercise sessions and 1 education session per week.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Level of physical activity

    Using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Scores are expressed in MET-minutes/week. Higher scores indicate higher levels of physical activity and a better outcome.

    Time frame: Before the procedure, after the procedure, one month later, three months later, and six months later the procedure.

  2. Central level of awareness

    Using the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI). Total score ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater symptoms related to central sensitization and a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Before the procedure, after the procedure, one month later, three months later, and six months later the procedure.

  3. Pain on movement

    Pain using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS): Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity and a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Before the procedure, after the procedure, one month later, three months later, and six months later the procedure.

  4. Level of catastrophizing

    Level of catastrophizing using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). Total score ranges from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate greater pain catastrophizing and a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Before the procedure, after the procedure, one month later, three months later, and six months later the procedure.

  5. Functionality - Lumbar movements

    Using a motion capture system. Each movement is performed 5 times (the middle 3 repetitions will be analyzed). In all cases, pain will be assessed using a visual analog scale ranging from 0 to 10. Thirty-six markers will be placed throughout the body, except on the hands. The tests measured using the motion capture system will be: lumbar flexion-extension, rotations, and lateral bending.

    Time frame: Before the procedure, after the procedure, one month later, three months later, and six months later the procedure.

  6. Functionality - The 5 Time Sit to Stand Test

    Using a motion capture system. Each movement is performed 5 times (the middle 3 repetitions will be analyzed). In all cases, pain will be assessed using a visual analog scale ranging from 0 to 10. Thirty-six markers will be placed throughout the body, except on the hands. The test measured using the motion capture system will be the 5-Time Sit-to-Stand Test. he outcome is the time required to complete five consecutive sit-to-stand repetitions, measured in seconds. Scores range from 0 seconds to no theoretical maximum. Higher scores indicate poorer lower-limb functional performance and a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Before the procedure, after the procedure, one month later, three months later, and six months later the procedure.

  7. Functionality - Lifting a 5 kg ball off the floor

    Using a motion capture system. Each movement is performed 5 times (the middle 3 repetitions will be analyzed). In all cases, pain will be assessed using a visual analog scale ranging from 0 to 10. Thirty-six markers will be placed throughout the body, except on the hands. The test measured using the motion capture system will be lifting a 5 kg ball from the floor in a free-standing position, in a deadlift and in a squat.

    Time frame: Before the procedure, after the procedure, one month later, three months later, and six months later the procedure.

  8. Degree of disability

    Using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI): Scores range from 0 to 100%, with higher scores indicating greater disability and a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Before the procedure, after the procedure, one month later, three months later, and six months later the procedure.

  9. Conditioned Sensitivity Test

    Test to assess the condition of the nervous system. The test stimulus is applied using an algometer, and the pressure pain threshold is assessed on the tibialis anterior muscle (5 cm distal to the tibial tuberosity). The patient verbally reports the point at which pressure becomes painful (the average of three consecutive measurements is calculated). Next, a conditioning stimulus is applied using a blood pressure cuff at a constant pressure of 240 mmHg for 120 seconds. Finally, the pressure pain threshold in the tibialis anterior is assessed.

    Time frame: Before the procedure, after the procedure, one month later, three months later, and six months later the procedure.

  10. Biering-Sörensen Test

    This is a functional test of the lumbar spine used to measure the isometric strength and endurance of the trunk extensor muscles, particularly in the lumbar spine. This test is measured using surface electromyography (EMG), and the electrodes-which are 20 mm in size-should be placed on the iliocostalis muscle 3-4 cm lateral to the midline and at the level of L2-L4.

    Time frame: Before the procedure, after the procedure, one month later, three months later, and six months later the procedure.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Anthropometric data - Weigth

    Weight will be measured using a bioimpedance scale and will be reported in kilograms.

    Time frame: Before the procedure, after the procedure, one month later, three months later, and six months later the procedure.

  2. Demographic data - Age

    Age. Age will be expressed in years.

    Time frame: Before the procedure, after the procedure, one month later, three months later, and six months later the procedure.

  3. Anthropometric data - Body Mass Index (BMI)

    Body Mass Index. BMI will be measured using a bioimpedance scale and will be expressed as a percentage and in kg/m²

    Time frame: Before the procedure, after the procedure, one month later, three months later, and six months later the procedure.

  4. Demographic data - Gender

    Gender (male or female)

    Time frame: In the initial valuation.

  5. Sensitivity

    Using the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test for tactile sensitivity and the pinprick test for pain sensitivity by dermatome.

    Time frame: Before the procedure, after the procedure, one month later, three months later, and six months later the procedure.

  6. Anxiety and depression

    Using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Total score ranges from 0 to 42. Higher scores indicate greater anxiety and depression symptoms and a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Before the procedure, after the procedure, one month later, three months later, and six months later the procedure.

  7. Kinesiophobia

    Using the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). Total score ranges from 0 to 96. Higher scores indicate stronger fear-avoidance beliefs and a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Before the procedure, after the procedure, one month later, three months later, and six months later the procedure.

  8. Fibromyalgia Index

    Using the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ).Total score ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater impact of fibromyalgia and a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Before the procedure, after the procedure, one month later, three months later, and six months later the procedure.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Facultat de Fisioteràpia
    Valencia, Valencia 46010, Spain
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — For data protection purposes.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started May 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 7 months after the start.

Of 436 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Fibromyalgia, half reached primary completion within 16 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 31. This study's planned 7 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 449 studies reached it within 15 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 31.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 4, 2026
First posted
Jul 9, 2026
StartActual
May 5, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2028
Last update
Jul 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 9, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07693998
Responsible party
Pilar Serra Añó (Full Professor, University of Valencia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 9, 2026
Start date
May 5, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 9, 2026

Study contacts

Sara Mollá, Casanova
study director · Universitat de València

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion