CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT07687277ASL-TDDUpdated Jul 7, 2026

3D-ASL and TDD-MRI for True Progression and Pseudoprogression After Glioma Surgery

An observational study in Glioma and Brain Neoplasms, sponsored by Lanzhou University Second Hospital. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-07.

Sponsored by Lanzhou University Second Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
75
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background: Differentiating true progression (TP) from pseudoprogression (PsP) after glioma surgery remains a major clinical challenge because conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) often cannot reliably distinguish these conditions.

Objective: This prospective observational diagnostic accuracy study aims to evaluate the value of multiparametric imaging based on three-dimensional arterial spin labeling (3D-ASL) combined with time-dependent diffusion MRI (TDD-MRI) for differentiating TP from PsP in postoperative glioma patients.

Methods: Consecutive adult patients with suspected tumor progression after glioma surgery will undergo routine MRI, 3D-ASL, and TDD-MRI examinations. Quantitative perfusion and diffusion parameters will be extracted, and a combined imaging model will be developed and evaluated. Final diagnosis will be established according to pathological findings when available or by longitudinal clinical and imaging follow-up based on the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria.

Expected Outcomes: The primary outcome is the diagnostic performance of the combined imaging model, assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The study is expected to provide a noninvasive imaging strategy for distinguishing TP from PsP and to support clinical decision-making during postoperative follow-up.

Read the detailed description

Glioma is the most common primary malignant tumor of the central nervous system and is characterized by high invasiveness and a high recurrence rate. During postoperative follow-up after surgery and adjuvant therapy, newly developed or enlarged contrast-enhancing lesions may represent either true progression (TP) or treatment-related pseudoprogression (PsP). Because these entities require substantially different clinical management, accurate differentiation is essential.

Histopathological confirmation remains the reference standard but is invasive and not feasible for all patients. Conventional MRI has limited diagnostic accuracy because TP and PsP often demonstrate overlapping imaging characteristics. Advanced functional MRI techniques have therefore attracted increasing interest for improving noninvasive diagnosis.

Three-dimensional arterial spin labeling (3D-ASL) provides quantitative assessment of cerebral perfusion without exogenous contrast agents, whereas time-dependent diffusion MRI (TDD-MRI) characterizes tissue microstructure by measuring water diffusion under different diffusion times. These techniques provide complementary information regarding tumor vascularity and cellular architecture.

This is a single-center, prospective observational diagnostic accuracy study conducted at Lanzhou University Second Hospital. Approximately 75 consecutive postoperative glioma patients with suspected disease progression will be enrolled. All participants will undergo routine MRI, 3D-ASL, and TDD-MRI examinations according to a standardized imaging protocol. Quantitative imaging parameters, including relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF), ADC20Hz, ADC40Hz, Cellularity, and Diameter, will be extracted after image preprocessing and lesion segmentation.

Participants will not receive any additional therapeutic intervention as part of the study. Clinical management will be determined by treating physicians according to routine clinical practice. Final classification of TP or PsP will be established using pathological confirmation whenever available or comprehensive longitudinal clinical and imaging follow-up according to the RANO 2.0 criteria.

The primary objective is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the combined 3D-ASL and TDD-MRI model using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Secondary objectives include evaluating the diagnostic performance of individual imaging parameters, comparing diagnostic models, assessing calibration and clinical utility, determining interobserver agreement, and exploring the influence of clinicopathological factors on model performance.

The findings of this study are expected to establish a reliable, noninvasive multiparametric MRI strategy for differentiating TP from PsP after glioma surgery, thereby facilitating individualized postoperative management and reducing unnecessary invasive procedures.

02

Conditions studied

  • Glioma
  • Brain Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Three-Dimensional Arterial Spin Labeling
  • 3D-ASL
  • Time-Dependent Diffusion MRI
  • TDD-MRI
  • True Progression
  • Pseudoprogression
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Diagnostic Accuracy
  • Multiparametric MRI
  • Glioma Surgery
  • RANO
  • Cerebral Blood Flow
  • Diffusion MRI
03

In context

Glioma

1,397 studies on the registry are indexed under Glioma; 351 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 75 is below the median of 88 across 238 observational studies indexed under Glioma.

Browse Glioma studies →

Lead sponsor

Lanzhou University Second Hospital is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients with histopathologically confirmed glioma who develop suspected tumor progression during postoperative follow-up at Lanzhou University Second Hospital and undergo routine MRI, three-dimensional arterial spin labeling (3D-ASL), and time-dependent diffusion MRI (TDD-MRI).

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older.
  • Histopathologically confirmed glioma.
  • Received standard postoperative treatment or routine clinical treatment.
  • New or enlarged contrast-enhancing lesion on follow-up MRI suggestive of tumor progression.
  • Able to undergo routine MRI, three-dimensional arterial spin labeling (3D-ASL), and time-dependent diffusion MRI (TDD-MRI).
  • MRI image quality sufficient for image processing, registration, lesion segmentation, and quantitative parameter extraction.
  • Written informed consent provided by the participant or legally authorized representative.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Incomplete clinical, pathological, or imaging follow-up data.
  • MRI images with severe motion artifacts, susceptibility artifacts, or geometric distortion affecting image analysis.
  • Failure to complete routine MRI, 3D-ASL, or TDD-MRI examinations according to the study protocol.
  • Lesions too small or poorly defined for reliable three-dimensional volume-of-interest delineation and parameter extraction.
  • Any other condition judged by the investigators to make participation inappropriate.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
75 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • True Progression (TP)

    Participants with suspected postoperative glioma progression who are ultimately diagnosed with true progression based on histopathological findings when available or comprehensive longitudinal clinical and imaging follow-up according to the RANO 2.0 criteria. All participants undergo routine MRI, three-dimensional arterial spin labeling (3D-ASL), and time-dependent diffusion MRI (TDD-MRI).

    Diagnostic Test: Multiparametric MRI (3D-ASL and TDD-MRI)

  • Pseudoprogression (PsP)

    Participants with suspected postoperative glioma progression who are ultimately diagnosed with pseudoprogression based on histopathological findings when available or comprehensive longitudinal clinical and imaging follow-up according to the RANO 2.0 criteria. All participants undergo routine MRI, three-dimensional arterial spin labeling (3D-ASL), and time-dependent diffusion MRI (TDD-MRI).

    Diagnostic Test: Multiparametric MRI (3D-ASL and TDD-MRI)

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testMultiparametric MRI (3D-ASL and TDD-MRI)

    Participants undergo standardized multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, including routine MRI, three-dimensional arterial spin labeling (3D-ASL), and time-dependent diffusion MRI (TDD-MRI). Quantitative perfusion and diffusion parameters are extracted for evaluation of their diagnostic performance in differentiating true progression from pseudoprogression after glioma surgery. No experimental therapeutic intervention is administered as part of the study.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. AUC of the Combined 3D-ASL and TDD-MRI Model

    Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the combined three-dimensional arterial spin labeling (3D-ASL) and time-dependent diffusion MRI (TDD-MRI) model for differentiating true progression from pseudoprogression after glioma surgery.

    Time frame: From enrollment through completion of clinical and imaging follow-up (up to 12 months)

Secondary outcomes

  1. AUC of rCBFmean

    Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of mean relative cerebral blood flow (rCBFmean) for differentiating true progression from pseudoprogression.

    Time frame: From enrollment through completion of clinical and imaging follow-up (up to 12 months)

  2. AUC of rCBFmax

    Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of maximum relative cerebral blood flow (rCBFmax) for differentiating true progression from pseudoprogression.

    Time frame: From enrollment through completion of clinical and imaging follow-up (up to 12 months)

  3. AUC of rCBFmin

    Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of minimum relative cerebral blood flow (rCBFmin) for differentiating true progression from pseudoprogression.

    Time frame: From enrollment through completion of clinical and imaging follow-up (up to 12 months)

  4. AUC of ADC20Hz

    Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of ADC20Hz derived from time-dependent diffusion MRI for differentiating true progression from pseudoprogression.

    Time frame: From enrollment through completion of clinical and imaging follow-up (up to 12 months)

  5. AUC of ADC40Hz

    Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of ADC40Hz derived from time-dependent diffusion MRI for differentiating true progression from pseudoprogression.

    Time frame: From enrollment through completion of clinical and imaging follow-up (up to 12 months)

  6. AUC of Cellularity

    Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the Cellularity parameter derived from time-dependent diffusion MRI for differentiating true progression from pseudoprogression.

    Time frame: From enrollment through completion of clinical and imaging follow-up (up to 12 months)

  7. AUC of Diameter

    Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the Diameter parameter derived from time-dependent diffusion MRI for differentiating true progression from pseudoprogression.

    Time frame: From enrollment through completion of clinical and imaging follow-up (up to 12 months)

  8. Sensitivity of the Combined 3D-ASL and TDD-MRI Model

    Sensitivity of the combined 3D-ASL and TDD-MRI model for differentiating true progression from pseudoprogression.

    Time frame: From enrollment through completion of clinical and imaging follow-up (up to 12 months)

  9. Specificity of the Combined 3D-ASL and TDD-MRI Model

    Specificity of the combined 3D-ASL and TDD-MRI model for differentiating true progression from pseudoprogression.

    Time frame: From enrollment through completion of clinical and imaging follow-up (up to 12 months)

  10. Youden Index of the Combined 3D-ASL and TDD-MRI Model

    Youden index of the combined 3D-ASL and TDD-MRI model for differentiating true progression from pseudoprogression.

    Time frame: From enrollment through completion of clinical and imaging follow-up (up to 12 months)

  11. Optimal Cutoff of the Combined 3D-ASL and TDD-MRI Model

    Optimal cutoff value of the combined 3D-ASL and TDD-MRI model determined from receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

    Time frame: From enrollment through completion of clinical and imaging follow-up (up to 12 months)

  12. AUC Difference Between the Combined Model and the Best Individual MRI Parameter

    Difference in AUC between the combined 3D-ASL and TDD-MRI model and the best-performing individual MRI parameter.

    Time frame: From enrollment through completion of clinical and imaging follow-up (up to 12 months)

  13. Hosmer-Lemeshow Goodness-of-Fit P Value

    Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test P value for evaluating calibration of the combined 3D-ASL and TDD-MRI model.

    Time frame: After completion of model construction and statistical analysis

  14. Clinical Net Benefit of the Combined 3D-ASL and TDD-MRI Model

    Clinical net benefit of the combined 3D-ASL and TDD-MRI model assessed using decision curve analysis.

    Time frame: After completion of model construction and statistical analysis

  15. Interobserver Agreement for MRI Parameter Measurements

    Interobserver agreement for quantitative MRI parameter measurements assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

    Time frame: At image analysis after completion of MRI examinations

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Lanzhou University Second Hospital
    Lanzhou, Gansu 730030, China
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared because the study data contain potentially identifiable clinical and imaging information. De-identified aggregate results may be reported in publications.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07687277
Lead sponsor
Lanzhou University Second Hospital
Responsible party
Junwei Chang (Principal Investigator, Lanzhou University Second Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 7, 2026
Start date
Mar 1, 2024
Primary completion
Feb 28, 2026
Completion
Jul 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 7, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion