ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07686172Impact-INHAUpdated Jul 8, 2026

Interprofessional Health Needs Assessment (IHNA) for Older Adults Living at Home

An interventional study of Interprofessional Health Needs Assesement (INHA) in Health Related Quality of Life, sponsored by University of Stavanger. Recruiting at 2 sites in Norway. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-08.

Sponsored by University of Stavanger · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2026, registered Jun 2026).
  • Started Mar 2026; still recruiting 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Interprofessional Health Needs Assessment (IHNA) in older adults living at home. Specifically, the trial will assess the effects of IHNA on health-related quality of life, social care-related quality of life, survival, and health service utilization.

The primary objective is to determine the effect of IHNA on participants' health-related quality of life at 12 months. Secondary objectives are to assess its effects on social care-related quality of life, survival (time to death), health service utilization, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at 6 and 12 months.

Read the detailed description

Early identification of health needs among home-dwelling elderly adults is crucial for maintaining health and function, improving quality of life, and preventing hospitalizations. When allocating municipal health and care services, healthcare professionals assess functional abilities and health needs. Based on this assessment, services such as emergency alarms, everyday rehabilitation, home nursing care, practical assistance at home, and assistive devices are assigned. However, there is no standardized approach to what should be included in these assessments or how they should be conducted.

This project develops a procedure for interprofessional health needs assessment (IHNA) to systematically identify and address the health needs of older adults living at home. IHNA integrates the older adult's values and preferences into the assessment, ensuring that interventions and services align with their priorities. IHNA incorporates screening tools to provide a structured, holistic assessment of health and social domains.

The project involves co-creation of IHNA with healthcare professionals and older adults, workplace training in the effective use of IHNA, and implementation in two Norwegian municipalities through a randomized controlled trial.

By developing interprofessional practices for assessing health needs and equipping healthcare professionals with screening tools and training, the project will help municipalities provide fairer, more effective services to home-dwelling older adults.

02

Conditions studied

  • Health Related Quality of Life

Keywords

  • health care utilization
  • health needs assesement
  • geriatric assessment
  • quality of life
  • independent living
03

In context

Patient Acceptance of Health Care

308 studies on the registry are indexed under Patient Acceptance of Health Care; 53 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is close to the median of 201 across 217 interventional studies indexed under Patient Acceptance of Health Care.

Browse Patient Acceptance of Health Care studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Stavanger is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 65 years and older
  • applying for a municipal health and care service at home (i.e., practical assistance, home nursing, assistive devices, rehabilitation, day care center)
  • the health care service will have a duration of more than 2 weeks

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • younger than 65 years
  • diagnosed with dementia
  • shorter than 6 months
  • applying for a nursing home placement
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    INHA Intervention group

    The intervention group will be assessed using INHA

    Other: Interprofessional Health Needs Assesement (INHA)

  • No intervention
    Control group

    The participants in the control group will be assessed by the standard assessment form used by the municipality and have services allocated as usual.

Interventions

  • OtherInterprofessional Health Needs Assesement (INHA)

    Interprofessional teams with a nurse, physiotherapist, or occupational therapist from Stavanger and Sandnes municipalities will assess participants in the intervention group using the Interprofessional Health Needs Assessment (INHA) procedure. INHA includes screening tools to assess mobility, cognition, mental health, nutrition and oral health, vision and hearing, activities of daily living, social network, physical and behavioral health. Based on the IHNA findings, the interprofessional teams, in collaboration with the older adult, will decide on the allocation of municipal health services, make referrals, and provide advice on available preventive and health promotion interventions from the municipality's health and care services and relevant voluntary and private actors.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Health-related quality of life

    Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five response levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems/unable to perform. Responses are combined into a 5-digit health-state profile, with 11111 representing the best health state and 55555 the worst health state. Health state will be converted into a utility index score, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life. The primary outcome will be the change in EQ-5D-5L utility index score from baseline to 12 months.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Self-rated health

    The EuroQol Visual Analog Scale (EQ VAS) will be assessed as a secondary outcome measure of self-rated health. Participants rate their current health on a scale from 0 to 100. A score of 100 is equivalent to the best possible health. A score of 0 is equivalent to the worst possible health. Changes in EQ VAS scores from baseline to 6 months and 12 months will be evaluated, with higher scores indicating better perceived health.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months

  2. Social care related quality of life

    The Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) will be used as a secondary outcome measure of social care-related quality of life. ASCOT covers eight domains: control over daily life, personal cleanliness and comfort, food and drink, personal safety, social participation and involvement, occupation, accommodation cleanliness and comfort, and dignity. Each domain has four response options scored from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. Domain responses will be combined into an overall ASCOT score, with higher scores indicating better social care-related quality of life. Changes in ASCOT scores from baseline to 6 months and 12 months will be evaluated.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months

  3. Time to death (survival)

    Time from baseline to death within 12 months will be obtained from municipal electronic patient records. Longer survival indicates a better outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

  4. Health care utilization

    Health care utilization will be assessed as a secondary outcome measure. Data on nursing home admissions, municipal emergency service visits, and hospital admissions will be obtained from the Norwegian Registry for Primary Health Care and the Norwegian Patient Registry. Health care utilization will be measured as the number of nursing home admissions, municipal emergency service visits, and hospital admissions during the 6- and 12-month follow-up periods. Lower health care utilization indicates better outcomes.

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months

  5. Quality-Adjusted Life Years ( QALYs)

    Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) will be a secondary outcome, measuring the combined effects of the intervention on survival and health-related quality of life. QALYs will be calculated over the 12-month follow-up period by combining survival with health utility values derived from the EQ-5D. Higher QALYs indicate better overall health outcomes. QALY estimates will be used to inform cost-effectiveness analyses.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 8, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07686172
Lead sponsor
University of Stavanger
Collaborators
Stavanger Municipality, Norway, Sandnes Municipality, Norway
Responsible party
Marianne Storm (Professor, University of Stavanger) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 7, 2026
Start date
Mar 10, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 8, 2026

Study contacts

Arnt Egil Ydstebø
Contact

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion