ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07681492OLDBELIEFSUpdated Jul 2, 2026

Belief Update: The Effects of Depression and Antidepressants in Older People

An interventional study of Response to questionnaire in Major Depressive Episode (MDE), Beliefs and Beliefs About Future, sponsored by Hospital Center Guillaume Régnier. Recruiting at 2 sites in France. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-02.

Sponsored by Hospital Center Guillaume Régnier · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2025, registered Jun 2026).
  • Started Jan 2025; still recruiting 1 year 9 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
62
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

People in good health do not perceive the future in the same way as those suffering from depression. This difference in perception affects behaviour and emotions and warrants further investigation, both before and after treatment with antidepressants. Research shows that past negative experiences with medication can reduce the effectiveness of treatment, whilst positive expectations can increase it. It is important to gain a better understanding of how antidepressants influence the way in which elderly people with major depressive disorder (MDD) change their beliefs, and to determine whether an improvement in their depressive symptoms is linked to these changes in their beliefs. This study aims to understand whether antidepressants can alter the way people view the future and whether this contributes to their effectiveness. It also seeks to determine whether patients' expectations regarding treatment influence clinical outcomes, and whether changes in their mood may in turn affect these expectations. The study will involve 31 patients aged 65 and over who are suffering from a depressive disorder and require a change of antidepressant, and 31 healthy subjects, also aged 65 and over. The participants' involvement will last for 12 weeks.

During a medical consultation, once the doctor has checked that the participant meet all the study's eligibility criteria, they will ask for the participant consent to take part in the study. The participant will then be asked to answer one question about what you hope to gain from the new antidepressant treatment that the doctor will prescribe for the participant. Finally, the participant will carry out a belief-updating exercise, which involves : presenting the participant with a series of events and ask them to indicate how likely they think each of them is to occur, and then. Once they have received further information about these events, ask them to reassess the likelihood of them occurring. This task will be carried out again 12 weeks after the participant start taking their antidepressant, during a consultation required as part of their individual care plan. From the first week of antidepressant treatment until week 12, the participant will be contacted by telephone once a week to answer two short questions about their expectations regarding the treatment and any changes in your mood.

02

Conditions studied

  • Major Depressive Episode (MDE)
  • Beliefs
  • Beliefs About Future
  • Depression

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Major Depressive Episode (MDE)
  • Beliefs
  • Beliefs about future
  • Depression
03

In context

Depression

8,577 studies on the registry are indexed under Depression; 1,720 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 62 is below the median of 81 across 7,063 interventional studies indexed under Depression.

Browse Depression studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital Center Guillaume Régnier is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria for patients with major depressive disorder :

  • Patient over 65 years old in outpatient care
  • Patients with major depressive disorder or patients with bipolar major depressive disorder as evaluated by the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) semi-structured interview for the group suffering from depression
  • Absence of cognitive impairment as evidenced by an (Mini Mental State Examination) ≥ 24
  • MADRS ≥ 20
  • MMSE ≥ 24
  • Change of antidepressants
  • Person affiliated with a social security scheme
  • Patients who have received informed information about the study and have signed a consent form to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria with major depressive disorder :

  • mental disorders other than mood disorders : attention deficit dissorder, borderline personality disorder, schizophrenia, autism spectrum disorder, anorexia-bulimia disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, anxiety disorders and substance use disorder (except tobacco).
  • Inability to understand task instructions and perform the behavioral task
  • Neurological or neurosurgical comorbidities
  • Major visual impairment
  • Adults under state medical aid
  • Adults under legal protection (legal guardianship, curatorship, trusteeship), persons deprived of their liberty

Inclusion Criteria for patients with major depressive disorder :

  • Absence of psychiatric disorders attested by administration of the MINI
  • Absence of cognitive impairment as evidenced by an MMSE ≥ 24
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
62 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group with major depressive disorder

    Group with major depressive disorder

    Behavioral: Response to questionnaire

  • Placebo comparator
    Group without major depressive disorder

    Group without major depressive disorder

    Behavioral: Response to questionnaire

Interventions

  • BehavioralResponse to questionnaire

    The patients are assessed using the MADRS score upopn inclusion (after the wash-out, before the new treatment) and 12 weeks later, after the treatment. The patient are also assessed by looking at the overall changes in atitude, the first time upon inclusion and after every week until the end of the treatment 12 weeks later.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference in MADRS (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale) score before versus after treatment.

    The aim is to assess whether any changes in the severity of major depressive episodes (MDEs) following treatment with conventional antidepressants are associated with changes in belief updating in older patients with MDEs compared to healthy volunteers. This is assessed by using the MADRS scale and by looking at all changes in the updating of beliefs. Upon inclusion, patients are assessed using the MADRS. Patients are also assessed 12 weeks later after treatment. Score ranges from 0 to 60. The higher the score, the more severe the disorder is.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the data collecting process : 3 months.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Difference in treatment expectations

    Assess whether changes in treatment expectations over time are associated with clinical improvement in depression. The patients are assessed by using the MADRS scale for the first time upon inclusion and for a second time 12 weeks later (after tratment). Score ranges from 0 to 60. The higher the score, the more severe the disorder is.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the data collecting process : 3 months

  2. Difference in treatment expectations

    Assess whether changes in treatment expectations over time are associated with changes in subjective mood assessment over time. This is assessed by looking at all changes in the updating of beliefs, the first time upon inclusion and the second time, 12 weeks later (after treatment).

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the data collecting process : 3 months

07

Study locations

1 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Keks N, Hope J, Keogh S. Switching and stopping antidepressants. Aust Prescr. 2016 Jun;39(3):76-83. doi: 10.18773/austprescr.2016.039. Epub 2016 Jun 1. PubMed 27346915 ↗
  • Kozyra E, Lau T. Medication Strategies: Switching, Tapering, Cross-Over, Overmedication, Drug-Drug Interactions, and Discontinuation Syndromes. In: Fenn HH, Hategan A, Bourgeois JA, éditeurs. Inpatient Geriatric Psychiatry : Optimum Care, Emerging Limitations, and Realistic Goals [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019 [cité 3 févr 2025]. p. 325-38
  • Pecina M, Chen J, Karp JF, Dombrovski AY. Dynamic Feedback Between Antidepressant Placebo Expectancies and Mood. JAMA Psychiatry. 2023 Apr 1;80(4):389-398. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.0010. PubMed 36857039 ↗
  • Krell HV, Leuchter AF, Morgan M, Cook IA, Abrams M. Subject expectations of treatment effectiveness and outcome of treatment with an experimental antidepressant. J Clin Psychiatry. 2004 Sep;65(9):1174-9. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v65n0904. PubMed 15367043 ↗
  • Colloca L, Barsky AJ. Placebo and Nocebo Effects. N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 6;382(6):554-561. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1907805. No abstract available. PubMed 32023375 ↗
  • Mondloch MV, Cole DC, Frank JW. Does how you do depend on how you think you'll do? A systematic review of the evidence for a relation between patients' recovery expectations and health outcomes. CMAJ. 2001 Jul 24;165(2):174-9. PubMed 11501456 ↗
  • Perlman K, Benrimoh D, Israel S, Rollins C, Brown E, Tunteng JF, You R, You E, Tanguay-Sela M, Snook E, Miresco M, Berlim MT. A systematic meta-review of predictors of antidepressant treatment outcome in major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord. 2019 Jan 15;243:503-515. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.09.067. Epub 2018 Sep 18. PubMed 30286415 ↗
  • Bottemanne H, Morlaas O, Claret A, Sharot T, Fossati P, Schmidt L. Evaluation of Early Ketamine Effects on Belief-Updating Biases in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression. JAMA Psychiatry. 2022 Nov 1;79(11):1124-1132. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.2996. PubMed 36169969 ↗
  • Garrett N, Sharot T, Faulkner P, Korn CW, Roiser JP, Dolan RJ. Losing the rose tinted glasses: neural substrates of unbiased belief updating in depression. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Aug 28;8:639. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00639. eCollection 2014. PubMed 25221492 ↗
  • Korn CW, Sharot T, Walter H, Heekeren HR, Dolan RJ. Depression is related to an absence of optimistically biased belief updating about future life events. Psychol Med. 2014 Feb;44(3):579-92. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713001074. Epub 2013 May 15. PubMed 23672737 ↗
  • Kube T. Biased belief updating in depression. Clin Psychol Rev. 2023 Jul;103:102298. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102298. Epub 2023 Jun 1. PubMed 37290245 ↗
  • Chowdhury R, Sharot T, Wolfe T, Duzel E, Dolan RJ. Optimistic update bias increases in older age. Psychol Med. 2014 Jul;44(9):2003-12. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713002602. Epub 2013 Nov 4. PubMed 24180676 ↗
  • Sharot T, Korn CW, Dolan RJ. How unrealistic optimism is maintained in the face of reality. Nat Neurosci. 2011 Oct 9;14(11):1475-9. doi: 10.1038/nn.2949. PubMed 21983684 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Data about study protocol and clinical information will be available on request from other researchers.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07681492
Lead sponsor
Hospital Center Guillaume Régnier
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 2, 2026
Start date
Jan 14, 2025
Primary completion
Oct 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 2, 2026

Study contacts

Gabriel ROBERT, PhD
Contact
g.robert@ch-guillaumeregnier.fr
+332 99 33 39 37

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion