CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07680881VENTI-PRONEUpdated Jul 29, 2026

Ventilation Mode and Atelectasis After Prone-Position Surgery: A Lung Ultrasound Study

An observational study in Pulmonary Atelectasis, Postoperative and Postoperative Pulmonary Complications, sponsored by Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital Organization. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-29.

Sponsored by Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital Organization · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
90
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective single-centre observational study compared two intraoperative mechanical ventilation modes, volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) and VCV with AutoFlow/AF, in adults undergoing elective surgery in the prone position. The ventilation mode was selected by the attending anaesthesiologist as part of routine clinical care; the investigators did not assign it. Perioperative atelectasis was assessed using a modified bilateral 12-zone lung ultrasound score obtained before induction of anaesthesia and after extubation, and oxygenation was assessed using the alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient calculated from an intraoperative arterial blood gas sample. The study also examined whether the effect of ventilation mode on atelectasis differed according to obesity.

Read the detailed description

Ninety adults (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II, body mass index below 35 kg/m2, aged 18 to 65 years) scheduled for elective prone-position surgery were grouped by the ventilation strategy chosen by the attending anaesthesiologist: VCV (n=45) or VCV-AF (n=45). Both groups received a tidal volume of 6 to 8 mL/kg and median positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cmH2O, delivered with a Draeger Perseus A500 anaesthesia workstation. A modified lung ultrasound score was obtained in the supine position using a 2 to 5 MHz convex probe before induction and at least 30 minutes after extubation, with each hemithorax divided into anterior, lateral and posterior regions and each region scored for loss of aeration. The alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient was calculated from an arterial blood gas sample taken 15 minutes after prone positioning. Patients were stratified by body mass index (below 30 versus 30 kg/m2 or above).

The primary comparison was the postoperative lung ultrasound score between the two ventilation modes. Pre-specified analyses included adjustment for the baseline lung ultrasound score using analysis of covariance and a formal ventilation-mode by obesity interaction test. The correlation between the lung ultrasound score and the alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient was also assessed. Of 97 patients initially enrolled, seven were excluded because postoperative lung ultrasound data could not be completed owing to unavailability of the ultrasound device or operator, leaving 90 patients with complete data for analysis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pulmonary Atelectasis, Postoperative
  • Postoperative Pulmonary Complications

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Lung ultrasound
  • Atelectasis
  • Prone position
  • Mechanical ventilation
  • Alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient
03

In context

Pulmonary Atelectasis

301 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulmonary Atelectasis; 80 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 90 is above the median of 72 across 73 observational studies indexed under Pulmonary Atelectasis.

Browse Pulmonary Atelectasis studies →

Lead sponsor

Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital Organization is the lead sponsor of 84 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adults aged 18 to 65 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II and a body mass index below 35 kg/m2, scheduled for elective surgery in the prone position at a single tertiary care hospital. Patients were grouped according to the intraoperative ventilation mode selected by the attending anaesthesiologist (volume-controlled ventilation or volume-controlled ventilation with Autoflow).

Inclusion criteria

Consented adults aged 18 to 65 years American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II Body mass index below 35 kg/m2 Scheduled for elective surgery in the prone position Oriented and cooperative

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

No consent Pre-existing pulmonary disease Any perioperative lung pathology Inability to complete postoperative lung ultrasound assessment

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
90 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • VCV

    Patients managed intraoperatively with volume-controlled ventilation, as chosen by the attending anaesthesiologist.

  • VCV-AF

    Patients managed intraoperatively with Volume-Controlled Ventilation with AutoFlow ventilation, as chosen by the attending anaesthesiologist.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative modified lung ultrasound score

    Modified bilateral 12-zone lung ultrasound score assessed after surgery and compared between ventilation modes. Each hemithorax was divided into anterior, lateral and posterior regions, and each region was scored for loss of aeration, with a higher total score indicating greater atelectasis.

    Time frame: At least 30 minutes after extubation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient

    Alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient calculated from an intraoperative arterial blood gas sample, compared between ventilation modes.

    Time frame: 15 minutes after prone positioning

  2. Ventilation-mode by obesity interaction on postoperative lung ultrasound score

    Difference in the effect of ventilation mode on the postoperative lung ultrasound score between non-obese patients (body mass index below 30 kg/m2) and obese patients (body mass index 30 kg/m2 or above), tested as a formal interaction.

    Time frame: At least 30 minutes after extubation

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Cemil Tasciogu Research and Training Hospital
    Istanbul, Sisli, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07680881
Lead sponsor
Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital Organization
Responsible party
Taylan Kırdan (MD, Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital Organization) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 2, 2026
Start date
Mar 1, 2024
Primary completion
Oct 30, 2024
Completion
Oct 30, 2024
Last update
Jul 29, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion