CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07657845CRYOFUPUpdated Jun 22, 2026

Long Term Safety of Preoperative Percutaneous Intercostal Cryoneurolysis

An observational study in Cryo Analgesia and Pectus Surgery, sponsored by Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 14 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-22.

Sponsored by Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
50
Ages
14 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Follow up of patients who underwent percutaneous cryoneurolysis for pectus excavatum repair (the Nuss procedure) pain management

Read the detailed description

Follow up of patients after receiving percutaneous cryoneurolysis for pectus excavatum repair, who undergo a physical examination and a neurosensory assessment of the chest wall at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively, corresponding to the scheduled follow-up visits. In addition, to evaluate neuropathic pain, chronic pain, and quality of life, patients complete validated questionnaires.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cryo Analgesia
  • Pectus Surgery

Keywords

  • follow up
  • lanss
  • neuropathy
  • chronic pain
  • cpsp
  • neuropathic pain
  • sensitivity recovery
  • PedsQL
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
14 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adolescents older than 14 years and young adults who underwent percutaneous cryoanalgesia between July 1, 2022 and December 31, 2026.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients who underwent percutaneous cryoneurolysis.
  • Patients who underwent surgical correction of pectus excavatum according to the Nuss procedure.
  • Signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to participate in the study
  • Peripheral nervous system disorders
  • Age \< 14 years
  • Failure to attend scheduled follow-up visits
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients who underwent percutaneous cryoneurolysis for the Nuss procedure pain management

    All patients who underwent surgical correction of pectus excavatum via the Nuss procedure between July 1, 2022 and February 28, 2026 are considered eligible for enrollment. Additionally, for the prospective component, patients scheduled for surgery up to December 31, 2026 at the Pediatric Surgery department of our institution will be considered eligible. Inclusion criteria: Age greater than 14 years. Patients who underwent percutaneous cryoneurolysis. Patients who underwent surgical correction of pectus excavatum according to the Nuss procedure. Exclusion criteria: Patients who withhold consent to participate in the study, patients with pre-existing neurological conditions, and patients who do not attend the scheduled follow-up visits will be excluded from the study.

    Diagnostic Test: Self-report Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) Questionnaire - Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL™) Questionnaire - Patient Self-Assessment Sensory Scale

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testSelf-report Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) Questionnaire - Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL™) Questionnaire - Patient Self-Assessment Sensory Scale

    Assessment tools include validated questionnaires - the S-LANSS (Self-report Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs, range 0-24, higher scores indicating greater likelihood of neuropathic pain) and the PedsQL™ (Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory, v4.0, Adolescent/Young Adult Report, range 0-100, higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life) - together with the Patient Self-Assessment Sensory Scale (range 0-10, 0 indicating no sensitivity and 10 indicating normal sensitivity) and a structured physical examination of thoracic sensitivity. These tools are administered at pre-specified follow-up timepoints. The physical examination assesses four sensory modalities corresponding to specific afferent fibre classes of the intercostal nerves: cold thermal sensation (Aδ fibres, ice-water contact, 4-10°C), warm thermal sensation (C fibres, \~40°C water), light touch (Aβ fibres, camel-hair brush), and pressure sensitivity (Aβ fibres, Von Frey filament 5.07/10g)

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Self-report Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (S-LANSS) questionnaire results

    To assess the incidence of neuropathic pain using the validated S-LANSS (Self-report Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs) scale, administered at the scheduled follow-up visits. The S-LANSS score ranges from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater likelihood and severity of neuropathic pain (a score ≥12 is suggestive of pain of predominantly neuropathic origin

    Time frame: The same patients are followed across multiple timepoints (1, 3, 6, 12, 24 months), allowing to track how S-LANSS score evolve over time.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) questionnaire

    To describe the quality of life of patients using a specific validated questionnaire appropriate for adolescents and young adults (Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory - PedsQL™ version 4.0 for adolescents and young adults). The PedsQL total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life.

    Time frame: The same patients are assessed across multiple timepoints (1, 3, 6, 12, 24 months), allowing to track how quality of life evolve over time.

  2. chronic postoperative pain (CPSP) assessment

    To describe the incidence of chronic postoperative pain (CPSP), defined as persistence of pain beyond one month, according to two parameters: direct measurement using the NRS (Numeric Rating Scale) for pain intensity, and indirect measurement through consumption of analgesic medications included in the institutional current protocol (acetaminophen and NSAIDs). The NRS ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity.

    Time frame: The same patients are followed across multiple timepoints (1, 3, 6, 12, 24 months), allowing to track how chronic pain evolve over time.

  3. sensitivity recovery using the Patient Self-Assessment Sensory Scale

    To describe the evolution of thoracic thermotactile hypoesthesia over time, starting from the day of cryoneurolysis, using the Patient Self-Assessment Sensory Scale. The scale ranges from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no sensitivity (complete anaesthesia) and 10 indicating maximal/normal sensitivity, with higher scores indicating better (more complete) sensory recovery.

    Time frame: The same patients are assessed across multiple timepoints (1, 3, 6, 12, 24 months), allowing to track how sensitivity recovery evolve over time.

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII
    Bergamo, BG 24127, Italy
    Recruiting
07

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07657845
Lead sponsor
Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital
Responsible party
Stefano Mariconti (Consultant Anesthesiologist, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 18, 2026
Start date
Feb 2, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 13, 2026
Completion
Jan 15, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 22, 2026

Study contacts

Stefano Mariconti, MD
Contact
smariconti@asst-pg23.it
0039 + 0352675149
Ezio Bonanomi, MD
study chair · Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Paediatric Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion