ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07648069Updated Jun 15, 2026

Tumor Neoantigen Vaccine SarVac Combined With Tumor Specific Lymphocyte Reinfusion in the Treatment of Advanced Sarcoma

A Phase 1 interventional study of Neoantigen vaccine + specific lymphocytes + anti-PD1 antibody and Neoantigen vaccine + anti-PD1 antibody in Soft Tissue Sarcoma (STS) and Osteosarcoma, sponsored by Sun Yat-sen University. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-15.

Primary conditionOsteosarcomaRegistry: SarcomaReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Sarcoma — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Osteosarcoma
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Osteosarcoma, a narrower term within Sarcoma.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Sun Yat-sen University · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2024, registered Jun 2026).
  • Started Sep 2024; still recruiting 2 years 2 months later.
Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
16
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of this trial is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the tumor neoantigen vaccine (SarcVac) in combination with a PD-1 antibody, with or without tumor-specific lymphocytes, in patients with advanced bone and soft tissue sarcoma who have failed first-line treatment. The secondary objectives are to assess the preliminary efficacy of SarcVac combined with a PD-1 antibody, with or without tumor-specific lymphocytes, in these patients and to evaluate whether the vaccine's efficacy demonstrates dose dependency.

Read the detailed description

Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) represents a heterogeneous group of malignant tumors. The prognosis is poor with an overall survival of 12-19 months for patients with metastasis. A critical unmet medical need is to develop novel and effective therapeutic approaches to improve the survival of patients with STS, for whom limited alternative chemotherapeutic or targeting regimens are available.

In recent years, tumor immunotherapy has emerged as a promising alternative to traditional treatments like surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. This approach includes four primary categories: immune checkpoint blockade, immunomodulators, adoptive cell transfer, and tumor vaccines. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 antibodies, have shown efficacy in treating certain cancers. Tumor vaccines, which utilize tumor antigens to stimulate specific immune responses against cancer cells, offer notable advantages. These vaccines are characterized by low toxicity, high specificity, and the ability to induce immune memory, thereby reducing the risk of recurrence. Tumor-specific lymphocytes further enhance the immune system's capacity to target and kill tumor cells directly.

This study utilizes next-generation sequencing technology and bioinformatics analysis to accurately identify personalized tumor neoantigens. By screening for neoantigens with high MHC affinity and strong immunogenicity, we develop a personalized neoantigen vaccine, SarcVac. Subsequently, these neoantigens are used in vitro to activate and expand the patient's peripheral blood lymphocytes, yielding tumor-specific lymphocytes. This clinical trial will assess the safety and tolerability of the neoantigen vaccine (SarcVac) in combination with a PD-1 antibody, with or without tumor-specific lymphocytes, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Additionally, a preliminary assessment of its efficacy will be conducted.

02

Conditions studied

  • Soft Tissue Sarcoma (STS)
  • Osteosarcoma

Browse trials for

03

In context

Osteosarcoma Reclassified

488 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteosarcoma; 124 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 16 is below the median of 40 across 354 interventional studies indexed under Osteosarcoma.

Browse Osteosarcoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Sun Yat-sen University is the lead sponsor of 1,690 studies on the registry; 619 are open to participants now.

Compared within Osteosarcoma, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Sarcoma. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Before any procedures related to the research program, including screening and evaluation stage, signed .
  2. Age≥18 years old, and≤70 years old ;
  3. diagnosed as solid tumors, including bone or soft tissue sarcoma, and staging for advanced or unresectable patients ;
  4. Patients with treatment failure ;
  5. No previous tumor vaccine treatment ; no previous treatment with antibody ;
  6. According to the RECIST1.1 standard, there are and superficial lesions ;
  7. The following three screening indicators should be met in the test screening period:

(1)The available tumor tissue samples ( paraffin sections and fresh surgical specimens ) were used for subsequent whole exome and transcriptome sequencing analysis and primary cell culture to obtain tumor neoantigen-related mutation sequence information and gene expression.

( 2 ) Available peripheral blood samples; ( 3 ) Tumor new antigen prediction analysis and in vitro laboratory testing; 8. score 0-1 ( see Appendix ) and expected survival time greater than 6 months ; 9. Patients were not allowed to use anti-tumor drugs and radiotherapy within 4 weeks before vaccination; 10. Patients with who were stable for at least one month after treatment can be included; 11. echocardiography showed ≥ 50 %; 12. The results of laboratory tests should meet at least the following indicators :

  1. White blood cell count ≥ 3.0 × 109 / L;
  2. ( ANC ) ≥ 1.5 × 109 / L ( without GCSF support ) ;
  3. absolute lymphocyte count ( ALC ) ≥ 1.0 × 109 / L;
  4. ( PLT ) ≥ 75 × 109 / L;
  5. ≥ 90g / dL ( no blood transfusion in the past 7 days ) ;
  6. or INR ≤ 1.5x normal upper limit time, unless receiving anticoagulant therapy;
  7. partial thromboplastin time ( APTT ) ≤ 1.5x normal upper limit time, unless receiving anticoagulant therapy;
  8. serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 × ( upper limit of normal ) ; 24-hour rate ≥ 60 mL / min;
  9. (AST/SGOT) ≤ 2 × ULN;
  10. Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT/SGPT) ≤ 2 × ULN;
  11. total ( TBIL ) ≤ 1 × ULN 13. Females with fertility were negative in pregnancy test before treatment ; consent must be given to the use of or the prohibition of same-sex or opposite-sex sexual activity during treatment; 14. During the whole experiment, we can regularly go to the research institutions to carry out relevant testing, evaluation and management.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Before any procedures related to the research program, including screening and evaluation stage, signed .

    2. Age≥18 years old, and≤70 years old ; 3. diagnosed as solid tumors, including bone or soft tissue sarcoma, and staging for advanced or unresectable patients ; 4. Patients with treatment failure ; 5. No previous tumor vaccine treatment ; no previous treatment with antibody ; 6. According to the RECIST1.1 standard, there are and superficial lesions ; 7. The following three screening indicators should be met in the test screening period:

    (1)The available tumor tissue samples ( paraffin sections and fresh surgical specimens ) were used for subsequent whole exome and transcriptome sequencing analysis and primary cell culture to obtain tumor neoantigen-related mutation sequence information and gene expression.

( 2 ) Available peripheral blood samples; ( 3 ) Tumor new antigen prediction analysis and in vitro laboratory testing; 8. score 0-1 ( see Appendix ) and expected survival time greater than 6 months ; 9. Patients were not allowed to use anti-tumor drugs and radiotherapy within 4 weeks before vaccination; 10. Patients with who were stable for at least one month after treatment can be included; 11. echocardiography showed ≥ 50 %; 12. The results of laboratory tests should meet at least the following indicators :

  1. White blood cell count ≥ 3.0 × 109 / L;
  2. ( ANC ) ≥ 1.5 × 109 / L ( without GCSF support ) ;
  3. absolute lymphocyte count ( ALC ) ≥ 1.0 × 109 / L;
  4. ( PLT ) ≥ 75 × 109 / L;
  5. ≥ 90g / dL ( no blood transfusion in the past 7 days ) ;
  6. or INR ≤ 1.5x normal upper limit time, unless receiving anticoagulant therapy;
  7. partial thromboplastin time ( APTT ) ≤ 1.5x normal upper limit time, unless receiving anticoagulant therapy;
  8. serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 × ( upper limit of normal ) ; 24-hour rate ≥ 60 mL / min;
  9. (AST/SGOT) ≤ 2 × ULN;
  10. Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT/SGPT) ≤ 2 × ULN;
  11. total ( TBIL ) ≤ 1 × ULN 13. Females with fertility were negative in pregnancy test before treatment ; consent must be given to the use of or the prohibition of same-sex or opposite-sex sexual activity during treatment; 14. During the whole experiment, we can regularly go to the research institutions to carry out relevant testing, evaluation and management.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(17)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Line of therapy

A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.

“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.

PD-1, PD-L1 and checkpoint inhibitors

PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4 are proteins that act as brakes on the immune system. Checkpoint inhibitors, such as pembrolizumab or nivolumab, block them so the immune system can attack a cancer.

PD-L1 can also be measured in a tumour sample. Some scores count stained tumour cells only (TPS); others also count certain immune cells (CPS). The study names the score and the minimum it uses.

Measurable disease

The amount of disease can be tracked with a defined measurement, so the study can see whether it shrinks or grows. It might be a tumour measured on a scan or, in some blood cancers such as myeloma, a marker measured in blood or urine.

The criteria or the study team say which measurement counts — having no tumour visible on a scan does not by itself rule you out.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Brain metastases

Cancer deposits in the brain from a cancer that started elsewhere in the body (CNS metastases include the spinal cord).

Studies differ: some leave out any brain metastases, some accept ones treated and stable for some weeks. Check what this study allows.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
16 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Drug delivery mode 1

    1. Neoantigen Vaccine Injection: Each subject receives injections of vaccine components determined from prior in vitro experiments throughout the treatment course. The SarcVac peptide vaccine, mixed with an adjuvant (PolyI:C) in 0.5 ml of saline, is administered subcutaneously in the inguinal region on days 1, 3, 7, 15, 30, 65, and 86 from treatment initiation. 2. Tumor-Specific Lymphocyte Infusion: Throughout the treatment course, each subject receives tumor-specific lymphocyte infusions. 3. Antibody Therapy: Subjects receive anti-PD-1 antibody (Sintilimab) via intravenous infusion throughout the treatment period.

    Biological: Neoantigen vaccine + specific lymphocytes + anti-PD1 antibody

  • Experimental
    Drug delivery mode 2

    1. Neoantigen Vaccine Injection: Each subject receives injections of vaccine components determined from prior in vitro experiments throughout the treatment course. The SarcVac peptide vaccine, mixed with an adjuvant (PolyI:C) in 0.5 ml of saline, is administered subcutaneously in the inguinal region on days 1, 3, 7, 15, 30, 65, and 86 from treatment initiation. 2. Antibody Therapy: Subjects receive anti-PD-1 antibody (Sintilimab) via intravenous infusion throughout the treatment period.

    Biological: Neoantigen vaccine + anti-PD1 antibody

Interventions

  • BiologicalNeoantigen vaccine + specific lymphocytes + anti-PD1 antibody

    Neoantigen vaccine+ specific lymphocytes + anti-PD1 antibody

  • BiologicalNeoantigen vaccine + anti-PD1 antibody

    Neoantigen vaccine + anti-PD1 antibody

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence and severity of adverse events

    The primary objective of this trial is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the tumor neoantigen vaccine (SarcVac) in combination with a PD-1 antibody, with or without tumor-specific lymphocytes.

    Time frame: 120 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. ORR

    The secondary objectives are to assess the preliminary efficacy of SarcVac combined with a PD-1 antibody, with or without tumor-specific lymphocytes, and to evaluate whether the vaccine's efficacy demonstrates dose dependency.

    Time frame: 270 days

  2. DCR

    The secondary objectives are to assess the preliminary efficacy of SarcVac combined with a PD-1 antibody, with or without tumor-specific lymphocytes, and to evaluate whether the vaccine's efficacy demonstrates dose dependency.

    Time frame: 270 days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 27 months after the start.

Of 49 phase 1 interventional studies under Osteosarcoma, half reached primary completion within 77 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 54 and three quarters within 134. This study's planned 27 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 10, 2026
First posted
Jun 15, 2026
StartActual
Sep 3, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
CompletionEst.
Jun 30, 2027
Last update
Jun 15, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07648069
Responsible party
Xing Zhang (Vice director of department of medical sarcoma and melanoma,Principal Investigator,Clinical Professor, Sun Yat-sen University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 15, 2026
Start date
Sep 3, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 15, 2026

Study contacts

Zhang
Contact
zhangxing@sysucc.org.cn
86-020-87343192

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion