ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07643415Updated Jun 16, 2026

Spinal Versus General Anesthesia in Open Simple Prostatectomy

An interventional study of Spinal anesthesia and General anesthesia in Urologic Neoplasms, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Anesthesia, sponsored by Hitit University. Recruiting at 2 sites in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-16.

Sponsored by Hitit University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Apr 2026; still recruiting 6 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

Open simple prostatectomy is still performed for selected patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia, particularly in cases with large prostate volume. Postoperative bleeding, hematuria, clot retention, and transfusion requirement are clinically important complications after this procedure.

This prospective randomized controlled trial will compare the effects of spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia on postoperative bleeding in patients undergoing open simple prostatectomy. Participants will be randomized into two groups: spinal anesthesia or general anesthesia. Tranexamic acid or any additional hemostatic agent will not be used. Postoperative bleeding will be assessed using hemoglobin and hematocrit changes, transfusion requirement, hematuria, clot retention, need for bladder irrigation, and bleeding-related reintervention.

The study aims to determine whether spinal anesthesia is associated with reduced postoperative bleeding compared with general anesthesia in open simple prostatectomy.

Read the detailed description

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is one of the most common urological conditions affecting aging men and may result in bladder outlet obstruction, lower urinary tract symptoms, recurrent urinary retention, urinary tract infections, bladder stones, hematuria, and renal dysfunction. Although minimally invasive surgical techniques have become increasingly popular, open simple prostatectomy remains an important treatment option for patients with very large prostate volumes and in centers where endoscopic enucleation techniques are not routinely available.

Bleeding remains one of the most clinically relevant complications following open simple prostatectomy. Postoperative hematuria, clot retention, prolonged bladder irrigation, blood transfusion, and bleeding-related reinterventions may increase morbidity, prolong hospitalization, and negatively affect postoperative recovery. Several surgical and perioperative strategies have been investigated to reduce perioperative bleeding; however, the influence of anesthesia technique on postoperative bleeding outcomes has not been adequately studied.

Spinal anesthesia may theoretically reduce perioperative bleeding through sympathetic blockade, decreased venous pressure, reduced pelvic venous congestion, and improved hemodynamic stability. In contrast, general anesthesia may be associated with greater hemodynamic fluctuations during induction, emergence, extubation, and positive-pressure ventilation, potentially affecting surgical bleeding. Despite these physiological considerations, evidence comparing spinal and general anesthesia with respect to postoperative bleeding after open simple prostatectomy remains limited.

The investigators observed in routine clinical practice that patients undergoing open simple prostatectomy under spinal anesthesia frequently appeared to experience a more stable perioperative course and less postoperative bleeding-related morbidity compared with patients receiving general anesthesia. This observation has not been prospectively evaluated in a randomized setting.

Therefore, this prospective randomized controlled trial aims to compare spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia in patients undergoing open simple prostatectomy. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either spinal anesthesia or general anesthesia. Tranexamic acid will not be administered in either group. Perioperative management, transfusion thresholds, and postoperative care protocols will be standardized.

The primary objective is to evaluate clinically significant postoperative bleeding within the first 72 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include perioperative hemoglobin and hematocrit changes, transfusion requirement, clot retention, duration of bladder irrigation, postoperative urinary functional outcomes, PSA changes, postoperative hospital stay, catheter duration, drain duration, renal function parameters, and perioperative complications classified according to the Clavien-Dindo system.

02

Conditions studied

  • Urologic Neoplasms
  • Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
  • Anesthesia

Keywords

  • Open simple prostatectomy
  • Spinal anesthesia
  • general anesthesia
  • postoperative bleeding
03

In context

Urologic Neoplasms

155 studies on the registry are indexed under Urologic Neoplasms; 40 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is above the median of 60 across 109 interventional studies indexed under Urologic Neoplasms.

Browse Urologic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Hitit University is the lead sponsor of 87 studies on the registry; 29 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male patients aged 18 years or older.
  • Diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
  • Scheduled to undergo open simple prostatectomy.
  • (ASA) physical status I-III.
  • Ability to provide written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal or inability to provide .
  • Patients scheduled for radical prostatectomy due to prostate cancer.
  • Emergency surgery.
  • Known coagulation disorders or thrombocytopenia.
  • Ongoing anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy that cannot be discontinued according to institutional protocols.
  • to spinal anesthesia.
  • Participation in another interventional clinical trial that may affect study outcomes.
  • Administration of tranexamic acid or any additional hemostatic agent during the perioperative period.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Spinal Anesthesia

    Participants allocated to this arm will receive spinal anesthesia for open simple prostatectomy according to the institutional standard anesthesia protocol.

    Procedure: Spinal anesthesia

  • Active comparator
    General Anesthesia

    Participants allocated to this arm will receive general anesthesia for open simple prostatectomy according to the institutional standard anesthesia protocol.

    Procedure: General anesthesia

Interventions

  • ProcedureSpinal anesthesia

    Spinal anesthesia will be performed at the L3-4 or L4-5 interspace under aseptic conditions using hyperbaric bupivacaine. Light sedation may be administered when clinically required.

  • ProcedureGeneral anesthesia

    General anesthesia will be induced and maintained according to the institutional standard protocol. Airway management, mechanical ventilation, anesthetic maintenance, antiemetic prophylaxis, and multimodal analgesia will be applied according to routine clinical practice.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinically Significant Postoperative Bleeding

    Clinically significant postoperative bleeding is defined as the occurrence of at least one of the following events: Requirement for red blood cell transfusion; Hemoglobin decrease ≥2 g/dL accompanied by persistent gross hematuria and/or ongoing bladder irrigation; Clot retention requiring intensified bladder irrigation or endoscopic clot evacuation; Bleeding-related reintervention.

    Time frame: Within 72 hours after surgery

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Apr 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2026, 3 months after the start.

Of 23 interventional studies with no phase under Urologic Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 30 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 64. This study's planned 3 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 8, 2026
First posted
Jun 11, 2026
StartActual
Apr 29, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Aug 15, 2026
CompletionEst.
Sep 15, 2026
Last update
Jun 16, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 16, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07643415
Lead sponsor
Hitit University
Responsible party
Mustafa Serdar CAGLAYAN (Medical Doctor, Hitit University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 11, 2026
Start date
Apr 29, 2026
Primary completion
Aug 15, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 15, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 16, 2026

Study contacts

Mustafa Serdar Çağlayan
Contact
serdar.09.09@hotmail.com
+905074311951
Sibel Onen Ozdemir
Contact
sibelonen89@gmail.com
+905442892194
Ozgur Yağan, Professor
study chair · Hitit University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion