ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07641283Updated Jun 11, 2026

Naltrexone for Nonsuicidal Self-Injury

An interventional study of Naltrexone 50mg (Whanin Naltrexone Tab. 50mg) and Placebo in Nonsuicidal Self-Injury and Self-Injurious Behavior, sponsored by Seoul National University Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 3 sites in South Korea. Open to participants aged 16 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-11.

Sponsored by Seoul National University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of naltrexone in reducing nonsuicidal self-injurious behavior among individuals with nonsuicidal self-injury. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either naltrexone plus treatment as usual or placebo plus treatment as usual for 6 weeks.

The primary objective is to determine whether naltrexone reduces the frequency of nonsuicidal self-injurious behavior compared with placebo. Secondary objectives include evaluating changes in clinical severity, suicidal ideation, self-injury-related urges, ecological momentary assessment measures, and safety outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Nonsuicidal self-injury is defined as the intentional destruction of one's own body tissue without suicidal intent. It is clinically important because it is associated with emotional dysregulation, impulsivity, psychiatric comorbidity, and increased risk of future suicidal behavior. However, evidence-based pharmacological treatments specifically targeting nonsuicidal self-injurious behavior remain limited.

Naltrexone is an opioid receptor antagonist that has been suggested to reduce repetitive self-injurious behaviors by modulating endogenous opioid-related reinforcement mechanisms. This study will investigate whether naltrexone is effective in reducing nonsuicidal self-injurious behavior in a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled design.

A total of 150 participants will be enrolled across multiple study sites. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the naltrexone group or the placebo group. The intervention period will last 6 weeks, with clinical evaluations conducted at baseline and every 2 weeks thereafter. Smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment will also be used to monitor self-injurious urges, mood states, and related behavioral variables during the study period.

Safety will be assessed throughout the study through adverse event monitoring, assessment of suicidal ideation and behavior, laboratory testing, urine testing, and electrocardiography according to the study schedule.

02

Conditions studied

  • Nonsuicidal Self-Injury
  • Self-Injurious Behavior

Keywords

  • Nonsuicidal self-injury
  • NSSI
  • Self-injurious behavior
  • Naltrexone
  • Opioid antagonist
  • Impulsivity
  • Suicidal ideation
  • Ecological momentary assessment
03

In context

Self-Injurious Behavior

303 studies on the registry are indexed under Self-Injurious Behavior; 105 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 150 is above the median of 70 across 254 interventional studies indexed under Self-Injurious Behavior.

Browse Self-Injurious Behavior studies →

Lead sponsor

Seoul National University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 1,900 studies on the registry; 274 are open to participants now.

Of its 12 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (17%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants must meet all of the following criteria:

    1. Individuals aged 16 years or older.
    2. Individuals with nonsuicidal self-injurious behavior.
    3. Individuals who are able to understand the study procedures and provide written . For minors, consent from a legal guardian and assent from the participant will be obtained according to applicable regulations.
    4. Individuals who are able to comply with study procedures, including clinical visits, medication administration, and study assessments.
    5. Women of must have a negative urine pregnancy test at screening and agree to use appropriate during the study period.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants meeting any of the following criteria will be excluded:

    1. Current serious suicidal ideation or high suicide risk, as determined by the investigator.
    2. Current opioid use, opioid dependence, or use of opioid-containing medications.
    3. Current use of opioid antagonists or medications that may interact with naltrexone, including methadone or buprenorphine.
    4. Use of naltrexone within 1 week before screening.
    5. Positive naloxone challenge test or positive urine opioid test, if applicable.
    6. Known to naltrexone or any component of the product.
    7. Active liver disease, active hepatitis, or hepatic impairment.
    8. Clinically significant renal impairment.
    9. Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
    10. Intellectual disability, organic brain disorder, or other condition that may interfere with the participant's ability to understand study procedures or complete assessments.
    11. Inability to read or write Korean sufficiently to complete study assessments.
    12. Documented prior non-response to naltrexone for nonsuicidal self-injury, as judged by the investigator.
    13. Any other clinically significant medical or psychiatric condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would make participation inappropriate or unsafe.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Naltrexone Group

    Participants will receive Naltrexone 50mg orally once daily for 6 weeks, in addition to their current Treatment as Usual (TAU).

    Drug: Naltrexone 50mg (Whanin Naltrexone Tab. 50mg)

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Group

    Participants will receive a matching placebo orally once daily for 6 weeks, in addition to their current Treatment as Usual (TAU).

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Total Number of Nonsuicidal Self-Injury Episodes During the 6-Week Treatment Period

    The total number of nonsuicidal self-injury episodes during the 6-week treatment period will be assessed by blinded clinical evaluators. A lower number indicates fewer nonsuicidal self-injury episodes.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 6

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Modified Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale Adapted for Nonsuicidal Self-Injury Urges Total Score

    Self-injurious urges will be assessed using the Modified Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale adapted for nonsuicidal self-injury urges. The total score ranges from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating more severe self-injurious urges.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, and Week 6

  2. Change From Baseline in Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale Suicidal Ideation Severity Score

    Suicidal ideation will be assessed using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale suicidal ideation severity score. The score ranges from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating more severe suicidal ideation.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, and Week 6

  3. Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions-Severity Score

    Overall clinical severity will be assessed using the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity scale. The score ranges from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating greater illness severity.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, and Week 6

  4. Number of Event-Based Ecological Momentary Assessment Reports of Nonsuicidal Self-Injury Urges

    Participants will complete an event-based smartphone ecological momentary assessment entry when they experience nonsuicidal self-injury urges. The outcome will be reported as the total number of event-based reports of nonsuicidal self-injury urges. A higher number indicates more frequent self-injurious urges.

    Time frame: During the 6-week intervention period

  5. Number of Event-Based Ecological Momentary Assessment Reports of Nonsuicidal Self-Injury Behavior

    Participants will complete an event-based smartphone ecological momentary assessment entry when nonsuicidal self-injury behavior occurs. The outcome will be reported as the total number of event-based reports of nonsuicidal self-injury behavior. A higher number indicates more frequent nonsuicidal self-injury behavior.

    Time frame: During the 6-week intervention period

  6. Percentage of Planned Investigational Product Doses Taken as Assessed by Pill Count

    Medication adherence will be assessed using pill count. Adherence will be calculated as the number of doses taken divided by the number of planned doses, multiplied by 100. The percentage ranges from 0% to 100%, with higher percentages indicating greater adherence.

    Time frame: Week 2, Week 4, and Week 6

  7. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events

    Treatment-emergent adverse events will be assessed throughout the study period. The outcome will be reported as the number of participants with one or more treatment-emergent adverse events.

    Time frame: Baseline through Week 6

  8. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities

    Laboratory safety will be assessed using prespecified blood and urine tests. The outcome will be reported as the number of participants with clinically significant laboratory abnormalities as judged by the investigator.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

  9. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram Abnormalities

    Electrocardiogram safety will be assessed using standard electrocardiography. The outcome will be reported as the number of participants with clinically significant electrocardiogram abnormalities as judged by the investigator.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

  10. Change From Baseline in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale Total Score

    Depressive symptoms will be assessed using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale. The total score ranges from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, and Week 6

  11. Change From Baseline in Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety Total Score

    Anxiety symptoms will be assessed using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety. The total score ranges from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, and Week 6

  12. Change From Baseline in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Total Score

    Self-reported depressive symptoms will be assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. The total score ranges from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, and Week 6

  13. Change From Baseline in Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Total Score

    Self-reported anxiety symptoms will be assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale. The total score ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, and Week 6

  14. Change From Baseline in Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire Global Score

    Eating disorder-related psychopathology will be assessed using the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire global score. The global score ranges from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater eating disorder-related psychopathology.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

  15. Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement Score

    Overall clinical improvement will be assessed using the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale. The score ranges from 1 to 7, where 1 indicates very much improved and 7 indicates very much worse. Lower scores indicate greater improvement.

    Time frame: Week 2, Week 4, and Week 6

  16. Weekly Positive Affect Score as Assessed by the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule

    Positive affect will be assessed weekly using the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule positive affect subscale through smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment. The positive affect subscale score ranges from 10 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater positive affect.

    Time frame: Weekly during the 6-week intervention period

  17. Weekly Negative Affect Score as Assessed by the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule

    Negative affect will be assessed weekly using the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule negative affect subscale through smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment. The negative affect subscale score ranges from 10 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater negative affect.

    Time frame: Weekly during the 6-week intervention period

07

Study locations

3 sites
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O'Neal L, McLeod L, Delacqua G, Delacqua F, Kirby J, Duda SN; REDCap Consortium. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9. PubMed 31078660 ↗
  • Bradburn NM, Rips LJ, Shevell SK. Answering autobiographical questions: the impact of memory and inference on surveys. Science. 1987 Apr 10;236(4798):157-61. doi: 10.1126/science.3563494. PubMed 3563494 ↗
  • Clark DM, Teasdale JD. Diurnal variation in clinical depression and accessibility of memories of positive and negative experiences. J Abnorm Psychol. 1982 Apr;91(2):87-95. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.91.2.87. No abstract available. PubMed 7200102 ↗
  • Shiffman S, Stone AA, Hufford MR. Ecological momentary assessment. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2008;4:1-32. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415. PubMed 18509902 ↗
  • Sonne S, Rubey R, Brady K, Malcolm R, Morris T. Naltrexone treatment of self-injurious thoughts and behaviors. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1996 Mar;184(3):192-5. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199603000-00011. No abstract available. PubMed 8600226 ↗
  • Casner JA, Weinheimer B, Gualtieri CT. Naltrexone and self-injurious behavior: a retrospective population study. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1996 Oct;16(5):389-94. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199610000-00008. PubMed 8889912 ↗
  • Buzan RD, Thomas M, Dubovsky SL, Treadway J. The use of opiate antagonists for recurrent self-injurious behavior. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1995 Fall;7(4):437-44. doi: 10.1176/jnp.7.4.437. PubMed 8555746 ↗
  • Kars H, Broekema W, Glaudemans-van Gelderen I, Verhoeven WM, van Ree JM. Naltrexone attenuates self-injurious behavior in mentally retarded subjects. Biol Psychiatry. 1990 Apr 1;27(7):741-6. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(90)90589-t. PubMed 2158355 ↗
  • McCauley E, Berk MS, Asarnow JR, Adrian M, Cohen J, Korslund K, Avina C, Hughes J, Harned M, Gallop R, Linehan MM. Efficacy of Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Adolescents at High Risk for Suicide: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Aug 1;75(8):777-785. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.1109. PubMed 29926087 ↗
  • Mehlum L, Tormoen AJ, Ramberg M, Haga E, Diep LM, Laberg S, Larsson BS, Stanley BH, Miller AL, Sund AM, Groholt B. Dialectical behavior therapy for adolescents with repeated suicidal and self-harming behavior: a randomized trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;53(10):1082-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2014.07.003. Epub 2014 Jul 22. PubMed 25245352 ↗
  • Aboujaoude E, Salame WO. Naltrexone: A Pan-Addiction Treatment? CNS Drugs. 2016 Aug;30(8):719-33. doi: 10.1007/s40263-016-0373-0. PubMed 27401883 ↗
  • Bresin K, Gordon KH. Endogenous opioids and nonsuicidal self-injury: a mechanism of affect regulation. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Mar;37(3):374-83. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.01.020. Epub 2013 Jan 20. PubMed 23339875 ↗
  • Blasco-Fontecilla H, Fernandez-Fernandez R, Colino L, Fajardo L, Perteguer-Barrio R, de Leon J. The Addictive Model of Self-Harming (Non-suicidal and Suicidal) Behavior. Front Psychiatry. 2016 Feb 1;7:8. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00008. eCollection 2016. PubMed 26869941 ↗
  • Vega D, Sintes A, Fernandez M, Punti J, Soler J, Santamarina P, Soto A, Lara A, Mendez I, Martinez-Gimenez R, Romero S, Pascual JC. Review and update on non-suicidal self-injury: who, how and why? Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2018 Jul;46(4):146-55. Epub 2018 Jul 1. PubMed 30079928 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be publicly shared due to privacy and ethical restrictions. De-identified data may be made available from the corresponding investigator upon reasonable request and with appropriate institutional approval.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07641283
Collaborators
Asan Medical Center, Uijeongbu Eulji University Hospital
Responsible party
Yong Min Ahn (Professor, Seoul National University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 11, 2026
Start date
Jun 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 11, 2026

Study contacts

Myeong-hyeon Mun, MD, Master's Degree
Contact
psalms139@hanmail.net
+821085171499

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Naltrexone

Start the discussion