ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07634757MGUUpdated Jun 10, 2026

Mobile Geriatric Unit (MGU) to Reduce Hospitalisations in Nursing Home Residents

An observational study in Nursing Home Care and Hospitalisation Prevention, sponsored by Universität des Saarlandes. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Germany. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-10.

Sponsored by Universität des Saarlandes · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
4,907
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective observational before-after study evaluates the impact of a Mobile Geriatric Unit (MGU) on hospitalisation rates among nursing home residents. The study includes a 12-month control phase with usual care followed by a 12-month intervention phase during which the MGU is implemented. The MGU provides advanced on-site diagnostics and telemedicine-supported specialist consultation within nursing homes.

Read the detailed description

This prospective observational before-after study evaluates the impact of a Mobile Geriatric Unit (MGU) on hospitalisation rates among nursing home residents in Saarland, Germany. The study includes a 12-month control phase with usual care followed by a 12-month intervention phase with MGU implementation in 46 nursing homes.

The MGU provides on-site advanced diagnostics (CT, X-ray, ultrasound, ECG, EEG, and laboratory testing) supported by telemedicine consultation with hospital specialists. A physician and radiology technician perform diagnostics in the nursing home, with results communicated to the general practitioner for treatment decisions within 48 hours.

Usual care involves hospital referral and in-hospital diagnostics. The intervention aims to reduce avoidable hospital admissions by providing diagnostics and specialist input directly in the nursing home.

The primary outcome is hospital admissions per person-year. Secondary outcomes include mortality, functional and cognitive status, quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), complications, healthcare costs, and 30-day hospitalisation-free survival.

Eligible participants are nursing home residents with consent or proxy consent; those requiring immediate hospitalisation are excluded.

Data are obtained from routine care and medical records, MGU documentation, structured assessments, and follow-up. Multilevel Poisson regression and interrupted time series analysis will be used.

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Saarland (AZ 159-21) and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

02

Conditions studied

  • Nursing Home Care
  • Hospitalisation Prevention

Keywords

  • Nursing home
  • Geriatrics
  • Telemedicine
  • Hospitalisation
  • Mobile diagnostics
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Universität des Saarlandes is the lead sponsor of 68 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Residents of participating nursing homes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Residents of participating nursing homes
  • from participant or legal representative

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute life-threatening conditions requiring immediate hospitalisation
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
4,907 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Control Phase (Usual Care)

    Usual care including general practitioner (GP) referral, hospital transport, and in-hospital diagnostics and treatment.

  • Intervention Phase (MGU)

    On-site diagnostic evaluation using the Mobile Geriatric Unit with broad diagnostic capabilities followed by teleconsultation and further treatment by the general practitioner.

    Other: Mobile Geriatric Unit (MGU)

Interventions

  • OtherMobile Geriatric Unit (MGU)

    The MGU is a mobile diagnostic unit providing on-site diagnostics in nursing homes. It includes a 32-slice (64 slice reconstruction) whole body CT scanner, digital X-ray, portable ultrasound, ECG, EEG, and point-of-care laboratory diagnostics. A physician and radiology technician perform diagnostics on-site. Results are transmitted via telemedicine to hospital specialists and communicated to the general practitioner for treatment decisions within 48 hours.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hospital admissions per person-year

    Number of inpatient hospital admissions, excluding elective admissions.

    Time frame: Up to 24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mortality

    Mortality

    Time frame: Day 180

  2. Functional status; mobility: modified Rankin Scale (mRS)

    Modified Rankin Scale (mRS): 0: No symptoms 1. No significant disability 2. Slight disability 3. Moderate disability 4. Moderately severe disability 5. Severe disability 6. Death Minimum value: 0 (best outcome) Maximum value: 6 (worst outcome)

    Time frame: Day 180

  3. Functional status; frailty: Clinical Frailty Scale

    Clinical Frailty Scale (as according to Moorhouse and Rockwood\*): 1. very fit 2. well 3. managing well 4. apparently vulnerable 5. mildly frail 6. moderately frail 7. severely frail 8. very severely frail 9. terminally ill Minimum value: 1 (best outcome) Maximum value: 9 (worst outcome) \* Moorhouse P, Rockwood K. Frailty and its quantitative clinical evaluation. J R Coll Physicians Edinb 2012; 42: 333-40

    Time frame: Day 180

  4. Cognitive status

    The cognitive performance assessment is carried out through subjective evaluation by the nursing home's nursing staff at day 180.

    Time frame: Day 180

  5. Quality of life (EQ-5D-5L)

    EQ-5D-5L is a standardised measure of health-related quality of life developed by the EuroQol Group and assesses health status in terms of five dimensions of health. The five levels in each dimension are worded as (1) 'not /no problems', (2) 'slight problems', (3) 'moderate problems', (4) 'severe problems' and (5) 'unable to' (mobility, self-care, usual activities), 'extreme' (pain/depression), or 'extremely' (anxiety/depression). Minimum value: 1 (best outcome) Maximum value: 5 (worst outcome)

    Time frame: Day 180

  6. Healthcare costs

    Hospitalisation, transport, and MGU costs

    Time frame: Day 360

  7. 30-day hospitalisation-free survival

    Hospitalisation-free survival at day 30

    Time frame: Day 30

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Nursing Homes in Saarland
    Homburg, Saarland 66421, Germany
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07634757
Lead sponsor
Universität des Saarlandes
Collaborators
DIKOM Consortium
Responsible party
Klaus Faßbender (Principal Investigator, Universität des Saarlandes) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 9, 2026
Start date
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 10, 2026

Study contacts

Klaus Fassbender, Professor
Contact
klaus.fassbender@uks.eu
+49 681 302 75027
Silke Walter
Contact
silke.walter@uni-saarland.de
Klaus Fassbender, Professor
principal investigator · Universität des Saarlandes

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion