ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07632144Updated Jun 8, 2026

Ondansetron Versus Lidocaine for Preventing Pain on Propofol Injection.

An interventional study of Group C (Control) and Ondansetron 8 mg in Anesthesia Induction and Propofol Pain Injection, sponsored by Mongi Slim Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Tunisia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-08.

Sponsored by Mongi Slim Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2026, 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
156
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a prospective, single-center, randomized, double-blind controlled trial involving patients scheduled for elective surgery requiring general anesthesia with propofol induction. Participants are randomly assigned to one of three groups: the ondansetron group (8 mg IV), the lidocaine group (40 mg IV), or the control group (0.9% normal saline placebo). Study medications are administered intravenously over 5 minutes, ending 1 minute before anesthetic induction.

the goal: To assess the efficacy of intravenous ondansetron versus lidocaine and placebo in reducing the incidence and intensity of pain associated with propofol injection in patients undergoing general anesthesia.

Read the detailed description

This prospective, single-center, randomized, double-blind controlled trial is conducted at the operating theaters of the Mongi Slim University Hospital (Tunisia). The study aime to compare the effectiveness of intravenous ondansetron and lidocaine versus placebo in preventing pain associated with propofol injection during induction of general anesthesia.

Adult patients (ASA I-III) scheduled for elective surgery requiring propofol-based induction are randomly allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive either ondansetron 8 mg, lidocaine 40 mg, or normal saline placebo before anesthesia induction. The primary outcome is the incidence of pain during propofol injection, while secondary outcomes include pain intensity, postoperative nausea and vomiting, patient satisfaction, and pain recall.

A total of 156 patients are planned for inclusion. Pain is assessed immediately after administration of an initial propofol bolus using a numerical rating scale (0-10) by a blinded observer. The study is designed to determine whether ondansetron could provide analgesic efficacy comparable to the current standard treatment, lidocaine, while also offering potential benefits related to the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anesthesia Induction
  • Propofol Pain Injection

Browse trials for

03

In context

Pain

10,054 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain; 1,649 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 156 is above the median of 66 across 8,493 interventional studies indexed under Pain.

Browse Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Mongi Slim Hospital is the lead sponsor of 38 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • The study included patients who met all of the following criteria:

Aged 18 years or older; Classified as I-III (Appendix 1); Provided written to participate in the study; Scheduled for elective surgery requiring general anesthesia with propofol induction.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients were not eligible for inclusion if they:

Had received analgesics or antiemetics within 12 hours before surgery; Had communication difficulties or were unable to assess pain adequately (e.g., language barrier, dementia, impaired consciousness); Had a known allergy to ondansetron, lidocaine, or propofol; Did not receive propofol for anesthetic induction; Were pregnant or breastfeeding; Suffered from chronic pain or regularly used opioid medications; Did not have a 20-gauge intravenous catheter inserted on the dorsum of the hand; Declined participation in the study.

Patients were excluded from the study if they experienced any complication during anesthetic induction, including:

Anaphylactic shock or allergic reaction to study medications; Hemodynamic or respiratory instability.

Patients who subsequently withdrew their consent were also excluded from the study.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
156 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Group C (Control):

    Group C (Control): Patients receive 4 mL of 0.9% isotonic normal saline

    Drug: Group C (Control)

  • Experimental
    Group O (Ondansetron)

    Group O (Ondansetron): Patients receive 8 mg of ondansetron

    Drug: Ondansetron 8 mg

  • Active comparator
    Group L (Lidocaine)

    Group L (Lidocaine): Patients received 40 mg of lidocaine

    Drug: Lidocaine %2 ampoule

Interventions

  • DrugGroup C (Control)

    Group C (Control): Patients receive 4 mL of 0.9% isotonic normal saline (placebo) administered intravenously over 5 minutes, ending 1 minute before anesthetic induction.

  • Patients received 8 mg of ondansetron diluted to a total volume of 4 mL, administered intravenously over 5 minutes, ending 1 minute before anesthetic induction.

  • Patients received 40 mg of lidocaine diluted with 0.9% normal saline to a total volume of 4 mL, administered intravenously over 5 minutes, ending 1 minute before anesthetic induction.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of pain during propofol injection

    Time frame: During induction of general anesthesia

Secondary outcomes

  1. Intensity of pain during propofol injection

    Intensity of pain during propofol injection, assessed using a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) from 0 to 10: 0: No pain 1-3: Mild pain, or pain reported only in response to questioning 4-6: Moderate pain, or pain reported spontaneously without facial grimacing 7-10: Severe pain, characterized by marked vocal expression, facial grimacing, arm withdrawal, or tears

    Time frame: during the induction

  2. Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV)

    Time frame: During the first 24 hours

  3. Patient satisfaction

    Patient satisfaction, assessed using a Likert scale;

    Time frame: Two hours after surgery

  4. Pain recall

    Pain recall, evaluated by assessing patients' memory of the injection-related pain.

    Time frame: two hours after surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 8, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07632144
Lead sponsor
Mongi Slim Hospital
Responsible party
Mhamed Sami Mebazaa (Professor head of anesthesiology and ICU department, Mongi Slim Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 8, 2026
Start date
Jun 8, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 15, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 8, 2026

Study contacts

Mhamed Sami Mebazaa, professor
Contact
msmebazaa@gmail.com
22252589 ext. 00216
Amani Ben Haj youssef, assistant
Contact
amani.benhajyoussef@fmt.utm.tn
96874336 ext. 00216

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Ondansetron

Start the discussion