ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07631221Updated Jun 5, 2026

Effect of Protein Dosage on Persistent Acute Renal Failure in Critically Ill Patients.

An observational study in Acute Kidney Failure, Critical Illness and Protein Intake, sponsored by Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires. Recruiting at 6 sites in Argentina. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-05.

Sponsored by Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2025; still recruiting 1 year 1 month later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
344
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background:

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in critically ill patients and is associated with worse outcomes, including longer ICU stay, need for dialysis, and higher mortality. Patients with AKI often experience significant protein and calorie loss due to their illness and medical treatments. Providing the right amount of protein may help maintain muscle mass and improve recovery; however, consuming too much protein could potentially worsen kidney function. Current international guidelines recommend adequate protein intake, but the best dose remains uncertain, especially for patients with AKI.

Study Purpose:

This research will examine whether patients with AKI who receive a higher protein intake (greater than 1.2 g/kg/day) have different outcomes compared to those who receive a standard or lower protein intake (≤1.2 g/kg/day). The primary outcome is whether a higher protein intake leads to a longer recovery time from AKI or worsens kidney function.

Study Design:

This is a retrospective, multicenter study using data from five hospitals in Argentina. It is designed as a "target trial emulation," meaning researchers will analyze existing patient data as if it were a randomized clinical trial. Patients will be included on the fifth day of their ICU stay and classified into two groups based on their protein intake on day 5:

  • Group 1 (Standard Protein): ≤1.2 g/kg/day
  • Group 2 (High Protein): >1.2 g/kg/day No additional interventions will be performed; data are collected from medical records.

Study Population:

The study will include adult patients (≥18 years) admitted to the ICU who are receiving exclusive enteral or parenteral nutrition and have AKI (or worsening chronic kidney disease) according to KDIGO criteria. Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (creatinine clearance \<30 ml/min/1.73 m²) or undergoing hemodialysis at T0, previous kidney transplant, severe liver disease, or BMI >30 will be excluded.

Outcomes:

  • Primary Outcome: Time to recovery of kidney function within 30 days, measured by creatinine returning close to baseline values.
  • Secondary Outcomes: Changes in blood urea levels, duration of renal replacement therapy (hemodialysis), ICU length of stay, and 30-day mortality.

Statistical Approach:

To minimize bias, the study will use advanced statistical methods, including propensity score weighting, to ensure fair comparison between groups. Competing risks (such as death before kidney recovery) will be taken into account in the analysis.

Significance:

This study will provide important information about the safety and effectiveness of higher protein intake in critically ill patients with AKI. The findings may help guide nutritional strategies in the ICU, optimize kidney outcomes, and improve patient care.

Read the detailed description

Background:

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent complication in critically ill patients and is associated with prolonged hospital stay, need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), and higher mortality. Patients with AKI often develop protein-calorie malnutrition due to increased catabolism, inflammation, and nutrient losses. This is further aggravated when RRT is required, as dialysis contributes to nitrogen and amino acid losses. Clinical guidelines recommend providing an adequate protein intake to support recovery; however, the optimal protein dose remains uncertain.

Recent trials, such as the EFFORT Protein study, suggest that higher protein intake may benefit some critically ill patients, especially those with malnutrition or frailty. However, the same study also indicated potential harm in patients with severe illness or AKI, showing that excessive protein intake (>2.2 g/kg/day) could worsen kidney outcomes and increase mortality.

Given the uncertainty regarding the actual effect of increased protein intake in patients with AKI-and the possibility that it may be harmful in those with persistent AKI-this study uses a Target Trial Emulation approach to evaluate whether protein intake on the fifth day of ICU admission exceeding 1.2 g/kg/day leads to prolonged duration of AKI in critically ill patients.

Objective:

This study aims to evaluate whether a higher protein intake (>1.2 g/kg/day) compared with standard or lower intake (≤1.2 g/kg/day) affects the duration of AKI and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients.

Study Design:

This is a retrospective, multicenter study using a target trial emulation design. Patient data will be collected from electronic health records of five tertiary hospitals in Argentina. Eligible patients will be identified on the fifth day of their ICU admission, referred to as Time Zero (T0). Classification into treatment groups will depend on protein intake at T0:

  • Group 1: Standard protein intake (≤1.2 g/kg/day)
  • Group 2: High protein intake (>1.2 g/kg/day) No interventions will be administered as part of the study; data will be analyzed retrospectively.

Population:

Inclusion criteria: age ≥18 years, ICU admission, exclusive enteral or parenteral nutrition, and presence of AKI or worsening chronic kidney disease as defined by KDIGO criteria (rise in serum creatinine >0.3 mg/dL within 48 hours, or 1.5-fold increase within 7 days).

Exclusion criteria: advanced chronic kidney disease (creatinine clearance \<30 ml/min/1.73 m²) or dialysis at admission, prior kidney transplant, severe liver disease (Child-Pugh >7), AKI requiring RRT at baseline (T0), or body mass index >30.

Primary Outcome: Time to recovery of kidney function within 30 days, defined as return of serum creatinine to ≤1.5 times baseline or ≤30% above baseline, with death considered as a competing event.

Secondary Outcomes:

  • Change in blood urea levels at day 14.
  • Daily change in urea trajectory during the first 14 days.
  • Days free of AKI and days free of RRT within 30 days.
  • Mortality at day 30.
  • ICU length of stay within 30 days.
  • Reasons for initiation of RRT.

Sample Size: Based on prior literature, we estimated that 172 patients per group are required for non-inferiority testing with 80% power, α = 0.05, and a non-inferiority margin of 2 days of AKI. Adjustments for potential confounders indicate that at least 105 patients per group will be necessary.

Statistical Analysis:

  • Primary analysis will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis.
  • Propensity score weighting with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) will be used to adjust for baseline differences between groups.
  • For time-to-event outcomes (e.g., AKI recovery, ICU discharge, mortality), competing risks will be addressed using Fine-Gray regression.
  • Continuous outcomes (e.g., urea levels) will be compared using t-tests or Mann-Whitney tests, depending on distribution. Longitudinal changes in urea will be analyzed using mixed-effects models with restricted cubic splines.
  • Proportions (e.g., mortality) will be compared using logistic regression models adjusted with propensity score weighting.

Ethical Considerations:

This study involves a retrospective review of de-identified patient data. It poses minimal risk, as no interventions are introduced beyond standard care. Confidentiality will be strictly maintained in accordance with national and local regulations, including Argentina's Personal Data Protection Law (Law 25,326). Informed consent will be waived in accordance with CIOMS guidelines, as the study is retrospective, presents minimal risk, and has significant social and scientific value.

Significance:

This study will provide new evidence on the safety and effectiveness of protein dosing in critically ill patients with AKI. The results may inform future guidelines on nutritional therapy in the ICU and optimize outcomes for patients at high risk of kidney complications.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Kidney Failure
  • Critical Illness
  • Protein Intake
  • Nutritional Support
  • Mortality in Intensive Care Units

Keywords

  • Acute Kidney Injury
  • Critical Illness
  • Protein Intake
  • Target Trial Emulation
  • Intensive Care Unit
  • Nutritional Support
03

In context

Acute Kidney Injury

1,691 studies on the registry are indexed under Acute Kidney Injury; 395 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 344 is above the median of 160 across 814 observational studies indexed under Acute Kidney Injury.

Browse Acute Kidney Injury studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires is the lead sponsor of 133 studies on the registry; 24 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population consists of critically ill adult patients (≥18 years) admitted to intensive care units at five tertiary hospitals in Argentina. Eligible patients are those receiving exclusive enteral or parenteral nutrition who present with acute kidney injury (AKI) or worsening chronic kidney disease according to KDIGO criteria. Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (creatinine clearance \<30 ml/min/1.73 m²) or hemodialysis at admission, previous kidney transplant, severe liver disease, or body mass index (BMI) >30 are excluded.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 18 years or older admitted to the ICU.
  • Patients receiving exclusive enteral or parenteral nutrition
  • Acute kidney injury or exacerbated chronic kidney disease according to KDIGO criteria (increase in creatinine greater than 0.3 mg/dL in less than 48 hours or a 1.5-fold increase in baseline creatinine in 7 days)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients diagnosed with chronic kidney disease with a of less than 30 ml/min/m2 or on dialysis at admission.
  • Patients with a history of kidney transplantation
  • Patients with severe liver disease ( score >7 points)
  • Patients with acute kidney injury undergoing renal replacement therapy at T0
  • > 30
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

Child-Pugh class

A score of how well the liver works in people with liver disease such as cirrhosis: class A is mild, B moderate and C severe.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
344 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients whose protein intake at T0 is 1.2 g/kg/day or less.

    Patients in this group will be those whose documented protein intake on ICU day 5 is ≤1.2 g/kg/day. No additional interventions are administered as part of the study; classification is based solely on protein intake recorded in the medical record.

  • Patients whose protein intake at T0 is greater than or equal to 1.2 g/kg/day.

    Patients in this group will be those whose documented protein intake on ICU day 5 is greater than 1.2 g/kg/day. No additional interventions are administered as part of the study; classification is based solely on protein intake recorded in the medical record.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to recovery of kidney function

    Recovery of kidney function will be defined as the serum creatinine returning to ≤1.5 times the baseline value or ≤30% above the baseline value, with death considered a competing event. The analysis will compare patients receiving ≤1.2 g/kg/day vs. \>1.2 g/kg/day of protein intake on ICU day 5.

    Time frame: Within 30 days from ICU day 5 (Time Zero) or until ICU discharge, whichever occurs first.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in blood urea levels at day 14

    Comparison of serum urea concentration between groups at day 14 after ICU day 5 (Time Zero). The outcome will assess whether patients with higher protein intake (\>1.2 g/kg/day) show different urea values compared with those with standard intake (≤1.2 g/kg/day).

    Time frame: 14 days from ICU stay (T0)

  2. ICU length of stay

    Comparison of the duration of ICU stay between groups classified by protein intake on day 5 of ICU stay. Discharge will be considered the endpoint, with death treated as a competing event in the analysis.

    Time frame: Within 30 days from ICU day 5 (Time Zero) or until ICU discharge, whichever occurs first.

  3. Mortality at 30 days

    Proportion of patients who die within 30 days. The outcome will compare mortality rates between patients with higher protein intake (\>1.2 g/kg/day) and those with standard intake (≤1.2 g/kg/day).

    Time frame: Within 30 days or until hospital discharge, whichever occurs first.

07

Study locations

4 of 6 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Yehya N, Harhay MO, Curley MAQ, Schoenfeld DA, Reeder RW. Reappraisal of Ventilator-Free Days in Critical Care Research. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Oct 1;200(7):828-836. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201810-2050CP. PubMed 31034248 ↗
  • Doig GS, Simpson F, Bellomo R, Heighes PT, Sweetman EA, Chesher D, Pollock C, Davies A, Botha J, Harrigan P, Reade MC. Intravenous amino acid therapy for kidney function in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. Intensive Care Med. 2015 Jul;41(7):1197-208. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3827-9. Epub 2015 Apr 30. PubMed 25925203 ↗
  • Rosa-Diez GJ, Varela F, Crucelegui S, Algranati SL, Greloni G. [Comparison between CKD-EPI and MDRD-equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate in chronic kidney disease patients]. Medicina (B Aires). 2011;71(4):323-30. Spanish. PubMed 21893444 ↗
  • Deane AM, Casaer MP. Editorial: The interaction between protein delivery and blood urea and ammonia during critical illness. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2024 Mar 1;27(2):144-146. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000001016. Epub 2024 Feb 8. No abstract available. PubMed 38320160 ↗
  • Haines RW, Zolfaghari P, Wan Y, Pearse RM, Puthucheary Z, Prowle JR. Elevated urea-to-creatinine ratio provides a biochemical signature of muscle catabolism and persistent critical illness after major trauma. Intensive Care Med. 2019 Dec;45(12):1718-1731. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05760-5. Epub 2019 Sep 17. PubMed 31531715 ↗
  • Gunst J, Kashani KB, Hermans G. The urea-creatinine ratio as a novel biomarker of critical illness-associated catabolism. Intensive Care Med. 2019 Dec;45(12):1813-1815. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05810-y. Epub 2019 Oct 16. No abstract available. PubMed 31620835 ↗
  • Haines RW, Prowle JR, Day A, Bear DE, Heyland DK, Puthucheary Z. Association between urea trajectory and protein dose in critically ill adults: a secondary exploratory analysis of the effort protein trial (RE-EFFORT). Crit Care. 2024 Jan 16;28(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04799-1. PubMed 38229072 ↗
  • Heyland DK, Patel J, Compher C, Rice TW, Bear DE, Lee ZY, Gonzalez VC, O'Reilly K, Regala R, Wedemire C, Ibarra-Estrada M, Stoppe C, Ortiz-Reyes L, Jiang X, Day AG; EFFORT Protein Trial team. The effect of higher protein dosing in critically ill patients with high nutritional risk (EFFORT Protein): an international, multicentre, pragmatic, registry-based randomised trial. Lancet. 2023 Feb 18;401(10376):568-576. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02469-2. Epub 2023 Jan 25. PubMed 36708732 ↗
  • Kellum JA, Sileanu FE, Bihorac A, Hoste EA, Chawla LS. Recovery after Acute Kidney Injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar 15;195(6):784-791. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201604-0799OC. PubMed 27635668 ↗
  • Hoste E, Bihorac A, Al-Khafaji A, Ortega LM, Ostermann M, Haase M, Zacharowski K, Wunderink R, Heung M, Lissauer M, Self WH, Koyner JL, Honore PM, Prowle JR, Joannidis M, Forni LG, Kampf JP, McPherson P, Kellum JA, Chawla LS; RUBY Investigators. Identification and validation of biomarkers of persistent acute kidney injury: the RUBY study. Intensive Care Med. 2020 May;46(5):943-953. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05919-0. Epub 2020 Feb 6. PubMed 32025755 ↗
  • Patel JJ, McClain CJ, Sarav M, Hamilton-Reeves J, Hurt RT. Protein Requirements for Critically Ill Patients With Renal and Liver Failure. Nutr Clin Pract. 2017 Apr;32(1_suppl):101S-111S. doi: 10.1177/0884533616687501. Epub 2017 Feb 16. PubMed 28208022 ↗
  • Sabatino A, Fiaccadori E, Barazzoni R, Carrero JJ, Cupisti A, De Waele E, Jonckheer J, Cuerda C, Bischoff SC. ESPEN practical guideline on clinical nutrition in hospitalized patients with acute or chronic kidney disease. Clin Nutr. 2024 Sep;43(9):2238-2254. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2024.08.002. Epub 2024 Aug 20. PubMed 39178492 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — The study team is currently evaluating the feasibility of sharing de-identified individual participant data, taking into account ethical approvals, data privacy regulations, and the resources required for proper anonymization and curation. A final plan will be determined after completion of data collection and primary analyses.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Sep 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2026, 11 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 1, 2026
First posted
Jun 5, 2026
StartActual
Sep 15, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Aug 31, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 1, 2026
Last update
Jun 5, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 5, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07631221
Responsible party
Ivan A. Huespe (Chief, Section of Critical Care Research and Innovation, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 5, 2026
Start date
Sep 15, 2025
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 5, 2026

Study contacts

Ivan Alfredo Huespe, MS
Contact
ivan.huespe@hospitalitaliano.org.ar
+54949590200 ext. 850
Veronica Ester Monzon, MS
Contact
veronica.monzon@hospitalitaliano.org.ar
+54949590200 ext. 850
Ivan Alfredo Huespe, MS
study director · Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion